America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by Speyside. 103 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
OxyContin maker cuts sales staff, won't hawk drug to docs
teedubbya Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Here is a tip of the spear but there are better in the pipeline. This is just single dose ER but you get the picture. There are admittedly issues with the study and it is not a be all end all.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2661581

I do think it suggests what further studies will tell us, and what many Drs. already know. The assumption that opioids are somehow unrivaled for pain is something worthy of questioning excluding the side effects and dangers. Add in the side effects and dangers and maybe it's worth rethinking the preconditioned mindset we have about them and pain. They just might not do what you think, or at least as well as you think.

I am biased too, given my previous projects and seeing doctors and patients so convinced a drug did what it doesn't and screaming like chimps when you try to take it away. Now no one misses it. It did nothing but damage.
gummy jones Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
In acute and post surgical pain of significant intensity they are unrivaled by any other medications.

But they are certainly over used in many instances where nsaids, etc would do.
teedubbya Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
In acute and post surgical pain of significant intensity they are unrivaled by any other medications.

But they are certainly over used in many instances where nsaids, etc would do.



You do not know this. You think this. There are other classes that can be better. Even if correct, it is worth thinking about and considering. Just proclaiming it does not make it true. There are many examples of this sort of truth that later is proven untrue. Don't accept this as truth. Question it. But certainly we need further study.

But IV opiod use (or even oral) in hospitals following surgery are hardly the priority in this epidemic. Until we know more, I'm not saying this is not legitimate use. End of life as well.
teedubbya Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The mindset that opioids do what they may not do is a tough one for medical professionals to fight against.
gummy jones Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
teedubbya wrote:
You do not know this. You think this. There are other classes that can be better. Even if correct, it is worth thinking about and considering. Just proclaiming it does not make it true. There are many examples of this sort of truth that later is proven untrue. Don't accept this as truth. Question it.

But IV opiod use in hospitals following surgery are hardly the priority in this epidemic.


I do know this.

Everything else is an adjunct in true severe pain.

The problem with your study is it is hamstrung by our inability to actually measure pain. No one goes to the ed for pain and says "it's a 3/10." 7-10/10 is the overwhelming answer. I agree that most of them are probably 2-5/10 and would do best with Tylenol and anti inflammatories but for true 8+/10 opiates (unfortunately) are king by a long shot.

They are crappy medications overall and used way too much. Patients, docs, society, pharmaceutical companies and the government are complicit in the current epidemic.

gummy jones Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Also lets be careful to not jump around too much. If we are talking about opiate effectiveness in various situations it is one thing but if we are talking about the epidemic it is another. Tw it seems like you are bouncing back and forth.
teedubbya Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
I do know this.

Everything else is an adjunct in true severe pain.

The problem with your study is it is hamstrung by our inability to actually measure pain. No one goes to the ed for pain and says "it's a 3/10." 7-10/10 is the overwhelming answer. I agree that most of them are probably 2-5/10 and would do best with Tylenol and anti inflammatories but for true 8+/10 opiates (unfortunately) are king by a long shot.

They are crappy medications overall and used way too much. Patients, docs, society, pharmaceutical companies and the government are complicit in the current epidemic.




You do not know this. Opioids very well may not do what you think. We are finding this out more and more. We are conditioned to think they do.

There are more studies coming. I am not suggesting I know the outcome yet. I am suggesting neither do you. You do not know this. Its faulty logic to think you do.

And yes, this study is not the be all end all and does have issues. I said as much. But it does suggest future study, and does suggest what we think we know may not be true.

gummy jones Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
I know exactly what they do psychologically and physicologically in the short and long term. I know the research inside and out. You assume you are the only one with expertise far too often.
teedubbya Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
Also lets be careful to not jump around too much. If we are talking about opiate effectiveness in various situations it is one thing but if we are talking about the epidemic it is another. Tw it seems like you are bouncing back and forth.



Dude, I work on this issue (the opiod epidemic) every day and it's not a new issue for me. I've been working on it for years in some way shape or form. I am not jumping around, it is a multifaceted issue.

