America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by victor809. 366 replies replies.
8 Pages<12345678>
The Schumer Shutdown...
HuckFinn Offline
#201 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
TMCTLT wrote:
The American Immigration Council, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, is a powerful voice in promoting laws, policies, and attitudes that honor our proud history as a nation of immigrants. Through research and policy analysis, litigation and communications, and international exchange, the Council seeks to shape a twenty-first century vision of the American immigrant experience.

So what vision should we be seeking? A 19thc one? Reintroduce the Chinese Exclusion Act ?

Don't expand your understand, I get it. You don't need ANY new info. You are more than satisfied with the little you already know. Hot damn.
Wasting my time....Brick wall
DrafterX Offline
#202 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Illegal is illegal... Give them a free pass and you'll see border crossing like never before... Mellow
HuckFinn Offline
#203 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
DrafterX wrote:
Illegal is illegal... Give them a free pass and you'll see border crossing like never before... Mellow

That's BS. You make a full stop at every stop sign? Ever smoke weed? Play some poker in someone's home for $? Use someone's wi-fi? Speed? Forget to put on your seatbelt? Lesse.
Pee outside? Nm...

It's when laws are broken that get too close to our fears or prejudices that we get all legal.
You waited until you were 18 to have your first beer? Nope. Cheers!
DrafterX Offline
#204 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Ya, those compare with felony crossing the border... They're damn lucky they don't get shot... Mellow



Just admit you want open borders for anyone who'll vote Democrat... Mellow
dstieger Offline
#205 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I'm not sure why the dems aren't embracing this as the 'Schumer Shutdown'.....they thought they saw an opportunity and jumped at it....bit of a bluff, but with perceived popular support. If GOP calls the bluff and this drags well into the week, I think dems will accede and try to spin it as some sort of a win, while not likely getting anything in the end.

I don't feel too strongly about immigration issues EXCEPT that I feel very strongly that the rhetoric is asinine on all sides. I hope there's some sort of bipartisan agreements soon, if only because this immigration stuff is as toxic to national conversations as anything else out there right now. I'd like to think that once we get past the biggest 4 or 5 immigration points, there might be opportunity for actual conversation about other stuff like budgets and security and health care, etc.
DrafterX Offline
#206 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Vote happening now... Enough votes to reopen gunmen with no immigration stuff... As it should be.. ThumpUp
HuckFinn Offline
#207 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
dstieger wrote:
I'm not sure why the dems aren't embracing this as the 'Schumer Shutdown'.....they thought they saw an opportunity and jumped at it....bit of a bluff, but with perceived popular support. If GOP calls the bluff and this drags well into the week, I think dems will accede and try to spin it as some sort of a win, while not likely getting anything in the end.

I don't feel too strongly about immigration issues EXCEPT that I feel very strongly that the rhetoric is asinine on all sides. I hope there's some sort of bipartisan agreements soon, if only because this immigration stuff is as toxic to national conversations as anything else out there right now. I'd like to think that once we get past the biggest 4 or 5 immigration points, there might be opportunity for actual conversation about other stuff like budgets and security and health care, etc.

Google ' who is more responsible for the shutdown, Democrats or Republicans'
I hate em both but majority of Americans are saying Republicans are the bad guys here.
dstieger Offline
#208 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
HuckFinn wrote:
Google ' who is more responsible for the shutdown, Democrats or Republicans'
I hate em both but majority of Americans are saying Republicans are the bad guys here.


Why would I google that? Besides what the flying flak does 'majority of Americans are saying....' have to do with anything related to truth or reality?


The truth is that there was a CR crafted that had nothing in it that ANYONE in Congress objected to. The dems saw it as a chance to 'filibuster' without filibuster....shoot it down and hold it hostage for unrelated stuff.....smart play...if it works
HuckFinn Offline
#209 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
DrafterX wrote:
Ya, those compare with felony crossing the border... They're damn lucky they don't get shot... Mellow



Just admit you want open borders for anyone who'll vote Democrat... Mellow

Unlawful presence is neither a felony nor a misdemeanor, said Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. It is a civil infraction that results in removal and a bar on re-entry for a certain period of time.
dstieger Offline
#210 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
HuckFinn wrote:
Unlawful presence is neither a felony nor a misdemeanor, said Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. It is a civil infraction that results in removal and a bar on re-entry for a certain period of time.


