America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by jjanecka. 83 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
8 killed at school in tx...
opelmanta1900 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
...
victor809 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
8 more crisis actors killed?

Damn... Dangerous job...
Ewok126 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
Prayers for the all of them and their families. Live channels are saying 8 dead possibly 10.

Now lets wait on the "OMG we got to ban shotguns"
victor809 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
.... Should just ban crisis actors... They seem to always be involved
Ewok126 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
Just said on live channel they have found multiple explosive devices at the school and in a home that is where some or one of the students live.
delta1 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
thoughts and prayers...thankfully, it's no one I knew...and that I retired 4 years ago...
rfenst Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Sickening.
Gene363 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
victor809 wrote:
8 more crisis actors killed?

Damn... Dangerous job...


I guess you're over the McCain comment from the Whitehouse staffer? Beer
victor809 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I'm not qualified to work in the WH.
DrafterX Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
I blame Biden.. Mad
JadeRose Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
F*ck em. Can't we just admit as a country that we do not care about school shootings? We do nothing to stop them so it's obvious we've stopped caring. My kids are out of school so not my problem anymore. I could "send thoughts and prayers" on the internet but that involves typin' and whatnot and is tiring.

You're on your own, Kid. Welcome to the jungle...it gets worse here every day.
Krazeehorse Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
JadeRose wrote:
F*ck em. Can't we just admit as a country that we do not care about school shootings? We do nothing to stop them so it's obvious we've stopped caring. My kids are out of school so not my problem anymore. I could "send thoughts and prayers" on the internet but that involves typin' and whatnot and is tiring.

You're on your own, Kid. Welcome the jungle...it gets worse here every day.


Any ideas short of long lines at metal detectors and xray all the backpacks etc. like at the airport?
Just Relax Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 09-26-2016
Posts: 587
JadeRose wrote:
F*ck em. Can't we just admit as a country that we do not care about school shootings? We do nothing to stop them so it's obvious we've stopped caring. My kids are out of school so not my problem anymore. I could "send thoughts and prayers" on the internet but that involves typin' and whatnot and is tiring.

You're on your own, Kid. Welcome the jungle...it gets worse here every day.


Am I correct in forum etiquette responding with Axl wrote that?



This just sucks..... What's the answer? How are any gun bans going to prevent this tragedy? If you have guns in your house at all there is a shotgun and .38 at minimum.

There has to be a systematic change to the way we treat each other as a society. If you treat other people like they are beneath you this is the consequence. This type of tragedy it always seems takes years of being an outcast with peers, educators, and parents turning a blind eye.

If kids really don't want this happening at there school walking out won't help. Being nice to the kids that have been picked on since middle school will help. Accepting the kid who is different, whatever that non-normal different in your community is, will help. There is no other answer that I see.
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
^+1

David (dpnewell)
Counselor Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2018
Posts: 1
Ever since character education was dropped from the school curriculum years ago and replaced with test taking classes, School violence and school shootings have increased. As long as our society is more concerned about test scores and less concerned about our children, we are going to have more mental health issues that lead to more community and school violence.
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
JadeRose wrote:
F*ck em. Can't we just admit as a country that we do not care about school shootings? We do nothing to stop them so it's obvious we've stopped caring. My kids are out of school so not my problem anymore. I could "send thoughts and prayers" on the internet but that involves typin' and whatnot and is tiring.

You're on your own, Kid. Welcome to the jungle...it gets worse here every day.


OK Jade, why don't you elighten us with your solution?

Last month, Democrat polititians, the media talking heads, and many on the left told us the solution was to outlaw AR-15s, bump stocks and magazines over 10 rounds. If we just did this, our children would be safe. Now this spoiled punk narcissi, a product of the PC leftist education system, decided to use a "Uncle Joe Biden approved" shotgun, and a .38 revolver. Looks like the "solution" wasn't a solution after all.

When Trump and the right suggested that we needed better security at out schools, that we had to do away with these "gun free helpless victim zones", that we had to start providing armed security to protect our children, and allow QUALIFIED teachers to carry, we where laughed at and ridiculed by the left.

So if the ideas of the right are so ridiculous, and the outlawing of a style of firearm isn't going to work, then what do we do?

Last month on other boards I was ridiculed and promised that "no one was after my guns". These same posters are now calling for the outright banning of all civilian owned firearms. At least the liars are now being truthful.

