America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by delta1. 70 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Racist Massholes.
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
ZRX1200 Offline
#1 Posted: Sat, Apr 28 2018, 7:53 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
A Massachusetts Senate candidate filed a federal lawsuit Sunday after city officials told him to take down signs calling Sen. Elizabeth Warren a “fake Indian.”

The candidate, Shiva Ayyadurai, accused the city of free speech violations after being told to take down the signs showing Warren in a Native American headdress with the words “Only a REAL INDIAN Can Defeat the Fake Indian,” emblazoned on them, the Washington Times reported.

Warren has previously claimed Native American heritage in her past. She has claimed Cherokee ancestry, citing family lore, while being a professor at Harvard Law School.


President Trump has referred to Warren as “Pocahontas” on several occasions.


The two signs have been seen on Ayyadurais’ campaign bus since March 17 in a parking lot in front of an office building owned by Ayyadurai.


Cambridge building inspector Branden Vigneault told the Washington Times he received a number of complaints about the signs. Vigneault added that an inspection of the signs determined that they were posted “without approvals and permits,” and violated the city zoning ordinance.

If the signs are not removed, Ayyudarai faces fines up to $300 dollars per day and potential legal action, according to Vigneault.

Ayyudarai claims the signs are not subject to the city’s building code because they are placed on a bus and not on a building. He also claims that he has displayed other messages similarly for more than a year but has never had complaints from the city.


“They didn’t say anything when we had the first sign,” he said. “It was only when we put, ‘Only a real Indian can defeat the fake Indian,’ so it’s clearly trying to censor speech.”

“We will not remove the slogan from our bus,”Ayyadurai told the Washington Times. “We will defend the First Amendment, and we will fight this egregious attack on the First Amendment, at any cost.”
tailgater Offline
#2 Posted: Sat, Apr 28 2018, 8:12 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
She smokem big pipe.
MACS Offline
#3 Posted: Sat, Apr 28 2018, 10:04 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
tailgater wrote:
She smokem big pipe.



Huh. She looks like Janet Reno's twin brother... I figured she liked the clam, not the sausage.
rfenst Offline
#4 Posted: Sat, Apr 28 2018, 10:19 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,251
ZRX1200 wrote:
...

Cambridge building inspector Branden Vigneault told the Washington Times he received a number of complaints about the signs. Vigneault added that an inspection of the signs determined that they were posted “without approvals and permits,” and violated the city zoning ordinance.
...

Ayyudarai claims the signs are not subject to the city’s building code because they are placed on a bus and not on a building. He also claims that he has displayed other messages similarly for more than a year but has never had complaints from the city.


Well, what does the building code say?
ZRX1200 Offline
#5 Posted: Sat, Apr 28 2018, 10:20 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
It says "Brown people need not apply, if they're Republicans"
bgz Offline
#6 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 8:43 AM EST
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Any time whitey claims to be a Cherokee, we laugh and move on.


Oh, and any time a whitey tells us they're Indian, we guess Cherokee, then they say "how did you know?"... then we laugh and move on.
frankj1 Offline
#7 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 10:02 AM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
sign sign everywhere a sign...
tailgater Offline
#8 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 10:39 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
sign sign everywhere a sign...

5 man electrical band or Tesla?
tailgater Offline
#9 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 10:51 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
bgz wrote:
Any time whitey claims to be a Cherokee, we laugh and move on.


Oh, and any time a whitey tells us they're Indian, we guess Cherokee, then they say "how did you know?"... then we laugh and move on.


I always assume Wompanoag.
People of the first light.
Heir apparent to our newest casino.
All is good.
Ha Ha Ha.

As for chief Lie-a-watha?
The issue isn't that she mentioned some Cherokee blood.
It's that she used that unproven claim to advance in her field.

She's nothing more than a vile obstructionist with a shrill squeal.
RMAN4443 Offline
#10 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 11:30 AM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Faux ca haunt us
HuckFinn Offline
#11 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 11:54 AM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
frankj1 wrote:
sign sign everywhere a sign...

Acme?
HuckFinn Offline
#12 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 11:57 AM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
tailgater wrote:

She's nothing more than a vile obstructionist with a shrill squeal.


Project much?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#13 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 12:31 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
tailgater wrote:
I always assume Wompanoag.
People of the first light.
Heir apparent to our newest casino.
All is good.
Ha Ha Ha.

As for chief Lie-a-watha?
The issue isn't that she mentioned some Cherokee blood.
It's that she used that unproven claim to advance in her field.

She's nothing more than a vile obstructionist with a shrill squeal.





Damn TG...I had tears streaming down my face when I read that. I immediately recalled this...

http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/19/flashback-elizabeth-warren-plagiarized-cherokee-cookbook-to-prove-ethnicity/

and this...

https://elizabethwarrenwiki.org/elizabeth-warren-native-american-cherokee-controversy/

and this...

