America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by Abrignac. 105 replies replies.
3 Pages123>
Looks like Putin found...........
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
banderl Offline
#1 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 4:22 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
his useful idiot.
Gene363 Offline
#2 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 4:33 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,810
And unfortunately for Putin, he only has a few more days left in office.
banderl Offline
#3 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 4:36 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
That's not what I'm reading.
ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 5:17 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,587
How much do ya figure he made off the Uranium One deal?
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 5:28 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
No where near what he will if trump is his puppet
banderl Offline
#6 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 6:01 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
ZRX1200 wrote:
How much do ya figure he made off the Uranium One deal?



"Those who live in the past are cowards and losers" -- Mike Ditka
ZRX1200 Offline
#7 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 7:45 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,587
Those who get rich off of the public are pathetic cowards and losers.
DrafterX Offline
#8 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 9:11 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
Well, he did get Trump elected. .. or so I heard... or maybe that was some of that fake news Hillary was talking about. .. Unsure
Gene363 Offline
#9 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 10:58 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,810
banderl wrote:
That's not what I'm reading.


Well Obama did say, "We must guard against fake news..."
banderl Offline
#10 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 11:15 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
It appears that the CIA seems to think that where there is smoke, there is fire.
ZRX1200 Offline
#11 Posted: Sat, Dec 10 2016, 11:34 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,587
LMAO.......Yeah they would know all about to sticking their nose where it doesn't belong.

So we already have proof that the primary was rigged, and the statist sheep were OK with that even though their commie dream got cheated.
Gene363 Offline
#12 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 12:01 AM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,810
banderl wrote:
It appears that the CIA seems to think that where there is smoke, there is fire.


I hear you, but they are the guys that said Saddam had WMDs
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 12:02 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
He did... Mellow
Krazeehorse Offline
#14 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 7:45 AM EST
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
I was interested in the story until I saw the CIA was involved.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#15 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 8:19 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Krazeehorse wrote:
I was interested in the story until I saw the CIA was involved.


Gotta keep the war machine in business.
banderl Offline
#16 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 11:52 AM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Gene363 wrote:
I hear you, but they are the guys that said Saddam had WMDs


That's debatable.

https://news.vice.com/article/the-cia-just-declassified-the-document-that-supposedly-justified-the-iraq-invasion


Let's say that 5K3W's staffers are right in making that claim.
Is he not going to listen to any intelligence briefings for the duration of his presidency?
Is he going to scrap the CIA?
Gene363 Offline
#17 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 12:07 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,810
banderl wrote:
That's debatable.

https://news.vice.com/article/the-cia-just-declassified-the-document-that-supposedly-justified-the-iraq-invasion


Let's say that 5K3W's staffers are right in making that claim.
Is he not going to listen to any intelligence briefings for the duration of his presidency?
Is he going to scrap the CIA?


Good question, he would not be the first President to distrust the CIA. The CIA need some changes, e.g., gather more foreign intelligence, stay out of the USA and do less go meddling in other countries business.
ZRX1200 Offline
#18 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 1:11 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,587
The CIA and State Dept. Both need overhauled.
Gene363 Offline
#19 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 2:45 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,810
ZRX1200 wrote:
The CIA and State Dept. Both need overhauled.


True! Way too many embedded bureaucrats.
Mr. Jones Offline
#20 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 3:30 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,421
Leave the CIA....

A.L.O.N.E.

They are the only smart agency in the
"D.C. ALPHABET SOUP GROUP"
Lifer's at "the company" should run everything...
It's the 1 to 3 year appointees , That supposedly head the CIA who need to be eliminated...
George Tennent for example...

The CIA "bitching and moaning" about Russian
Election interventions is a smoke screen...
The CIA has overthrown dozens upon dozens of
Govrernments and rigged hundreds of not thousands of elections all over the world.
^^ it's like kettle calling the pot black...
OXYMORON at it's best..

Now ,
If you want to "OVERHAUL" some agencies?

START WITH THE FBI...
AND START FIRST THERE WITH CONVICTING
75% percent of the SECRET SURVELLINCE GROUP
DIVISION of the FBI UNDER DIRECTOR COMEY..
THEN,
START ROLLING HEADS AT THE N.S.A....
THOSE GUYS ARE OUTRIGHT "BIG BROTHER"...
Get some honest people in both of THOSE agencies
And leave the CIA ALONE.

JUST MY VERY LEARN-NED AND LIFELONG
EXPERIENCE with the CIA and my RECENT
4+ year long NIGHTMARE AND ILLEGAL PERSECUTION EXPERIENCES WITH THE
FBI-SSG DIVISION AND NSA > MEDDLING WITH THE WRONG GUY ( me) WHEN I TOLD AND PROVED WHO THEY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATING ( but they are RICH PROMINENT LANCASTER COUNTY CONNECTED REPUBLICANS WHO BUY THEIR WAY OUT OF GUILT, THROUGH THE RIGHT CHANNELS).
DrafterX Offline
#21 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 4:48 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
Can't trust Girl Scouts either. .. Mellow
tonygraz Offline
#22 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 5:17 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,242
Did they tell on you, Drafter ?
DrafterX Offline
#23 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 5:57 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
I don't think so. .. I never bitched about rising cookie prices in front of them. .. Mellow
Brewha Offline
#24 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 7:04 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Gene363 wrote:
Well Obama did say, "We must guard against fake news..."

