America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by HuckFinn. 282 replies replies.
6 Pages<123456>
ABC Cancels Sorry AZZ Rosannes
Mr. Jones Offline
#201 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,421
That stupid Kent can never just shut her pie hole...

She was looking down the 24 carat golden tracks of a GUARENTEED 3-6 YEARS OF MASSIVE MULTIPLE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS PAYDAY , for her and the loser cast that hung on her coat tails...

I hope Rosanne doesn't have any easy one day elective surgeries or tests coming up...
Or Michelle's doctor HIT SQUAD will take her out just like Michelle did to Joan RIVERS....

John Goodman is on a month long cocaine and vodka Binge @the Hollywood hotel bungalows where half of
"The stars" retreat to go on benders after bad news hits...he'll gain all that weight back in 3 months.
DrafterX Offline
#202 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Those comments are just as vile and hateful as anything Barr or Bee said, if not more so, yet I bet you don't see it.

David (dpnewell)



He did hurt my liver a bit.. Sad
HuckFinn Offline
#203 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Disclamer: I don't offer the following as an excuse for Bee, just as the reason why she said what she said about Ivanka. To be honest, I just found this out. Maybe you all already knew this (?)

She was criticizing the Trump administration over the separation of undocumented families apprehended at the border. There were photos of illegal immigrant moms being separated from their kids, lots a tears, kids sleeping in cages. Predictably she got worked up. Then she showed this newly released photo of Ivanka with her baby. Perfect photo.

And obvious dichotomy.

Then the rant : "Ivanka Trump, who works at the White House, chose to post the second most oblivious tweet we've seen this week," Bee said. "You know, Ivanka, that's a beautiful photo of you and your child, but let me just say, one mother to another, do something about your dad's immigration practices, you feckless c***!"
"He listens to you," she added. "Put on something tight and low-cut and tell your father to f***ing stop it. Tell him it was an Obama thing and see how it goes, OK?"

Bee apologized for the comment on Twitter Thursday afternoon.
"I would like to sincerely apologize to Ivanka Trump and to my viewers for using an expletive on my show to describe her last night. It was inappropriate and inexcusable. I crossed a line, and I deeply regret it," she said.

... not an excuse for the dumb outburst.
Just the context.



teedubbya Offline
#204 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Those comments are just as vile and hateful as anything Barr or Bee said, if not more so, yet I bet you don't see it.

David (dpnewell)



They are racist towards orange people? Vile yes. Disgusting yes. Hateful (towards trump) maybe (but it’s lame compared to Trumps garbage he’s spewed) Racist no. The difference between bee (who was wrong) and Rosanne is racism.

I bet you don’t know the difference.

Want vile and hateful? Don’t stop at Bee. Look at your presidents comments over the years. Vile yes. Hateful yes. Racist yes.

Ding ding ding we have a wiener.

I’ll apologize about the vile orange comments when Trump completes his long list of apologies he owes.
DrafterX Offline
#205 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
That pic of kids in a cage was taken in 2014.. Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#206 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It’s amazing to me anyone can support trump and pretend to be upset about anything vile or hateful.


Bee was trying to be funny. She wasn’t but the intent was humor. My bigger issue with her is it was intentional. It was taped and they still play it. Humor is often controversial. No issue. But this crossed a line. Not as much as Rosanne but ymmv.

As for my comment to drafter there was no I’ll or mean intent. And drafter knew it. If you don’t get the distinction I can’t help you. You don’t want to.

Rosanne wasn’t trying to be funny. She was attacking. And using racism to support her take.

I know many in here don’t get it. It reminds me of when Sal on the stern show had to apologize for a racist comment but just couldn’t get why it was racist.
DrafterX Offline
#207 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Was it about Mama Look-a boo boo day..?? Huh
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#208 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
teedubbya wrote:
They are racist towards orange people? Vile yes. Disgusting yes. Hateful, maybe. Racist no. The difference between bee (who was wrong) and Rosanne is racism.

I bet you don’t know the difference.

Want vile and hateful? Don’t stop at Bee. Look at your presidents comments over the years. Vile yes. Hateful yes. Racist yes.

