America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by Speyside. 261 replies replies.
Poll Question : How will DACA die?
Choice Votes Statistics
It's not even gonna get a vote 12 70 %
Failure in the Senate 1 5 %
It'll pass the Senate and fail in the House 2 11 %
Agent Orange won't sign anything 1 5 %
Pass the Senate but die by an Agent Orange tweet 1 5 %
Total 17 100%

6 Pages<123456>
Fool me once shame on me... fool me twice well I won't be fooled again...
jetblasted Offline
#201 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
teedubbya wrote:
revisionist history is crap whether you like or agree with it or not.


Applause
DrMaddVibe Offline
#202 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,423
The fooling keeps happening and the DACA votes keep on tallying.


The irony.
tailgater Offline
#203 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
In summary:

Lincoln Mary'd Todd.


delta1 Offline
#204 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
and hunted vampires ... for sex...in his twilight...
HuckFinn Offline
#205 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
And was linkedin
jetblasted Offline
#206 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
I’ve (only recently) found it interesting learning that Lincoln was not the first gay President. James Buchanan was. Interesting, that America had back to back homosexual presidents. Buchanan’s VP, William R. king, was also his lover. He died of TB six weeks into office and was replaced by John C. Breckinridge, who later became a General with the Confederate States. Now, Breckenridge is one of the people I find more interesting in history. His (pricey) biographies are on my list. I’m really quite interested in him. He had quite a life.
tailgater Offline
#207 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
back to back homosexual presidents?
Is that some kind of bathhouse maneuver?
HuckFinn Offline
#208 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
The 69th president should be required to mouthwash hourly.
delta1 Offline
#209 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
Seriously...if Lincoln was gay... proves how strong homophobia in America has been and how we, as a society, are still struggling with it. This struggle continues because some of us accept the idea that some of the greatest among us are worthy of being discriminated against.
teedubbya Offline
#210 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
he wasn't gay. that's nonsense

If anyone was ghey it was Robert E lee
victor809 Offline
#211 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I heard the entire civil war was because of a lovers quarrel.... Lincoln had gone and dumped Lee for Sherman....

Well, any historian worth his salt knows how much Lee hated getting dumped by guys less attractive than him. That just threw him into a tizzy and he wouldn't stop swearing until he had whipped 10 of his slaves (this is documented in the personal diaries of his Pantaloons Squire I. M. McBottom)...

so Lee rallied the troops thinking if he got a few wins on the battlefield his twink lover Lincoln would come back to him. Of course, then Sherman was like "oh no you di'int" and decided to stand up to keep his man.

banderl Offline
#212 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
teedubbya wrote:
he wasn't gay. that's nonsense

If anyone was ghey it was Robert E lee



Sherman violated Lee at Appomattox.
And Lee begged for more.
teedubbya Offline
#213 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
banderl wrote:
Sherman violated Lee at Appomattox.
And Lee begged for more.



Well Lee did take it up the arse and complain about Sherman making his southern parts burn. But I still don't beleive it. Sherman was a man. Lee was a twink.
victor809 Offline
#214 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
Well Lee did take it up the arse and complain about Sherman making his southern parts burn. But I still don't beleive it. Sherman was a man. Lee was a twink.


Sherman was a leather daddy.
teedubbya Offline
#215 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
victor809 wrote:
Sherman was a leather daddy.


and most likely jet's grandpappys babydaddy

or something like that... its the south. who knows?
victor809 Offline
#216 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Well... its the south, so getting some northerner genetic material in there turned the family stick into an actual bush....
teedubbya Offline
#217 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
it also shortened up the fiveheads a bit
delta1 Offline
#218 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
ok...to finish the thought...

if Lincoln wasn't gay, then revisionist historians who disapprove of historical events and attempt to smear the historic figure by claiming his motivations were due to his "sexuality" are repulsive and should be reviled, not celebrated or offered as speakers of truth. They should be ignored, and their "work" relegated to the trash heap...and the person exhuming the drivel should be shamed.
HuckFinn Offline
#219 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Have you seen him? Who sober would wanna get with this mug?
victor809 Offline
#220 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
HuckFinn wrote:
Have you seen him? Who sober would wanna get with this mug?


to be fair, they didn't have grindr... I'm guessing the guys were stuck with anyone who they could find....
banderl Offline
#221 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
victor809 wrote:
to be fair, they didn't have grindr... I'm guessing the guys were stuck with anyone who they could find....



Poor CROS.
victor809 Offline
#222 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
delta1 wrote:
ok...to finish the thought...

if Lincoln wasn't gay, then revisionist historians who disapprove of historical events and attempt to smear the historic figure by claiming his motivations were due to his "sexuality" are repulsive and should be reviled, not celebrated or offered as speakers of truth. They should be ignored, and their "work" relegated to the trash heap...and the person exhuming the drivel should be shamed.


