America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by SmokeMonkey. 263 replies replies.
6 Pages<123456>
Spring spicy unbanded reviews. CLOSED
dharbolt Offline
#201 Posted:
Joined: 08-03-2013
Posts: 6,931
danmdevries wrote:
The super premium stuff never seems worth the price to me. But when I've had em blindly (and they fall in my wheelhouse) I feel like they do impress, but when I find the price tag, it loses some of the appeal.

I've not found a $20 cigar that has ever out performed a $10 cigar, and I've found plenty $5-6 cigars that out perform $10 cigars, and get bonus points in my mind for being affordable.



I agree with this completely.

Though I do make an exception for a Padron family reserve from time to time. That are worth the price for a special occasion to me.
dharbolt Offline
#202 Posted:
Joined: 08-03-2013
Posts: 6,931
Very good reviews everyone this has been a fun thread.
delta1 Offline
#203 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
SmokeMonkey wrote:
You're just saying that because you're afraid I'll send you 37 more Perdomos and a 10 lb sack of grits Whistle
...


LOL...Perdomo doesn't get enough respect here. I like a lot of them, and they are priced right. I am planning to make a batch of grits with my next barbecue!!!
SmokeMonkey Offline
#204 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
delta1 wrote:
LOL...Perdomo doesn't get enough respect here. I like a lot of them, and they are priced right. I am planning to make a batch of grits with my next barbecue!!!


Do it and throw a little cream and cheese in at the end. Beautiful.
namadio Offline
#205 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
I've smoked all 3 of the Col's unbanded ones. I'll get reviews and guesses posted asap......

Damn that hot sauce is good too. Squire Morgan's Volcano Sauce. Had it on chili, chips n cheese, and a burrito so far. Delicious sweet heat!
stinger88 Offline
#206 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
Glad you like the hot sauce. I smoked 1&2 already. #3 tonight or tomorrow.

Tried the garlic chipotle sauce on chicken quesadilla last night and it was great. I haven't tried the other yet.

I will post all review after finishing the 3rd one.
namadio Offline
#207 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
Ok all of these smokes ended up being in the company of multiple friends and I have terrible self diagnosed adult ADHD so these are far from decent reviews. But the conversation was good too! 1 outside on the patio and 2 smoked at the lounge.

Stinger #1
Smells familiar
5x50ish robusto
double cap i think
Habano looking wrapper
some large veins
firmly packed

1st third
familar earth and cedar taste
sweet flavor on retrohale
solid medium smoke

2nd third
was talking too much

last third
cedar or maybe oak. wood for sure. floral
still sweet retrohale, a touch of spice.

Paired it with WT Rare Breed neat.

My guess -this is a T52? The medium cost?
namadio Offline
#208 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
Stinger #2
Lighter wrapper than #1 but not connecticut by any means
maybe cameroon?
lonsdale ish size (forgot to measure before heading to lounge)
Not very toothy

Punch cut

Lots of smoke produced
Medium-full flavor

Leather and tobacco flavor received throughout.
Not super duper complex but continued to produce tons of smoke the whole time.

Great burn as well.

This cigar was completely unfamiliar to me, but I enjoyed it. I'm gonna guess its the premium? No idea what though.

Paired with Glenrothes sherry cask scotch.
namadio Offline
#209 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
Stinger #3
Robusto
Maduro

punch cut at the lounge again

even more distracted than previous smokes.... i failed at this concentrate on the mystery thing. Everyone in the lounge liked to hear about what I was doing though!

paired it with water!

Sweet retrohale.
Very very familiar taste.
Floral and sweet and delicious.

Maybe its an undercrown? COuldve been an LP theme? Is an undercrown a yard gar? Yard gar is my only choice left....


LETS KNOW THE TRUTH! THIS WAS GREAT FUN!!!
stinger88 Offline
#210 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
1. Undercrown
2. The Hammer (little brother)
3. Sancho Panza (Honduras)

Glad you liked them.
namadio Offline
#211 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
stinger88 wrote:
1. Undercrown
2. The Hammer (little brother)
3. Sancho Panza (Honduras)

Glad you liked them.