Are you actually trying to argue that entering this country outside of immigration law is somehow legal?


Fuzz?
victor809 Offline
#211 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
He makes an interesting point.
Do you know what law is broken by being in the country without a visa/green card? And whether it's a felony or misdemeanor? Cuz I dont...
victor809 Offline
#212 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
He makes an interesting point.
Do you know what law is broken by being in the country without a visa/green card? And whether it's a felony or misdemeanor? Cuz I dont...
HuckFinn Offline
#213 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
dstieger wrote:
Why would I google that? Besides what the flying flak does 'majority of Americans are saying....' have to do with anything related to truth or reality?


The truth is that there was a CR crafted that had nothing in it that ANYONE in Congress objected to. The dems saw it as a chance to 'filibuster' without filibuster....shoot it down and hold it hostage for unrelated stuff.....smart play...if it works

You said Democrats should own the Schumer Shutdown. I and most don't see it that way.
Donald baited and switched on them.
Don wanted and now he's got his wished-for shutdown.
Republicans control the Congress and White House. But the Dems are too blame?

You could also care less if approximately 800,000 people are freaking deported in March?

It's not a game. Donald says no DACA without his wall and that's not shady.
But this is?
DrafterX Offline
#214 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Illegal Immigration is a Crime. Each year the Border Patrol apprehends hundreds of thousands of aliens who flagrantly violate our nation's laws by unlawfully crossing U.S. borders. Such illegal entry is a misdemeanor, and, if repeated after being deported, becomes punishable as a felony.


Most do come back if caught... Mellow
Phil222 Offline
#215 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
I think the shutdown is over. I wonder if Dems caved to Republican demands?
DrafterX Offline
#216 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
No immigration bill attached so ya... Mellow
delta1 Offline
#217 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
Looks like a compromise was reached...vote to re-open govt with temporary funding until Feb 8 will happen in the Senate soon....measure then goes to the House, where it is expected to pass...

then we get to watch each side pointing fingers and doing their victory laps...

meanwhile, the rest of the world thinks we're imbeciles...and blame Trump ... https://www.vox.com/world/2018/1/22/16919166/government-shutdown-2018-global


Guess Eric Trump didn't help matters by saying the shutdown was a good thing...
HuckFinn Offline
#218 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
victor809 wrote:
He makes an interesting point.
Do you know what law is broken by being in the country without a visa/green card? And whether it's a felony or misdemeanor? Cuz I dont...

Seems not in Florida
But in the USA in general ...a misdemeanor, maybe, sometimes
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/24/politics/undocumented-immigrants-not-necessarily-criminal/index.html
DrMaddVibe Offline
#219 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,424
Chuckle really showed what he's made of.

What did he get?


The heat was too much for him.

Way to cave. The Apology Tour 2.0 will be revving up with Pelosi screeching about something.

What a comedy.
HuckFinn Offline
#220 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
DrafterX wrote:
No immigration bill attached so ya... Mellow

You won!?
dstieger Offline
#221 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
victor809 wrote:
He makes an interesting point.
Do you know what law is broken by being in the country without a visa/green card? And whether it's a felony or misdemeanor? Cuz I dont...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325
dstieger Offline
#222 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
HuckFinn wrote:
You said Democrats should own the Schumer Shutdown. I and most don't see it that way.
Donald baited and switched on them.
Don wanted and now he's got his wished-for shutdown.
Republicans control the Congress and White House. But the Dems are too blame?

You could also care less if approximately 800,000 people are freaking deported in March?

It's not a game. Donald says no DACA without his wall and that's not shady.
But this is?

What planet are you from? How many R's are in the Senate and how many votes required to pass a spending bill????
Where did I say ANYTHING about 800k anything, much less mention deportation????
DrafterX Offline
#223 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
They spread the lies to scare peoples... If you repeat the lies enough times people will believe them... It's from The Resistance playbook... Mellow
DrMaddVibe Offline
#224 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,424
dstieger wrote:
What planet are you from? How many R's are in the Senate and how many votes required to pass a spending bill????
Where did I say ANYTHING about 800k anything, much less mention deportation????