Meh.
Lincoln's sexuality should be irrelevant, just as the sexuality of anyone should be.

I look at people claiming lincoln was gay as falling into two groups... 1 - People saying lincoln was gay as a piece of trivia which others may or may not know... they are hopefully not making a judgement call, and therefore there's nothing really wrong with it... vs 2 - Someone trying to use his sexuality a a smear... that's obviously homophobic, simply because homosexuality isn't an insult, unless you believe there is something inherently wrong with it (ie, are a homophobe)...

Anyone trying to say that one's sexuality would dictate whether one is going to free slaves or not is using piss-poor logic. I'm sure there were plenty of gay southerners who loved the institution of slavery. Probably gave them easy access to some azz that wouldn't rat out their secrets.
teedubbya Offline
#223 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
delta1 wrote:
ok...to finish the thought...

if Lincoln wasn't gay, then revisionist historians who disapprove of historical events and attempt to smear the historic figure by claiming his motivations were due to his "sexuality" are repulsive and should be reviled, not celebrated or offered as speakers of truth. They should be ignored, and their "work" relegated to the trash heap...and the person exhuming the drivel should be shamed.



Actually I think it was a gay man saying a great american was gay for his own purposes
delta1 Offline
#224 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
c'mon...even then, feigning illness and throwing up was the "get out of horseface" card...
teedubbya Offline
#225 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
delta1 wrote:
c'mon...even then, feigning illness and throwing up was the "get out of horseface" card...



what does this have to do with sarah jessica parker?
victor809 Offline
#226 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
what does this have to do with sarah jessica parker?


Was Lincoln the Sarah Jessica Parker of the gay civil war era scene?
teedubbya Offline
#227 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard he was fabulous until Robert E lee stole his boyfriend
Kawak Offline
#228 Posted:
Joined: 11-26-2007
Posts: 4,025
The room is starting to spin from all the gayness...Cal I love you!
teedubbya Offline
#229 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Kawak wrote:
The room is starting to spin from all the gayness...Cal I love you!



we were just trying to get you interested again sally
delta1 Offline
#230 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
I heard Lee cussed Sherman out: "Damn you and the horse you rode in on!"
teedubbya Offline
#231 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
he rode in on SJP?
teedubbya Offline
#232 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
More likely Shannon Sharpe
banderl Offline
#233 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
teedubbya wrote:
More likely Shannon Sharpe



I hope that he didn't speak.
jetblasted Offline
#234 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
victor809 wrote:
Lincoln's sexuality should be irrelevant, just as the sexuality of anyone should be.
lincoln was gay as a piece of trivia which others may or may not know...


This is my interest . . . the mere fact that it's so unknown. **REGARDLESS** of what I said in the beginning.

I do have my beliefs, but I really don't like the way you "debate". Talking to you victor, would be much more of a pleasant experience if you weren't such an ***hole. I'd love to debate or converse with you on a number of things . . . "What do you think about this?", and "I disagree ... I see it this way. I feel you're wrong, and this is why, Ok I can see how you might view it that way, but I see it like this. That kinda makes sense, but I don't believe so because . . . . . . (etc.)" But no . . . You really come across as a pompous ******. You have zero respect for people you disagree with. And in turn it is reflected upon you, as well. If you weren't such a jerk, then conversation would be much, much more fun. And possibly a *lot* more enlightening as well. Screaming at people is never a way to win friends, influences or arguments.

teedubbya wrote:
and most likely jet's grandpappys babydaddy. or something like that... its the south. who knows?


I've actually got no direct bloodline for anyone that actively served in the Civil War. It's kind of a complicated thing for our family to trace. There are those in our family that served on the "home-guard", probably associated with "Joe Brown's Pets", but I haven't looked too much into their story as of yet.
teedubbya Offline
#235 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I’ve got direct descendants that fough in the war. On both sides. It got pretty ugly between two of them.
HuckFinn Offline
#236 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Jet? If you really dislike vics manner why bait him that way?
You sure you don't actually enjoy mixing it up with him?
You have to know he's gonna try and bite your head off for a comment like that.
Right?
teedubbya Offline
#237 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
235 - my adoptive family that is
teedubbya Offline
#238 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And for the record Victor rarely types in all caps.

HuckFinn Offline
#239 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
teedubbya wrote:
235 - my adoptive family that is

How were they related?
teedubbya Offline
#240 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Brothers in one instance. The ugly instance (same battle against each other) first cousins.
HuckFinn Offline
#241 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
teedubbya wrote:
Brothers in one instance. The ugly instance (same battle against each other) first cousins.

Wow.
victor809 Offline
#242 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
This place has always been ugly.
Most don't remember, or don't think about it because they weren't the recipients of the ugly.

When I first got here I had to argue with morons that I actually existed, and wasn't a fake name of another poster (adroomi) who I shared some views with. I patiently tried to explain to them that I existed, even provided way more information to prove my existence than I really should have bothered. I was stupidly polite, but didn't know better.

