America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by RMAN4443. 41 replies replies.
Why isn't Madonna in jail??
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
bs_kwaj Offline
#1 Posted: Sat, Jan 21 2017, 10:03 PM EST
Joined: 02-13-2006
Posts: 5,214

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/01/21/madonna-gives-profanity-laced-speech-at-womens-march-in-washington.html

"I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House," the 58-year-old pop star said, before adding that she "knows this won't change anything."

d'oh!
DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted: Sat, Jan 21 2017, 10:29 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Seen her boobs before.... Mellow
corey sellers Offline
#3 Posted: Sat, Jan 21 2017, 10:37 PM EST
Joined: 08-21-2011
Posts: 10,358
Where they nice looking
DrafterX Offline
#4 Posted: Sat, Jan 21 2017, 10:39 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Yes.. but that was a long time ago. .. Mellow
RMAN4443 Offline
#5 Posted: Sat, Jan 21 2017, 10:59 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
DrafterX wrote:
Seen her boobs before.... Mellow



Now to see her boobs she needs to lift her skirt Cry Baby Cry
Nicar Offline
#6 Posted: Sat, Jan 21 2017, 11:11 PM EST
Joined: 03-18-2010
Posts: 14,972
She's talking Monica Lewinsky style...blow up...
burnem2 Offline
#7 Posted: Sun, Jan 22 2017, 1:54 AM EST
Joined: 12-23-2009
Posts: 628
I thought the same thing when I heard that comment. They're probably afraid of what that skank might spread in jail!
Mr. Jones Offline
#8 Posted: Sun, Jan 22 2017, 9:01 AM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
I could care less about ANYTHING
That STD BLOB has to say....
Krazeehorse Offline
#9 Posted: Sun, Jan 22 2017, 9:05 AM EST
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
Nicar wrote:
She's talking Monica Lewinsky style...blow up...

I'm guessing the President would decline.
TMCTLT Offline
#10 Posted: Sun, Jan 22 2017, 9:06 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Mr. Jones wrote:
I could care less about ANYTHING
That STD BLOB has to say....



+1
gummy jones Offline
#11 Posted: Sun, Jan 22 2017, 9:31 AM EST
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
prior to this thread i thought she was completely irrelevant
alas, she must still have minute, fractional relevancy
Buckwheat Offline
#12 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 5:07 PM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Because she didn't break any laws. She's just full of herself and stupid. If that were a crime just about everyone here would be behind bars. fog
dstieger Offline
#13 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 5:19 PM EST
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I enjoyed watching her speech live on CNN...For some unknown reason, they didn't have a tape delay...Took 3 f-bombs before they cut away
Speyside Offline
#14 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 5:32 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Meh, it's only words.
tailgater Offline
#15 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 5:50 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Buckwheat wrote:
Because she didn't break any laws. She's just full of herself and stupid. If that were a crime just about everyone here would be behind bars. fog


Pretty sure you're wrong.
You can't publicly say, imply or otherwise suggest that it's OK to bomb the white house.
At least I think that's true.

On the other hand, I know for a fact that Madonna is a rotten whorebag who is simply trying to regain relevance with her target audience: lonely middle aged women with poor self esteem and even poorer personal grooming habits.
frankj1 Offline
#16 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 6:51 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
weird, cuz she speaks so well of you.
Abrignac Offline
#17 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 7:15 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
Don't find her to be relevant. Not real sure if what she said is prosecutable since she didn't specifically threaten the President, jut where he lives.. Perhaps, the secret service will pay her a visit though.
RMAN4443 Offline
#18 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 7:56 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
tailgater wrote:
Pretty sure you're wrong.
You can't publicly say, imply or otherwise suggest that it's OK to bomb the white house.
At least I think that's true.

On the other hand, I know for a fact that Madonna is a rotten whorebag who is simply trying to regain relevance with her target audience: lonely middle aged women with poor self esteem and even poorer personal grooming habits.








