America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by snowwolf777. 161 replies replies.
4 Pages1234>
Need Suggestions For Preventing Mass Shootings
delta1 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
The lunatics are keeping score...58* is the new record...
(* means number likely to go up due to the people who may succumb to their critical injuries)


NRA succeeds/profits, since gun sales usually spike after mass killings...

A good man with a gun in the crowd would not have helped here, unless we allow open carry of scoped or semi-auto rifles...

Suspect is not known to have a history of mental problems...

The Carnage continues...

dammmmm....
victor809 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Nothing.

I believe nothing can be done and nothing should be done.

The world isn't safe and was never intended to be safe. People need to stop trying to make it safe (both sides do this they just have different irrational fears they are trying to protect themselves from)...

People need to buck up. You bury and mourn your dead and push on.
MACS Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
victor809 wrote:
Nothing.

I believe nothing can be done and nothing should be done.

The world isn't safe and was never intended to be safe. People need to stop trying to make it safe (both sides do this they just have different irrational fears they are trying to protect themselves from)...

People need to buck up. You bury and mourn your dead and push on.


Wow. I agree with Victor. Think

Well stated.
jjanecka Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 12-08-2015
Posts: 4,334
Not known to have mental problems? I heard he was a sex offender and a registered Democrat.
JadeRose Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
All info I've read is that the suspect was......nobody and everybody. Financially sound accountant. Not known to have mental problems. Liked poker and going on cruises. Not anti-Government...not anti-Trump. Not a known nazi or antifa kinda guy. Prolly smoked the occasional cigar and could have fit in fine right here.


There is nothing that could have stopped what happened. It's not Trump's fault or the NRA. It's not pro-gun or anti-gun. It's just a sh*tbag with a rifle and hate in his heart. As Victor rightfully says, we can politicize it or we can mourn the dead and move on.
Speyside Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Very true Victor.
bgz Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
The only thing that will prevent "me toos" is if the media quit releasing the names of the shooters and giving them their fame.

I agree with victor... Not much you can do about it.

Edit:

Deleted a piece of a thought I forgot to finish (and flat out forgot the thought so I couldn't finish it).
Krazeehorse Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
Victor got it right.
jjanecka Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 12-08-2015
Posts: 4,334
I think Vic's nuts finally dropped.
DrafterX Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
It's been said before and we've seen evidence.. people will use whatever they have to kill.. if they don't have a gun they'll use a knife or a truck or car.. or even a Crock-Pot..

We'll prolly never know what this bassard was thinking.. he stewed for a few days in that room tho... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
It is one thing for a law abiding American to own a six shooter to protect themselves. Or a shot gun, or a bolt action deer rifle.

But Americans believe that almost everyone should have access to almost anything. Assault rifles that are easy modified to be military grade automatic. Magazines as big as can be carried. As much ammo as you want. Weapons you can fight a war with - all alone from a hotel room if you like.

So as the body count runs to 59, let’s remember that we don’t believe that there is not any difference between the types of weapons that citizens might own. Especially as there are bill now that would expand the right of Americans to have silencers - just because they might want them. You know, for protection, or sport. Or incase you’re really having a bad day.







Couple of people here on the forum have argued that we should be able to buy hand grenades at walmart.

Guess if this guy had full and proper rights he would have hade RPG’s.....
DrafterX Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
There's prolly tens of millions of gun owners with over a dozen weapons.. if this guy couldn't get a gun he would have built a bomb.. Mellow
Brewha Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Of course - no reason not to sell grenades at walmart.

Because limiting access to really, really dangerous weapons is pointless - and of no value.
Did I get that right?
DrafterX Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
tannerite has been on the streets for years.. as far as I know nobody's ever used it to kill... Grenades at Walmart won't happen but I have no doubt someone could get one if they really tried.. Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
We don't know where he got the automatic weapons but they are highly restricted already.. if he didn't have the license to own them he was breaking existing laws.. is there another law that would have stopped him..?? Huh
victor809 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Honestly brew...

Meh.

I think people should have access to anything. If he wanted to shoot a dozen RPGs at the crowd he should have the right to buy them. More people would die. But I don't think we should get too hung up on whether the death count is 5 or 5000....

Human life isn't that precious that we need to make sure only certain people have the means to end it in large quantities....
Brewha Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
victor809 wrote:
Honestly brew...

Meh.

I think people should have access to anything. If he wanted to shoot a dozen RPGs at the crowd he should have the right to buy them. More people would die. But I don't think we should get too hung up on whether the death count is 5 or 5000....