The AR-15 has been on the civilian market for close to 50 years. For over 80 years we have had semi-auto rifles with far more firepower then an AR-15 in the hands of civilians. Heck, before 1934 you could purchase a Thompson sub-machine gun through the mail. My dad told me that when he was a boy, kids would carry their shotguns to school and hunt on their way to and from. Not too many years ago, you could find pickup trucks in school parking lots, with rifles in the rear window gun racks. Yet until recently, kids never thought of shooting up schools. What has changed?

David (dpnewell)
SubaruEK305 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2018
Posts: 11
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
OK Jade, why don't you elighten us with your solution?

Last month, Democrat polititians, the media talking heads, and many on the left told us the solution was to outlaw AR-15s, bump stocks and magazines over 10 rounds. If we just did this, our children would be safe. Now this spoiled punk narcissi, a product of the PC leftist education system, decided to use a shotgun, handgun and pipe bombs. Looks like the "solution" wasn't a solution after all.

When Trump and the right suggested that we needed better security at out schools, that we had to do away with these "gun free helpless victim zones", that we had to start providing armed security to protect our children, and allow QUALIFIED teachers to carry, we where laughed at and ridiculed by the left.

So if the ideas of the right are so ridiculous, and the outlawing of a style of firearm isn't going to work, then what do we do?

Last month on other boards I was ridiculed and promised that "no one was after my guns". These same posters are now calling for the outright banning of all civilian owned firearms. At least the liars are now being truthful.

The AR-15 has been on the civilian market for close to 50 years. For over 80 years we have had semi-auto rifles with far more firepower then an AR-15 in the hands of civilians. Heck, before 1934 you could purchase a Thompson sub-machine gun through the mail. Yet until recently, kids never thought of shooting up schools. What has changed?

David (dpnewell)





The easiest solution which i will always stand behind is not in gun control, banning weapons, mental health blah blah blah. These are all tiny little bandaids. How about a high tech security entrance into the school. Something that can be retrofitted in one day or less, Start putting them together n shipping em out. Similar to an airlock system complete with metal detector, bullet/shatterproof glass.
Gene363 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
The solution in the short run is stop making media heroes out of these killers, it only cases other losers to try and top the last loser.

https://nonotoriety.com

"The quest for notoriety and infamy is a well known motivating factor in rampage mass killings and violent copycat crimes. In an effort to reduce future tragedies, we CHALLENGE THE MEDIA – calling for RESPONSIBLE MEDIA COVERAGE FOR THE SAKE OF PUBLIC SAFETY when reporting on individuals who commit or attempt acts of rampage mass violence thereby depriving violent like minded individuals the media celebrity and media spotlight they so crave."

I've been saying this for a while now.
frankj1 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
#18 Gene-

no one living with a solidly normal mind thinks it would be cool to top a previous tragedy. Bullied kids don't always snap but some just don't have the ability to compartmentalize their anguish.

even if you could soft-censor the New York Times et al, I'm gonna guess without any proof that a kid like the one today has not read a major newspaper in his life.
All info comes through his phone...like so many his age.

The phrase "responsible media coverage" actually frightens me. If I had a say so, it sure wouldn't be what Trump would list. But I wouldn't say so...he might.
Opening that soft censor door could lead to colossal unintended repercussions down the road.

Freedom brings risks.
I've been saying this forever.
HuckFinn Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
JadeRose wrote:
F*ck em. Can't we just admit as a country that we do not care about school shootings? We do nothing to stop them so it's obvious we've stopped caring. My kids are out of school so not my problem anymore. I could "send thoughts and prayers" on the internet but that involves typin' and whatnot and is tiring.

You're on your own, Kid. Welcome to the jungle...it gets worse here every day.

Poignant commentary and perspective.

Sadly, he's right. We're used to school shootings. It's old news.

And everybody's so entrenched in their personal politics and side that they've stopped working together as parents and grandparents to protect children.

What's ever wrong with our kids didn't fall far from the tree.

Kind of reminds me of the Judgement of Solomon.  
We've collectively decide to cut the child in half.

 When we really care about our kids again maybe we'll find a solution.

Abrignac Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
HuckFinn wrote:
Poignant commentary and perspective.

Sadly, he's right. We're used to school shootings. It's old news.

And everybody's so entrenched in their personal politics and side that they've stopped working together as parents and grandparents to protect children.

What's ever wrong with our kids didn't fall far from the tree.