Holy **** was i correct on med, premo, yardgar?!?!?!!

Wrong on uc guess but damn cool.
stinger88 Offline
#212 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
Pretty good on the guesses. And yes, you were correct on the med, prem, and yard gar (just not the names).
tamapatom Offline
#213 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
Wow......glad little hammer shined as premium. Good rank breakdown.
namadio Offline
#214 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
I feel vindicated in buying 20 dollar cigars,. Never tried blind before super glad i could tell the nice 'un!
delta1 Offline
#215 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Here's the review of SmokeMonkey's #3.


Number 3 was a big cigar, a 6x60 box-press. It had a medium brown milk chocolate colored wrapper around medium brown and darker fillers. Two lighter colored stems were visible at the foot. It had a few thin veins and barely visible seams. The cigar was soft and spongy when pinched. I couldn’t smell much fragrance, but I had just put some lotion on my dry hands, so that didn’t help. The pre-light draw, which seemed very easy, gave a mild waxy dried fruit taste. Paired with ice water.

The first few puffs showed the draw to be wide open. Leather, wood, spice and a hint of light pepper were the initial flavors. The smoke flowed into the mouth and nose dry, but finished moist, causing me to salivate. A full retrohale tasted of charred wood and meat with some leather, and hints of pepper and spice. The open draw caused the cigar to burn hot, so I had to slow down and to take shorter softer puffs. Lots of smoke. About an inch in, the leather faded along with the spice and pepper, replaced by a wheaty/bready flavor, but the primary flavor was charred wood and meat. Then a sweet tobacco flavor joined as another primary flavor. The cigar left a minty/celery-like flavor in the mouth.

Mildly sweet tobacco with charred wood was dominant in the second third. An earthy pencil/lead flavor joined in, creating a pleasant tasting brew. (I used to chew on No.2 pencils while doing my homework in grade school and that’s what I tasted) Pepper notes along with some spice and a few citrus peel notes popped in every now and then, with the pepper getting stronger near the end of the second third. Still producing a lot of smoke.

The final third had primary flavors of sweet tobacco and woody earthy pencil lead. Sweetness seemed to get stronger. It is now past medium–full in strength. The pepper notes returned but in mild form, leaving little burn in the nose. The charred meat and wood flavor also came back, along with a sweet minty finish through the nose. Near the end, with about 2 inches left, the cigar went out. I re-lit it rather than put it down and was rewarded with some bright strong flavors of wood, bread, charred meat and sweet tobacco well blended. A few puffs later, the cigar got hot and harsh so I set it down at about an inch and a half nub.

The cigar burned crookedly in the first third, but rotating and blowing through it straightened it out without touch-up to the end. The light gray colored ash was flaky and dropped on my pants at about 1 ½ inch. The resting smoke gave a nice sweet tobacco aroma. As the cigar burned, it lost its box-press shape, becoming round in the inch directly behind the burn line. Smoking time was 1:30.
This was a really good cigar that I’m guessing is a middle tier smoke. It had the classic Nicaraguan profile of wood, leather, strong tobacco, pepper and spice, well-mixed with a few accent notes and reminded me somewhat of a My Father Flor de las Antillas, although I’ve only had the robusto and toro versions. I don’t usually like 60 rg cigars but I’m making an exception for this one.
delta1 Offline
#216 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Review of SmokeMonley's #1


This was even bigger than the #3, a dark torpedo measuring 6 ½” x 54. It had an oily dark chocolate brown maduro wrapper with fillers that were dark and medium brown. There were several small veins visible and two longer ones that extended the length of the cigar. The cigar yielded slightly when pinched but was solid, especially near the head. It smelled of sweet tea and some barnyard. The pre-light draw had a slight resistance and tasted like sweet tea and raisins. Paired with iced water.

