America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by snowwolf777. 161 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
Need Suggestions For Preventing Mass Shootings
delta1 Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
DrafterX wrote:
Millions of people have owned and used these guns for 100 years.. you want them to throw them away now..?? Huh



How many have been modified to simulate automatic fire?
DrafterX Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
You gotta try to believe that not everybody who owns a semi-auto or even one that has been modified has the desire to kill 59 people.. or even one... you seem to believe your neighbor is not capable of being responsible... you may as well take his V8 and restrict him to a 150 hp 4 cylinder... Mellow
gummy jones Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
ive seen people pull the trigger fast enough to average 300rpm on a semi
what is a bumpfire stock, 450?

i think the biggest problem is that some of those arguing the loudest are the least informed as to what they are even talking about

(a general statement, not directed at you delta)
TMCTLT Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
gummy jones wrote:
ive seen people pull the trigger fast enough to average 300rpm on a semi
what is a bumpfire stock, 450?

i think the biggest problem is that some of those arguing the loudest are the least informed as to what they are even talking about

(a general statement, not directed at you delta)




YESSIR and that certainly goes for most if not ALL reporting for the MSM
tailgater Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
Then you believe that in America, it is acceptable for someone to own and use the kinds of weapons that the really sick douche used to mow down more than 600 people, killing 58 of them? Try as I may, I can't really see the good in that...sorry...


I know what you're saying.
And I don't have a horse in this race: I don't own guns. I've only shot them once in my adult life (thanks Ed!).

But just because dela1 can't "see the good" in owning a semi automatic rifle doesn't mean it should be illegal.

What's next?
You don't "see the good" in owning more than 2 rifles?
Or in having more than a few hundred rounds?
Hell, maybe you won't "see the good" in owning a car that goes faster than the speed limit.

I hate the argument that we can't give an inch lest we're prepared to give up the proverbial mile. But in this instance that's precisely what we have to be concerned with.
Because what's next?

tailgater Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
and let's face it folks.

Buying weapons won't even be an issue very soon.
In a few short years consumers will be able to affordably purchase 3D printers that print with metal and composites that are fully capable of printing whatever you want.

Do we outlaw metal printers?

Or outlaw file sharing on the internet so people can't download the design files?


At the end of the day we don't have a gun problem.
We have a people problem.
And we'll never be able to outlaw them. Hell, even if they're illegal we can't outlaw them.
Go figure.

delta1 Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
DrafterX wrote:
You gotta try to believe that not everybody who owns a semi-auto or even one that has been modified has the desire to kill 59 people.. or even one... you seem to believe your neighbor is not capable of being responsible... you may as well take his V8 and restrict him to a 150 hp 4 cylinder... Mellow



Of course we have to believe that no one that we encounter during our daily travels is the next mass murderer. To think otherwise would turn us all into hermits...or gun-packing, kevlar wearing paranoics...

Most of the neighbors I know are good people... many killers had those reputations. I think there is nothing we can do to prevent any of our neighbors from thinking of going on a killing spree. I think we are likely to see an increase in mass shootings due to the social unrest and intolerance among us and anxieties that afflict a lot of people in America. And there are more of us, adding to the pressures...

If we can limit the lethality of the standard weapons available, that increases the probability of fewer casualties when these incidents happen, and that a potential victim can protect himself.

As for getting people to get rid of their V-8's...that is coming as new technology shifts away from internal combustion engines...you may have heard about this...something about global warming and such...
bgz Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
The probability of getting randomly killed by some nut job is pretty low... so low that it's statistically insignificant relative to no nutjobs killing people at all.

It's nothing to worry about. People snap, people have always snapped.

It's actually a pretty rare occurrence as doing so is not rational, and humans are generally rational when it comes to their own well being.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
delta1 wrote:
How many have been modified to simulate automatic fire?


You seriously don't know that it's against the law to do that??
DrMaddVibe Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
delta1 wrote:
Then you believe that in America, it is acceptable for someone to own and use the kinds of weapons that the really sick douche used to mow down more than 600 people, killing 58 of them? Try as I may, I can't really see the good in that...sorry...