Kind of reminds me of the Judgement of Solomon.  
We've collectively decide to cut the child in half.

 When we really care about our kids again maybe we'll find a solution.



Secure them like courthouses. Problem solved. But, then the left would have to find something else to be outraged about.
JadeRose Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
OK Jade, why don't you elighten us with your solution?

Last month, Democrat polititians, the media talking heads, and many on the left told us the solution was to outlaw AR-15s, bump stocks and magazines over 10 rounds. If we just did this, our children would be safe. Now this spoiled punk narcissi, a product of the PC leftist education system, decided to use a "Uncle Joe Biden approved" shotgun, and a .38 revolver. Looks like the "solution" wasn't a solution after all.

When Trump and the right suggested that we needed better security at out schools, that we had to do away with these "gun free helpless victim zones", that we had to start providing armed security to protect our children, and allow QUALIFIED teachers to carry, we where laughed at and ridiculed by the left.

So if the ideas of the right are so ridiculous, and the outlawing of a style of firearm isn't going to work, then what do we do?

Last month on other boards I was ridiculed and promised that "no one was after my guns". These same posters are now calling for the outright banning of all civilian owned firearms. At least the liars are now being truthful.

The AR-15 has been on the civilian market for close to 50 years. For over 80 years we have had semi-auto rifles with far more firepower then an AR-15 in the hands of civilians. Heck, before 1934 you could purchase a Thompson sub-machine gun through the mail. My dad told me that when he was a boy, kids would carry their shotguns to school and hunt on their way to and from. Not too many years ago, you could find pickup trucks in school parking lots, with rifles in the rear window gun racks. Yet until recently, kids never thought of shooting up schools. What has changed?

David (dpnewell)


I give no shits about your guns. Keep em. Buy more. I don't care. I don't know what the solution is but I DO know it goes much deeper than "gun control" or "better mental health". The American Empire is imploding from within as do all great empires. I'm not sure there IS a solution other than to just let it fail and pick up the pieces. It's not Trump's fault. He's but a symptom. It's not the Right or the Left. They are us. The problem is you. and me. and everyone else that just "accepts". Turning our school's into armed encampments is merely treating a symptom. I'm not sure there is a cure or if there is, it's very VERY radical and will be very ugly.
victor809 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Sounds like improper handling of legal guns led to the death of 10 people.

They should release the shooter.
Execute the owner of the guns... (I believe that is the father). It was his responsibility to make sure they were secure

Perhaps having his father executed in front of him will teach the kid not to go taking his parents guns and shoot up a school.
tailgater Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
JadeRose wrote:
I give no shits about your guns. Keep em. Buy more. I don't care. I don't know what the solution is but I DO know it goes much deeper than "gun control" or "better mental health". The American Empire is imploding from within as do all great empires. I'm not sure there IS a solution other than to just let it fail and pick up the pieces. It's not Trump's fault. He's but a symptom. It's not the Right or the Left. They are us. The problem is you. and me. and everyone else that just "accepts". Turning our school's into armed encampments is merely treating a symptom. I'm not sure there is a cure or if there is, it's very VERY radical and will be very ugly.


"Accepts" it?

It's time we stop spewing filth like that.

I agree with much of your post.
But to say that a lack of an immediate firm solution implies acceptance is ridiculous.

I guess we "accept" cancer. And homelessness. And rape.
Because those things all exist in our land of freedoms.





victor809 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
To be fair tail, we usually continue to initiate new dumb projects to try to combat rape and homelessness on a regular basis. And we are constantly working and trying new things to combat cancer.

What was the last new thing tried to reduce the number of school shootings?
frankj1 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
victor809 wrote:
Sounds like improper handling of legal guns led to the death of 10 people.

They should release the shooter.
Execute the owner of the guns... (I believe that is the father). It was his responsibility to make sure they were secure

Perhaps having his father executed in front of him will teach the kid not to go taking his parents guns and shoot up a school.

I've taken a few beatings here when I had the temerity to suggest that owners of stolen guns that killed people also serve jail time.

I'm a lib who says that Americans do have the right to own guns. All I ask is that you take blame when your guns kill a fellow human being.

Spare me the disingenuous arguments about stolen cars blah blah blah.

Repeat: I am a lib accepting your right to own guns.

Protect me. Protect my children.
MACS Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
Victor has already stated this, and it's a statement I agree with... this world is a dangerous place.