After lighting the cigar and taking a few short quick puffs, my initial reaction was: this is a unique cigar, something I’ve never had before in the 6 years I’ve smoked cigars, in a dubious sense. It seemed like it was infused or dipped or treated with flavor enhancements, but in a hard to describe way. The closest description I could think of was a blend of candle wax, vinyl and bitters. After a few more puffs and a feeling of revulsion mixed with insatiable curiosity, I tried to put into words the cacophony of flavors and sensations the smoke produced in my mouth and nasal passages. There was charred wood, salty buttered popcorn, mild pepper and some odd tasting spice that competed with the candle wax, vinyl and bitters. The flavors were not harmonious, but tasted like an orchestra warming up and testing its instruments loudly. At the ½ inch point, the vinyl taste became a background flavor while a sour dough taste arrived for a few puffs. Candle wax, wood, and mild pepper led the way to the second third.

As I smoked the first third, I noticed the aroma. Smoke poured off the cigar, even while at rest for more than a minute and despite the windy conditions. This is the first cigar whose aroma reminded me of food: old buttered popcorn and weird fried food. The smoke smelled like greasy fast food…hot deep fryer oil that has been used for a variety of stuff. It reminded me of the smell of the fried food court at the county fair.

Reluctantly, I continued on and smiled when some familiar sweet tobacco tastes appeared. I noticed a tartness in my mouth after exhaling. The middle phase of the cigar was dominated by candle wax, wood sweet tobacco and sourdough bread. Near the end of the second third, the tobacco taste got stronger but not sweeter. Some mint notes appeared on the finish in the mouth and nose.

The cigar became more like a traditional cigar in the final third. The candle wax taste faded into the background, where it was apparent but not a major player. The main tastes were sweet strong tobacco, light wood, a little mint and some bread, but not sour dough. Nearing the end, I noticed some leather, cream and light wood. The cigar needed a touch up with about 2 inches left, and that brought back the candle wax taste for the rest of the cigar, which I nubbed to 1 inch. Total smoking time: 1:45.

I suspected that the wrapper may have been treated with a flavored oil, so I moistened a fingertip and rubbed it on the cigar. The water beaded and did not get absorbed. The copious amount of smoke at rest was another indication. Few cigars churn off this volume of smoke while sitting in the ashtray. The cigar’s wrapper did have an oily sheen.

The ash was a flaky, light gray that flowered before dropping, after less than an inch. The draw was favorable, just a little resistance. The cigar put out a lot of smoke. The burn was wavy, but only needed a touch up near the end. I liked the last 3rd of the cigar, but the first 2/3 were unsettling, not relaxing, due to the unique qualities of the cigar. The last cigar I had that produced the candle wax flavor was a Liga Privada Undercrown that I smoked in 2012. I don’t remember much about its flavors, but that unique taste was not my cup of tea, so I haven’t had one since. Don’t think LP does torpedoes…this may have been the yard gar, but don’t ride your mower smoking one. I felt like this cigar surprised me with its uniqueness, and may give it another go if it comes in smaller vitolas, just to see if I can pinpoint the flavors better.
delta1 Offline
#217 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Thanks to SmokeMonkey for sending me some challenging cigars to review. I really liked the #3 and #2. I have to try the #1 again, a truly unique cigar in my limited cigar smoking experience...

I compared the #2 Davidoff Nicaragua to a Camacho Corojo, my fave yard gar. I think that the older versions and the vintage '06 Camachos tasted above their pay grade. Not sure if the Davidoff is worth the top tier price tag, definitely a mid tier price though, and wishful thinking that it would be priced comparable to the Camacho Corojo.

Are we agreed that: 1) yard gar is less than $5; 2) mid tier is between $6 - $10; and top tier is greater than $10?


Thanks also to chazbo for hosting this. I know you said to post short reviews, but sometimes I just can't shut up and make it brief...apologies, Bro!
shaun341 Offline
#218 Posted:
Joined: 08-02-2012
Posts: 8,826
Great reviews Delta, fun to read and me think that some of what you had may be good to try out even though I am in the same boat as I rarely go above a 50 rg.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#219 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
#3 was the mid range. You know I had to slip one in - it was a Perdomo 20th Anniverary Sungrown.

