America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by frankj1. 21 replies replies.
SO CLOSE!!!!
ZRX1200 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,589
Oh TB12......go drink some avacodo milkshakes.
27628931_2124391487579682_4582010522391795962_o.jpg
jespear Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2004
Posts: 9,464
LOVE IT, Jamie.
And the wimp didn't even have the courtesy, as is tradtion in the NFL, to walk across the field to congratulate Foles.
As soon as the game ended, he hustled his sore loser a$$ right into the locker room.
Classy, Tom . . . just fuggin' classy !
DrMaddVibe Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,409
Lol...why at least a back up Eagles QB can catch a td pass!
Speyside Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
LMAO!
bgz Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
lol
MACS Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,770
He didn't find Nick and shake his hand?

Wow. If that's true... it's a damn shame.
Palama Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,667
MACS wrote:
He didn't find Nick and shake his hand?

Wow. If that's true... it's a damn shame.


We showed Smooth Fox Terriers when I was growing up and one of my Dad's sayings was "Humble in victory, gracious in defeat." I had a pretty good dog but lost 3 times to a better dog in the Best in Show. Nonetheless, no matter how disappointed I was, I *always* shook the winning handler's hand. For Tom to run to the locker room without congratulating Foles or Peterson is pretty bad...at least in my book.
ZRX1200 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,589
I think it was due to Foles not being as sexy to Tom as Aaron Rodgers.
MACS Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,770
I agree with you, Conan. I did not watch the ending or the presentation, so I didn't see what happened.
bgz Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Brady shook hands with a few people, doubt he did it on purpose.
frankj1 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
bgz wrote:
Brady shook hands with a few people, doubt he did it on purpose.

well, I didn't wanna say but...of course.
Haven't heard first hand, but did hear a report that TB12 gave glowing compliments to the victors later...

how will that get twisted into hatred?
MACS Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,770
bgz wrote:
Brady shook hands with a few people, doubt he did it on purpose.


I did say IF it was true, and I also said I did not watch the ending. BUT - it's common practice for the coaches and QB's of both teams to meet and shake hands after the game, right?
frankj1 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
just finished watching the fast version of the game on NFL network.

Belichick made his way across the field but not like in a sprint, lots of people all over the place on the field, confetti flying...a couple of camera shots caught Foles hugging coaches, then a player or two, all of this on their sideline.

Never saw any mix of white and green jerseys that you'd normally see at midfield after a regular game, way too much hoopla going on and security all over the place, who knows if security impeded movement...and then a shot of Brady trotting off the field with Gronk and other Pats...but it was after a while, not right away.

I have no idea how Philly fans have determined sulking classless Brady refused to congratulate Foles. No one could tell from the game film if it was even possible to make it happen.

That said, if Brady did snub Foles intentionally, that goes against everything I learned and believe in from sports competition.

If not true, then Philly fans being unhappy when they win...God bless 'em.
ZRX1200 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,589
I don't really care if he did or didn't, they lost. Superbowls are always a big mess at the conclusion.....I think Bill did right by sitting Butler, don't know how he didn't play him on at least 3rd down in the 2nday half.
jespear Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2004
Posts: 9,464
frankj1 wrote:
well, I didn't wanna say but...of course.
Haven't heard first hand, but did hear a report that TB12 gave glowing compliments to the victors later...

how will that get twisted into hatred?


Haters gonna hate !Flapper
frankj1 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
jespear wrote:
Haters gonna hate !Flapper

hey, if I could be (I can't) neutral, I'd consider it one of the best Super Bowls evah...

I'd say stuff like:

Philly fans should be delirious for weeks, maybe months. Especially since the win was legit, they had a much more difficult road to get there than the Pats, and they even had to make a comeback in the fourth, and then hold on twice to seal the deal.

But I'm not neutral, so...
jespear Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2004
Posts: 9,464
frankj1 wrote:
hey, if I could be (I can't) neutral, I'd consider it one of the best Super Bowls evah...

I'd say stuff like:

Philly fans should be delirious for weeks, maybe months. Especially since the win was legit, they had a much more difficult road to get there than the Pats, and they even had to make a comeback in the fourth, and then hold on twice to seal the deal.

But I'm not neutral, so...


I think I may have posted this elsewhere, but . . .

For football fans who "didn't have a horse in the race", it WAS an exciting fun game to watch. Possibly, from an entertainment aspect, the best SB evah, BUT for EAGLES and PATRIOTS fans, it was nerve racking and gut wrenching.
I'll have to admit, before the game, as confident as I was in an Eagles victory, the last few minutes had me more than slightly worried. I KNEW just what Brady and the Pats were capable of, and I found myself thinking . . . OH No, here we go again.
If not for a timely forced fumble by my boy Brandon Graham . . . who knows ?
cacman Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
Can you say "Lollygagger"
frankj1 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
cacman wrote:
Can you say "Lollygagger"

every time I try it comes out Rapelesberger
delta1 Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,782
hehe...at 40, he's lost a step...woulda had it last year or the year before...
frankj1 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
even when young was not particularly athletic or swift
Users browsing this topic
Guest