America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by frankj1. 18 replies replies.
Head Tax
cacman Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
Seattle approves ‘head tax’ on large businesses despite Amazon’s opposition

The Seattle City Council on Monday approved a pared-down version of the “head tax” on the metro area’s largest employers to fund efforts to battle homelessness despite public criticism from local businesses, including e-commerce giant Amazon.

Approved by a vote of 8-1 on the amended version, the measure will go into effect in January 2019 and tax companies that earn $20 million or more in annual sales 14 cents per employee hour, or $275 per employee annually. The tax is expected to raise roughly $50 million per year toward outreach efforts for the homeless, including affordable housing and emergency shelter.

Proponents on the city council reluctantly agreed to reduce the scope of the bills, which originally called for a tax of 26 cents per employee hour to raise about $75 million annually. Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan had vowed to veto the larger tax.

While supporters said the head tax was necessary to fund efforts to address a housing crisis and rising homelessness in the city, the measure was met with near-universal opposition from businesses, as well as the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce.

In the days ahead of the vote, Amazon said it had halted planning on a new 17-story office tower pending the city council’s decision. The Seattle-based e-commerce company employs more than 40,000 workers in Seattle, with plans for further expansion.

Amazon vice president and spokesman Drew Herdener said the company is "disappointed" with the Seattle City Council's decision to impose the tax.

“While we have resumed construction planning for Block 18, we remain very apprehensive about the future created by the council’s hostile approach and rhetoric toward larger businesses, which forces us to question our growth here,” Herdener said. “City of Seattle revenues have grown dramatically from $2.8B in 2010 to $4.2B in 2017, and they will be even higher in 2018.”

Herdener added that city revenue "far outpaces" Seattle's population growth over the same period.

"The city does not have a revenue problem – it has a spending efficiency problem. We are highly uncertain whether the city council’s anti-business positions or its spending inefficiency will change for the better," he said.

Seattle-based coffeehouse chain Starbucks did not immediately respond to FOX Business’s request for comment on the city council’s decision.

Boeing, Costco Wholesalers and Microsoft, which are each among Seattle’s largest employers, declined to comment on the matter.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/seattle-approves-head-tax-on-large-businesses-despite-amazons-opposition



First people complain big business are given huge tax breaks, now they complain about a new tax. There's just no pleasing people.

Coming soon to Cali LMAO!!!
bgz Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Seattle is taxing blow jobs now?
delta1 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
California's state and local governments have already passed a number of tax measures to try and solve the homeless problem...it's not the taxes that seem to be the issue...people here seem resigned that we need to spend some money to solve a pressing problem...

so we've raised a lot of money to provide low cost housing...the main issue is that no one wants those places built near them...NIMBY!!!

victor809 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
SF wastes money on the homeless all the time.
The ridiculous amount spent on the homeless here annually could just give them a home.

This seattle tax seems even more obnoxious... tying the tax to a company's job creation.... I mean, I'm sure they're trying to find some proxy for company value (as profits are easily reinvested and avoided)... but this is not the best way to go about it.
DrafterX Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,534
Damn evil corporations.. Mad
dstieger Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Any company with current revenue over about $17M is incentivized NOT to grow.

I thought $15/hr min wage was going to ensure that everyone could afford to live there?
DrafterX Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,534
Well, kids aren't allowed to share bedrooms and stuff anymore.. 4 and 5 bedroom houses get expensive to rent.. Mellow
deadeyedick Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,066
dstieger wrote:
Any company with current revenue over about $17M should be incentivized to get the hell out.

I thought $15/hr min wage was going to ensure that everyone could afford to live there?

DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,534
There will never be enough Free Stuff... Mellow
bgz Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
You know what I find funny... how all these corporations in Seattle for the most part claim to be politically liberal, but they'll fight tooth and nail to avoid additional taxes.

Kinda hypocritical don't ya think?
Gene363 Online
#11 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,790
Taxation is theft, period.

MACS Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,735
dstieger wrote:
Any company with current revenue over about $17M is incentivized NOT to grow.

I thought $15/hr min wage was going to ensure that everyone could afford to live there?


Pipe dream... as is solving the 'homeless' problem. Most of the homeless people choose to be there. They don't want responsibilities, or bills, or for anyone to tell them they can't drink and do drugs. They WANT to drink and do drugs.

Even their own damn families have given up, and don't want them around. Why the hell should the taxpayers care about people who don't give 2 damns about anyone but themselves?

Remember... any one of them would be happy to steal your sh*t to pay for their drugs/alcohol.
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,534
Those Bassards..!! Mad
frankj1 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
bgz wrote:
You know what I find funny... how all these corporations in Seattle for the most part claim to be politically liberal, but they'll fight tooth and nail to avoid additional taxes.

Kinda hypocritical don't ya think?

yup
deadeyedick Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,066
bgz wrote:
You know what I find funny... how all these corporations in Seattle for the most part claim to be politically liberal, but they'll fight tooth and nail to avoid additional taxes.

Kinda hypocritical don't ya think?


Exactly. Libs love to spend other peoples money. Come to think of it, who doesn't?
cacman Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
Taxing any company to provide benefits to non-employees (let alone the homeless) seems totally absurd to me. Company money should be used to create jobs, not fund those that don't work.

I like the solution they utilize in Texas. Put' em to f+ckin work instead of gouging someone's pocket!
http://www.newsweek.com/homeless-paid-clean-streets-texas-786311
DrafterX Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,534
Instead of the city being happy there are more tax payers working and living in the city for this company they decide to double-dip..?? or attempt to anyways... What idiot invented the head tax..?? Huh
frankj1 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
I blame Steve
Users browsing this topic
Guest