Human life isn't that precious that we need to make sure only certain people have the means to end it in large quantities....

Ah, but as a misanthrope, you are (hopefully) only a minority. And not in line with society as a whole.

But what about the rest of us who think that the kid next door buying sticks of dynamite is not a good idea - even if it offends his rights as an American?
I know - too bad for us.

Just to put this in perspective, you’re good with people pizzing in the streets, right?
Brewha Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
DrafterX wrote:
We don't know where he got the automatic weapons but they are highly restricted already.. if he didn't have the license to own them he was breaking existing laws.. is there another law that would have stopped him..?? Huh

Well, “laws don’t stop crime”, as I have often read here.

So why have laws at all?

Next time you get a speeding ticket, you should ask the cop; “Why even have a speed limit, it didn’t stop me?”




So, maybe law are about deterrence.....
DrafterX Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
And when broken penalties are paid.. breaking the law is a choice.. Mellow
bgz Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Brewha wrote:
Well, “laws don’t stop crime”, as I have often read here.

So why have laws at all?

Next time you get a speeding ticket, you should ask the cop; “Why even have a speed limit, it didn’t stop me?”




So, maybe law are about deterrence.....


Congratulations, you've won the strawman post of the day.
Brewha Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
bgz wrote:
Congratulations, you've won the strawman post of the day.

Why thank you.

Going for the Tinman post of the day?

- jk
victor809 Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Brewha wrote:
Ah, but as a misanthrope, you are (hopefully) only a minority. And not in line with society as a whole.

But what about the rest of us who think that the kid next door buying sticks of dynamite is not a good idea - even if it offends his rights as an American?
I know - too bad for us.

Just to put this in perspective, you’re good with people pizzing in the streets, right?



I'd rather we have a few mass murderers a year if it can reduce the number of people pizzing on the street.... but I'm not sure how they are linked.

One is the operation of an ordered society. You don't pizz on the street in an ordered society. A mass murderer has already decided to disconnect themselves from the ordered society. They aren't planning to kill a bunch of people and then be allowed back in...

It'll even out Brew... I honestly think if we just let it go for a while you'd get more support.
Let the neighbor kid have some grenades...
Let the weird dude down the block have some rocket launchers....
Let the kindergarten teacher have some weaponized biologicals....
Let the civil war re-enacter have some mustard gas...
Let Kim Jong Un, as well as the hot lady you always ogle when she jogs down the street have nuclear weapons....

Give it a few years.... see what sort of interesting things happen. At the end of that, you may find more people on your side. Or it will turn out we are all actually responsible people when we have heavy weaponry... either way.... doesn't matter
Brewha Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
DrafterX wrote:
And when broken penalties are paid.. breaking the law is a choice.. Mellow

So......Laws do help prevent, deter crimes. Good thing, yes?
Brewha Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
victor809 wrote:
I'd rather we have a few mass murderers a year if it can reduce the number of people pizzing on the street.... but I'm not sure how they are linked.

One is the operation of an ordered society. You don't pizz on the street in an ordered society. A mass murderer has already decided to disconnect themselves from the ordered society. They aren't planning to kill a bunch of people and then be allowed back in...

It'll even out Brew... I honestly think if we just let it go for a while you'd get more support.
Let the neighbor kid have some grenades...
Let the weird dude down the block have some rocket launchers....
Let the kindergarten teacher have some weaponized biologicals....
Let the civil war re-enacter have some mustard gas...
Let Kim Jong Un, as well as the hot lady you always ogle when she jogs down the street have nuclear weapons....

Give it a few years.... see what sort of interesting things happen. At the end of that, you may find more people on your side. Or it will turn out we are all actually responsible people when we have heavy weaponry... either way.... doesn't matter

I see your point Victor.

But I can think of 59 reasons why it does matter - today.
victor809 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
bgz wrote:
Congratulations, you've won the strawman post of the day.


Brew's overall statement may have been a strawman but there was a legit argument.

Drafter's question is one of those stupid questions... "f he didn't have the license to own them he was breaking existing laws.. is there another law that would have stopped him..?? " Which ignores the entire supply chain....

Now - caveat... the supply chain for weaponry is changing... more and more people are able to just manufacture a weapon.
However, it does still apply (for a couple more years)... if you make the laws more strict, the penalties more severe and add additional laws along the entire supply chain you make it more expensive to acquire any illegal weaponry. And like any good republican who hates the minimum wage would agree, making something more expensive reduces demand. You reduce the demand and threre's less a chance this particular nut-job would get the weapon.

It's a sound argument.