#1 was the yard gar and I agree fully with Delta's review - it's a really interesting smoke for the money. It was a Pinar del Rio Oscuro.

Glad you enjoyed them!
delta1 Offline
#220 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Perdomo 20th Anny Sun Grown...huh...loved it...it was a tad better than the ones I've smoked, the Maduro.

PdR Oscuro...hmmm...haven't had that one. I'll have to check my stash to see if I've been sent one. I've had a few other PdR...and they were OK.

Thank you, Sir!
tamapatom Offline
#221 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
Well, I got hit by the monkey the other day and I have been dying to try that Davidoff Nicaragua. But first since i have just gotten over a 3 week chest and sinus infection, i thought i would break myself in with a ten year old Camacho corojo i had. I have had these before but the flavor was rather muted and i thought its either aging too long or my pallet has not recovered......that was Friday. But i decide to do the Davidoff today anyway. No special time carved out, no special whiskey....i certainly did not set the stage properly. Cigar had visible veins but well constructed. I could pick up no aroma at prelight inspection and thought oh crap, i hope i dont waste a good cigar on my compromised condition. I lit it up and i said wow. An assault of flavors. Sweet, spicy.....like a fine Mexican dish. And it kept on with a cornicopia of flavors till i nubbed it. I had to relight several times as this became a half day cigar. I enjoyed the relights as much as the first. I must be cured or this is a great cigar......or both. I had a hard time putting this down (as i had some things to do around the house). I had to keep coming back to my lawn chair and just enjoy. Thanks monkeyboy!
SmokeMonkey Offline
#222 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
tamapatom wrote:
Well, I got hit by the monkey the other day and I have been dying to try that Davidoff Nicaragua. But first since i have just gotten over a 3 week chest and sinus infection, i thought i would break myself in with a ten year old Camacho corojo i had. I have had these before but the flavor was rather muted and i thought its either aging too long or my pallet has not recovered......that was Friday. But i decide to do the Davidoff today anyway. No special time carved out, no special whiskey....i certainly did not set the stage properly. Cigar had visible veins but well constructed. I could pick up no aroma at prelight inspection and thought oh crap, i hope i dont waste a good cigar on my compromised condition. I lit it up and i said wow. An assault of flavors. Sweet, spicy.....like a fine Mexican dish. And it kept on with a cornicopia of flavors till i nubbed it. I had to relight several times as this became a half day cigar. I enjoyed the relights as much as the first. I must be cured or this is a great cigar......or both. I had a hard time putting this down (as i had some things to do around the house). I had to keep coming back to my lawn chair and just enjoy. Thanks monkeyboy!


Well worth sending it to you, then!
stinger88 Offline
#223 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
Namadio’s #1
Pre-draw. Light brown with one vein running the length of the cigar. Triple cap and it is 6.5 inches long. I used a Xicar V cutter, making a single V cut. Pre-light it has a nice mild flavor to it. Draw through is easy. It lit easy and maintained a steady burn throughout the smoke. Initial light is smooth….no pepper taste. Very creamy feel at the start, leaving a bit of coating on the tongue. About an inch, I am getting a slight hint of leather. Ash is a very light grey and it has a nice straight burn, no touchups at the half way point.
At the half, I am starting to get little hints of sweet and progressing into a grassy taste (not a bad grassy taste). Getting into the last third and it is still smoking like a champ. Hints of caramel and maybe even a little touch of vanilla.
Took this one down to about 3/4 of an inch.