Blame it on the soap suds. He was washing cars yesterday while spouting statistic
Mumbo jumbo ...it made sense to him though!


It could be Fuzz. About as smart.
HuckFinn Offline
#225 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
dstieger wrote:
What planet are you from? How many R's are in the Senate and how many votes required to pass a spending bill????
Where did I say ANYTHING about 800k anything, much less mention deportation????

With any lucky, not your f***ing planet.
HuckFinn Offline
#226 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Blame it on the soap suds. He was washing cars yesterday while spouting statistic
Mumbo jumbo ...it made sense to him though!


It could be Fuzz. About as smart.

Go brush your hair Nancy
DrafterX Offline
#227 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Huck's losing it... Laugh
RMAN4443 Offline
#228 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
HuckFinn wrote:
Unlawful presence is neither a felony nor a misdemeanor, said Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. It is a civil infraction that results in removal and a bar on re-entry for a certain period of time.

Are you Martha Coakley from Mass.??Think She advocated your stance back in 2010......
https://legalinsurrection.com/2010/05/“technically-it-is-not-illegal-to-be-illegal-in-massachusetts”/

She was wrong then, and I think your wrong now.......illegal is illegal!!!Not talking
Phil222 Offline
#229 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
"If my parents rob a bank to give me a better life, shouldn't I get to keep the money?" <<< Not a great argument.

BUT sending away the "Dreamers" will cost our economy a couple hundred billion. Republicans won't do it and I wouldn't either. That is why Dems should've held out longer, but I guess they never miss a chance to bend the knee...Cool

Edit: "ending DACA — and deporting the workers who will no longer enjoy legal status — could reduce the size of the U.S. economy by anywhere from $280 billion to $430 billion over the next decade." -Cato Institute

Corporations don't want this ^^^. Both sides answer to corporations for the most part. DACA will stay.
DrafterX Offline
#230 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
If the illegals find a way to citizenship they should still have to pay a hefty fine.. apply those funds to da wall and you've got Mexicans paying for da wall... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#231 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
dstieger wrote:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325


That appears to indicate that it is only a civil crime and not subject to any criminal laws... maybe I'm reading it wrong but it lists this as a civil violation...

so everyone saying they're super illegal.... well, I think under existing law reckless driving is a harsher crime.
dstieger Offline
#232 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
victor809 wrote:
That appears to indicate that it is only a civil crime and not subject to any criminal laws... maybe I'm reading it wrong but it lists this as a civil violation...

so everyone saying they're super illegal.... well, I think under existing law reckless driving is a harsher crime.


Are you smoking the same stuff as Huck?
Civil crime is a CRIME against a person or people, no?
Criminal law violation is crime against the state in violation of written and duly passed laws....if I recall my HS civics after 40 years.

So violation of US Title Code (with specified lock-up time included in text of law) would be crime against the state, no?

Are you trying to equate illegally entering a foreign country with slander?

victor809 Offline
#233 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Hey... I'm still trying to figure it out. Prolly need one of the law type guys to tell us what this is.

I can't find any indication of felony or misdemeanor, just the definition as a civil crime... I don't even know who would be the plaintiff.
dstieger Offline
#234 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
TCBY...of course
DrafterX Offline
#235 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts
Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
(b) Improper time or place; civil penaltiesAny alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of—
(1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or
(2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection.
Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.
(c) Marriage fraud
Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000, or both.
(d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud
Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.

Film at 11... Mellow
HuckFinn Offline
#236 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
I've gotten fined for more than that for speeding.
victor809 Offline
#237 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Not a real insightful answer drafter. We all read that from the other link. You gonna provide any actual insight or just add "film at 11" and touch yourself repeatedly?
DrafterX Offline
#238 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I could give you someone's interpretation of the law or just make some chit up if you'd like... Or do you prefer I keep looking until I find a definition that suits your agenda..?? Mellow
delta1 Offline
#239 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
Here are the guidelines for classification of federal crimes. As in most states, crimes are classified by the punishment that is associated with it: one or more years in prison = felony; less than year in jail = misdemeanor; no jail time = infraction...in general...