But really no fun. Because the entire time you've worked to make that supply chain more expensive, you've had to listen to people whine about their rights being trampled on.

When left with two choices - one being a marginal reduction in access to deadly weaponry through laws, but having a constant fight over what the 2nd amendment may mean, and really incessant whining.... and the other being getting to see the end result of uncontrolled access to all weaponry by our population?.... I'd choose the second option any day.
bgz Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Brewha going full troll style today...

Anyway, 59 isn't really that big of a number.

In some muslim countries, that would simply be Tuesday's morning session before lunch.
victor809 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Brewha wrote:
I see your point Victor.

But I can think of 59 reasons why it does matter - today.



They aren't 59 important reasons...

Dude.... there's 7 billion of us.

7... billion....


with a b.

59 is 8.42 * 10-7% of that....
victor809 Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
bgz wrote:
Brewha going full troll style today...


I wouldn't call that trolling.

He just happens to think a life is important. Probably need to have one or two of those types around
bgz Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
victor809 wrote:
Brew's overall statement may have been a strawman but there was a legit argument.

Drafter's question is one of those stupid questions... "f he didn't have the license to own them he was breaking existing laws.. is there another law that would have stopped him..?? " Which ignores the entire supply chain....

Now - caveat... the supply chain for weaponry is changing... more and more people are able to just manufacture a weapon.
However, it does still apply (for a couple more years)... if you make the laws more strict, the penalties more severe and add additional laws along the entire supply chain you make it more expensive to acquire any illegal weaponry. And like any good republican who hates the minimum wage would agree, making something more expensive reduces demand. You reduce the demand and threre's less a chance this particular nut-job would get the weapon.

It's a sound argument.

But really no fun. Because the entire time you've worked to make that supply chain more expensive, you've had to listen to people whine about their rights being trampled on.

When left with two choices - one being a marginal reduction in access to deadly weaponry through laws, but having a constant fight over what the 2nd amendment may mean, and really incessant whining.... and the other being getting to see the end result of uncontrolled access to all weaponry by our population?.... I'd choose the second option any day.


I think you missed Drafter's point. This dude was a pro gambler... you're not walking into a store and buying full auto machine guns... not happening.

His loan shark probably knew a guy who knew a guy.
bgz Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
victor809 wrote:
I wouldn't call that trolling.

He just happens to think a life is important. Probably need to have one or two of those types around


Talking about his comment style today, not substance.
Brewha Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
victor809 wrote:
They aren't 59 important reasons...

Dude.... there's 7 billion of us.

7... billion....


with a b.

59 is 8.42 * 10-7% of that....

Well, if you want social Darwinism then we should just start a long and sustainable war and enlist the economically disadvantaged to.....





Oh, never mind.
Brewha Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
bgz wrote:
Talking about his comment style today, not substance.

Consider the audience, please.....
bgz Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Brewha wrote:
Well, if you want social Darwinism then we should just start a long and sustainable war and enlist the economically disadvantaged to.....





Oh, never mind.


Dude, I think you're on to something here Flapper


Brewha wrote:
Consider the audience, please.....


Come on now, Drafter is a good guy!
victor809 Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
bgz wrote:
I think you missed Drafter's point. This dude was a pro gambler... you're not walking into a store and buying full auto machine guns... not happening.

His loan shark probably knew a guy who knew a guy.


That's my point as well.
Illegal goods have a supply chain. The more points along the supply chain which have more risk, the more expensive the goods are. The more laws one has to break (and the more severe the penalties) to bring a good from point A to point Psychopath, the more money each person wants along the way. Thus the more expensive it is for him to buy from his loan shark friends... and the less likely he is to do so.

But that's marginal reduction.

Ultimately the problem solved itself by him getting his hands on lots of guns. He's dead. Problem is solved 100%.
bgz Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
victor809 wrote:
That's my point as well.
Illegal goods have a supply chain. The more points along the supply chain which have more risk, the more expensive the goods are. The more laws one has to break (and the more severe the penalties) to bring a good from point A to point Psychopath, the more money each person wants along the way. Thus the more expensive it is for him to buy from his loan shark friends... and the less likely he is to do so.

But that's marginal reduction.

Ultimately the problem solved itself by him getting his hands on lots of guns. He's dead. Problem is solved 100%.


Well, this dude was rich, so even that probably wasn't enough to stop him.

You do have a solid closing argument though.


Edit:

The punishment for illegal gun sales is already steep, doubt more laws would really impact that. Then you have corruption at the choke points, etc... I don't think it's as easy as making the penalties more severe.
Brewha Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
bgz wrote:

Come on now, Drafter is a good guy!

