America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by TMCTLT. 106 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
The most shocking thing about Hilldog Clintorious.....
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
DrafterX Offline
#51 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 12:58 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
hey, the fellating was going on inside Vic's head... leave me out of it.. Not talking
tailgater Offline
#52 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:03 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
I blame X.

And yes the republicans chose to run trump. Simply a fact.


The voters chose him.
the Republican party did everything they could to try to prevent it.

I'm glad it's Trump, because the others are nothing more than Hillary-lite.
I laugh at the outcry surrounding Trump. He's a dolt, but with our built in checks and balances I'm OK with a 4 year shake up of our system down in DC.

Sure, you can vote FOR Hillary if you like. Many of us are just partisan sheep. I get it. But don't tell me your hillary vote is just an anti-Trump vote. Because you're a liar, or a hypocrite, or simply lack the intestinal fortitude to make things happen.


And just to be clear: F*ck Hillary.
That stench hole belongs behind bars.
dstieger Offline
#53 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:08 PM EST
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
tailgater wrote:
He's a dolt, but with our built in checks and balances I'm OK with a 4 year shake up of our system down in DC.




According to Rush and Hannity and Drudge, etc....there are no checks, nor balances....Obama has cracked the code
DrafterX Offline
#54 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:09 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
and just imagine Hillary with da code... And Obama sitting on the Supreme Court... ya they're talking about it.. Mellow
tailgater Offline
#55 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:17 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
I forgot about that code breaking thingy.

Thanks guys.
dstieger Offline
#56 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:19 PM EST
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
IDK, X....while I've made it clear that I'll never vote for Clinton, I can imagine the risk assessment comparison:

I imagine that by 2020, an HRC presidency will almost certainly have a net negative, but probably not disastrously so...Republican congress will prevent any lasting serious damage

A Trump presidency could go anywhere from 'Ok..not bad, some shake up in dc was good'...to 'Holy ****, wth were we thinking, all out war, civil unrest and a tanked economy'

Just maybe, the 'fairly certain, somewhat bad' is actually better than the 'maybe good, maybe end of the world'
teedubbya Offline
#57 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:31 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I didn't say the republican leadership. I said the republicans. The party is the people and they are the ones that voted for trump.

The republicans through their primaries chose to run trump. It's funny how some want to back off that.

If trump wins in the General the American people chose trump. In the case of the primaries it was the republicans.

And mostly drafter.
tailgater Offline
#58 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:34 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
I didn't say the republican leadership. I said the republicans. The party is the people and they are the ones that voted for trump.

The republicans through their primaries chose to run trump. It's funny how some want to back off that.

If trump wins in the General the American people chose trump. In the case of the primaries it was the republicans.

And mostly drafter.


Your thought process is very divisive.
But you'll probably drone on about that too.
teedubbya Offline
#59 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:35 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Divisive?
DrafterX Offline
#60 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:37 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
ok I understand now... because I voted for Rubio Trump is now our candidate... I get it... Mellow



Think
teedubbya Offline
#61 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:38 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I must be missing something on the divisive part. The parties use the primaries to chose their candidate and the conventions to formalize.

The republicans chose trump, the dems Clinton. It seems pretty fact based to me.
teedubbya Offline
#62 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:39 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
In the case of drafter I could be wrong. I'm just basing it on his trump tattoo.
teedubbya Offline
#63 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:41 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Hey drafter I'm just givin ya ****. I'm a republican too that voted for kaisich. Trump and Cruz were non starters to me.

My party chose to run Trump. I can't vote for him.
DrafterX Offline
#64 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:49 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Laugh

I know man... I was just being contrary so Vic wouldn't go all fellating on me and stuff.. I didn't vote for Trump but I will... damn shame McAfee didn't beat the Johnson... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#65 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 1:55 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
His Johnson was prolly flaccid from the coke and stuff. Macafees's too.
tailgater Offline
#66 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:23 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Divisive?


Both candidates are polarizing, and you are harping on the "you're repblican therefore YOU put trump on the ballot".
Which isn't necessarily true.
It could have been the Independents (Unenrolled) that put trump on the R ticket.
Either way, you want to pigeon hole anyone who is registered a certain way, and in this instance it doesn't really hold much water.
The people who are sick and tired of the same old same old are the ones who put Trump on the ballot.
be they Republican or Independent.
But it wasn't "the republicans" as a whole, because the leadership of that party was dead set against it.

Trump won the republican nomination.
It's semantics (sorry Frank), but it's not the same thing that you're stating.
In a black and white world, maybe. But we live in the grey.
Any self respecting fence sitter should recognize that.
teedubbya Offline
#67 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:30 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Actually I thought I simply said Hillary was unelectable but unfortunately the republicans chose to run trump.

Thanks for enlightening me on all the other stuff lol.
tailgater Offline
#68 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:33 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Actually I thought I simply said Hillary was unelectable but unfortunately the republicans chose to run trump.