And I thought FoxNews was too big to fail.....
DrafterX Offline
#25 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 7:12 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
Well, they did say Hillary lied and stuff. .. Mellow
Brewha Offline
#26 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 7:24 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
DrafterX wrote:
Well, they did say Hillary lied and stuff. .. Mellow

So, your sayin' it take one to know one? Think
DrafterX Offline
#27 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 7:50 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
No... just what I heard... but I'm pretty sure it was confirmed. .. even tho she considers it fake news.. Mellow
Brewha Offline
#28 Posted: Sun, Dec 11 2016, 8:31 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
She ain't the only one.......
Burner02 Offline
#29 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 7:09 PM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
What is the big deal for the left. Killary was not concerned about hacking when she had her personal server setup to circumvent gov requirements. Now that Russia allegedly attempted to influence the recent election it is a very BFD.

So what's the problem?

Either it is or it isn't.
DrafterX Offline
#30 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 7:28 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
leaking the truth is apparently a very bad thing... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#31 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 7:29 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
it wasn't a big deal when Bernie complained about being screwed either... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#32 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 7:40 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Burner02 wrote:
What is the big deal for the left. Killary was not concerned about hacking when she had her personal server setup to circumvent gov requirements. Now that Russia allegedly attempted to influence the recent election it is a very BFD.

So what's the problem?

Either it is or it isn't.

Well comrade, we should wait for the new Ministry of Information to tell us what to think about this.

For the good of Mother Amerika.
Burner02 Offline
#33 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 8:06 PM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Brewha wrote:
Well comrade, we should wait for the new Ministry of Information to tell us what to think about this.

For the good of Mother Amerika.




I rest my case.
Brewha Offline
#34 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 8:17 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
It was plenty tired anyway.....
Speyside Offline
#35 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 9:18 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Please, Rodinia.
Mr. Jones Offline
#36 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 11:39 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,421
Bernie is one honest guy, period.
He should be appointed to a cabinet posistion.
What title? Who knows? HOW MANY are there?
ZRX1200 Offline
#37 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 11:40 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,587
Yeah he did a great job in charge of the veterans affair comittee......
Mr. Jones Offline
#38 Posted: Mon, Dec 12 2016, 11:59 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,421
I am not a Bernie expert ....
Sorry.
If he messed up then ,
I never heard about it.

You WIN.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#39 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2016, 10:14 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Gotta keep the war machine in business.


Funny business isn't it?

Used to be a day when domestic issues were all handled by the FBI.

Now we have the CIA meddling around on our own shores. One would think that toppling leaders, creating coups, and civil unrest in other countries would keep them busy enough.

Still haven't heard or seen anything that wasn't already known as year ago.
tailgater Offline
#40 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 12:42 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
What a joke.

Now the left is b1tching about Putin and the election.

Think about that.
Even if it's true.
The left is outraged that Putin would get involved.
But they're ignoring that the emails were real. And disturbing.
And they were inadequately protected on her private server that provided easy access to people without clearance.

But let's shoot the messenger.
Because, you know, Trump.
DrafterX Offline
#41 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 1:01 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
and now they can't provide any proof Russia did anything when pressed for it... it's just an effort to get the electoral votes changed... we won't hear anything more about it when the votes are cast... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#42 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:10 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The election is over. But we should still look in to and take Russian actions seriously.

Separate trump and the results from it. What's done is done. But trump love is no reason not to look further.

DrafterX Offline
#43 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:14 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
ok, but looking into Hillary's illegal private server was bad tho..?? that was the source of all the leaked e-mails... but we should look into it now..?? Think
teedubbya Offline
#44 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:20 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
We did and should have looked in to that to. It need not be either or
teedubbya Offline
#45 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:21 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And in my mind regardless of Russian motive or lack of trump did nothing wrong.

Finding out what the Russians did or didn't do isn't anti president elect honey boo boo.
DrafterX Offline
#46 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:23 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
if it's an attempt to nullify the election it is... and it is... but like I said, after the votes are in we prolly won't hear anymore about it... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#47 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:27 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Maybe to some it is but not to me. I am concerned that some don't want to look in to it out of trump love. That's just as concerning to me.

Just find the facts and act like adults. Trump won regardless, but that's a poor choice excuse to put your head in the ground.
teedubbya Offline
#48 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:30 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Are you saying you are ok with it if Russia interfered with our elections so there is no need to look in to it.?
ZRX1200 Offline
#49 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:33 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,587
OBama had this info months ago.

Padesta let them in (unknowingly).

Russians didn't WRITE these emails.

And Anonimous says leaks were DNC staffers, not the Russians.

Look into it?
Sure......

But WHOTF is really putting their heads in the sand and trying to control the NARRATIVE.
DrafterX Offline
#50 Posted: Thu, Dec 15 2016, 3:33 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,546
just to be contrary.... cause to this day some will insist Hillary's server was no big deal.. for some reason it is now, but for different reasons... and ya, if Russia hacked Hillary's server we should bomb the chit out of them... Mellow
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Back to Top