shaun341 wrote:Those are all irrelevant for the obvious reason. You do not know the winner and if they are a noob or not. Also, that is not a betting pool where you have no control over who wins. Those arguments are all one on one interactions with controlled situations. This is gambling whether you like it or not and you don't get a say on how the person gets to enjoy their winnings.
Shaun... I can't argue with you, you're statements are invalid... you keep trying to compare apples to oranges, and when I throw equivalent arguments you claim that they are not.
If you don't have the capacity to understand what I'm saying and the context in which it's said, then there's nothing else I can really say to you.
Again... I never claimed I had a say in what you do with your squares, but you keep insinuating it after I repeatedly tell you I'm not.
shaun341 wrote:
Ben, I would not have thought you such the snob that the idea of a cigar considered more then an everyday going to someone you don't know as a problem. As a matter of fact there are plenty of cigars that I probably won't smoke and get if I won a quarter. Maybe I'll just throw them away without lighting them, so maybe I shouldn't be considered for this pool of chance.
Seriously? That whole paragraph is laughable. Well, if you hit a square and I have to send to you, then I hope you throw all the cigars away out of spite, that'll fix me... rofl, dumb af.
shaun341 wrote:
You can disagree all you want but you are wrong in your thinking on this one, and come of a little snobbish and unappreciative of what a charity is supposed to be all about.
I'm rarely wrong, and am certainly not wrong here. Here, let me sum it up for you:
You're basically arguing that it's ok to throw your money in the toilet if you want to.
I'm arguing it's ok for you to do just that, but I reserve the right to call you a dumb azz for doing it.
It's a moot point anyway because now I know the process it's not even a a thing... But now you're just arguing with me on hypotheticals.