America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by ZRX1200. 202 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345>
PROOF ! Global Warming is a Hoax
FuzzNJ Offline
#151 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
victor809 wrote:
see... now no one likes a gloater.


Like me? That ship sailed long ago.
victor809 Offline
#152 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
FuzzNJ wrote:
Um. . .


Drafter doesn't understand the difference between "The interwebs say so!" and "Here's an article published in PNAS, a reputable journal with a web presence"
HockeyDad Offline
#153 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
FuzzNJ wrote:
More info. for the information challanged.



Never try to insult people's intelligence and then make a spelling error!
wheelrite Offline
#154 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
^^^
Ha !!!
borndead1 Offline
#155 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,215
Just follow the money.


Al Gore's net worth during the 2000 election: approximately $1 million

Al Gore's net worth 5 years after "An Inconvenient Truth" was released: approximately $100 million
teedubbya Offline
#156 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Makin money is bad
DadZilla3 Offline
#157 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
FuzzNJ wrote:
The 928 papers were divided into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position. Of all the papers, 75% fell into the first three categories, either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view; 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change. Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position.


And before Nicolaus Copernicus came along and spoiled everything with his book, 'On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres' in 1543, the consensus beyond a shadow of a doubt of all the learned experts in Europe was that the earth was the center of the universe.
FuzzNJ Offline
#158 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DadZilla3 wrote:
And before Nicolaus Copernicus came along and spoiled everything with his book, 'On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres' in 1543, the consensus beyond a shadow of a doubt of all the learned experts in Europe was that the earth was the center of the universe.


That's actually a good example of how science comes out on top in all these arguments. Notice no one is still holding on to the earth being the center of the universe thing anymore. Even though I personally have never travelled through space to actually see for myself how our planetary system works, I still trust those who do this for a living every day to give me the correct information, and that information can change as new things are learned.

Remember also, before Darwin there was only the church's version of events. (simplified version, of course) It hasn't been as long since that discovery was made, so there are still stubborn people holding on to that creation nonsense, but that too will fade away with time, just like the center of the universe sh*t, and the global warming is a hoax sh*t. But with the global warming thing there could be some real dire consequences that we could have avoided if we just hadn't been so stupid.
HockeyDad Offline
#159 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
If Darwin was right, you'll be able to evolve and adapt to the warmer climate.
FuzzNJ Offline
#160 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
HockeyDad wrote:
If Darwin was right, you'll be able to evolve and adapt to the warmer climate.



Um, no.
teedubbya Offline
#161 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
If Darwin was so smart why is he dead? Score one for god.
teedubbya Offline
#162 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Jesus still loves him and fuzz though.
HockeyDad Offline
#163 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
FuzzNJ wrote:
Um, no.


Score +1 for Darwinism
teedubbya Offline
#164 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
47 - 36 but it's only halftime.

Gooooooo jebus
HockeyDad Offline
#165 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
Go Jesus!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs_mkDBKCMo
teedubbya Offline
#166 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Jesus Jesus he's our man. If he can't do it Easter ham!
tailgater Offline
#167 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract

Enjoy


The experts cited are 1300+ of "Most actively publishing" scientists.

Question: Who would publish most actively?
Answer: Follow the money.

Fuzz, this isn't Big Business. It's friggin' HUGE business.
Politicians are basing policies on fuzzy logic (no pun intended).

I'm not saying here, nor have I ever said, that man isn't contributing to climate change.
I'm just saying that a knee jerk reaction by politicians to solve a "problem" whose scope isn't fully understood is the wrong way to go.
And these foolhardy scientists who work for governmental agencies and universities should be ashamed at how they ignore the sample pool of measured temperatures over an historical perspective.

FuzzNJ Offline
#168 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
tailgater wrote:
The experts cited are 1300+ of "Most actively publishing" scientists.

Question: Who would publish most actively?
Answer: Follow the money.

Fuzz, this isn't Big Business. It's friggin' HUGE business.
Politicians are basing policies on fuzzy logic (no pun intended).

I'm not saying here, nor have I ever said, that man isn't contributing to climate change.
I'm just saying that a knee jerk reaction by politicians to solve a "problem" whose scope isn't fully understood is the wrong way to go.
And these foolhardy scientists who work for governmental agencies and universities should be ashamed at how they ignore the sample pool of measured temperatures over an historical perspective.



Dude, stfu.

You were calling me a liar earlier.

You have no idea wtf you are talking about.