Over the years I ran into a huge number of posters who have been ridiculously reductive in their arguments (don't want laws based on the christian bible? you must be a liberal!) and for years I dealt with them in a respectful manner. I argued with them point for point in a way that attempted to show respect for their stupid positions.

About the time I got into pages long arguments with jpotts, who tried to change the basic transitive property of algebra to support his point (and refused to acknowledge the incorrect math), I stopped giving a f$$k. I'm not going to spend hours trying to share ideas with someone if they are unwilling to accept the basic principles of math as a foundation for a discussion.


Now... if you say something stupid, I'm simply going to state that. I'm not mad. I'm usually just disappointed that people still have the poor logic skills they display today. That and amused at mocking them.... I dunno if the germans have a word for "disappointed and amused at the same time".... probably something like matterfarker....
frankj1 Offline
#243 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
teedubbya wrote:
I’ve got direct descendants that fough in the war. On both sides. It got pretty ugly between two of them.

there are fine people on both sides
frankj1 Offline
#244 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
victor809 wrote:
This place has always been ugly.
Most don't remember, or don't think about it because they weren't the recipients of the ugly.

When I first got here I had to argue with morons that I actually existed, and wasn't a fake name of another poster (adroomi) who I shared some views with. I patiently tried to explain to them that I existed, even provided way more information to prove my existence than I really should have bothered. I was stupidly polite, but didn't know better.

Over the years I ran into a huge number of posters who have been ridiculously reductive in their arguments (don't want laws based on the christian bible? you must be a liberal!) and for years I dealt with them in a respectful manner. I argued with them point for point in a way that attempted to show respect for their stupid positions.

About the time I got into pages long arguments with jpotts, who tried to change the basic transitive property of algebra to support his point (and refused to acknowledge the incorrect math), I stopped giving a f$$k. I'm not going to spend hours trying to share ideas with someone if they are unwilling to accept the basic principles of math as a foundation for a discussion.


Now... if you say something stupid, I'm simply going to state that. I'm not mad. I'm usually just disappointed that people still have the poor logic skills they display today. That and amused at mocking them.... I dunno if the germans have a word for "disappointed and amused at the same time".... probably something like matterfarker....

wait...so you're NOT Adroomi?
Or you are?

whatever happened to your brothers Victor808 and the other one? Do you still hear from them?

Stoopid people suck.
teedubbya Offline
#245 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
They were all a holes
tailgater Offline
#246 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
banderl wrote:
I hope that he didn't speak.


See that?

Common ground!

tailgater Offline
#247 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
This place has always been ugly.
Most don't remember, or don't think about it because they weren't the recipients of the ugly.

When I first got here I had to argue with morons that I actually existed, and wasn't a fake name of another poster (adroomi) who I shared some views with. I patiently tried to explain to them that I existed, even provided way more information to prove my existence than I really should have bothered. I was stupidly polite, but didn't know better.

Over the years I ran into a huge number of posters who have been ridiculously reductive in their arguments (don't want laws based on the christian bible? you must be a liberal!) and for years I dealt with them in a respectful manner. I argued with them point for point in a way that attempted to show respect for their stupid positions.

About the time I got into pages long arguments with jpotts, who tried to change the basic transitive property of algebra to support his point (and refused to acknowledge the incorrect math), I stopped giving a f$$k. I'm not going to spend hours trying to share ideas with someone if they are unwilling to accept the basic principles of math as a foundation for a discussion.


Now... if you say something stupid, I'm simply going to state that. I'm not mad. I'm usually just disappointed that people still have the poor logic skills they display today. That and amused at mocking them.... I dunno if the germans have a word for "disappointed and amused at the same time".... probably something like matterfarker....


I hear the Germans are remorsefully guiltless about that.

HuckFinn Offline
#248 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
victor809 wrote:

I'm not going to spend hours trying to share ideas with someone if they are unwilling to accept the basic principles of math as a foundation for a discussion.

“The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.”
― Isaac Asimov
frankj1 Offline
#249 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
victor809 wrote:
The democrats are fools.

Whether one cares about DACA or not, you have to agree this is pure stupid by the dems.

Assuming they actually wanted to pass a DACA extension before it expires in March, with the knowledge that the orange f$$tard has already torpedoed a bill to extend it which was supported by both dems and reps... they were idiots to accept a "pinky swear" from McConnel. He didn't even promise anything more that "we'll look at it".

Who wants to take bets on how the DACA program will be torpedoed?

Think the Senate won't pass anything?
Think something will pass the Senate but not the House?
Think a joint bill will make it to El Presidente F#$$tard and he'll veto it?
Some combination of the above BS?

couldn't vote, cuz I don't think it will die.
HuckFinn Offline
#250 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
victor809 wrote:

.... I dunno if the germans have a word for "disappointed and amused at the same time"


weltschmerz comes close
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages<123456>