We can't protect our children 24/7/365. We simply can't. All we can do is teach them, nurture them not to be these filthy animals, and tell them how to deal with these situations should they arise.

It's been said... we've had guns for years, and never had these problems. It is NOT the guns. It's the people. Our society has devolved. Our children do not value life as we did.
frankj1 Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
MACS wrote:
Victor has already stated this, and it's a statement I agree with... this world is a dangerous place.

We can't protect our children 24/7/365. We simply can't. All we can do is teach them, nurture them not to be these filthy animals, and tell them how to deal with these situations should they arise.

It's been said... we've had guns for years, and never had these problems. It is NOT the guns. It's the people. Our society has devolved. Our children do not value life as we did.

you had to wait until I broke out drinking to make sense?

I still have a problem with stolen guns doing the killing.
Gene363 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
frankj1 wrote:
#18 Gene-

no one living with a solidly normal mind thinks it would be cool to top a previous tragedy. Bullied kids don't always snap but some just don't have the ability to compartmentalize their anguish.

even if you could soft-censor the New York Times et al, I'm gonna guess without any proof that a kid like the one today has not read a major newspaper in his life.
All info comes through his phone...like so many his age.

The phrase "responsible media coverage" actually frightens me. If I had a say so, it sure wouldn't be what Trump would list. But I wouldn't say so...he might.
Opening that soft censor door could lead to colossal unintended repercussions down the road.

Freedom brings risks.
I've been saying this forever.


I not talking about censorship, I'm talking about reporting vs making a celebrity our of a killer. It's a matter of responsibility. As a gun owner I hold myself to a higher standard of responsibility for the care and use of a firearm, it is a dangerous freedom. There is no reason that should not apply to the new media. There shouldn't any difference in how we treat one Amendment or another.
MACS Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
frankj1 wrote:
you had to wait until I broke out drinking to make sense?

I still have a problem with stolen guns doing the killing.


I agree. People should protect their property, but you can't fault them if criminals are crafty.

Negligence should be punished. I agree with that.
frankj1 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
MACS wrote:
I agree. People should protect their property, but you can't fault them if criminals are crafty.

Negligence should be punished. I agree with that.

aw *****ue! here I am ready for a fight and you take the wind outta my wind thing.

Barkeep, hit me.
MACS Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
I'll have another, too... Anthony is asleep in my second recliner. It's just you and me, Frankie...
frankj1 Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
Gene363 wrote:
I not talking about censorship, I'm talking about reporting vs making a celebrity our of a killer. It's a matter of responsibility. As a gun owner I hold myself to a higher standard of responsibility for the care and use of a firearm, it is a dangerous freedom. There is no reason that should not apply to the new media. There shouldn't any difference in how we treat one Amendment or another.

I just don't get the making of a celebrity part.

kid shoots up a school. I see 3 reports of it on my 3 local outlets.

where are you seeing fabulous where I am seeing tragedy reported? Kids crying. Families crying.
What is the attraction you are seeing that would entice anyone with close to normal thought process?

Trump blames media (kill the messenger). Have you been swept up in this dangerous attack on a very valuable freedom protector because it is not supporting your political leanings?

Major news story, and you think it should be page 4 below the fold?

we both know you are smarter than that.
Abrignac Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
MACS wrote:
I'll have another, too... Anthony is asleep in my second recliner. It's just you and me, Frankie...


Relaxed, not asleep, but close.
frankj1 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
Shawn, reapply the pillow to Anthony's face.
Gene363 Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
frankj1 wrote:
I just don't get the making of a celebrity part.

kid shoots up a school. I see 3 reports of it on my 3 local outlets.

where are you seeing fabulous where I am seeing tragedy reported? Kids crying. Families crying.
What is the attraction you are seeing that would entice anyone with close to normal thought process?

Trump blames media (kill the messenger). Have you been swept up in this dangerous attack on a very valuable freedom protector because it is not supporting your political leanings?

Major news story, and you think it should be page 4 below the fold?

we both know you are smarter than that.


You're being argumentative, there were endless stories about the shootings, the largest, the most deadly, the most tragic, the worst shooting etc etc etc. It was a bombing, but Rolling Stone put one of the Boston Marathon bomber's pictures on their cover.

Here is an entire page of references: https://nonotoriety.com/home/

JadeRose Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
tailgater wrote:
"Accepts" it?

It's time we stop spewing filth like that.