I am suggesting opioid efficacy should be challenged as a whole.
teedubbya Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
I know exactly what they do psychologically and physicologically in the short and long term. I know the research inside and out. You assume you are the only one with expertise far too often.



I am not the only one with expertise.... and I am admitting I do not know the answer. You are the one proclaiming efficacy. I am saying not so fast. The data is starting to suggest otherwise.

I'm also not suggesting discontinuation until we know that for sure like we did Propoxyphene (which I consider a win). Oxy is one I think will disappear for the same reason. It has no value. I'll bet you a dollah it disappears into the slag heap of unnecessary medications.



At any rate.... the use has to be scaled back considerably in hospitals and outpatient settings. The mindset of their value and efficacy is certainly over valued by many folks. And I will push back on that every time. They are not unrivaled.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
My truthful, rear-view belief about my experience with opioids and morphine are that they really did nothing about the actual pain... it was still very much there and i was still vey much aware of it....

when i was on a morphine drip in the hospital i had a clicker and i hit that thing an absurd amount of unauthorized times... i think the nurse in the morning said something like 350 times... And it wasn't because the pain was unbearable... it was because feeling high while i was in pain was way more enjoyable than just feeling the pain...
teedubbya Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
By the way I have my issues with NSAIDs as well.
gummy jones Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
#59 many people work in this issue. Some in greater capacities than others.

#60 I'm not sure what you are asking. The data is 100 percent clear but the waters are muddy for many other reasons.

I agree, get rid of oxycontin and take the rest of them as well aside for very specific indications and for limited duration.
gummy jones Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
#62 I'll take the issues caused by nsaids over those from any narcotic any day of the week.
teedubbya Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
My truthful, rear-view belief about my experience with opioids and morphine are that they really did nothing about the actual pain... it was still very much there and i was still vey much aware of it....

when i was on a morphine drip in the hospital i had a clicker and i hit that thing an absurd amount of unauthorized times... i think the nurse in the morning said something like 350 times... And it wasn't because the pain was unbearable... it was because feeling high while i was in pain was way more enjoyable than just feeling the pain...



Opel, that's all I'm saying. I've been looking at some studies and data that are in the works that suggest what we think opioids do for pain, they indeed do not. It's a big stay tunes, but I don't think we will have to wait that long.
gummy jones Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Go deeper tw. What is pain? In many instances it isn't what we think it is. That is where the frontier is.
teedubbya Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy the data is not 100% clear and in fact is starting to show the opposite of what you are saying. and yes there are other things that muddy the water.


I will say it again clearly. Opioids may very well not be effective for pain, or at least as effective as you think. I say may, because it's still being studied. If I had to choose what I believe the answer is I would say they are NOT effective. But I can't say that for sure at this point. It's fighting dogma but more and more are realizing they may be (I think are) innefective regardless of the downside.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
They also made my pepe and plumbing hurt... i thought i was having bladder cancer issues it got so bad... my sister - quite awkwardly - was the one who told me the same thing happened to her husband... he quit oxy, those symptoms all went away...
teedubbya Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
Go deeper tw. What is pain? In many instances it isn't what we think it is. That is where the frontier is.



I agree there and am heavily involved in that area. Me and my contractors are working on better ways to measure and assess pain let alone how to address it.

There is very definitely a physical as well as mental component. There are also lots of strategies from mental (midfulness, meditation etc), to physical (electrical and all sorts of voodoo LOL), to medicines (opiods, comas etc.). I'm interested in some of the physical brain approaches as well from surgery to using your mind to change the physical structure of the brain (something we believed impossible a decade or two ago... it was proclaimed a truth that it could not happen at the time)

Its a complicated subject, but opioids days are numbered as a whole I believe. I don't mean never, I mean rarely. It is difficult because many over value their usefulness.
teedubbya Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
They also made my pepe and plumbing hurt... i thought i was having bladder cancer issues it got so bad... my sister - quite awkwardly - was the one who told me the same thing happened to her husband... he quit oxy, those symptoms all went away...



MY FIL took fentanil (A drug I suspect has no value), oxy, percocet, etc. for chronic back pain for years. He got really weird for awhile. He also had epidurals etc.