You sound like the kind of person that should leave America. This nation isn't for you anyways. You tried, and didn't like it. It's NEVER going to be what you want it to be. Somewhere there's a magical place for you that you can set up your shop and live out your dreams. Just don't go there and try to F it all up by trying to change them like people from New York moving down to FL. Don't be THAT. Just leave and you might obtain the happiness you're looking for.
DrafterX Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Laugh

I think we need to keep Delta.. Apparently he makes a mean fish taco... Mellow
Ewok126 Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
delta1 wrote:
How many have been modified to simulate automatic fire?



I plead the fif! lol
MACS Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
delta1 wrote:
How many have been modified to simulate automatic fire?


The better question would be... A) how many assault rifles are legally owned? B) how man people have modified them... and then C) how many people have used them to maim and kill.

Answer: A) millions B) probably a few thousand C) a handful over the last 100 years

So... a fraction of a percent. And the libs think we need to confiscate them all.
gummy jones Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
MACS wrote:
The better question would be... A) how many assault rifles are legally owned? B) how man people have modified them... and then C) how many people have used them to maim and kill.

Answer: A) millions B) probably a few thousand C) a handful over the last 100 years

So... a fraction of a percent. And the libs think we need to confiscate them all.


i would seriously doubt that there were even a handful

we are talking about a need to "do something" otherwise you are a "coward" prompted by an exceedingly rare occurrence
TMCTLT Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
MACS wrote:
The better question would be... A) how many assault rifles are legally owned? B) how man people have modified them... and then C) how many people have used them to maim and kill.

Answer: A) millions B) probably a few thousand C) a handful over the last 100 years

So... a fraction of a percent. And the libs think we need to confiscate them all.


They also like to use these types of words to sensationalize the discussion and for the ignorant ( not meaning you ) to parrot.
A rifle is a rifle is a rifle.....what it's made of, what color it is and how long the barrel is insignificant
bgz Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
MACS wrote:
The better question would be... A) how many assault rifles are legally owned? B) how man people have modified them... and then C) how many people have used them to maim and kill.

Answer: A) millions B) probably a few thousand C) a handful over the last 100 years

So... a fraction of a percent. And the libs think we need to confiscate them all.


I will make the same argument I made above (this is just a subset of what I said)...

The number is statistically insignificant relative to no deaths by assault rifles at all.



The problem:

Libs will quote statistics saying Americans are x times more likely to die by gun death than y country.

so lets say x is some obscene number for like... 100 times (which is probably way way way over what they quote).

And lets say the probability of dying by gunshot in country y is .00000025% chance.

Well, that means you have a .000025% chance of dying by gun violence!

Keep in mind, if you factor in other things, like...

Are you in the military? Are you a police officer? Are you in a gang? Are you a crack head?

If you answer no to any of these, then the probability goes down by a very large percentage.

So, no. We don't have a gun violence issue in this country...

If you look at the real numbers and not the BS the media feeds you, it's easy to see, we don't really have a problem.
Ewok126 Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
TMCTLT wrote:
They also like to use these types of words to sensationalize the discussion and for the ignorant to parrot.
A rifle is a rifle is a rifle.....what it's made of, what color it is and how long the barrel is insignificant


Very Very True


What is all boils down to is knowledge, Knowing how to use it and how to properly execute

One: you give me a standard deer hunting riffle with a scope and I would bet that I could have done way more damage than the dumb ass did with his little full auto and also had a better probability of getting away.

It was said at one point a question if there was military background due to how he was controlling the burst of a full auto. I call BS and here is why. Any one that has ever shot a full auto knows the gun rises. To stay on target or even round about pointing in the general direction of a target you have to burst unless you are just doing a spray and pray. Two: His muzzle flash was seen by many stupid mistake. Any one with any decent knowledge would know how to hide a muzzle flash especially when shooting at any distance. Three: Even on the video recordings you could hear the report of his the rifle. Stupid Stupid Mistake.

With a standard legal non modified bolt action deer rifle you can shoot and hit a target at very long range very accurately if you know how. A 7mm bolt action Remington is what I used to win 1000 yard long range tournaments. At 1000 yards you do not hear the report of the rifle. If you where to be standing near the target all you would hear is metal hitting meat and at a concert unless you had the ears of a dog you would not hear that. Last with every one watching the concert start from the back of the pack and work your way forwards. No one notices people behind them falling to the ground. Whole squads have been taken out this way in just using the sound of a stream they was crossing, They could not hear the report of the rifle, The guy in the back drops and then the next and next so on and so forth. This is with a bolt action rifle. The whole squad wiped out before they got across the stream and none of them even knew they was getting shot at until the last one noticed his whole squad was dead and by that time pop he was to.