I agree with much of your post.
But to say that a lack of an immediate firm solution implies acceptance is ridiculous.

I guess we "accept" cancer. And homelessness. And rape.
Because those things all exist in our land of freedoms.








You heard me. We accept children being gunned down while sitting in classrooms. You may not agree but the evidence is all around us. We accept it and expect it. Humans are very adaptable. We would rather live in the misery we know than try to change it for the paradise we don't. As I said above, I don't think the answers lies in gun bans or metal detectors. Those are very short term "solutions" that won't do much anyway. This kid used a revolver and a shotgun. Are we gonna ban those? Ridiculous. The solution in all this is a deep fundamental change in our society. I'm not smart enough to know exactly what that looks like but I do not believe it will happen in my life time. I think the US is basically f*cked. and THAT is coming from a person that loves his country as much as anyone. or maybe I'm just being cranky and cynical.


as far as cancer, homelessness and rape acceptance? We do. Especially homelessness. We spend Trillions of dollars every year on Foreign Aid, wars, walls, blah, blah, blah and yet we still have kids, Veterans, and Elderly folks, without roofs over their heads, food in their bellies, and no access to medicines they need to live. We shouldn't give a single f*cking nickle to any of this nonsense, until these things no longer exist. Yes, there will always be poverty and the lazy and the halt, but a 6 year old child or an 81 year old woman or an honorably discharged veteran that is out there suffering because of the damage done to him by his service are none of those things. Yet we see them and look away. Do you personally do that? I doubt it. I think you are an honorable man as most of us on here are. But don't kid yourself into thinking that we, as a society at large, don't accept these things. We absolutely do.
Speyside Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Jade, I think you are right.
victor809 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS... We aren't talking about crafty criminals here.
The kid is simply grabbing his parents guns.

If your own kid is the criminal then your got negligence in raising the kid to be a criminal while having firearms. Negligence in securing firearms against the criminal you keep in your house....

We won't see a change until the parents of these school shooters are forced to take responsibility for raising (and sometimes arming, intentionally or unintentionally) the criminals.
DrafterX Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Did the bucket of rocks bill not pass..?? Huh
Phil222 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
JadeRose wrote:
We spend Trillions of dollars every year on Foreign Aid, wars, walls, blah, blah, blah and yet we still have kids, Veterans, and Elderly folks, without roofs over their heads, food in their bellies, and no access to medicines they need to live. We shouldn't give a single f*cking nickle to any of this nonsense, until these things no longer exist. Yes, there will always be poverty and the lazy and the halt, but a 6 year old child or an 81 year old woman or an honorably discharged veteran that is out there suffering because of the damage done to him by his service are none of those things. Yet we see them and look away.

This.
frankj1 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
Gene363 wrote:
You're being argumentative, there were endless stories about the shootings, the largest, the most deadly, the most tragic, the worst shooting etc etc etc. It was a bombing, but Rolling Stone put one of the Boston Marathon bomber's pictures on their cover.

Here is an entire page of references: https://nonotoriety.com/home/


yes, I was being argumentative,

Gene, do you think the Bombers Face on Rolling Stone made even one normally functioning, mentally stable, emotionally balanced person commit a heinous act because of the "fame" it would bring him or her?
I don't.

And censorship is just a step toward despotism.


HuckFinn Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
frankj1 wrote:
yes, I was being argumentative,

Gene, do you think the Bombers Face on Rolling Stone made even one normally functioning, mentally stable, emotionally balanced person commit a heinous act because of the "fame" it would bring him or her?
I don't.

And censorship is just a step toward despotism.



Yeah, but unfortunately overzealous media attention does appeal to sick minds.

It's called the 'media contagion effect'.

http://www.center4research.org/copy-cats-kill/

frankj1 Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
HuckFinn wrote:
Yeah, but unfortunately overzealous media attention does appeal to sick minds.

It's called the 'media contagion effect'.

http://www.center4research.org/copy-cats-kill/


they are already sick. media blame is a new and dangerous game...slanted views or not.

and we have established several times recently that a very small percentage of mass murderers have been considered committable.

But "committable" shouldn't be the thing that alarms us nor limits our scope when trying to push for money to be restored and even increased for detection, treatment andd even prevention(?) of mental illness and emotional disturbance.

that said, I'd add:
a sick mind seeking fame? killahs gonna kill anyway.
Kill freedom of the press, government gonna be killing next.


tailgater Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
To be fair tail, we usually continue to initiate new dumb projects to try to combat rape and homelessness on a regular basis. And we are constantly working and trying new things to combat cancer.