I am not the greatest at differentiating all the little nuances of flavor. This was a very good smoke that is right in my wheel house. I am going to say that this one was the premium cigar.
stinger88 Offline
#224 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
Namadio’s #2….cigar that is.
Pre-draw. Medium dark wrapper with a triple cap. The wrapper is a few shades of brown darker than the actual filler tobacco. The wrapper has a rough feel to it. Length of cigar is exactly the same as my iPhone 6 (didn’t have a ruler on me). Pre-light. No sweetness and no immediate pepper. Draw through seemed a little plugged so I performed another v-cut. (now it is an X cut). It seems to be a cigar. Definitely not getting much more than a single not…..tobacco. No pepper, no sweet, no grass….pretty much just normal tobacco. About the half way point and the burn is getting a little wonky. Have had to touch it up a couple of times. At this point the amount of smoke seems to be decreasing and i am fighting the cigar. I ended up biting down on the end to try and open it up and it seemed to work. If not, this baby would have been tossed. I continued to smoke it for another 15 minutes and then threw in the towel. Overall it wasn’t a bad cigar but seemed like a lot of work and not a lot of enjoyment. When I eventually stood up….I felt the nicotine.

This one had me perplexed…..flavor wise, I would say that it is the yard gar but the construction of the cigar (pre-light) leads me to believe it is not the yard gar.
stinger88 Offline
#225 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
Namadio’s #3
Pre-draw. Rich dark brown cigar, hard to tell if it is a single or a double cap. 5 inches long. Used my V-cutter again on this one. Pre-light draw through was light and easy. Initial flavor was mild…not quite sweet but nice. This one seems really familiar to me….initial feel to me is a La Aroma de Cuba. The cigar just poured out the smoke. Burn was perfectly straight with a nearly white ash. Again I didn’t get a lot of flavor nuances on this one. I have to admit to being slightly distracted during this one. About 15 minutes in and it started to rain. I had to keep moving my chair further from the edge of the porch. I was almost in the door. I definitely liked the cigar. Nothing overly complex but it was a very enjoyable cigar. Nubbed it.
tamapatom Offline
#226 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
So which was which?
namadio Offline
#227 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
tamapatom wrote:
So which was which?


I'll have to check my notes when I get home.
namadio Offline
#228 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
namadio wrote:
I'll have to check my notes when I get home.


Damnit I forgot to look last night. I stuffed the bands in an envelope in the box and labeled them 1-3. Otherwise I'll try to remember to check tonight!
tamapatom Offline
#229 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
Review OUTRAGE!
bgz Offline
#230 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
tamapatom wrote:
NO REVIEW RESULTS OUTRAGE!!!!


fify

tamapatom Offline
#231 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
bgz wrote:
fify


Thanks....reviews have been great....no outrage there.
tamapatom Offline
#232 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
tamapatom wrote:
NO REVIEW RESULTS OUTRAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TTT
stinger88 Offline
#233 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
#1 was a L'Atelier Racine
#2 was a My Father LE Bijou Toro Fino (I believe)
#3 La Perla (never seen this label before)
tamapatom Offline
#234 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
stinger88 wrote:
#1 was a L'Atelier Racine
#2 was a My Father LE Bijou Toro Fino (I believe)
#3 La Perla (never seen this label before)

So #1 mid, #2 top shelf and #3 yard gar?
stinger88 Offline
#235 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
That is what I gather too.

I didn't do very well.
bgz Offline
#236 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Bummer about the le bijou, I like those.

Pretty much like everything they put the L'Atelier name on too, though I don't think I've tried this one.
shaun341 Offline
#237 Posted:
Joined: 08-02-2012
Posts: 8,826
tamapatom wrote:
So #1 mid, #2 top shelf and #3 yard gar?


I think you have 1 and 2 flip flopped.

I would think #1 was top shelf, #2 mid-range, and #3 yard gar
tamapatom Offline
#238 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
shaun341 wrote:
I think you have 1 and 2 flip flopped.

I would think #1 was top shelf, #2 mid-range, and #3 yard gar

That was a guess without researching.......they are both very nice cigars IMO, also never had a La Perla...might try one.
shaun341 Offline
#239 Posted:
Joined: 08-02-2012
Posts: 8,826
Smoking one of those Anejo 46s I had with a couple months under 3 years rest right now Tampa. It did have some more of that spice like the one you sent but it was strong for a second then fades to a mocha like flavor then comes back which I didn't experience much transition in the 50 that you sent. Might just be a difference in the vitolas but after visiting them again there is a similarity in spiciness here and there.
namadio Offline
#240 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
tamapatom wrote:
So #1 mid, #2 top shelf and #3 yard gar?