(a)Classification.—An offense that is not specifically classified by a letter grade in the section defining it, is classified if the maximum term of imprisonment authorized is—
(1) life imprisonment, or if the maximum penalty is death, as a Class A felony;
(2) twenty-five years or more, as a Class B felony;
(3) less than twenty-five years but ten or more years, as a Class C felony;
(4) less than ten years but five or more years, as a Class D felony;
(5) less than five years but more than one year, as a Class E felony;
(6) one year or less but more than six months, as a Class A misdemeanor;
(7) six months or less but more than thirty days, as a Class B misdemeanor;
(8) thirty days or less but more than five days, as a Class C misdemeanor; or
(9) five days or less, or if no imprisonment is authorized, as an infraction.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3559


so immigration violations are generally infractions, the least serious sort of crime, as far as punishment, unless repetition is involved...

infractions in CA are mostly traffic violations, some minor MJ possessions crimes, trespassing, disturbing the peace, drunk and disorderly and minor shoplifting/theft
HuckFinn Offline
#240 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
I stole a chunky bar once in 5th grade. By the time the guilt wore off it melted in my pocket.
victor809 Offline
#241 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
No... there is a "not more than 6mo" jail time. So class b misdemeanor?
dstieger Offline
#242 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
delta, huck, vic.....

I'm perplexed....seems to be a lot of words/effort to suggest that sneaking into the country without permission is no big deal....is that your point?

If so, I seriously doubt that any sort of reasonable debate, or even conversation can result. There's such a fundamental difference between that sentiment and what I (and many here?) feel that we can't even begin any rational discussion.

I maintain that any sovereign nation (especially one as recognized by most other nations) has the right, if not the responsibility to manage the people allowed to enter....if you don't subscribe to that notion, I probably can't debate you
DrafterX Offline
#243 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Mexicans shoot Guatemalans on their southern border everyday... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#244 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Dstieg... a sovereign nation has the right to do whatever it wants. But if people are going to play the "they are all illegal and breaking the law" then it is important to define specifically what law has been broken and how serious a law it is.

If someone started yelling "illegal driver!" At everyone who sped down the street some may ask what the speed limit is and what the specific law says...
frankj1 Offline
#245 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
HuckFinn wrote:
I stole a chunky bar once in 5th grade. By the time the guilt wore off it melted in my pocket.

with or without raisins?
Phil222 Offline
#246 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
Is anyone else curious as to why being in this country illegally is equal to a parking violation? I wouldn't mind knowing the real answer to that question, but I already have my hypothesis.
DrafterX Offline
#247 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Thanks Obama..!! Mad
dstieger Offline
#248 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
victor809 wrote:
Dstieg... a sovereign nation has the right to do whatever it wants. But if people are going to play the "they are all illegal and breaking the law" then it is important to define specifically what law has been broken and how serious a law it is.

If someone started yelling "illegal driver!" At everyone who sped down the street some may ask what the speed limit is and what the specific law says...


and once you understand what the speed limit is...and you're issued a ticket, because you are, in fact, in violation of the law...do you pay the fine? Or, do you ask your elected representatives to simply let you off the hook....because....because what?

I still don't get it....if you cannot argue that someone here without legal permission to have entered the country is not in violation of some sort of statute or law...then how can we even converse?

Once we've established that there's an objective legal definition and someone is outside of it....then we have agreed that the 'undocumented' person is here illegally -- whether you're willing to actually say those words or not
banderl Offline
#249 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
frankj1 wrote:
with or without raisins?



Doesn't it have to have raisins to be a Chunky Bar?
victor809 Offline
#250 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Why do you think I won't say they are here "illegally"?
You realize that by having a fit over the word "illegal " being used you aren't any better than the people you whine about right?

Both terms "iillegal immigrant" and "undocumented immigrant" appear to be correct. I don't care which anyone uses. Your hangup over the word is your problem not mine.

I simply wanted to know exactly how serious a crime is it in the United States to be so evilly illegal. It appears to be a misdemeanor. That's an important thing to keep in mind when the basis of so many of the arguments against these people start with "OMG they are illegal!"
Users browsing this topic
Guest
8 Pages<12345678>