America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by bgz. 12 replies replies.
Gonna have to watch this one...
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
The Department of Justice is seeking personal information on visitors to an anti-Trump website connected to destructive Inauguration Day protests, sparking a court fight with the hosting service which says the request violates privacy protections.

The DOJ has obtained a search warrant ordering web-hosting service DreamHost “to assist law enforcement and produce such electronic data.”

The department wants data including IP addresses, names and other personal information pertaining to visitors to the website disruptj20.org, which helped organize political protests against the Trump administration.

More than 200 people were charged after protesters broke windows and set fire to a limousine on Trump's Inauguration Day on Jan. 20. Prosecutors say the website disruptj20.org was used for planning the disturbances.

DreamHost, however, says the warrant seeking information on the 1.3 million visitors to the site and other information is "sweeping" and violates the Constitution and a federal privacy law.

In its own filing, the company said the warrant requires them to “turn over every piece of information it has about every visitor to a website expressing political views concerning the current administration … Including the IP address for the visitor, the website pages viewed by the visitor, even a detailed description of software running in the visitor’s computer.

“In essence, the Search Warrant not only aims to identify the political dissidents of the current administration, but attempts to identify and understand what content each of these dissidents viewed on the website.”

DreamHost argues the “Search Warrant cannot survive scrutiny” considering First Amendment protections.

The government argues that the “website was used in the development, planning, advertisement, and organization of a violent riot that occurred in Washington, D.C., on January 20, 2017.”

A Friday hearing is scheduled.


Film at 11... Think
dstieger Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Wow....welcome to North Korea, folks
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
At least your Nazi porn is safe for now.
DrafterX Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I bet some of youse guys are gonna disappear... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Trump hired Bush's Jack Booted Thugs back... Mellow
bgz Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
dstieger wrote:
Wow....welcome to North Korea, folks


To sum up this article for you and what it really means, they requested the Apache server access logs.

It's pretty standard really, and contains all the information they demonized in the article.

I wouldn't have thought looting, rioting and breaking stuff would also be illegal in NK, who woulda thunk...


With that said, Dreamhost will probably win.
Speyside Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Wow, unbelievable. What a POS.
DrafterX Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I don't like it.. but at the same time they were plotting a crime right..??

can they be trusted to dump the info they don't need..?? prolly not.. so I don't like it..

if they were plotting to rob a bank and did would they be able to get the info..??

If they are ordered to give up their server will they just bleach it like Hillary..?? Huh
opelmanta1900 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
bgz wrote:
To sum up this article for you and what it really means, they requested the Apache server access logs.

It's pretty standard really, and contains all the information they demonized in the article.

I wouldn't have thought looting, rioting and breaking stuff would also be illegal in NK, who woulda thunk...


With that said, Dreamhost will probably win.

kinda strange...

government wants it: bad

some company you've probably never heard of with far less regulation than the US government already has it: good
delta1 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
Think
bgz Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
opelmanta1900 wrote:
kinda strange...

government wants it: bad

some company you've probably never heard of with far less regulation than the US government already has it: good


Actually, Dreamhost is pretty big, and of course they have it, the website in question is hosted there.

It's common for investigators to request the access logs for websites. It's also common for companies to dispute it.

Like I said, Dreamhost will probably win this.

I've never heard a request for access logs described in such a way above though, it makes it sound way dirtier than it really is.
bgz Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Oh, the ones you can't win, are the ones you don't hear about because they're classified ;)

Edit:

I've never had such a request, but I do know they exist.
Users browsing this topic
Guest