America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by Burner02. 44 replies replies.
Beauvoir offers to take Confederate monuments
Mattie B Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Seems reasonable to me.


To save some the hassle of google,

Beauvoir is the homeplace of Jefferson Davis in Biloxi MS.


It's a beautiful place to visit if you're in the area.
Burner02 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,876
Assuming Beauvoir will last. Pretty sure it will go before Washington or Jefferson stuff.
teedubbya Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think the whole statue thing is stupid. I don't care if they build a statue to King George in philly or if the brits throw up tons of statues of Washington, Jefferson etc.

Personally I think statues of gen Sherman should be mandated in every county seat south of the mason Dixon line.

Trump hates gen lee. He prefers winners.
victor809 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I'd be curious what the numbers are regarding statues/ monuments to the north vs south. How many statues of Sherman are there vs Lee? Because I don't know of many Sherman statues (ny... prolly one in dc).

Kinda weird to think about.
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think there is a massive one in the Beauvoir town square. History is important. If you don't have statues in the square history is gone.
Burner02 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,876
teedubbya wrote:
I think there is a massive one in the Beauvoir town square. History is important. If you don't have statues in the square history is gone.



I'm sure there are many statues in and around London. Good luck on finding the Beauvoir town square.
teedubbya Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'm going to London in October. I'll try to find the non museum based gen washington, Paul revere etc statues.

On my way back maybe I'll stop by the Gen Sherman statue in Beauvoir. Not in town square huh? Prolly in the park.
teedubbya Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
True story. My first time in Annapolis I wandered in (sort of drunk) to the middle of the Kunta Kintay festival. I was alone and it felt awkward. They do have an Alex Haley statue there.
Abrignac Online
#9 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,261
I wonder how the left feels about Martin Luther King Jr. Wasn't he anti-gay?

If so, shouldn't those statues also come down? While we're at it shouldn't the Robert Byrd pkwy be renamed. He was a Klansman.
victor809 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Are the statues commemorating MLK fighting to keep gay rights suppressed? Cuz if they are, then probably.
MACS Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
MACS wrote:
Compromise, perhaps?

https://tinyurl.com/y98r4vze

The parts that swayed me:

"It seems unfair and unjust to ask black people to work, play, raise their children and live their lives among statues and memorials that celebrate their historical oppression. But it also seems dishonest and unfair to history to grind those monuments to dust. The Confederacy and the destruction it caused should be remembered, as should the ongoing effort among some to preserve its acrid ideology."

"In Moscow’s Gorky Park, right next to the state art museum, there’s a stretch of green space called Fallen Monument Park. It’s populated with monuments to Stalinism and Leninism erected during the Soviet era. It’s pretty striking. Each monument includes a plaque explaining when it was erected, how it was funded and that it has been preserved and installed in the park not to celebrate Stalin or Lenin or their ideas but because of its historical significance."


I'm all for compromise. I can't really believe we're having this conversation today, to be honest. These are things that happened so far back in the past, anyone there has been dead for 50+ years. It's history. If a statue hurts your delicate sensibilities, you have issues.

This country acts as if we were the inventors, purveyors, and last surviving bastion of slavery. We weren't. We're just the only retards in this entire world who obsess over it.
victor809 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
... that's not true MACS. (I like your compromise though)
The civil war may have been a long time ago but some of these statues were erected in the 50s and 60s ... no one asked the people erecting them why they cared so much for something that was 100 years ago.

Part of the history isn't the civil war. Part of the history is the reasons some of these statues and monuments were erected. That's history people still alive lived through.
Abrignac Online
#13 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,261
victor809 wrote:
... that's not true MACS. (I like your compromise though)
The civil war may have been a long time ago but some of these statues were erected in the 50s and 60s ... no one asked the people erecting them why they cared so much for something that was 100 years ago.

Part of the history isn't the civil war. Part of the history is the reasons some of these statues and monuments were erected. That's history people still alive lived through.


I agree with you Victor. We should be more like the Taliban and blow up every statue that we disagree with. Rock on!!!
Abrignac Online
#14 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,261
MACS wrote:
I'm all for compromise. I can't really believe we're having this conversation today, to be honest. These are things that happened so far back in the past, anyone there has been dead for 50+ years. It's history. If a statue hurts your delicate sensibilities, you have issues.

This country acts as if we were the inventors, purveyors, and last surviving bastion of slavery. We weren't. We're just the only retards in this entire world who obsess over it.



EXACTLY
victor809 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Well... we were all happy when they pulled down statues of saddam... would you question their judgement if they started erecting new statues of him?
MACS Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
victor809 wrote:
Well... we were all happy when they pulled down statues of saddam... would you question their judgement if they started erecting new statues of him?