“That’s what I heard Mellow


In fairness, he is a master of subterfuge. And a cunning linguist......
Brewha Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
victor809 wrote:
That's my point as well.
Illegal goods have a supply chain. The more points along the supply chain which have more risk, the more expensive the goods are. The more laws one has to break (and the more severe the penalties) to bring a good from point A to point Psychopath, the more money each person wants along the way. Thus the more expensive it is for him to buy from his loan shark friends... and the less likely he is to do so.

But that's marginal reduction.

Ultimately the problem solved itself by him getting his hands on lots of guns. He's dead. Problem is solved 100%.

My compliments Victor. You have skillfully blended reductive and inductive reasoning.

Bra-vo.
DrafterX Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Why do you think there would be more points along the supply chain..?? Millions of AR15s are already on the streets.. you just need it modified to be illegal...
And let's suppose for a minute you tax the chit out of gun manufacturers.. the market would get flooded with reverse engineered Chinese weapons for half price..

This guy was rich and flipped out.. he could have found an RPG if he tried.. And yes, there is a law against that.. Mellow
Speyside Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Delta, you already know the answer. As Victor clearly stated before he became facetious there is no answer. I don't know about you, but I do not want to live in a police state that minimizes the rights of individuals so the masses feel protected. Even then there is no guarantee that mass murder will not happen. While this is tragic, and horrific, Victor is correct, statistically it is irrelevant. If the media stopped sensationalizing these tragedies I think there would be less of them. But that is not going to happen, plus I do not want the government sensor in out news. I think perhaps a better question is why certain people hold so little value for human life. If that could be understood maybe it could be fixed.
MACS Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

- Ben Franklin

As Victor said, before he started waffling... the world is an inherently dangerous place. Most people are good. You cannot, no matter what the f*** you do, protect yourself from a nutjob bent on destruction.
Brewha Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
I’ve always wanted one of those mini guns like Arnold used.
It’s my right as an American to have one, right?

I want a LAWS rocket too. You know, for snakes and such......
Brewha Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Lots of snakes in Texas.

Like we say; “No step on snek”
DrafterX Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Stephen Paddock’s ability to kill scores of concertgoers Sunday night may have come from using modified semi-automatic weapons with high-capacity magazines, something that enabled him to shoot hundreds of rounds in just a few minutes.


When the feds stormed the hotel room that the 64-year-old Nevada resident used to launch his massacre, they found 23 weapons -- along with two devices that are attached to the stocks of semi-automatic guns to allow fully automatic gunfire, two officials familiar with the investigation told The Associated Press.

Automatic weapons fire a stream of bullets when the trigger is pulled once and held. They differ from semiautomatic weapons, which require one trigger pull for eachz round fired.

The deadly shooting at a Las Vegas concert has claimed more than 50 lives and injured hundreds more. It made Nevada the home of the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history. Here's a look at the gun laws in the state.Video
Las Vegas shooting: What are Nevada's gun laws?

Unless a person is a member of the military or a police agency, obtaining an automatic firearm is difficult and expensive. Potential buyers must first locate a gun dealer who is authorized to sell automatic weapons. Then they must submit applications to both federal and local agencies. If those applications are approved, the buyer must pay $200 for a tax stamp.

But semi-automatic rifles can be modified to fire fully automatic. Sometimes, add-on devices are attached to the stock that allows a method called bump firing – in which the shooter uses the recoil of the gun to push the trigger against the stationary finger allowing for a rapid succession of shots, similar to a fully automatic firearm. Devices called bump stocks can be attached to the rear of a semi-automatic to help facilitate this method.

Other devices like a trigger crank can also modify these weapons so they fire in an automatic fashion at a low cost.





So, he didn't have true automatic weapons.. Think
Ewok126 Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
Brewha wrote:
I’ve always wanted one of those mini guns like Arnold used.
It’s my right as an American to have one, right?

I want a LAWS rocket too. You know, for snakes and such......


If you in Tucson AZ we might be able to hook you up they have big snakes out there too. Well if you got the money that is. Oh I forgot, we got to do this legal. PSSSST.... PM me we will set up a time to meet in the Walmart parking lot. ThumpUp. Now if you want a custom built AR we can hit a buddy up in Biloxi MS also, if you want full auto I can have the federal papers there for you or for an extra few grand we will just take off the serial numbers lmaooooo.