Thanks for enlightening me on all the other stuff lol.


That's how it started. Yes.
teedubbya Offline
#69 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:39 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And ended. Other than me teasing drafter. I don't really think he chose trump in the primaries any more than I think you take it in the badonkadonk.

The republicans did choose to run trump though.


Try to keep up.
DrafterX Offline
#70 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:43 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
teedubbya wrote:


The majority of the republicans did choose to run trump though.



There we go... can't argue that anymore... ThumpUp
teedubbya Offline
#71 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:45 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The republicans chose trump. I watched the convention and everything.
teedubbya Offline
#72 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:45 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
By the way, was it a majority?
teedubbya Offline
#73 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:48 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I still think it's funny anyone would argue with the fact the republicans chose to run trump or even that it's remotely controversial. They simply did.
DrafterX Offline
#74 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:49 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
maybe not if you consider the independents and ex-democrats that voted for him... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#75 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:50 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
but they woulda had to register repub tho.. Think
teedubbya Offline
#76 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:51 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Or that for awhile the vote was split 17 ways. It's hard to get past 50% which he didn't get close to in most states.

So less than 50% of individuals voting g in the republican primaries voted for him but indeed the Republican Party chose to run trump.
DrafterX Offline
#77 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:52 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
teedubbya wrote:
I still think it's funny anyone would argue with the fact the republicans chose to run trump or even that it's remotely controversial. They simply did.




it's also very obvious not all are happy with the result.. but that's not really uncommon.. my argument was I personally didn't do it.. Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#78 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:53 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
teedubbya wrote:
Or that for awhile the vote was split 17 ways. It's hard to get past 50% which he didn't get close to in most states.

So less than 50% of individuals voting g in the republican primaries voted for him but indeed the Republican Party chose to run trump.



we should have a do over... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#79 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 2:58 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Lol.

You also know I was just giving you **** as a matter of course.

But the statement I made that tcby disagreed with isn't particularly controversial or arguable. It's arguing another point all together. My statement didn't say any individual chose him. The party did though.
DrafterX Offline
#80 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:06 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Stupid Party.... Mad


but at least we're not Libertarians.. Mellow



















just kiddin again.. time to go drink beers.. Beer
teedubbya Offline
#81 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:08 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Cheers
tailgater Offline
#82 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:24 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
And ended. Other than me teasing drafter. I don't really think he chose trump in the primaries any more than I think you take it in the badonkadonk.

The republicans did choose to run trump though.


Try to keep up.


Yes sah!
tailgater Offline
#83 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:26 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
In the case of drafter I could be wrong. I'm just basing it on his trump tattoo.


Did you say Rump Tattoo?

banderl Offline
#84 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:28 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
teedubbya wrote:
In the case of drafter I could be wrong. I'm just basing it on his trump tattoo.



Drafter has a Trump tramp stamp?
Above or below the "Exit Only J/K" tat?
tailgater Offline
#85 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:31 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Did you add the "J/K"?
banderl Offline
#86 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:32 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
DrafterX wrote:
but they woulda had to register repub tho.. Think



Illinois has open primaries, you tell the election judge which party's ballot you'd like.
No registering required.
ZRX1200 Offline
#87 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:32 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,589
No, his phone auto spelled from his Grinder account.
banderl Offline
#88 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:33 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
tailgater wrote:
Did you add the "J/K"?



No, that's part of Drafter's tattoo.
teedubbya Offline
#89 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 3:35 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
You all are wrong. When he spreads his cheeks it actually says jfk. He's actually a dem and as a result he is single handedly responsible for Hillary.
Brewha Offline
#90 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 5:17 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Carib1 wrote:
If you saw me your pansy ass would run the other way. Believe me when I say it.

Let me guess Carib, you eat little peices of sh1t for breakfast......
banderl Offline
#91 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 5:19 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Brewha wrote:
Let me guess Carib, you eat little peices of sh1t for breakfast......



He eats himself?

Freak!
frankj1 Offline
#92 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 6:03 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
I heard semantics!

Don't make me come up there!
DrafterX Offline
#93 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 7:42 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Mad





Not you Frank... Laugh
victor809 Offline
#94 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 7:53 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hang on... Drafter has an "f" shaped butthole? What the hell did he stick in there to cause that?
mikey1597 Offline
#95 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 8:05 PM EST
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
victor809 wrote:
Hang on... Drafter has an "f" shaped butthole? What the hell did he stick in there to cause that?


Maybe he has a natural futthole.
victor809 Offline
#96 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 8:16 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
... Ok that was funny...
teedubbya Offline
#97 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 8:36 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard drafters butt is f able
victor809 Offline
#98 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 8:39 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
So drafters butt looks like this?
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/f-hole
frankj1 Offline
#99 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 8:50 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
I am so not going there.
teedubbya Offline
#100 Posted: Fri, Oct 7 2016, 8:58 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Already been there huh?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Back to Top