"You are expressing your opinion that there is no link, with no data to support it, does that make you a liar?"
Plu-leeze. You go ahead and quote me where I said there was no link. I said there is no causual relationship that you keep pointing to.
"In fact you’re apparently too ignorant or cowardly to argue the opposite side. And in fact, the market rallied for a 18.78% the week just prior to the election, so what "trending data" I left out are you talking about you liberal hack?"
Close on May 15, 2008: 12992
Close on November 5, 2008: 8695
No, sir, no trend there. And there certainly isn't any well documented reason for that trend. No, it must have been B. Huessien Obama taking a lead in the polls.
"It’s not a "lie" to argue that there is a link."
You are arguing not a link but a causal relationship (remember typing "But, there are times when a direct link can be drawn, such as the market experiencing its single largest one-day loss after a presidential election"?).
You can't prove your statement, so you call me names. There is no causal relationship.