He brutalized his people. Recently. They're still alive... so it's not a fair comparison.

It seems to me people are just digging up sh*t to be outraged over. Why weren't we outraged about this in 1994? Or even 2000? Why today?
Abrignac Online
#17 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,261
MACS wrote:
He brutalized his people. Recently. They're still alive... so it's not a fair comparison.

It seems to me people are just digging up sh*t to be outraged over. Why weren't we outraged about this in 1994? Or even 2000? Why today?



Thank Mitch Landrieu for once again fanning the race fire using identity politics. That's been the Dem strategy for some time. When things aren't going your way deal the race card from the bottom of the deck. No wonder people can't get a long in the US.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
To be fair, MACS, when I was in college in TN a fair few years ago, the monuments around the town as well as the name of at least one building were debated publicly and frequently. While nothing changed with the monuments, at least to my knowledge, the name of Forrest Hall was a few years ago. Perhaps it was more regional then? I'm sure Murfreesboro, TN wasn't the only place in the South where these conversations were had 20-30 years ago. But they probably weren't had up North.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
Abrignac wrote:
Thank Mitch Landrieu for once again fanning the race fire using identity politics. That's been the Dem strategy for some time. When things aren't going your way deal the race card from the bottom of the deck. No wonder people can't get a long in the US.


Anthony, I haven't paid much attention to New Orleans politics lately, so I'm guessing things aren't going well for Mitch right now? Sorry, a bit off-topic, but it made me realize I had become a bit disconnected to a place I've spent a great deal of time in.

Mattie B Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Two things that stick out in this thread


Victor....uh statues don't fight for anything buddy. I've never seen one even move. I think that's where we get the saying, "still as a statue". Come on man


TW....
Beauvoir is the home place of Jefferson Davis. It's not a town. I think it's about 50 acres in size.


Abrignac Online
#21 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,261
SmokeMonkey wrote:
Anthony, I haven't paid much attention to New Orleans politics lately, so I'm guessing things aren't going well for Mitch right now? Sorry, a bit off-topic, but it made me realize I had become a bit disconnected to a place I've spent a great deal of time in.




It's become a real chithole. Crime is so bad that the state police are now patrolling the city streets. All the while Landrieu is setting himself up for a run at the White House.
victor809 Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS... you don't think there's a chance that the people who were upset about it then were afraid to say anything then? In some ways what some people are identifying as racial divisiveness is actually improved racial equality allowing people to voice their opinion about something which 50 years ago wpuld have been a big problem.

It's a different generation... while their parents were just happy they weren't going to be lynched... this generation is asking questions about why the nation is honoring these people with statues.

I Don't see why we are honoring them with statues either... they were not Americans and they didn't further the American cause or humanities cause.
victor809 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Let me rephrase... during the time they fought for the confederacy they were not americans... I guess they got brought back in...
SmokeMonkey Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
Abrignac wrote:
It's become a real chithole. Crime is so bad that the state police are now patrolling the city streets. All the while Landrieu is setting himself up for a run at the White House.


That's an absolute shame. It's a city ripe for an economic boom, and hopefully not the short-term oil type of the 70's/early 80's.
Burner02 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,876
teedubbya wrote:
I'm going to London in October. I'll try to find the non museum based gen washington, Paul revere etc statues.

On my way back maybe I'll stop by the Gen Sherman statue in Beauvoir. Not in town square huh? Prolly in the park.


Not going to find those there but if it were only early Jul you could get some of the locals to throw in on a 4th of Jul celebration.
Burner02 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,876
Mattie B wrote:

TW....
Beauvoir is the home place of Jefferson Davis. It's not a town. I think it's about 50 acres in size.





I did not go into detail but that was taken care of in #6.
teedubbya Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Ahhh I see. Like Monticello

Well when I visit where should I look for the Sherman statue?
teedubbya Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I hope jetblasteds kids have to go to tecumseh Sherman high school. He after all was a winner.
teedubbya Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think you can tell the statue thing is a non issue. But the nazis I hate and would never march with them no matter how nice they are.
teedubbya Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think you can tell the statue thing is a non issue to me. But the nazis I hate and would never march with them no matter how nice they are.
delta1 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,776
yah...who wants to go to the trouble and expense to make a statue now when a noose, a burning cross or a spray painted swastika works just as well...


...I think that the obsession over statues may be a symptom of the political winds that are blowing today... a response to the voter restriction laws being passed that seem to disproportionately disenfranchise poor and mostly minority people...the perception that law enforcement doesn't treat poor people and minorities equally...
8trackdisco Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,065
It just struck me. Victor has become Androomi Light. I don't believe he believes a third of what he posts. Although I do believe he does hate the homeless.