18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the Presidency
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
US Code

(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the offices of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69 Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L. 97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)








Threatening the Pres. of the US ???????????? Terrorist threats against a Us target????????????? Has to be something in there
Shame on you Shame on you Shame on you Think Think Think Not talking Not talking Not talking

Abrignac Offline
#19 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 8:12 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
RMAN4443 wrote:
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the Presidency
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
US Code

(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the offices of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69 Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L. 97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)








Threatening the Pres. of the US ???????????? Terrorist threats against a Us target????????????? Has to be something in there
Shame on you Shame on you Shame on you Think Think Think Not talking Not talking Not talking



Had she threatened him directly you would have a point. But, she spoke very carefully. She said blow up the White House. Very different from saying blow up the White House while the President is inside. No DA would take this case without having an ulterior motive knowing this would certainly be thrown out and said prosecutor would be made into an ass.
delta1 Offline
#20 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 8:18 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Ya...and if that quote is correct, she "has thought an awful lot" about blowing up the White House, and unless she has taken some action in furtherance of that act, not yet a crime, except on Minority Report.
Abrignac Offline
#21 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 8:54 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
delta1 wrote:
Ya...and if that quote is correct, she "has thought an awful lot" about blowing up the White House, and unless she has taken some action in furtherance of that act, not yet a crime, except on Minority Report.


From one retired LEO to another, had she directly threatened the POTUS she wouldn't need to take further action. That in of itself is a crime. There are a few people doing time for making direct threats to Obama.
delta1 Offline
#22 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 8:56 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Very true, Sir!
Abrignac Offline
#23 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 8:59 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
Google is your friend....

Michael Francis Clapper
William Peterman Jr
Brian Dutcher
ZRX1200 Offline
#24 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 8:59 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
Nugent got a visit for less, they should talk to the schrew and introduce her to the SSG.
Abrignac Offline
#25 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 9:00 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
delta1 wrote:
Very true, Sir!


I'm sure that's what you meant.

Hopefully, we can get this fishing trip nailed down. Looking forward to buying you a beer.
Abrignac Offline
#26 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 9:02 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
ZRX1200 wrote:
Nugent got a visit for less, they should talk to the schrew and introduce her to the SSG.


Is that similar to BBC??? If so, I suspect that introduction has already been made.
delta1 Offline
#27 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 9:23 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Abrignac wrote:
I'm sure that's what you meant.
Hopefully, we can get this fishing trip nailed down. Looking forward to buying you a beer.


ThumpUp

Didn't know their names and thought there were more...

Madonna's statement is like those posters with Obama in the crosshairs of a rifle scope or with a noose around his neck...people displaying or carrying them weren't arrested...free speech

Herfing Beer
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#28 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 9:25 PM EST
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
ZRX1200 wrote:
Nugent got a visit for less, they should talk to the schrew and introduce her to the SSG.


Well, he is a pedophile and stuff....
teedubbya Offline
#29 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 9:59 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
True true
RMAN4443 Offline
#30 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 10:22 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Abrignac wrote:
Had she threatened him directly you would have a point. But, she spoke very carefully. She said blow up the White House. Very different from saying blow up the White House while the President is inside. No DA would take this case without having an ulterior motive knowing this would certainly be thrown out and said prosecutor would be made into an ass.

But if people overheard Timothy McVeigh say he had "thought" about bombing a Federal Building aren't they supposed to report it to LE , and then wouldn't LE be expected to investigate the allegations to find out how much "thought" he had actually given the idea ??
So wouldn't an investigation be warranted , at least to be sure she hadn't given it to much "thought" and possibly even come up with some preliminary plans on how to actually do such a thing?
Abrignac Offline
#31 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 10:43 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
RMAN4443 wrote:
But if people overheard Timothy McVeigh say he had "thought" about bombing a Federal Building aren't they supposed to report it to LE , and then wouldn't LE be expected to investigate the allegations to find out how much "thought" he had actually given the idea ??
So wouldn't an investigation be warranted , at least to be sure she hadn't given it to much "thought" and possibly even come up with some preliminary plans on how to actually do such a thing?