You know nothing.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#169 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,411
FuzzNJ wrote:
Dude, stfu.

You were calling me a liar earlier.

You have no idea wtf you are talking about.

You know nothing.



You ARE a liar.

You've brought NOTHING to the table in any discussion...EVER!


For you to utter that anybody else knows nothing is an affront to the education system. YOU are an abject failure in EVERYTHING!
DadZilla3 Offline
#170 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
FuzzNJ wrote:
That's actually a good example of how science comes out on top in all these arguments. Notice no one is still holding on to the earth being the center of the universe thing anymore. Even though I personally have never travelled through space to actually see for myself how our planetary system works, I still trust those who do this for a living every day to give me the correct information, and that information can change as new things are learned.

Remember also, before Darwin there was only the church's version of events. (simplified version, of course) It hasn't been as long since that discovery was made, so there are still stubborn people holding on to that creation nonsense, but that too will fade away with time, just like the center of the universe sh*t, and the global warming is a hoax sh*t. But with the global warming thing there could be some real dire consequences that we could have avoided if we just hadn't been so stupid.


It's also a good example of how so many experts can be wrong...in my example, how all the best and brightest believed that the universe was geocentric...in that era in no small part to avoid excommunication or worse. Nowadays we don't excommunicate scholars or burn them at the stake, we simply defund their research grants. Same result. They go along, get along, or go home.

Try an experiment. Apply for two research grants: one to prove the Global Warming/ Climate Change phenomenon is caused by human intervention, and one to disprove it. Guess which study will get the check? Think
FuzzNJ Offline
#171 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DadZilla3 wrote:
It's also a good example of how so many experts can be wrong...in my example, how all the best and brightest believed that the universe was geocentric...in that era in no small part to avoid excommunication or worse. Nowadays we don't excommunicate scholars or burn them at the stake, we simply defund their research grants. Same result. They go along, get along, or go home.

Try an experiment. Apply for two research grants: one to prove the Global Warming/ Climate Change phenomenon is caused by human intervention, and one to disprove it. Guess which study will get the check? Think


Best and brightest? Maybe. But that was as bright as one could get under a theocratic rule where one could be killed for going against church doctrine. Doctrine is not the same as peer reviewed research, not even close. To even compare the two is ridiculous.
tailgater Offline
#172 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
Dude, stfu.

You were calling me a liar earlier.

You have no idea wtf you are talking about.

You know nothing.


And you wonder why so many of the good BOTL's on this board jump on your sh*t all the time.

Don't forget your marbles on your way home.
DadZilla3 Offline
#173 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
FuzzNJ wrote:
Best and brightest? Maybe. But that was as bright as one could get under a theocratic rule where one could be killed for going against church doctrine. Doctrine is not the same as peer reviewed research, not even close. To even compare the two is ridiculous.


Doctrine is doctrine regardless if it is influenced by the church or the government. The end result is the same. The peer reviewers are under similar pressure to conform.
FuzzNJ Offline
#174 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
tailgater wrote:
And you wonder why so many of the good BOTL's on this board jump on your sh*t all the time.



I do?
FuzzNJ Offline
#175 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DadZilla3 wrote:
Doctrine is doctrine regardless if it is influenced by the church or the government. The end result is the same. The peer reviewers are under similar pressure to conform.


Yes, all the same. Science is a religion. You're saying that don't trust anything, they are all just as bad as religion, or give religion an equal chance of screwing you?
DadZilla3 Offline
#176 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
FuzzNJ wrote:
Yes, all the same. Science is a religion. You're saying that don't trust anything, they are all just as bad as religion, or give religion an equal chance of screwing you?


I'm saying that there is now, as there has been throughout history, factors that shape the lens through which expert opinion views the facts and forms their conclusions. In the past in Europe it was church doctrine influencing scientific and philosophical conclusions on issues like the geocentric versus heliocentric view of the solar system. Nowadays in the West we have the religion of political correctness and selective government financing of research influencing expert opinion on issues like global climate change and social engineering.

You bring up an excellent question though...who can you really trust?
HockeyDad Offline
#177 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
DadZilla3 wrote:
You bring up an excellent question though...who can you really trust?



The globalists.
teedubbya Offline
#178 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Fence post.
FuzzNJ Offline
#179 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DadZilla3 wrote:
I'm saying that there is now, as there has been throughout history, factors that shape the lens through which expert opinion views the facts and forms their conclusions. In the past in Europe it was church doctrine influencing scientific and philosophical conclusions on issues like the geocentric versus heliocentric view of the solar system. Nowadays in the West we have the religion of political correctness and selective government financing of research influencing expert opinion on issues like global climate change and social engineering.