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/is-elizabeth-warren-native-american-or-what/257415/


I laugh every time...especially on this!

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/03/11/elizabeth-warren-no-wont-take-dna-test/


Because she's full of schyt!

Pow-Wow-Chow? Anyone hungry for crab? Did the 1800's Cherokee Nation have it flown in fresh? I LOL every time.

WORSHIP HER! BAWHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!!

She's the Vanilla Clinton!!!
HuckFinn Offline
#14 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 12:56 PM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044


Genealogists have traced Warren's Native American heritage to the late 19th century. She is 1/32 Native American.


"As a kid, I never asked my mom for documentation when she talked about our Native American heritage. What kid would? But I knew my father's family didn't like that she was part Cherokee and part Delaware, so my parents had to elope," she said.

But hey, LOCK HER UP!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#15 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 1:01 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
HuckFinn wrote:
Genealogists have traced Warren's Native American heritage to the late 19th century. She is 1/32 Native American.


"As a kid, I never asked my mom for documentation when she talked about our Native American heritage. What kid would? But I knew my father's family didn't like that she was part Cherokee and part Delaware, so my parents had to elope," she said.

But hey, LOCK HER UP!




OH NOES!!!


We gots us a Warren water carrier!

This is gonna be great! I can't wait for some PI to pay to have DNA they got out of her trash or some restaurant tested and find out she's...well...let's say Harvard will be red faced!!!!!

whip whip whip
tailgater Offline
#16 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 1:09 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
HuckFinn wrote:
Project much?


Perhaps.
But seeing that I'm neither an obstructionist (by any definition) nor shrill (except in the throes of passion) I can't imagine why you'd suggest this.

Should have saved that one for when it actually made sense.
tailgater Offline
#17 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 1:12 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
HuckFinn wrote:
Genealogists have traced Warren's Native American heritage to the late 19th century. She is 1/32 Native American.


"As a kid, I never asked my mom for documentation when she talked about our Native American heritage. What kid would? But I knew my father's family didn't like that she was part Cherokee and part Delaware, so my parents had to elope," she said.

But hey, LOCK HER UP!


Your crush on her is based solely on politics.

That, or her sexy voice...
RMAN4443 Offline
#18 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 1:33 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
tailgater wrote:
Your crush on her is based solely on politics.

That, or her sexy voice...



Maybe her high Native American cheekbones Think
DrMaddVibe Offline
#19 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 2:07 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
Oh FAAAK!!!


This is gold!!
RMAN4443 Offline
#20 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 2:30 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Elizabeth has verified English, with smaller amounts (to varying degrees) of Swiss-German, Scottish, Welsh, Irish, Scots-Irish (Northern Irish), and Swedish, ancestry.
Elizabeth has stated that she was told by her family, that one of her maternal great-great-great-grandmothers, Neoma Sarah Smith (popularly known as O.C. Sarah Smith), was of Cherokee Native American background. She has also stated that she has some degree of Delaware Native American ancestry. These statements, and their accuracy, were often the subject of media coverage during the 2012 Senate campaign in Massachusetts (where Elizabeth Warren was a candidate). Many of O.C. Sarah Smith’s ancestral lines have been traced to foreign-born (non-Native American) origins. To date, it appears that no genealogical evidence has been produced that Elizabeth Warren has Cherokee Native American ancestry.

https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Warren-U-S-Senator/6000000017864224908

Last Updated:
December 2, 2016
Think
DrMaddVibe Offline
#21 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 3:25 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389







OOOOPSIE!!!!





Someone...didn't get the memo!!!
HuckFinn Offline
#22 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 3:30 PM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Amazing how important it is to you guys that's she's lying. Lying. I mean, guess what..ah, nm.
Why is that? And don't try to sell me that lying is immoral or unethical.
Look who you've been defending since his and before his inauguration.

If she's wrong then, well, her grandmother lied to her I guess.

One thing is certain, she's a hell of a lot smarter than me, or anybody I know. Even anyone at cbid. Wikipedia her.
And based on that alone I doubt she'd fabricate a story being well aware of the scrutiny she'd be under and the long arm of technology. But I waste my breath...

Christopher Child, a genealogist at the New England Historic Genealogical Society, said that he had discovered possible supporting evidence. The Boston Globe reported that Child found a newsletter that indicated that Warren’s great-great-great grandmother had been listed as Cherokee on a marriage document in 1894. That would make Warren 1/32 American Indian.


Do some research. Or just sit on you hands. And pretend to be amused at what you assume is my frustration. More schadenfreude....but sorry, your responses are predictable and feeble.

“Let me be clear. I never asked for, never got any benefit because of my heritage.”