Already answered this.

Abrignac wrote:
Don't find her to be relevant. Not real sure if what she said is prosecutable since she didn't specifically threaten the President, jut where he lives.. Perhaps, the secret service will pay her a visit though.
RMAN4443 Offline
#32 Posted: Mon, Jan 23 2017, 11:29 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Abrignac wrote:
Don't find her to be relevant. Not real sure if what she said is prosecutable since she didn't specifically threaten the President, jut where he lives.. Perhaps, the secret service will pay her a visit though.

It's just that "he" is not the only person who lives there . There are many people there at all hours of the day. I'm pretty sure there are Marines and Secret Service Agents ,at the very least ,there at all times. I'm sure there are several other staff members there also.
I'm also pretty sure if I were to announce publicly that I was "thinking a lot about blowing up Madonna's house" that I would hear from LE about making threatening statements or menacing or stalking Madonna.........which I assure you I am not........

I'm not trying to argue , I'm just saying what is good for the common man should also apply to "A" list celebrities too. Making threats is illegal no matter who is making them.
delta1 Offline
#33 Posted: Tue, Jan 24 2017, 12:29 AM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Maybe if she also said, "come on fellas, you and you (pointing), let's go get some dynamite..."
DrMaddVibe Offline
#34 Posted: Tue, Jan 24 2017, 7:23 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
tailgater wrote:
Pretty sure you're wrong.
You can't publicly say, imply or otherwise suggest that it's OK to bomb the white house.
At least I think that's true.

On the other hand, I know for a fact that Madonna is a rotten whorebag who is simply trying to regain relevance with her target audience: lonely middle aged women with poor self esteem and even poorer personal grooming habits.


Now ya gotta ask yourself...is Sean Penn to blame for that or was she a trainwreck already?
tailgater Offline
#35 Posted: Tue, Jan 24 2017, 10:01 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Didn't she also gobble the goo for Dennis Rodman and Jose Conseco?

Talk about sloppy seconds that would make even TW flinch.

Bottom line: She's a known celebrity, but the fact that these women look up to her makes their effort a thousand times weaker.
teedubbya Offline
#36 Posted: Tue, Jan 24 2017, 10:36 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'm not flinching.

I heard Rodman was on the short list for sec of state.
tailgater Offline
#37 Posted: Tue, Jan 24 2017, 11:38 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Did I say Flinch?
I meant Filtch.
RMAN4443 Offline
#38 Posted: Tue, Jan 24 2017, 1:22 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
teedubbya wrote:
I'm not flinching.

I heard Rodman was on the short list for sec of state.


Ambassador to N.Korea
Mr. Jones Offline
#39 Posted: Wed, Jan 25 2017, 12:11 AM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
ONCE she starts getting harrassed, intimidated and
Followed by the S.S. AND THE FBI-SSG...

which is happening right now as we speak with the
Wiley and damn good ADVANCE TEAMS....

I WONDER WHEN HER SECURITY WILL NOTICE?
If they fool her SECURITY? Or don't?

Then your gonna have a very PISSED off vocal
Celebrity....not a good thing for shadow dwellers
Who like to remain unknown or "just not real"...

"COINTELPRO II HEARINGS 2017"
will need TESTIMONY.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#40 Posted: Wed, Jan 25 2017, 8:07 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Madonna is and has been a role model for American females and a shining beacon of womanhood throughout the globe.
RMAN4443 Offline
#41 Posted: Thu, Jan 26 2017, 4:36 AM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Madonna is and has been a role model for American females and a shining beacon of womanhood throughout the globe.

If we could only get her to shave her pits!!! d'oh!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top