Ding ding ding we have a wiener.

I’ll apologize about the vile orange comments when Trump completes his long list of apologies he owes.


Great defense. Trump does it, so I can do it too. Sure sounds like grade school logic. Johnny did it, so can I.

Why are hatefull, vile comments based on race any worse then hatefull, vile comments based on someone's political views? When you speak ill of half of Americans, degrade them, call them stupid and consider their opinions worthless, how is that so much different then racism? They are both based on the same ideology. That someone else is inferior and therefore has less value to society then you do. One based on someone's skin color, the other on someone's political views. You know deep down inside that my analogy is correct, but you'll continue to excuse it away.

Here's something the left doesn't seem to understand. It is possible to hire someone you do not like, to do a job you feel needs to be done. I would venture to say that many Trump supporters do not like the man. I know I don't. Many times I wish he would just shut the frack up. Other times I wish he would resign and allow Pence to take over. The vile things he says degust me, and I'm embarrassed by his childish rants, but I hired him to do a job, not to be someone I emulate or look up to. I know, a very hard concept for the left to wrap their heads around, as many on the left tend to worship their leaders. I personally believe that Obama is a better human being then Trump is, yet I would have Trump as my President over Obama any day.

David
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#209 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
teedubbya wrote:
It’s amazing to me anyone can support trump and pretend to be upset about anything vile or hateful.


See the 2nd half of my post above.

Quote:

Bee was trying to be funny. She wasn’t but the intent was humor. My bigger issue with her is it was intentional. It was taped and they still play it. Humor is often controversial. No issue. But this crossed a line. Not as much as Rosanne but ymmv.


Still making excuses I see.

Quote:
As for my comment to drafter there was no I’ll or mean intent. And drafter knew it. If you don’t get the distinction I can’t help you. You don’t want to.


That's between you and Drafter, and if the two of you are cool, then that's fine.

Quote:
Rosanne wasn’t trying to be funny. She was attacking. And using racism to support her take.

I know many in here don’t get it. It reminds me of when Sal on the stern show had to apologize for a racist comment but just couldn’t get why it was racist.


What a nice, PC way to imply that others on this board who happen to see things differently then you are "stupid".

David
victor809 Offline
#210 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
.... seriously?
Being mean to someone based on the color of their skin is just as bad as being mean to someone based on the choices they made?

So I take it you're in the camp of "it's not right to call Nazis bad names"?
teedubbya Offline
#211 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I’m not going to respond point by point because it’s silly.

I never said because trump does it I can. That’s the defense used by and for trump. I didn’t do “it”.

What I did with drafter is what two buddies or friends/brothers do to each other in a good natured friendly way. That’s not what Rosanne or Bee did not is it what trump does.

You are trying to equate something that doesn’t equate. And I never interjected race, which is a whole other can of worms.

Drafter and I were PMing at the same time. I know he was ok with it.

I’d never direct that at you DP. I don’t know you and if you really see this as the same thing I’d recognize I couldn’t do it with you. You would take it the wrong way so I wouldn’t do it. I’m not really in to attacking people like trump, bee and Rosanne are.

I know you may not understand but that’s ok.

frankj1 Offline
#212 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Great defense. Trump does it, so I can do it too. Sure sounds like grade school logic. Johnny did it, so can I.

Why are hatefull, vile comments based on race any worse then hatefull, vile comments based on someone's political views? When you speak ill of half of Americans, degrade them, call them stupid and consider their opinions worthless, how is that so much different then racism? They are both based on the same ideology. That someone else is inferior and therefore has less value to society then you do. One based on someone's skin color, the other on someone's political views. You know deep down inside that my analogy is correct, but you'll continue to excuse it away.

Here's something the left doesn't seem to understand. It is possible to hire someone you do not like, to do a job you feel needs to be done. I would venture to say that many Trump supporters do not like the man. I know I don't. Many times I wish he would just shut the frack up. Other times I wish he would resign and allow Pence to take over. The vile things he says degust me, and I'm embarrassed by his childish rants, but I hired him to do a job, not to be someone I emulate or look up to. I know, a very hard concept for the left to wrap their heads around, as many on the left tend to worship their leaders. I personally believe that Obama is a better human being then Trump is, yet I would have Trump as my President over Obama any day.