Price wise yes!
1 - lat ER15 lancero - about 5 bucks on cbid
2 - MF Le Bijou Grand Robusto - 20 bucks at local (i feel like price went up since they got cigar of year)
3 - La Perla Habana WIDE - cheap on cigarbid like 5er for 3 bucks or something when i got em. I do like tho. One of my favorite cheapies.

Sorry for delay, I came down with some nasty flu. Still recoverings.
bgz Offline
#241 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Damn, 20 bucks for a mflb... I bought a box for like 130 or something like that a while back. I think the shop robbed you.
danmdevries Offline
#242 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2014
Posts: 17,314
bgz wrote:
Damn, 20 bucks for a mflb... I bought a box for like 130 or something like that a while back. I think the shop robbed you.


The short robusto is $16ish at my shpo, plus tax could see the larger ones hitting 20 easily.

Last time i went there was right when the my father connecticut came out. Wanted to try one, paid 12 bucks for a rob.
bgz Offline
#243 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
danmdevries wrote:
The short robusto is $16ish at my shpo, plus tax could see the larger ones hitting 20 easily.

Last time i went there was right when the my father connecticut came out. Wanted to try one, paid 12 bucks for a rob.


Lesson learned, don't buy the cigar of the year at the shpo.

Mother ship has them at 10 bucks a piece.

danmdevries Offline
#244 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2014
Posts: 17,314
bgz wrote:
Lesson learned, don't buy the cigar of the year at the shpo.

Mother ship has them at 10 bucks a piece.



They do have a tag on the boxes proclaiming "CA Cigar of the year!"

bgz Offline
#245 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
danmdevries wrote:
They do have a tag on the boxes proclaiming "CA Cigar of the year!"



Lol, that's worth 60 percent markup!
namadio Offline
#246 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
bgz wrote:
Lesson learned, don't buy the cigar of the year at the shpo.

Mother ship has them at 10 bucks a piece.



But I didn't want a 5 pack Shame on you

I enjoyed a petite robusto and a grand robusto of these a while back. I liked it but Didn't think it was cigar of the year material. I was curious what someone else would think blind!
bgz Offline
#247 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Well, I guess I've paid full price for cigars to fulfill PIBs before with spending double what I could get them here for, so I guess I kind of see your point...

Can't say I've ever spent double MSRP though, lol.
tamapatom Offline
#248 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
shaun341 wrote:
Smoking one of those Anejo 46s I had with a couple months under 3 years rest right now Tampa. It did have some more of that spice like the one you sent but it was strong for a second then fades to a mocha like flavor then comes back which I didn't experience much transition in the 50 that you sent. Might just be a difference in the vitolas but after visiting them again there is a similarity in spiciness here and there.

I think mine was 2 years so not much different in age.... could be vitola as you said. Shouldn't be that much difference though 46 is going to have slightly higher percent wrapper.
namadio Offline
#249 Posted:
Joined: 11-24-2014
Posts: 1,621
bgz wrote:
Well, I guess I've paid full price for cigars to fulfill PIBs before with spending double what I could get them here for, so I guess I kind of see your point...

Can't say I've ever spent double MSRP though, lol.


Guess that is kinda rough when you think about it like that. But they the only shop in town and i buy something everytime i smoke there....

Also now I feel kinda bad.. that doesn't seem very premium at 10 bucks... maybe I should've selected better. Also the ER15 MSRP is like $9.25 at mothership. Not much room between the two.
stinger88 Offline
#250 Posted:
Joined: 05-29-2012
Posts: 6,574
Namadio.....you are good to go. It was fun doing this as it usually is. I think my premium and mid-range were pretty close to the same.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages<123456>