America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by RMAN4443. 266 replies replies.
6 Pages<123456>
So.... no one's gonna post about it?
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
victor809 Offline
#51 Posted: Wed, Dec 6 2017, 7:27 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
delta1 wrote:
I doubt if any of them are into pedophilia...but I won't be rude and ask them if they'll vote for Moore...


I wouldn't bet money on burner not voting for an accused pedo.
teedubbya Offline
#52 Posted: Wed, Dec 6 2017, 7:35 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
But if Franken leaves and Moore wins it’s a net plus two for my party. That’s what’s important because we are the party of principles.

Dems are turning against Franken while the GOP is turning towards Moore.

I’m so proud.
Gene363 Offline
#53 Posted: Wed, Dec 6 2017, 9:22 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
teedubbya wrote:
But if Franken leaves and Moore wins it’s a net plus two for my party. That’s what’s important because we are the party of principles.

Dems are turning against Franken while the GOP is turning towards Moore.

I’m so proud.


Like the Democrap/Repuglacannot mutual adoration club in the parliament of whores is going to change one thing.
delta1 Offline
#54 Posted: Wed, Dec 6 2017, 9:31 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Gene363 wrote:
Like the Democrap/Repuglacannot mutual adoration club in the parliament of whores is going to change one thing.


best string of words I've seen in awhile...not sure if your 10th grade English teacher would be proud, but it's witty...
frankj1 Offline
#55 Posted: Wed, Dec 6 2017, 9:43 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
delta1 wrote:
best string of words I've seen in awhile...not sure if your 10th grade English teacher would be proud, but it's witty...

I feel so inadequate
Speyside Offline
#56 Posted: Wed, Dec 6 2017, 10:48 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
A guy like a genius with the nickname Frankie tripod feels inadequate. I feel ah um er, never mind, I'm fershimmeled.
teedubbya Offline
#57 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:55 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Gazunetight
teedubbya Offline
#58 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:56 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
At least you aren’t voting for an accused pedophile and doing strange gyrations to pretend it’s acceptable.
DrafterX Offline
#59 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 9:30 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
I'm gonna have to laugh if he wins.. just cause... Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#60 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 9:56 AM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
Speyside wrote:
A guy like a genius with the nickname Frankie tripod feels inadequate. I feel ah um er, never mind, I'm fershimmeled.

so fershimmeled you don't know if you're Carmen or Cohen?
teedubbya Offline
#61 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 10:16 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
I'm gonna have to laugh if he wins.. just cause... Mellow



Yes pedophila is HIGHlareous


and Crimson Tide realy means once they bleed it's ok
DrafterX Offline
#62 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 12:08 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Alleged... Mellow
RMAN4443 Offline
#63 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 12:08 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
[quote=teedubbya]Yes pedophila is HIGHlareous


and Crimson Tide realy means once they bleed it's ok[/quote

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed????Anxious










Sarcasm
delta1 Offline
#64 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 12:45 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
frankj1 wrote:
so fershimmeled you don't know if you're Carmen or Cohen?


OK...that was a very witty string of words...lmdycao...
Burner02 Online
#65 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 1:08 PM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,876
teedubbya wrote:
So vote a possible pedophile in to office to get rid of him forever? Quite the rationalization. Since he is running against the establishment, and that’s who would presumably remove him it seems to me that would galvanize him. The opposite.

Besides he likely would not get removed and even if he did it would take most of the time remaining in the seat and he could run again. It almost assures he will be in the mix without ever leaving it.

A loss would at a minimum show disdain for him and maybe kill or at least slow his career.

A vote for someone is quite simply a vote fior someone no matter how much you want to pretend it isn’t.



I neither have the time nor the inclination to argue with you over someone I'm not for or support .

But I do have a question for you. Don't you think one "AH" on this forum that argues every word or breath is enough?

If your answer is no then I have a couple of recommended forum name changes for you.
frankj1 Offline
#66 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 1:46 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
delta1 wrote:
OK...that was a very witty string of words...lmdycao...

dam yellow candy azz?
delta1 Offline
#67 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 1:53 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
daffodil yellow chinese azz...


I think that is the hue of yellow that is closest to the color of my butt...
frankj1 Offline
#68 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 1:58 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
delta1 wrote:
daffodil yellow chinese azz...


I think that is the hue of yellow that is closest to the color of my butt...