What was the last new thing tried to reduce the number of school shootings?


You're obviously not serious.

Discussions hit every angle from outright banning guns to redefining what "automatic" means to changing laws to age 25, to mandatory fingerprint readers, etc etc etc.

As for cancer? You want to eliminate lung cancer then you need to ban all forms of smoking tobacco.
Ban rape? Mandatory castration ought to do the trick.
Homeless?
Make it illegal to sleep outside. Set up clinics to report to, and hand each person a trash bag and rake for a legal night's sleep.

You get the idea.
There are indeed solutions.
But costs or an assault on rights is bound to be a topic for discussion.

So it brings us back to Jade's post.
I know what he's saying. But it's inaccurate to say we "accept" it simply because we haven't found a reasonable solution.
In fact, it's counter productive.

tailgater Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
I've taken a few beatings here when I had the temerity to suggest that owners of stolen guns that killed people also serve jail time.

I'm a lib who says that Americans do have the right to own guns. All I ask is that you take blame when your guns kill a fellow human being.

Spare me the disingenuous arguments about stolen cars blah blah blah.

Repeat: I am a lib accepting your right to own guns.

Protect me. Protect my children.


Prove that the weapon was obtained through negligence from the gun owner.

Gun ownership requires responsibility. It's not responsible to be negligent.

tailgater Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
MACS wrote:
I agree. People should protect their property, but you can't fault them if criminals are crafty.

Negligence should be punished. I agree with that.


Or I could have just read what MACS stated.

Gene363 Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
frankj1 wrote:
yes, I was being argumentative,

Gene, do you think the Bombers Face on Rolling Stone made even one normally functioning, mentally stable, emotionally balanced person commit a heinous act because of the "fame" it would bring him or her?
I don't.

And censorship is just a step toward despotism.




You're really stuck on this censorship thing and nothing could be further from the truth. Yes, that Rolling Stone picture got that killer a ton of sympathy and attention. It's nothing about censorship it all about presentation and making a media hero/victim out of a crazy cold blooded killer.

Kids see the attention focused on gangs and they want so of that attention for themselves. It'c completely illogical to an adult sane person, but then so is taking a gun and killing a lot of stranger because you're unhappy about whatever.

tailgater Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
JadeRose wrote:
You heard me. We accept children being gunned down while sitting in classrooms. You may not agree but the evidence is all around us. We accept it and expect it. Humans are very adaptable. We would rather live in the misery we know than try to change it for the paradise we don't. As I said above, I don't think the answers lies in gun bans or metal detectors. Those are very short term "solutions" that won't do much anyway. This kid used a revolver and a shotgun. Are we gonna ban those? Ridiculous. The solution in all this is a deep fundamental change in our society. I'm not smart enough to know exactly what that looks like but I do not believe it will happen in my life time. I think the US is basically f*cked. and THAT is coming from a person that loves his country as much as anyone. or maybe I'm just being cranky and cynical.


as far as cancer, homelessness and rape acceptance? We do. Especially homelessness. We spend Trillions of dollars every year on Foreign Aid, wars, walls, blah, blah, blah and yet we still have kids, Veterans, and Elderly folks, without roofs over their heads, food in their bellies, and no access to medicines they need to live. We shouldn't give a single f*cking nickle to any of this nonsense, until these things no longer exist. Yes, there will always be poverty and the lazy and the halt, but a 6 year old child or an 81 year old woman or an honorably discharged veteran that is out there suffering because of the damage done to him by his service are none of those things. Yet we see them and look away. Do you personally do that? I doubt it. I think you are an honorable man as most of us on here are. But don't kid yourself into thinking that we, as a society at large, don't accept these things. We absolutely do.



Accepting something as inevitable is not the same as "acceptance" in the manner you're projecting.

When we tolerate injustices it doesn't mean we accept it. Other than accepting the fact that it might be inevitable.

Wordplay, to be sure. But the distinction is important.








tailgater Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:


do you think the Bombers Face on Rolling Stone made even one normally functioning, mentally stable, emotionally balanced person commit a heinous act because of the "fame" it would bring him or her?



The picture? No.
But the article? Abso-fuqing-lutely.

Maybe the worst (recent) example you could offer.



Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>