So again its not the type of rifle used. It is the person using it. If I was going to do such, I would leave the assault rifle as a fall back for CC. I would take the bolt action out for most lethal damage and also for the most length of time of being able to take many more kills with out being seen or noticed.

As TMCTLT says they like to use words like ASSAULT its a scare tactic. It don't matter if it is an assault rifle or a single shot bolt action. It does not deplete the amount of victims. In the proper hands and when I say proper hands I mean just a little common sense and a tiny bit of knowledge a single shot bolt action could have not only taken out more people but increased the odds of the shooter getting away.

Just my honest opinion from my own experience take it as you will
DrMaddVibe Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
tailgater wrote:
and let's face it folks.

Buying weapons won't even be an issue very soon.
In a few short years consumers will be able to affordably purchase 3D printers that print with metal and composites that are fully capable of printing whatever you want.

Do we outlaw metal printers?

Or outlaw file sharing on the internet so people can't download the design files?


At the end of the day we don't have a gun problem.
We have a people problem.
And we'll never be able to outlaw them. Hell, even if they're illegal we can't outlaw them.
Go figure.



Good points

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYm_2oCVdSM
Ewok126 Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
Zappa hit it dead on for sure.
delta1 Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
If I say " gun control laws don't work in America" and make some fish tacos, can I stay?
Ewok126 Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
delta1 wrote:
If I say " gun control laws don't work in America" and make some fish tacos, can I stay?


Hummm Think Think Think

Ahh hell I wouldnt know how to act with you gone Delta Besides you dont have to say it we already know that is true lmaooo.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
delta1 wrote:
If I say " gun control laws don't work in America" and make some fish tacos, can I stay?


No. You can't help yourself. That penchant about how bad you have here in America and how racist it is and all the guns...you aren't filming "Borat II" are you?

Really, you know deep down that you'd be happier if you left.
Ewok126 Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
DrMaddVibe wrote:
No. You can't help yourself. That penchant about how bad you have here in America and how racist it is and all the guns...you aren't filming "Borat II" are you?

Really, you know deep down that you'd be happier if you left.



LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
frankj1 Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
I have to admit that it is truly amazing to have learned how all liberals generalize.
Speyside Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Our generals are liberals? Who'd a thunk it.
frankj1 Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
can't stick around, but some funny generalizations happening accusing the left of criminal level generalizing!

gotta run.

take care.
gummy jones Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
delta1 wrote:
If I say " gun control laws don't work in America" and make some fish tacos, can I stay?


tell me more about these tacos
MACS Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
More gun control laws is the ticket?

I mean... all those laws we have against drugs fixed our drug problem, right?
tailgater Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
If I say " gun control laws don't work in America" and make some fish tacos, can I stay?


Stay?
Hell, you'll be promoted to Grand Poobah.
tailgater Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
I have to admit that it is truly amazing to have learned how all liberals generalize.


I think it's fair to say that people who generalize are prone to irony.
Think
MACS Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
Ironic, isn't it?
RMAN4443 Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
tailgater wrote:
Stay?
Hell, you'll be promoted to Grand Poobah.

I thought Fred Flintstone was the Grand Poobah???Anxious
frankj1 Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
tailgater wrote:
I think it's fair to say that people who generalize are prone to irony.
Think

you get me, really get me


Frankie Fields
SteveS Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
tailgater wrote:
I think it's fair to say that people who generalize are prone to irony.


I think it's fair to say that irony is the opposite of wrinkly ...
delta1 Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
People who eat lots of spinach are the most prone to irony...
Brewha Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,161
DrMaddVibe wrote:
No, that's not my "point" at all. Let's start with the "well regulated militia". Learn to walk before you run.

Wait - you had a point?
Now that’s a thunderbolt out of a clear sky.

Here I thougt you just upchucking a belly full and angst that you prolly swallowed while watching Fox.



Where you trying to say the the Second Amenedment decrees that there are no limits to civilian arms ownership?
Brewha Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,161
tailgater wrote:
Would you have preferred if the people died from a U-Haul truck filled with fertilizer?