The media and the left have no idea... I mean NONE, as to how much damage they have done and continue to do.

They are going win the battle and lose the war. I don't recall any of you who are taking the left stand on statues being outraged by them prior to Charlotte. Where was your moral outrage to the memorials?

Hopefully, they take the next reasonable step- tearing down Gettysburg and other military parks. Or if they stay, the South or the Confederacy would not be referred to as such. Maybe something like The People Who Fought The Loving Father Government That Shall Not Be Named.... as not to offend.

Victor, I know you'll be crushed to hear this, but at for least for a day or two, I'll be missing out on both your, and the posts of Hank. I've been Hank-free for a month and a half and it has become a nice, quality of life upgrade.

Life is too short. MACS, you were right.

When the Alt Right hits next (because it will) maybe they'll pick Starbucks.

A left wing business, populated by hate-filled people, who denounce hate.

Seven dolllar coffees are offensive.

And once they are identified as rallying points for the Alt Right, they'll need to be shut down and removed.
madspackler Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 03-07-2000
Posts: 3,608
victor809 wrote:
Let me rephrase... during the time they fought for the confederacy they were not americans... I guess they got brought back in...

Yep. After the war Lincoln pardoned those who fought against the United States rather than round them all up and toss them in jail. Only real option he had at the time.

I have a slightly different perspective having graduated from Washington and Lee University. Lee was President of then Washington College after the war. He actively recruited the sons of the members of the union army to attend his college. At least two union generals and the secretary of the navy sent their sons to Lee's college. Lee and his family, including Traveller, are buried at Lee Chapel on campus. Lee himself designed the chapel and the presidents house angered he lived on campus. Both are still in use today. After Lee died they renamed the college to add his name. His actions simply showed the war was over and time to move this country forward.

We don't plow under Auschwitz. We are still friendly with the British after taking a country from them and their burning the White House to the ground in 1812. Should we tear down the Alamo and blame the Mexicans?

Don't recall who said it but if we forget our history we are doomed to repeat it again. The statues are markers of not just our history but reminders of where we have come from and how far we have come. Taking them down removes that reminder.
teedubbya Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I don't care about the damn statues. Leave them. I think it's dumb.

Auswich, Alamo etc are museums meant to teach and remember. The holocost museum is very moving and no one wants references to Hitler or the nazis removed. The American Indian museum is way cool and features Custer among others. No one wants confederates removed from the story. There are many museums that tell the whole story.

I'm not aware of anyone wanting to remove the statues from museums. Although I'd not be surprised if there is some moron pushing that, that's not what's happening here. No one is trying to forget history, maybe not glorify it, but not forget it. If you honestly believe this particular group wants you to forget who fought to keep them enslaved beg to differ.

The irony here is it's a state or local decision in these cases and it seems some take issue with that. If a locality decides to remove a statue what's the issue to you or me?

It is possible to understand a position you disagree with. I really don't care about the statues. So 8 you are right. I was neither outraged before nor now. But I also don't summarily discount someone else's views because I don't agree. Although some in here would argue otherwise I just don't think I'm smart enough to believe my view is the right one or the only right one and the opposing view is nothing but destructive, greedy, evil, or some other nonsense.

In here to understand the other side, defend part of the other side, or not march lock step to your side (not talking about 8) makes you liberal or communist or whatever. The need to label and blame opposing views is sick and part of the problem.

I get why some are opposed to the statues. It makes total sense to me. To not understand how people in a group that was enslaved not all that long ago in historical terms might take offense to the statues is pretty blind to your own view. I may not agree with it but I get it. It would be weird if a good amount of them didn't feel that way.

The protesters against the nazis were not the same as the nazis. I strongly beleive that. Ymmv. I may think differently of you if you do think they are the same. Whatever.

I get called fence post sometimes, a liberal sometimes etc depending who's views I agree or don't agree with. There is a difference between having no integrity or core beliefs and having an open mind. I think more need to use empathy in their logic. You don't need to change your position to be able to understand the other side. It's just not always good vs evil because you beleive your beliefs are good.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
8trackdisco wrote:


They are going win the battle and lose the war. I don't recall any of you who are taking the left stand on statues being outraged by them prior to Charlotte. Where was your moral outrage to then?


8, there's been an ongoing, off and on, debate around this in the South for at least 20-30 years. As I mentioned in another post, I suspect this was more of a regional thing for a long time.

I'm not too bothered either way. And I feel strongly that the people who live in towns should make the call on whether to keep them. If left to me, I'd prefer them to be more museum pieces. Some, like the one on the town square in my hometown, honor both sides and state simply "Lest we forget." I'm very cool with that.