Would you like those in Mat Black or Army Green, we can also do Desert cammo if you prefer for an extra cost. Also to be socially acceptable in today's society We can do Pink grips, Manley black grips with cobras on them, Rainbow Grips, Furry Grips ect. Which ever way that best suits how you self identify if its Gay, Lesbian, Male, Heterosexual, Homosexual, Female, Beaver, moose, cow ect and so on again for a little extra cost. For just a few dollars more if you are a manly male but bisexual transgender we can mix the grips for you one side with the black tactical grip and cobras and on the other side Pink or rainbow grip. We are like burger king baby, you can have it your way. LOL LOL LOL
Ewok126 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
The trigger crank is what we call a hell fire trigger or a gat crank, for every turn of the crank the weapon fires 3 times. The diameter of a full rotation is about 3 inches. You can dump 75 rounds in less than a few seconds. Because of the fact that the Gat Crank trigger is not a spring loaded device it is legal in the majority of states. It is viewed as just pulling the trigger rapidly. I use to have one lol.
Abrignac Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,273
Has anyone come a solution?

Didn’t think so.

I’ve got some ideas. More laws which means more convicts to warehouse in jail. Kinda goes against the wisdom du jour in which the winds of releasing prisoners is blowing hard in the opposite direction.

Perhaps we should confiscate all weapons. Shouldn’t be that hard. I’m thinking it could be accomplished by December of 2117.

Easy peasy

Abrignac Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,273
On second thought the best thing is for the media to agree to not release the name of the shooter(s). It they were denied notoriety then perhaps these fucked up people would nibble on a barrel before taking out innocent lives.
SteveS Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
victor809 wrote:
Nothing.

I believe nothing can be done and nothing should be done.

The world isn't safe and was never intended to be safe. People need to stop trying to make it safe (both sides do this they just have different irrational fears they are trying to protect themselves from)...

People need to buck up. You bury and mourn your dead and push on.


who are you and what have you done with Victor ???
Ewok126 Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
Abrignac wrote:
Has anyone come a solution?

Didn’t think so.

I’ve got some ideas. More laws which means more convicts to warehouse in jail. Kinda goes against the wisdom du jour in which the winds of releasing prisoners is blowing hard in the opposite direction.

Perhaps we should confiscate all weapons. Shouldn’t be that hard. I’m thinking it could be accomplished by December of 2117.

Easy peasy



Bwahahahah not so sure that would be "easy peasy" Some people "Like Me" was able to see the writing on the wall years ago. Therefore, they had enough fore site to procure weapons and ammo that could not be traced, Hide said weapons in places that no one would ever look, and Never spoke of such.

That way when the next civil war should break out, well, I shall quote HG Wells, 1904 from his short story, “Country of the Blind and it says “In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.”

At the rate we are now heading, the Nazi uprisings over a statue, The lets erase history because it was racist, people getting ran over with cars, people throwing bags of crap and piss on every one else, Riots, people hurting each other over difference of opinions such as who is President who isn't. Lets kneel for the Anthem and disrespect the flag, No lets stand and show respect for the flag ect and so on and on and on and on....... All this just in our own nation with our own people. Now lets throw in Fatty fat fat and who knows what that crazy fat little midget will do.

Well lets just say when resources gets scarce don't be surprised if people that had the "fore site" show up at your house. I promise you this, it will not the door bell they will be ringing to get your attention so they can borrow a cup of sugar. Just my opinion of course and in having a stroke my brain, it no work right. lmaooooo.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,424
Brewha wrote:
It is one thing for a law abiding American to own a six shooter to protect themselves. Or a shot gun, or a bolt action deer rifle.

But Americans believe that almost everyone should have access to almost anything. Assault rifles that are easy modified to be military grade automatic. Magazines as big as can be carried. As much ammo as you want. Weapons you can fight a war with - all alone from a hotel room if you like.

So as the body count runs to 59, let’s remember that we don’t believe that there is not any difference between the types of weapons that citizens might own. Especially as there are bill now that would expand the right of Americans to have silencers - just because they might want them. You know, for protection, or sport. Or incase you’re really having a bad day.







Couple of people here on the forum have argued that we should be able to buy hand grenades at walmart.

Guess if this guy had full and proper rights he would have hade RPG’s.....


I guess you failed at understanding the 2nd Amendment. You should probably go back and read the words there. Take out your agenda and for good measure read the Federalist Papers take on it as well.

"Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it."



After all, they were written (by those pesky Founding Fathers everyone loves to hate now!) as a primer for the people to digest what they representatives were voting for in the birth of this Nation. Wouldn't be a bad idea as your post shows you don't have a grasp on the topic at hand.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages1234>