I have daffodils and jonquils in my yard, can't tell which is which.
Nice early spring splash of yellow though.
teedubbya Offline
#69 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 2:55 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Burner02 wrote:
I neither have the time nor the inclination to argue with you over someone I'm not for or support .

But I do have a question for you. Don't you think one "AH" on this forum that argues every word or breath is enough?

If your answer is no then I have a couple of recommended forum name changes for you.



It's a legitimate discussion and if you characterize it as arguing every word or breath and being an AH then call as many names as you like.... but along the way get a coat.
victor809 Offline
#70 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 3:03 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Burner02 wrote:
I neither have the time nor the inclination to argue with you over someone I'm not for or support .



....but still totally gonna vote for....
teedubbya Offline
#71 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 3:05 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
just because you vote for someone doesn't mean you support them. You could be voting them in to office to punish them and stuff. That will show 'em
victor809 Offline
#72 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 3:13 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Those poor poor republican pedophiles **... forced into office by the voters to punish them by making them "work" for the country.




** (accused)
teedubbya Offline
#73 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 4:33 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard Moore already plans to hire Millie Bobby Brown as an intern because he heard she was 11....
tailgater Offline
#74 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 5:43 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Moore's biggest problem was he chose the wrong sex.

Ask Gerry Studds.

If the underage victim is male, the democrat, er, I mean the politician gets re-elected.
If the vic is a chick, they get called a pedo.


I think they're both pedo.
But too many democrats would call that homophobic.


The hypocrisy runs deep here in CBid nation.
Very deep indeed.
teedubbya Offline
#75 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 5:57 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
both would be pedo in that situation. I agree.

We just went through that conversation with the OK republican/trump campaign chair a week or two ago in here. Drafter took more issue with the victim than the creep.

Hypocrisy does run deep.
victor809 Offline
#76 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 6:11 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Is this another "but hillary!" response or something?

This happened so long ago that the internet didn't exist at the time. But you're angry we aren't posting about it on cbid? Really? I did a search, no one has posted on cbid that they really liked studds... so your complaint must be that we aren't still complaining about him.

not to mention, and I looked it up, the studds guy (who was censured along with a republican for doing the same damn thing) screwed around with a 17 year old. Which is age of consent in DC.

Alabama has an age of consent of 16. Moore went after 14/15 year old girls.

Not only is this the worst "but hillary!" it's also just dumb.
teedubbya Offline
#77 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:18 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I didn’t look just took his word for it. 34 years ago but none the less wrong.

Let’s go back to that time. Would Regan have backed a pedophile of any type?

DrafterX Offline
#78 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:21 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Speculation from 40 years ago at best... And the 17 year old whore boy was not a victim.. he was being paid for his time... And I never approved... Still don't... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#79 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:24 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Besides drafters had many studds loads in his day.
DrafterX Offline
#80 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:32 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Homie don't play dat...Not talking
teedubbya Offline
#81 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:42 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
For the record homie refused to blow his load in drafter and drafter is still upset about it
DrafterX Offline
#82 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:42 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
You wish..Not talking
frankj1 Offline
#83 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:45 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
"for the record..."
crazy.
teedubbya Offline
#84 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 7:47 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Lol
frankj1 Offline
#85 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 9:16 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
teedubbya wrote:
Lol

HA!
DrafterX Offline
#86 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 9:17 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Mellow
tailgater Offline
#87 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 9:18 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Is this another "but hillary!" response or something?

This happened so long ago that the internet didn't exist at the time. But you're angry we aren't posting about it on cbid? Really? I did a search, no one has posted on cbid that they really liked studds... so your complaint must be that we aren't still complaining about him.

not to mention, and I looked it up, the studds guy (who was censured along with a republican for doing the same damn thing) screwed around with a 17 year old. Which is age of consent in DC.

Alabama has an age of consent of 16. Moore went after 14/15 year old girls.

Not only is this the worst "but hillary!" it's also just dumb.


You truly are a fool.
You act as if I've defended the pedo.
I didn't.

But your trump derangement doesn't allow you to actually comprehend. Just to respond.
victor809 Offline
#88 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 10:20 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
And you are imprecise in your language and reading.
I said nowhere that you defended a pedo. Just that you pulled a "buthillary!" When we are discussing a pedo.