He's backed off most everything (certainly the fentanil) but still takes some things, I'm not sure what.

They did little to nothing for the pain (although I guess they made him near comatose at times) but sure effed him up. He is part of the epidemic but not one of the group macs identifies. He uses no more than prescribed.
gummy jones Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
If you break your leg and have truly excruciating pain the only way to alleviate it is an opiate or a nerve block. Period. Even a general anesthetic needs supplemented with an opiate to return vitals to baseline when the person is unconscious. Opiates are easier to administer than nerve blocks. If you disagree with that you don't have the expertise to continue this conversation.

Once again, if we are just talking about "pain" Huffington post headline style ill agree that opiates are the wrong answer for many of the questions but defining the terms and measuring variables is hard bordering on impossible.

We know how they work (mostly) and are slowly learning more about pain. Unfortunately opiates are active pretty much every where in the body, doing way more than alleviating pain (hence my assertion in this thread they are dirty medications).

Their days should be numbered but there is no great alternative yet - at least not for all cases. Their risks (small window aside) out weigh their benefits.

Minimally or non invasive pain measuring and modulation is the future.
gummy jones Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
#70 is 100 percent correct (aside for fentanyl having "no value"). Hopefully he gets off of everything.
gummy jones Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Crazy how little we talk about cigars on a cigar forum.
teedubbya Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
If you break your leg and have truly excruciating pain the only way to alleviate it is an opiate or a nerve block. Period. Even a general anesthetic needs supplemented with an opiate to return vitals to baseline when the person is unconscious. Opiates are easier to administer than nerve blocks. If you disagree with that you don't have the expertise to continue this conversation.

Once again, if we are just talking about "pain" Huffington post headline style ill agree that opiates are the wrong answer for many of the questions but defining the terms and measuring variables is hard bordering on impossible.

We know how they work (mostly) and are slowly learning more about pain. Unfortunately opiates are active pretty much every where in the body, doing way more than alleviating pain (hence my assertion in this thread they are dirty medications).

Their days should be numbered but there is no great alternative yet - at least not for all cases. Their risks (small window aside) out weigh their benefits.

Minimally or non invasive pain measuring and modulation is the future.



I know I am coming off as argumentative and for that I apologize. I get where you are coming from and am not going to argue your limited scenario or it's context within the opiod epidemic. I'm certainly not going to argue about my expertise or ability to continue this conversation.

I don't understand the huffington post comments, which have nothing to do with my work or how we are approaching it *scratching my head*. Maybe we are comming at this from different thought streams.

You are right, it is hard. That's why I enjoy and am challenged by it. We are truly looking for better ways to measure and address. I'm not sure what the huffington post is doing.

I also said rarely not never pretty clearly.

I started where you are at. I get it. We have overestimated the efficacy and value of opiods. They are not unrivaled and we need to get past that. For the time being they may have some limited uses but you are correct, those days are numbered too.
teedubbya Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
Crazy how little we talk about cigars on a cigar forum.



meh. it's all good.

If this site carried good cigars maybe we'd talk about them more LOL

and I do suspect (not know at this point) that fentanil has little or no value.
gummy jones Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
It has value.

Relatively high lipid solubility with fast onset and short duration, coupled with little to no histamine release or true allergies gives it a role in some settings.
teedubbya Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
It has value.

Relatively high lipid solubility with fast onset and short duration, coupled with little to no histamine release or true allergies gives it a role in some settings.



We will see. I think it has very little value. Maybe very little is better than no.
gummy jones Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
#74 "limited scenario?"

Lol.

That is the idealized opiate scenario. Everything else is something else and skirts true indications.

"Huffington post" comment was tongue in cheek referring to societies and media's (and parts of this thread) tendency to not define terms and make huge generalities one way or another.
teedubbya Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
#74 "limited scenario?"

Lol.

That is the idealized opiate scenario. Everything else is something else and skirts true indications.

"Huffington post" comment was tongue in cheek referring to societies and media's (and parts of this thread) tendency to not define terms and make huge generalities one way or another.



