America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 16 months ago by Speyside2. 135 replies replies.
3 Pages123>
Chevy Small Block vs Big Block
wheelrite Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Pre-1972,,,,

Small block without question,,,

except maybe a 396cid...

or 427cid

wheel,
gimbel Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2010
Posts: 11,148
400cid
illinichaser Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2011
Posts: 5,772
BIG BLOCK 454 all the way.
wheelrite Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
gimbel wrote:
400cid


the worst small block ,other than the 305 chevy ever produced...

try again,,,
wheelrite Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
illinichaser wrote:
BIG BLOCK 454 all the way.

crap...

too long of a stroke.
a decent dump truck motor though
HockeyDad Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
I just blew up a 305 chevy!
wheelrite Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
The greatest engine Chevy ever produced,,,

302 DZ Small Block...
wheelrite Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
HockeyDad wrote:
I just blew up a 305 chevy!


it was an old piece of crap...
HockeyDad Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
Yup. 1984.

Shopping for a crate 383 to turn it into a drag car.
illinichaser Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2011
Posts: 5,772
My dream car is a '70 chevelle LS 6.

454 producing 450 hp and close to 500 ft-lb of torque.

a revolutionary car for the muscle generation.
wheelrite Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
HockeyDad wrote:
Yup. 1984.

Shopping for a crate 383 to turn it into a drag car.

no bro,,,

Get a 350, steel crank shaft, 4 bolt main caps and aluminum heads with a triple angle vale job...
illinichaser Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2011
Posts: 5,772
wheelrite wrote:
no bro,,,

Get a 350, steel crank shaft, 4 bolt main caps and aluminum heads with a triple angle vale job...



This

For a dragster you can't go wrong with a set up like this.
wheelrite Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
illinichaser wrote:
My dream car is a '70 chevelle LS 6.

454 producing 450 hp and close to 500 ft-lb of torque.

a revolutionary car for the muscle generation.


no,,,

the 396 or 427 ,
much faster engines,

The 69 Z28 was THE revoutionary muscle car...
illinichaser Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2011
Posts: 5,772
Not a fan of the z28. Don't know why, just not.

But, one things for sure, any of these bury a pony every day of the week and twice on sunday.
wheelrite Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
illinichaser wrote:
Not a fan of the z28. Don't know why, just not.

But, one things for sure, any of these bury a pony every day of the week and twice on sunday.


do you know the specs of the 69 Z28 with the 302 DZ ?

It is still one of the most powerful engines chevy ever produced...
HockeyDad Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
wheelrite wrote:
no bro,,,

Get a 350, steel crank shaft, 4 bolt main caps and aluminum heads with a triple angle vale job...




383 is just a bored out 350. Even a 350 will be enough to force a transmission swap also!
Numismaniac Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2012
Posts: 12,222
427, go for the power
illinichaser Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2011
Posts: 5,772
wheelrite wrote:
do you know the specs of the 69 Z28 with the 302 DZ ?

It is still one of the most powerful engines chevy ever produced...


not disagreeing. Just not my choice in cars.

Maybe from my days of growing up around a bunch of rednecks all idolizing the camaro body.
wheelrite Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
HockeyDad wrote:
383 is just a bored out 350. Even a 350 will be enough to force a transmission swap also!


No need to overbore a 350...

the bigger displacemnet does nothing but weaken the cylinder wall.

A steel crank shaft, 4 bolt mains make the motor durable..
And as we all should know it's the Heads that produce the HP...
202 valves, screw in studs, ported AND polished,,,

now that's a beast...
illinichaser Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2011
Posts: 5,772
HockeyDad wrote:
383 is just a bored out 350. Even a 350 will be enough to force a transmission swap also!



If you gonna swap out tranny's, may as well do it right and put in a ford 9 in rear-rear end.


Blaspheme, I know.
Numismaniac Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2012
Posts: 12,222
Find you a 430 with a 4 barrel carb from an old burick deuce and a quarter, my 1st car, thing would fly top end. Can be geared to pick up on the front end or put in a boat as well, hehe
wheelrite Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
illinichaser wrote:
If you gonna swap out tranny's, may as well do it right and put in a ford 9 in rear-rear end.


Blaspheme, I know.



No no no...
a short tailed turbo 400 with a high stall speed torque converter and a 488 12 bolt chevy differential will do nicely.

But if it's a real drag racer, a two speed powerglide tranny is the way to go,,,
wheelrite Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Numismaniac wrote:
Find you a 430 with a 4 barrel carb from an old burick deuce and a quarter, my 1st car, thing would fly top end. Can be geared to pick up on the front end or put in a boat as well, hehe


stop,,,
MACS Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
I'd love a 60's era Impala with the 427 hydramatic... 425 hp. WOO HOOO!

When your HP is close to your CID... you'ze cookin' wit grease.
wheelrite Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
MACS wrote:
I'd love a 60's era Impala with the 427 hydramatic... 425 hp. WOO HOOO!

When your HP is close to your CID... you'ze cookin' wit grease.


ugly car, great engine...
MACS Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
wheelrite wrote:
ugly car, great engine...


That's why they make a lot of different cars, dude. Somebody thought the Avalanche looked nice... it didn't, IMO.