David

why are liberals/the left lumped together for group inabilities? teedub isn't even a liberal!

Without intending to, or even realizing it, we all have some "group" prejudices that allow us (incorrectly) to look down on others.

At least I think so.
HuckFinn Offline
#213 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Great defense. Trump does it, so I can do it too. Sure sounds like grade school logic. Johnny did it, so can I.

Why are hatefull, vile comments based on race any worse then hatefull, vile comments based on someone's political views? When you speak ill of half of Americans, degrade them, call them stupid and consider their opinions worthless, how is that so much different then racism? They are both based on the same ideology. That someone else is inferior and therefore has less value to society then you do. One based on someone's skin color, the other on someone's political views. You know deep down inside that my analogy is correct, but you'll continue to excuse it away.

Here's something the left doesn't seem to understand. It is possible to hire someone you do not like, to do a job you feel needs to be done. I would venture to say that many Trump supporters do not like the man. I know I don't. Many times I wish he would just shut the frack up. Other times I wish he would resign and allow Pence to take over. The vile things he says degust me, and I'm embarrassed by his childish rants, but I hired him to do a job, not to be someone I emulate or look up to. I know, a very hard concept for the left to wrap their heads around, as many on the left tend to worship their leaders. I personally believe that Obama is a better human being then Trump is, yet I would have Trump as my President over Obama any day.

David

Deep down? Not even at core do I see it that way. And btw, I dont consider folks with opposing political points of view stupid. I like having what I think or believe is clear and objective challenged. I kind of enjoy having to re-examine what I take for granted.
I might think some of their ideas are stupid but it's never personal. It's clear that there are extremely bright and well-intentioned folks on the right.

The analogy you made, heres my beef with it:
We're born in to races and ethnicities. And as there's no choosing where we came from or the color of our skin, to hate or mock a group of people because of the way 'God ' made them is not rational.
It's a subtle difference but a real one when it comes to personal insults. These are choices. You're disputing ideas. Flexible things. Can't change the color of your skin. Ok...MJ...

You might think the trump wall is a good idea and after we argue and are finally out of patience, you or I might start name-calling.
In a nut shell, our beliefs are choices, our skin color isn't.
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#214 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
victor809 wrote:
.... seriously?
Being mean to someone based on the color of their skin is just as bad as being mean to someone based on the choices they made?



Victor, being vile and hateful to someone, is being vile and hateful. To me, it is unacceptable and evil, no matter what the motive. If you want to insist that one is more evil then the other based on motive, well, that's your choice.

Quote:
So I take it you're in the camp of "it's not right to call Nazis bad names"?


Wow! Where did that come from?!!!!!

David (dpnewell)
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#215 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
teedubbya wrote:
I’m not going to respond point by point because it’s silly.

I never said because trump does it I can. That’s the defense used by and for trump. I didn’t do “it”.

What I did with drafter is what two buddies or friends/brothers do to each other in a good natured friendly way. That’s not what Rosanne or Bee did not is it what trump does.

You are trying to equate something that doesn’t equate. And I never interjected race, which is a whole other can of worms.

Drafter and I were PMing at the same time. I know he was ok with it.

I’d never direct that at you DP. I don’t know you and if you really see this as the same thing I’d recognize I couldn’t do it with you. You would take it the wrong way so I wouldn’t do it. I’m not really in to attacking people like trump, bee and Rosanne are.

I know you may not understand but that’s ok.



We're cool, bro. I spend time on AOL, CNN and WP boards and am attacked ruthlessly day in and day out. I'm hit with the "Cheeto dust on lips" and "extra chromasone" multiple times a day, as well as those wishing for my death, deportation, interment or re-education. You just happened to use key phrases that triggered me. Phrases I associate with the vile hatred I receive elsewhere, simply due to my differing opinion. I never meant for this to get personal and I apologize if it has gone there. Ok, I'm done with this subject. Time for a cigar and Rye.