Or a Boeing 737?

Or a rented van?


With freedom comes responsibility.
Don't take away MY freedoms because some D-Bag is irresponsible.


You might well have asked if I would have preferred that the people died from a small minded conservative.
(Oddly this might have been the case).


But back at it - Don’t hide behind the flag with “your rights”. This is public safety, and if not wearing seat belts or not being able to buy a machine robs you of “freedom” than sux it up.

This keeps sounding like you guys whining “mommy won’t let me play with matches” - well guess what, maybe you shouldn’t.
Speyside Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
The second amendment and SCOTUS have set precedent for civilians and weaponry. Comments about hand grenades and nuclear weapons are rather simple minded. If you don't like the existing law then you work towards change, but change is difficult to accomplish.
Brewha Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,161
If it seems simple minded consider the audience. Many here argue that alll gun regulation deprives them of their freedom.

My point is that we have these laws for good reason and where these military grade capable weapons and accessories are concerned it seems obvious that we need better regulation.

Now for the conservative crowd that interpreted the above statement as “confiscate all weapons”, or oh so cleverly see it as “only the first step in taking our weapons and making all Russian slaves”, well - there is no reasoning with the unreasonable.
Brewha Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,161
Ok, NEWS FLASH - some Republicans, including Eddie Muster, are coming out and saying tha bump stops should be regulated.


Ya’ll need to head down to Walmart and my all the ammo they got. Trump is comin’ fo yo guns!!!!
DrafterX Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
I'm happy with existing laws.. they aren't depriving me of anything I want.. if I really wanted a bump-stock I'd have one... If they take them off the shelves and I decide I want one I'll still get one.. Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Well, turns out bump-stocks had Obama's approval and now the NRA is speaking out against them.. interesting turn.. because they didn't have any moving parts Obama said they were ok.. Thanks Obama.. Mad
delta1 Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
I heard he did that after he saw those pictures of him: 1) his head w with a rifle-scope cross hair super-imposed over it, 2) a mannequin looking like him hanging from a tree with a noose around his neck...
DrafterX Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Kinda like that Griffin woman holding the decapitated head of Trump everyone laughed at..?? Huh
MACS Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
Brewha wrote:
Well, “laws don’t stop crime”, as I have often read here.

So why have laws at all?

Next time you get a speeding ticket, you should ask the cop; “Why even have a speed limit, it didn’t stop me?”

So, maybe law are about deterrence.....


How many people would speed if we didn't have speed limits? Admit it... you drive 5, 10 miles over the limit because you don't want to stand out and get pulled over, right? Just like almost everyone else. Except that one lunatic who drives 145 once in a while because his car will do it. Anxious

So what do we do about that guy? He gets ticketed. He gets his license suspended. We have measures in place. What's to prevent the next crazy driver?

Nothing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5ELyG9V1SY

DrafterX Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Ya.. it was a silly argument.. Mellow
fishinguitarman Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,148
Brick wall
qmech Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 06-17-2016
Posts: 970
I think Delta should stay. We are already loosing enough jobs to the world . Pulling out of Atlanta and going to Berlin is simply not an option. Every American who cannot agree with this should get time on the comfy chair and be tickled with feathers until he pees on himself.. Yes yes harsh but heart felt words...

Q
tailgater Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Brewha wrote:
You might well have asked if I would have preferred that the people died from a small minded conservative.
(Oddly this might have been the case).


But back at it - Don’t hide behind the flag with “your rights”. This is public safety, and if not wearing seat belts or not being able to buy a machine robs you of “freedom” than sux it up.

This keeps sounding like you guys whining “mommy won’t let me play with matches” - well guess what, maybe you shouldn’t.



Yeah.
You have a knee jerk reaction to a terrible tragedy and I'm the one whining.

Not to worry, though. In a week or so you'll see something else shiny and your attention will be diverted. Your faux outrage dujour will end with some harsh words on a cigar forum. Meanwhile you won't have written your congressman. You won't have investigated a reasonable solution. But you WILL point fingers at every opportunity you get.

tailgater Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
I heard he did that after he saw those pictures of him: 1) his head w with a rifle-scope cross hair super-imposed over it, 2) a mannequin looking like him hanging from a tree with a noose around his neck...


You google the most unusual things.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>