America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by Mr. Jones. 32 replies replies.
Double Jeopardy
tailgater Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
So the drooling liberals want to hang Trump.
We've said it before: They don't know what it is, but Trump did it.

They "knew" they had him when Comey sat in the hot seat.
Then they "knew" they'd get him when Sessions took the chair.
Now they "know" they'll get him on obstruction of justice.

And what proof is there to accuse the POTUS?
Well, they feel that he fired Director Comey because of the Russian investigation.


So to recap:
Comey's hearing revealed nothing in regards to the Russians.
But Trump is accused of Obstructing that nothingness.

There was nothing there. But you're guilty of obstructing it.
Eh?



What the f*ck is wrong with these ANTI-American f*ck-wads on the left?



teedubbya Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
They won't get him on anything. They can't in court and congress won't go after him as long as it is R controlled.

I sort of wish he could just pardon (legally or politically) himself so we can actually focus on Russia and what it was trying to do instead of being offensive or defensive politically on the subject.



Point of reference though.... it is possible to obstruct an investigation even if the investigation ultimately finds there is nothing there.
DrafterX Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
That would be gay... Not talking
teedubbya Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
takes one to know one
delta1 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,754
We can't just take the emperor's word that there is no there there. The Russian meddling was accomplished through highly sophisticated, and evasive cyber means and the use of undercover intelligence agents. We, the public, don't know much about the evidence because our intelligence experts who have been tracking this stuff since last summer during the election campaign, don't want to divulge what they know because that would reveal our intelligence gathering capability. When the investigations are complete, a full and confidential report will be made to Congress and to the President.

In the meantime, shouldn't we want to know what the Russians did? Shouldn't we let the investigators track down all the evidence unimpeded?

The firing of the man at the top of the agency doing a big part of the investigation, and then admitting that the firing was motivated by the on-going investigation causing trouble for the one who fired him, is a textbook example of obstruction of justice. This is a separate issue from the Russian thing and whether or not Trump's campaign people were involved. Obstruction would not be an issue but for Trump's own actions and words.
MACS Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,593
I would love to know what they did. Up to this point, nobody has told me what the Russians actually did to affect our elections.
teedubbya Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
or tried to do. hopefully we get there
DrMaddVibe Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,301
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/15/putin-james-comey-asylum-239589
Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan

DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
He always looked a little nuts to me... Mellow
opelmanta1900 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
delta1 wrote:
We can't just take the emperor's word that there is no there there. The Russian meddling was accomplished through highly sophisticated, and evasive cyber means and the use of undercover intelligence agents. We, the public, don't know much about the evidence because our intelligence experts who have been tracking this stuff since last summer during the election campaign, don't want to divulge what they know because that would reveal our intelligence gathering capability. When the investigations are complete, a full and confidential report will be made to Congress and to the President.

In the meantime, shouldn't we want to know what the Russians did? Shouldn't we let the investigators track down all the evidence unimpeded?

The firing of the man at the top of the agency doing a big part of the investigation, and then admitting that the firing was motivated by the on-going investigation causing trouble for the one who fired him, is a textbook example of obstruction of justice. This is a separate issue from the Russian thing and whether or not Trump's campaign people were involved. Obstruction would not be an issue but for Trump's own actions and words.


didn't podesta or someone on his team, in answering an email, fall for one of the oldest tricks in the book, the old "your account has been compromised, enter your password here" scam?
DrafterX Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
One of them Hillary peoples was also using 'password' as their password... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think we know a bunch more than has been leaked. Hopefully we will see.
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
I wouldn't count on the fake news panning out... Mellow
MACS Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,593
Would Hillary have ever been 'hacked' if she stayed on the gov't server instead of setting up her own? Think
DrafterX Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
nope... but she also wouldn't have been able to hide her pay-to-play stuff either.. Mellow
Krazeehorse Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
DrafterX wrote:
nope... but she also wouldn't have been able to hide her pay-to-play stuff either.. Mellow

Turns out no one on the left either believed or cared about pay to play.
DrafterX Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
nope... just imagine how big the Foundation would be now if she had been elected... but she lost... Mellow
gummy jones Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
I just wish civility magically returned and we all focused on a better America
SmokeMonkey Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
Krazeehorse wrote:
Turns out no one on the left either believed or cared about pay to play.


As one on the left who didn't vote for her, I think your wrong on this one.
frankj1 Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
SmokeMonkey wrote:
As one on the left who didn't vote for her, I think your wrong on this one.

make that two
tailgater Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Frank voted twice!
MACS Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,593
tailgater wrote:
Frank voted twice!


Libtard...
teedubbya Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I also don't recall hillarys email getting hacked.
deadeyedick Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 16,957
tailgater wrote:
Frank voted twice!


Now, we citizens don't know for sure that Frank voted twice, but once the investigation is completed (in about 4 years unless Trump is reelected) the classified details will be given to Congress.
frankj1 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
In order to save taxpayers' money, I did vote twice.

Let's call it a Double Johnson.
DrafterX Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
Frank got double Johnsoned..?? Huh
Gene363 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,669
MACS wrote:
I would love to know what they did. Up to this point, nobody has told me what the Russians actually did to affect our elections.


They would have no reason to favor Trump over anyone from the democratic party, recall Obama's "flexibility" comment and Hillary's uranium deal. I heard two NY Times reporters say as much on NPR. In their opinion, the Russians want to undermine western democratic processes, e.g., our elections. Ironically, post election, the democrats are doubling down on that Russian goal.
gummy jones Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Gene363 wrote:
They would have no reason to favor Trump over anyone from the democratic party, recall Obama's "flexibility" comment and Hillary's uranium deal. I heard two NY Times reporters say as much on NPR. In their opinion, the Russians want to undermine western democratic processes, e.g., our elections. Ironically, post election, the democrats are doubling down on that Russian goal.


i just remember romney stating russia was our biggest problem or at least would be in the future and obama making a very snide remark followed by laughter from the crowd. i didnt like either of those dudes but it is funny how we are now all so worried about russia.
DrafterX Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
ya.. it's seems the 'Resistance' is doing more to take apart our country than Russia ever hoped for... Mellow
gummy jones Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
DrafterX wrote:
ya.. it's seems the 'Resistance' is doing more to take apart our country than Russia ever hoped for... Mellow


maybe their whole goal was to breed a rabid "resistance" and dismantle us from within

game, set, match
DrafterX Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
Hillary is leading it... Mellow
Mr. Jones Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,359
That's what your MOTHER said....TREBEC'...
Users browsing this topic
Guest