You bring up an excellent question though...who can you really trust?


Obviously only the people who say things that 'feel' right according to one's political philosophy and religion. Data, facts, history and research don't count because that's all manipulated crap, right? Just go with your gut. That works best for creating public policy. No need to learn sh*t. Brilliant.
HockeyDad Offline
#180 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
Question everything.
FuzzNJ Offline
#181 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
HockeyDad wrote:
Question everything.


Always.
teedubbya Offline
#182 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Are you sure?
FuzzNJ Offline
#183 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
teedubbya wrote:
Are you sure?


Talking to me?
teedubbya Offline
#184 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
What's it to you?
teedubbya Offline
#185 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
What's it to you?
FuzzNJ Offline
#186 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
teedubbya wrote:
What's it to you?


Ok then. Nevermind.
Roaster Dude Offline
#187 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771
FuzzNJ wrote:
Obviously only the people who say things that 'feel' right according to one's political philosophy and religion. Data, facts, history and research don't count because that's all manipulated crap, right? Just go with your gut. That works best for creating public policy. No need to learn sh*t. Brilliant.

WTF?
You have drank far to much agenda coolaid.
pdxstogieman Offline
#188 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
It's just the latest nazi government plot. Open your eyes, man, they're trying to control Global Warming. Get it Global. That's U.N. Commissars code for telling us what the temperature is gonna be in our outdoors. Let it warm up I say. See what Butchros Butchros Ghali Ghali thinks of that. We'll grow oranges in Alaska.
ZRX1200 Offline
#189 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,589
"Obviously only the people who say things that 'feel' right according to one's political philosophy and religion. Data, facts, history and research don't count because that's all manipulated crap, right? Just go with your gut. That works best for creating public policy. No need to learn sh*t. Brilliant."





^










Yet you love socialism.
FuzzNJ Offline
#190 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Roaster Dude wrote:
WTF?
You have drank far to much agenda coolaid.


All this time we've been fooled, tricked into believing the earth is a sphere and our 'planetary system' is heliocentric, only so "they" could steal billions and billions of dollars of our money to fund 'space travel' or 'research'. All this time the flat earthers were right! Evil scientists!

This is hugh and series. Revolution time baby. I fear for our lives for what has been uncovered here.

Attributing religious rules and thinking or rapaciousness to the scientific method is ridiculous. Any supposition made is then looked at by professionals in that field and they try to disprove it, make it false, tell the person that they are full of sh*t. Even Copernicus was proved wrong. If they can't do that then, hmmm, we may have something here. So when 98% of those people say there is something there, it's kind of a big deal.

(Standard disclaimer. Yes, there can be corruption and unethical people in this and every line of work, class of people, religion, etc.)

Why don't you think that the earth is the center of the universe? Earth is flat? No? How do you really know? How do you know that your car won't just explode when you reach 70 mph? How do you know that taking that aspirin will really help you avoid a heart attack?

All that is just 'common sense'? Have any of you personally observed any of that and can prove it? I'm guessing you are trusting the people who do that for a living to have done it right.

But if you were born when one major influence was saying the earth was flat and the center of the universe, god created everything and man has dominion over the earth and can do anything he wants, and another saying we've evolved in a heliocentric planetary system on a planet with a fragile ecosystem that we're f*cking up and it's going to have some pretty bad ramifications, you'd think what was common sense would be quite different.

So what I'm finding funny is Copernicus, a scientist, is brought up as a brilliant example of critical thinking and scientific discoveries are just common sense, yet the same process, logic and reasoning that leads to conclusions one may not agree with for whatever reason can be religious, brainwashing dogma at the same time.

I'm sure the people who first heard what Copernicussy had to say were saying pretty much the same stuff you are. He's so arrogant thinking he knows all the answers, he thinks he knows more than god? He just wants attention. Who is he to question us and try to change our way of life?

Personally, I think the whole higgs particle thing is a scam. I've never seen a higgs. Freakin' grifters.
FuzzNJ Offline
#191 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
"Obviously only the people who say things that 'feel' right according to one's political philosophy and religion. Data, facts, history and research don't count because that's all manipulated crap, right? Just go with your gut. That works best for creating public policy. No need to learn sh*t. Brilliant."


Yet you love socialism.