You can choose whether you did that in defense of a pedo or because you really wanted to talk about a 1983 sexual encounter between a 17 year old and a congressman.
frankj1 Offline
#89 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 10:29 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
the old joke in MA was that Studds lost his Library of Congress membership because he bent over a Page.
DrafterX Offline
#90 Posted: Thu, Dec 7 2017, 10:36 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
TW used to be a page... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#91 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 3:58 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
And you are imprecise in your language and reading.
I said nowhere that you defended a pedo. Just that you pulled a "buthillary!" When we are discussing a pedo.

You can choose whether you did that in defense of a pedo or because you really wanted to talk about a 1983 sexual encounter between a 17 year old and a congressman.


LOL!
Why did you exclaim "But Hillary!" if you weren't complaining about me defending anyone?
As for the "1983 sexual encounter" , you state the year as if it's much different from when Moore did his creepy dating.

Your Trump derangement has you baffled. You don't even know WHY you're arguing. Just that you should.
From race to Hillary to Moore to EVERYTHING.
You used to be fun and you used to make sense even when I disagreed with you.

You're a mess, man.
tailgater Offline
#92 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 3:59 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
the old joke in MA was that Studds lost his Library of Congress membership because he bent over a Page.


Barney Frank blushes at that one.
ZRX1200 Offline
#93 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 4:28 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
http://www.dailywire.com/news/24480/breaking-moore-accuser-admits-she-wrote-note-under-ben-shapiro
victor809 Offline
#94 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 4:49 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
LOL!
Why did you exclaim "But Hillary!" if you weren't complaining about me defending anyone?
As for the "1983 sexual encounter" , you state the year as if it's much different from when Moore did his creepy dating.

Your Trump derangement has you baffled. You don't even know WHY you're arguing. Just that you should.
From race to Hillary to Moore to EVERYTHING.
You used to be fun and you used to make sense even when I disagreed with you.

You're a mess, man.



You're going to have to get your story straight with everyone else.
I have stopped trying to figure out what's going on in the tiny minds of people.

We were discussing a pedo running for congress as a republican in 2017. You stated that the hypocrisy in Cbid is deep, because in your mind no cbid democrat posted about a 1983 sex scandal with a 17 year old page.

Now... I know you're not too good with numbers. But 1983 is number that comes before the year that Cbid existed (2002?), so while I am absolutely shocked that no one posted on cbid about that scandal in 1983, I'm even more shocked that cbid democrats aren't still posting about it for the past 34 years. It's shameful. We should have a memorial. 1983 - never forget!!!!!

Now, whether you were raising the unforgivable oversight of not posting a thread annually to commemorate the butt-poking of a congressional page for the past 34 years because you are an aficionado of this scandal and believe it should be discussed often, or because you wanted to "buthillary!" a slightly more contemporary scandal, I don't know. Because I can't possibly understand what motivates you. Thus I did not state definitively that you are trying to defend the pedo.
victor809 Offline
#95 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 4:51 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:

You used to be fun and you used to make sense even when I disagreed with you.


An insightful person might question whether it isn't the other person who changed.
victor809 Offline
#96 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 9:26 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
victor809 wrote:
You're right. And if this were a trial, I would say "accused" is a very important word.

But the party that brought us "lock her up" is very silent on this topic.

As for the age range... yeah, seems to go from 14 to 18... when he was in his 30s. And he apparently this was bad enough that he's creeping on random young girls at the mall... or recitals when he doesn't have a child there?....

I feel like anyone who's willing to endorse someone like this with a "he's just been accused" should be required to have him babysit their teen daughter.



dammit TW! Stealing my damn ideas
teedubbya Offline
#97 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 9:34 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I hadn’t seen that but it’s a good idea.

A weekend with Uncle Roy.

teedubbya Offline
#98 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 9:35 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
There is no absolute proof so it’s prolly worth the risk and stuff.
victor809 Offline
#99 Posted: Fri, Dec 8 2017, 9:42 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
What's the worst that could happen?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#100 Posted: Sat, Dec 9 2017, 8:23 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
ZRX1200 wrote:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/24480/breaking-moore-accuser-admits-she-wrote-note-under-ben-shapiro



And if we have a false statement associated with the claim...add in Gloria Allred...yeah...couple it with the man staying with his assertion he didn't do any of this...stinks.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages<123456>
Back to Top