Others, like the one in Augusta, GA, were placed very specifically to honor the cause and its associated dead, rather than stand as a warning. I'm not as cool with that. When you specify with a line like "No nation rose so white and fair, None fell so pure of crime" that's a bit far.

And for the record, the full inscription that line is taken from:

Worthy to have lived and known our gratitude
Worthy to be hallowed and held
In tender remembrance
Worthy the fadless fame which
Confederate soldiers won
Who gave themselves in life
And death for us
For the honor of Georgia
For the rights of the States
For the liberties of the South
For the principles of the Union, as these were handed down to them,
By the fathers of our common Country.

No nation rose so white and fair, None fell so pure of crime.

Our Confederate Dead"

Erected A.D. 1878
by the Memorial Association of Augusta,
In honor of the men of Richmond County,
Who died in the cause of the Confederate States.
teedubbya Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
^ better stated and more concise than me. Yet demonstrates a better understanding. I learned something. Excellent.
SmokeMonkey Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
Thanks, TW. Growing up in the metropolitan South, you hear a bit of both sides. I get both arguments, but fall a bit more into one camp.

My only really strong opinion related to this is I've always been troubled by how much Southern white regional identify is tied to the Civil War. And I understand that the idea of a strong regional identity is, in the US, almost exclusive to the South (for example, just about everyone I know will always root for an SEC or Southern team over one from anywhere else - rivals notwithstanding. IMO, this is the best area of the country in which to live. We have so many positives - nice, kind and generous people, manners, great food, music whose descendant genres that dominates popular culture to this day, etc. The creation and dissolution of the Confederacy cemented the region, but we've done and grown so much since then. Remember the past, understand the good, learn from the bad, but drop those relics that should be consigned to history. Embrace the future, but keep the positive traditions.

And that doesn't mean become more liberal or more conservative. It means embrace and respect the South. All of it and everyone in it.

YMMV
delta1 Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,776
Monkey...I need to spank you...you have eloquently made a case for the South...can we hire you to promote California, prolly hated 10x as much as the South here?


I see a parallel...California's biggest industry needs immigrant labor, legal or illegal, to survive today, just as much as Southerners believed their survival depended on slave labor in the 18th century...Statues of union farm labor leaders are and have been very controversial here...


it's always the economy, which means living well or badly or worse, and one's position in society...once that issue comes to the forefront, the positives: the beauty of the natural surroundings, the possibilities for both sides, the humanity (all God's gifts to all) fades from the discussion.
victor809 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Did 8 just feel the need to tell me that he was going to block me?

That's kinda... weak. I would have figured it out if I was eagerly searching for responses from him. If I didn't figure it out... meh.

But to the original point. Everyone here is still trying to use the "for history" angle yet no one has actually provides an example of how a statue demonstrates history. It's a poor argument founded in a false premise.

Did I care about the statues prior to a group wanting to remove them? No. Because I'm white and honestly I don't even think of a statue when I walk by it. But their argument is reasonable and the opposing view fails to make an argument (remember... this is NOT history of the confederate war. ) moreso, the opposing view tends to attract Nazis and kkk and sees no problem with that...

8trackdisco Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,065
delta1 wrote:
Monkey...I need to spank you...you have eloquently made a case for the South...can we hire you to promote California, prolly hated 10x as much as the South here?


I see a parallel...California's biggest industry needs immigrant labor, legal or illegal, to survive today, just as much as Southerners believed their survival depended on slave labor in the 18th century...Statues of union farm labor leaders are and have been very controversial here...


it's always the economy, which means living well or badly or worse, and one's position in society...once that issue comes to the forefront, the positives: the beauty of the natural surroundings, the possibilities for both sides, the humanity (all God's gifts to all) fades from the discussion.


Are you suggesting enslaving illegal aliens in order to be both a deterrent, and to keep prices on produce low?

Where do I go to vote for you?
delta1 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,776
d'oh!


Laugh

Herfing Beer
Mr. Jones Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,410
Sensitive DUECES AND WHITE SNOWFLAKE CRYBABIES NEED CHILL PILLS and a GOOD SMACK UPSIDE THEIR SENSITIVE NOGGINS WITH A METAL EXPANDING BATON ROD....
SmokeMonkey Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
Mr Jones, that expanding metal rod may pique the interest of a few around here....
Burner02 Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,876
teedubbya wrote:
Ahhh I see. Like Monticello

Well when I visit where should I look for the Sherman statue?


Be sure and give us an update on the statues in De Beauvoir while in London.
Users browsing this topic
Guest