It is a very limited scenario. Opioid use should be a very limited scenario. I suspect we are both talking past each other a bit.

I get the generalities thing. I can assure you that's not where I come from.
gummy jones Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Maybe limited based on your knowledge, training or exposure (or lack thereof) but that is why opiates exist. They have grown into something way bigger and more grotesque and dangerous.
teedubbya Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
Maybe limited based on your knowledge, training or exposure (or lack thereof) but that is why opiates exist. They have grown into something way bigger and more grotesque and dangerous.



Ok. You don't get what I am saying which is cool. And if that's what you think about my knowledge, training and exposure I'm fine with that as well.

carry on. LOL
gummy jones Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
#79 I see you reworded that. I agree with what you say in the updated text.
gummy jones Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
I get what you are saying now after you edited your post. My response was before your edit.

Let's at least be logically honest here.
teedubbya Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'm not sure what I reworded (ie it wasn't intentional or based on anything you posted following....which I had not read) but my thought process is the same. I don't know what you are saying about logically honest, but it doesn't matter.
gummy jones Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
What do I know. I'm just some guy who is paid to sweep the floor and sometimes takes a break to argue on the internet.
teedubbya Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
when I say we are talking past each other, I think we are both saying their use should be extremely limited. On that we agree.
gummy jones Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
We probably agree 99.999 percent.

I just think we differ in our training and exposure.
gummy jones Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
And you have decided to never lose an argument. Even if there isn't one to be had.

But I have poked you with that sentiment many times over.

Perhaps I also enjoy arguing?
cacman Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
I'd suggest looking at Kratom as a natural alternative for pain since it has shown to act in a similar fashion to opiods, But the FDA and guberment have waged a war on it since it has a "high likelihood for abuse", and stopped all research on whether it has any medicinal value. Just like MJ and the b*ll**** "reefer madness" propaganda.

But hey, opiods are cheap and easy to get. Needles are free. And if you do happen to overdose don't worry because Narcan is also free. It saves lives.
teedubbya Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy jones wrote:
What do I know. I'm just some guy who is paid to sweep the floor and sometimes takes a break to argue on the internet.



I don't question your expertise or knowledge, and am not really sure why you question mine. That's the beauty of it. The answer is unknown at this time. That is sort of my point. Question what you think you know. The worst that happens is you find out you are right. You may find out you are wrong which is a good thing in this case.


I honestly believe (based on some data I've seen and am working on, combined with some recent studies and work with some experts addressing this epidemic) that opioids efficacy on pain is extremely overstated and in some instances (more than we know) null. Maybe I will be proven wrong, but it's not looking that way at the moment.

I'm not an absolute person though. Placebos can be highly effective on pain at times which I think is part of your poiont on defining pain.
gummy jones Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Lol cac jumps into an "opiates are bad" conversation to suggest taking an opiate as a substitute.

cacman Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
Obviously you missed the parts where it "acts similar to an opiod" and "no further research being done".
gummy jones Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
#90 doesn't matter if you believe it or not, what you say in your second paragraph is 100 percent correct

But you forgot to add that you have a skinny wiener ;)
gummy jones Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Trust me cac, i didn't miss anything
teedubbya Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
gummy I do like to argue but don't mind losing if it gains me knowledge. As I said I started with the premise that opiods are effective (maybe even unrivaled) in fighting or covering pain. I have morphed based on the argument.


but as for arguing as a whole, my dad taught me to like it. We used to argue like cats and dogs (except using english and stuff) and then he would make me argue his point and he would argue mine. His way of making sure I was listening and making sure I knew he was. There is no such thing as losing an argument if you were wrong in the first place. Losing would mean winning no?


tailgater Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
gummy jones wrote:
#62 I'll take the issues caused by nsaids over those from any narcotic any day of the week.


In general?
Because Nsaids can kill me.
Curious what's worse than that?

gummy jones Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
You are not everyone

teedubbya Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
In general?
Because Nsaids can kill me.
Curious what's worse than that?




Waking up to find Hillary really did win.



and my weiner is not skinny.... its short
tailgater Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
gummy jones wrote:
You are not everyone



You'd be surprised.





Speyside Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
So he is no one?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>