But, I guess, she is a liberal so...she is fair game to you guys...

Guilty until proven innocent.

And as far as me being the only one not open-minded is concerned, tell me..again, nm.

It's like I'm surrounded by a clan of hyenas in here. Wikipedia her. She dumb enough to lie about her heritage?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#23 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 3:32 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
HuckFinn wrote:
Amazing how important it is to you guys that's she's lying. Lying. I mean, guess what..ah, nm.
Why is that? And don't try to sell me that lying is immoral or unethical.
Look who you've been defending since his and before his inauguration.

If she's wrong then, well, her grandmother lied to her I guess.

One thing is certain, she's a hell of a lot smarter than me, or anybody is know. Even anyone at cbid. Wikipedia her.
And based on that alone I doubt she'd fabricate a story being well aware of the scrutiny she'd be under and the long arm of technology. But I waste my breath...

Christopher Child, a genealogist at the New England Historic Genealogical Society, said that he had discovered possible supporting evidence. The Boston Globe reported that Child found a newsletter that indicated that Warren’s great-great-great grandmother had been listed as Cherokee on a marriage document in 1894. That would make Warren 1/32 American Indian.


Do some research. Or just sit on you hands. And pretend to be amused at what you assume is my frustration. More schadenfreude....but sorry, your responses are predictable and feeble.

“Let me be clear. I never asked for, never got any benefit because of my heritage.”

But, I guess, she is a liberal so...she is fair game to you guys...

Guilty until proven innocent.

And as far as me being the only one not open-minded is concerned, tell me..again, nm.

It's like I'm surrounded by a clan of hyenas in here. Wikipedia her. She dumb enough to lie about her heritage?




C@NT



LOST!!!!


Boo-Frickety-Hoo!!!


Sucks to be YOU!!!!!


Pick up the collateral losses already!
HuckFinn Offline
#24 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 3:51 PM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Hey fellas, looks like your comrade dmv is a serious misogynist.

Hope you're not proud of the company you're in. But who knows...

Your guy's despicable.
DrafterX Offline
#25 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 4:04 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Well, you seem awfully judgemental today.. Not talking
HuckFinn Offline
#26 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 4:08 PM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Really. The guy calls a brilliant career public servant a c@nt because of her politics and I'm judgemental.

Bizarre drafter.

Got nothin' for ya dude.
DrafterX Offline
#27 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 4:19 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Well you lost me at the brilliant career servant thing.. Mellow
RMAN4443 Offline
#28 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 5:19 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
HuckFinn wrote:
Amazing how important it is to you guys that's she's lying. Lying. I mean, guess what..ah, nm.
Why is that? And don't try to sell me that lying is immoral or unethical.
Look who you've been defending since his and before his inauguration.

If she's wrong then, well, her grandmother lied to her I guess.

One thing is certain, she's a hell of a lot smarter than me, or anybody I know. Even anyone at cbid. Wikipedia her.
And based on that alone I doubt she'd fabricate a story being well aware of the scrutiny she'd be under and the long arm of technology. But I waste my breath...

Christopher Child, a genealogist at the New England Historic Genealogical Society, said that he had discovered possible supporting evidence. The Boston Globe reported that Child found a newsletter that indicated that Warren’s great-great-great grandmother had been listed as Cherokee on a marriage document in 1894. That would make Warren 1/32 American Indian.


Do some research. Or just sit on you hands. And pretend to be amused at what you assume is my frustration. More schadenfreude....but sorry, your responses are predictable and feeble.

“Let me be clear. I never asked for, never got any benefit because of my heritage.”

But, I guess, she is a liberal so...she is fair game to you guys...

Guilty until proven innocent.

And as far as me being the only one not open-minded is concerned, tell me..again, nm.

It's like I'm surrounded by a clan of hyenas in here. Wikipedia her. She dumb enough to lie about her heritage?

The key word in your post is "possible"......and according to what I read, if the document were to be accurate{which is in dispute), she would be 1/64th Cherokee.....that's like saying "I'm 1/64th Fingernail"
DrafterX Offline
#29 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 5:41 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
She should just come out and call her Grandmother a liar.. Mellow
HuckFinn Offline
#30 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 6:19 PM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
DrafterX wrote:
Well you lost me at the brilliant career servant thing.. Mellow



I get it. Dmv is a friend. To each his own I guess.
If you research Warren you'll see she is a good egg. Maybe.
HuckFinn Offline
#31 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 6:21 PM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
RMAN4443 wrote:
The key word in your post is "possible"......and according to what I read, if the document were to be accurate{which is in dispute), she would be 1/64th Cherokee.....that's like saying "I'm 1/64th Fingernail"