Pacer? Gremlin? Those were ugly cars. The 66 Impala SS was beautiful.
grmcooper Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2006
Posts: 20,430
Hard to beat the ls6.. no factory small block could come close.
grmcooper Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2006
Posts: 20,430
HD The 383 chevy is a 400 crank and 350trans block. Damn rookies.
hill5673 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2012
Posts: 1,404
Small blocks for cars, Big blocks for trucks. For the money you would spend on a mild big block you could build a SB with more HP and spin higher RPMs.
My 72 Nova has a 355 roller motor and has PLENTY of nuts for street/strip fun.
wheelrite Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
grmcooper wrote:
HD The 383 chevy is a 400 crank and 350trans block. Damn rookies.


yes,
it's called a stroking,,
and the they come apart at high rpms.
BuckyB93 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,188
Screw Chevy. Nothing beats a Ford!

(Now that I've stirred the pot, I'll ducking for cover and let the bar room fight progress)
grmcooper Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2006
Posts: 20,430
I forgot wheel knows everything. Pffft.
grmcooper Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2006
Posts: 20,430
Wheel can stroke me.......
wheelrite Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
hill5673 wrote:
Small blocks for cars, Big blocks for trucks. For the money you would spend on a mild big block you could build a SB with more HP and spin higher RPMs.
My 72 Nova has a 355 roller motor and has PLENTY of nuts for street/strip fun.


Rollers are too much work,,,

vrodrider Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 10-07-2007
Posts: 7,748
HockeyDad wrote:
383 is just a bored out 350. Even a 350 will be enough to force a transmission swap also!



A 383 is a 350 bored .300 with a 400 crank so it is bored and stroked
Numismaniac Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2012
Posts: 12,222
wheelrite wrote:
stop,,,



don't hate, get a real pimp ride, pick you up a 63 Wildcat and you'll be set.

Macs, I'll say they're not bad at all, a few guys around here have some rather original, really nice!!!
hill5673 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2012
Posts: 1,404
wheelrite wrote:
Rollers are too much work,,,



? I don't get it. How is it any more work?
grmcooper Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2006
Posts: 20,430
Hill........ wheel dont know about roller motors. Or anything else for that matter.
hill5673 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2012
Posts: 1,404
grmcooper wrote:
Hill........ wheel dont know about roller motors. Or anything else for that matter.


Whistle
ZRX1200 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,599
Did someone say stroking????


Ford is better and everyone knows it. Chevys are for people who turn wrenches like a monkey.

Course all you people in flyover country only have straight roads anyways so a crappy car that doesnt turn doesn't matter.

Looks like Wheel has been reading a hot rod mag and feels empowered. You go boyyyyyyyyyy!
grmcooper Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2006
Posts: 20,430
Wheel can read?
vrodrider Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 10-07-2007
Posts: 7,748
hill5673 wrote:
? I don't get it. How is it any more work?



Only way I could think of is if it was solid lifters and not hydraulic lifter and the same could be said about the flat tappet lifters they need adjusted pretty often
hill5673 Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2012
Posts: 1,404
ZRX1200 wrote:
Did someone say stroking????


Ford is better and everyone knows it. Chevys are for people who turn wrenches like a monkey.

Course all you people in flyover country only have straight roads anyways so a crappy car that doesnt turn doesn't matter.

Looks like Wheel has been reading a hot rod mag and feels empowered. You go boyyyyyyyyyy!


The only thing Ford did right was to put the distibutor in the front. Try taking a 302 or 351 Ford SB past 6k RPMs...
ZRX1200 Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,599
It has lotsa pictures too.....
hill5673 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2012
Posts: 1,404
vrodrider wrote:
Only way I could think of is if it was solid lifters and not hydraulic lifter and the same could be said about the flat tappet lifters they need adjusted pretty often


Yea, for the type of application I am talking about I would never use hydraulics.
itsawaldo Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 09-10-2006
Posts: 4,221
BuckyB93 wrote:
Screw Chevy. Nothing beats a Ford!

(Now that I've stirred the pot, I'll ducking for cover and let the bar room fight progress)


Mopar for me back then, 383's 440 twin 4 brls and 426 Hemis were my world.

(72 Sebring+ with 383 RR engine, slapstick auto for me back then)

A 69 396 Chevelle vs. 383 RR the race went both ways depending on the night. Both were great street cars.

Chevys? 302Z Camaro was a very kool and fast machine, looked as fast as they ran.
grmcooper Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2006
Posts: 20,430
Flat tappet=HP
vrodrider Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 10-07-2007
Posts: 7,748
ZRX1200 wrote:
Did someone say stroking????


Ford is better and everyone knows it. Chevys are for people who turn wrenches like a monkey.

Course all you people in flyover country only have straight roads anyways so a crappy car that doesnt turn doesn't matter.

Looks like Wheel has been reading a hot rod mag and feels empowered. You go boyyyyyyyyyy!



U been watching to damn many Ford commercials Jamie LOL
wheelrite Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
grmcooper wrote:
Hill........ wheel dont know about roller motors. Or anything else for that matter.


Roller Rockers have to be tweaked all the time..
The valves clatter,,,

have another Mimosa or for you a mamosa,,,

Applause
wheelrite Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
vrodrider wrote:
U been watching to damn many Ford commercials Jamie LOL


nope

I had a few hot rods in my time...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>