Beaten by your razor like wit once again. Damn you Z!
HockeyDad Offline
#192 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
pdxstogieman wrote:
It's just the latest nazi government plot. Open your eyes, man, they're trying to control Global Warming. Get it Global. That's U.N. Commissars code for telling us what the temperature is gonna be in our outdoors. Let it warm up I say. See what Butchros Butchros Ghali Ghali thinks of that. We'll grow oranges in Alaska.

'


We're keeping an eye on you.
Roaster Dude Offline
#193 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771

Exactly my point... please refer to post #187

FuzzNJ wrote:
All this time we've been fooled, tricked into believing the earth is a sphere and our 'planetary system' is heliocentric, only so "they" could steal billions and billions of dollars of our money to fund 'space travel' or 'research'. All this time the flat earthers were right! Evil scientists!

This is hugh and series. Revolution time baby. I fear for our lives for what has been uncovered here.

Attributing religious rules and thinking or rapaciousness to the scientific method is ridiculous. Any supposition made is then looked at by professionals in that field and they try to disprove it, make it false, tell the person that they are full of sh*t. Even Copernicus was proved wrong. If they can't do that then, hmmm, we may have something here. So when 98% of those people say there is something there, it's kind of a big deal.

(Standard disclaimer. Yes, there can be corruption and unethical people in this and every line of work, class of people, religion, etc.)

Why don't you think that the earth is the center of the universe? Earth is flat? No? How do you really know? How do you know that your car won't just explode when you reach 70 mph? How do you know that taking that aspirin will really help you avoid a heart attack?

All that is just 'common sense'? Have any of you personally observed any of that and can prove it? I'm guessing you are trusting the people who do that for a living to have done it right.

But if you were born when one major influence was saying the earth was flat and the center of the universe, god created everything and man has dominion over the earth and can do anything he wants, and another saying we've evolved in a heliocentric planetary system on a planet with a fragile ecosystem that we're f*cking up and it's going to have some pretty bad ramifications, you'd think what was common sense would be quite different.

So what I'm finding funny is Copernicus, a scientist, is brought up as a brilliant example of critical thinking and scientific discoveries are just common sense, yet the same process, logic and reasoning that leads to conclusions one may not agree with for whatever reason can be religious, brainwashing dogma at the same time.

I'm sure the people who first heard what Copernicussy had to say were saying pretty much the same stuff you are. He's so arrogant thinking he knows all the answers, he thinks he knows more than god? He just wants attention. Who is he to question us and try to change our way of life?

Personally, I think the whole higgs particle thing is a scam. I've never seen a higgs. Freakin' grifters.

pdxstogieman Offline
#194 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
HockeyDad wrote:
'


We're keeping an eye on you.


I'd like to live in your fairy-tale world, Hockeydad, but the Fair Play For Cuba Committee is retro-fitting my mower to power Fidel's one-man escape sub
FuzzNJ Offline
#195 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Roaster Dude wrote:
Exactly my point... please refer to post #187




Obviously!

The study says what the person pays to hear thing you brought up earlier to imply that's why global warming is a 'thing' made our posts like identical!

Weird.

And when you said you have been interested in the subject and been studying for 25 years and know a lot about it, yet still called me a liar on a fact that someone of your obvious expertise should know, that was like we were sharing a brain!

DadZilla3 Offline
#196 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
FuzzNJ wrote:
Obviously only the people who say things that 'feel' right according to one's political philosophy and religion. Data, facts, history and research don't count because that's all manipulated crap, right? Just go with your gut. That works best for creating public policy. No need to learn sh*t. Brilliant.

Well...there you go again.
Roaster Dude Offline
#197 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2011
Posts: 771
FuzzNJ wrote:
Obviously!

The study says what the person pays to hear thing you brought up earlier to imply that's why global warming is a 'thing' made our posts like identical!

Weird.

And when you said you have been interested in the subject and been studying for 25 years and know a lot about it, yet still called me a liar on a fact that someone of your obvious expertise should know, that was like we were sharing a brain!


I'm sorry...
What did you say?
I wasn't listening
jackconrad Offline
#198 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Goodbye Cruel World..
ZRX1200 Offline
#199 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,589
Poor Fuzzy.
dstieger Offline
#200 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
teedubbya wrote:
if all the armys of the world lauched al their nukes at the same time could they change the climate?


I didn't mean to steal your idea.....but, it sounds like it would work...someone ought to tell Trump.


BTW....except for the presence of some dearly departed, this thread could have been pretty recent

RIP Mayor
RIP Bill
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>