Why does this even matter? Really.
I don't understand why it's even something worth discussing.
Just saying...
DrafterX Offline
#32 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 6:24 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
“If the Republicans disarm, all is well and good. If they refuse to disarm, we shall disarm them ourselves”
Think
frankj1 Offline
#33 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 8:02 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
I think she's from Oklahoma
HuckFinn Offline
#34 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 8:13 PM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
OOOOk-lahoma, where the wind comes sweepin' down the plain,
delta1 Online
#35 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 8:23 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,776
DrafterX wrote:
“If the Republicans disarm, all is well and good. If they refuse to disarm, we shall disarm them ourselves”
Think



Snoped this...fake news...folks on the right sure like to believe what others on the right say that those on the left say (or do) about the darndest things...

when demonizing someone, you hafta make sure it's a real tail you're pinning on them...otherwise you lose all credibility...

not that those on the left think anyone on the right is credible...or vice versa...
MACS Offline
#36 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 8:28 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
DrafterX wrote:
Well you lost me at the brilliant career servant thing.. Mellow


Exactly...
HuckFinn Offline
#37 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 8:32 PM EST
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
I get it. I have no valid opinions. But you guys do.
DrafterX Offline
#38 Posted: Sun, Apr 29 2018, 8:55 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Actually Snopes says unproven not Fake.. which means the documentation was destroyed or is being saved on a private server somewhere.. Mellow
MACS Offline
#39 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 7:31 AM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
HuckFinn wrote:
I get it. I have no valid opinions. But you guys do.


I'm glad we understand each other. Herfing
Buckwheat Offline
#40 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 7:45 AM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
WGAF? Really this is such a non-starter. You guys get triggered over the most ridiculous stuff. fog
DrafterX Offline
#41 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 8:05 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
You wouldn't say that if she claimed to be in a wheelchair... Mellow
bgz Offline
#42 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 9:03 AM EST
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Huck... I don't know how many insecure white chicks I ran into claiming their great great great... great grandfather was a Cherokee...

See, they were just white girls wishing they had some more Indian in them... and I was glad to oblige them... because I was a walking hormone back then.

Seriously though, it's like... the oldest running joke for natives... that chick is not Indian... It's kinda like that one delusional old bat who managed to swindle her way into a the NAACP Rachel Dolezal who identifies as black... no matter how much they wish it or even believe it, doesn't make it true.
tailgater Offline
#43 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 10:13 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Buckwheat wrote:
WGAF? Really this is such a non-starter. You guys get triggered over the most ridiculous stuff. fog


Not ridiculous.

She probably doesn't beat Scott Brown for the MA Senate seat if she were not a Harvard professor. A position obtained by playing the Indian card.

Now she is in DC and making believers out of partisan fools.
She has been nothing but an obstructionist.
Maybe people believe in her ideals. Maybe people are against the things she obstructs.
But that doesn't make her an effective legislator.
And yet she's near the top of the short list to run for POTUS.

And it all can be traced back to her lies on her application.

So yes. It is a big deal.
frankj1 Offline
#44 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 12:52 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
tailgater wrote:
Not ridiculous.

She probably doesn't beat Scott Brown for the MA Senate seat if she were not a Harvard professor. A position obtained by playing the Indian card.

Now she is in DC and making believers out of partisan fools.
She has been nothing but an obstructionist.
Maybe people believe in her ideals. Maybe people are against the things she obstructs.
But that doesn't make her an effective legislator.
And yet she's near the top of the short list to run for POTUS.

And it all can be traced back to her lies on her application.

So yes. It is a big deal.



I'd be surprised if she ran for Prez...but ya never know.

It makes no sense at all, I agree, but partisan as she is, she has managed to get possibly more across-the-aisle cooperation on issues than just about anyone else from either party. Several GOP Senators and Reps have even praised her. Public persona is one thing but the real work gets done out of the lime light.

My main concern is all the undoing of consumer protections relating to the Big Financial Establishment Swamp.
fiddler898 Offline
#45 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 4:34 PM EST
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
Z just wishes he was a Masshole... Don’t worry Jamie, we welcome immigrants!
frankj1 Offline
#46 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 4:44 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
fiddler898 wrote:
Z just wishes he was a Masshole... Don’t worry Jamie, we welcome immigrants!

may we see his papers, please?
ZRX1200 Offline
#47 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 6:12 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
^ if only every Mass lib was as nice as you 2.....who knows, Oregon's gun laws might he as bad as yours soon and I may move.
ZRX1200 Offline
#48 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 6:13 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
At least I know Patrick would go camping with me.
DrafterX Offline
#49 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 6:17 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
OhMyGod Fiddler is Patrick..??
frankj1 Offline
#50 Posted: Mon, Apr 30 2018, 6:20 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
Basic Patrick or Amerasian Patrick?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Back to Top