victor809 wrote:Lincoln's sexuality should be irrelevant, just as the sexuality of anyone should be.
lincoln was gay as a piece of trivia which others may or may not know...
This is my interest . . . the mere fact that it's so unknown. **REGARDLESS** of what I said in the beginning.
I do have my beliefs, but I really don't like the way you "debate". Talking to you victor, would be much more of a pleasant experience if you weren't such an ***hole. I'd love to debate or converse with you on a number of things . . . "What do you think about this?", and "I disagree ... I see it this way. I feel you're wrong, and this is why, Ok I can see how you might view it that way, but I see it like this. That kinda makes sense, but I don't believe so because . . . . . . (etc.)" But no . . . You really come across as a pompous ******. You have zero respect for people you disagree with. And in turn it is reflected upon you, as well. If you weren't such a jerk, then conversation would be much, much more fun. And possibly a *lot* more enlightening as well. Screaming at people is never a way to win friends, influences or arguments.
teedubbya wrote:and most likely jet's grandpappys babydaddy. or something like that... its the south. who knows?
I've actually got no direct bloodline for anyone that actively served in the Civil War. It's kind of a complicated thing for our family to trace. There are those in our family that served on the "home-guard", probably associated with "Joe Brown's Pets", but I haven't looked too much into their story as of yet.