David (dpnewell)
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#216 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
HuckFinn wrote:
Deep down? Not even at core do I see it that way. And btw, I dont consider folks with opposing political points of view stupid. I like having what I think or believe is clear and objective challenged. I kind of enjoy having to re-examine what I take for granted.
I might think some of their ideas are stupid but it's never personal. It's clear that there are extremely bright and well-intentioned folks on the right.

The analogy you made, heres my beef with it:
We're born in to races and ethnicities. And as there's no choosing where we came from or the color of our skin, to hate or mock a group of people because of the way 'God ' made them is not rational.
It's a subtle difference but a real one when it comes to personal insults. These are choices. You're disputing ideas. Flexible things. Can't change the color of your skin. Ok...MJ...

You might think the trump wall is a good idea and after we argue and are finally out of patience, you or I might start name-calling.
In a nut shell, our beliefs are choices, our skin color isn't.


Well Huck, we will just have to agree to disagree. You wish to catagorize some forms of hatred as worse then others, while I feel all hatred is vile and wicked. I'm not going to change your mind, and you're not going to change mine. Peace out, brother.

David (dpnewell)
DrafterX Offline
#217 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I hate peas... Mellow
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#218 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
frankj1 wrote:
why are liberals/the left lumped together for group inabilities? teedub isn't even a liberal!

Without intending to, or even realizing it, we all have some "group" prejudices that allow us (incorrectly) to look down on others.

At least I think so.


Oh, stop your whining, Frank. You already stated that your dad was a Kennedy Democrat, which would make him a conservative in today's world. We know you would like us to believe that you are a liberal, but some of us can see behind the curtain.

David







Sarcasm
frankj1 Offline
#219 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
We're cool, bro. I spend time on AOL, CNN and WP boards and am attacked ruthlessly day in and day out. I'm hit with the "Cheeto dust on lips" and "extra chromasone" multiple times a day, as well as those wishing for my death, deportation, interment or re-education. You just happened to use key phrases that triggered me. Phrases I associate with the vile hatred I receive elsewhere, simply due to my differing opinion. I never meant for this to get personal and I apologize if it has gone there. Ok, I'm done with this subject. Time for a cigar and Rye.

David (dpnewell)


I get treated well here. Attacking my ideas is fine.

Usually, at least for me, my beliefs are not so much attacked as debated, which I enjoy. I think I'd be bored at sites where 98.2% agree with me...

this is the only site on which I am an active participant.
frankj1 Offline
#220 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
didn't see 218 when I posted 219.

I take it all back!
teedubbya Offline
#221 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DP it’s cool. We never have and never will have issues.

My only point was merely I don’t know you. It wouldn’t be my style to throw those things at someone I don’t know because it’s not my style to attack people. I’ll debate because that’s how I learn. By listening.

Drafter on the other hand sold his soul to trump. He even got an orange toupee.
victor809 Offline
#222 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Victor, being vile and hateful to someone, is being vile and hateful. To me, it is unacceptable and evil, no matter what the motive. If you want to insist that one is more evil then the other based on motive, well, that's your choice.

victor wrote:

So I take it you're in the camp of "it's not right to call Nazis bad names"?


Wow! Where did that come from?!!!!!

David (dpnewell)


How are you not able to see this?

Even your quote above: "being hateful to someone is being vile and hateful. to me it unacceptable and ....etc"
that right there is saying it's not right to be mean to nazis. not criticizing you for it, if you really truly are in the camp of every single human being in this world deserves to be treated nicely, then you're probably a better person than all of us.

(however, based on posts of yours I've seen in the past, I don't think you really adhere to that)

But the logic is unassailable.
If you believe this statement:
"Why are hatefull, vile comments based on race any worse then hatefull, vile comments based on someone's political views?"
Then you believe that saying something hateful about nazis (a political view) is equivalent to saying something hateful about black people, or gays, or anyone.

I am not as good a person as you apparently. I judge people.... daily. If someone says something I believe to be stupid, I judge them as a person who says something stupid. I'll likely say something to them to the effect of "that was stupid".
If someone holds a large number of stupid thoughts in their head, it usually coalesces into a dogmatic political view of equal stupidity.

I believe it is significantly different to judge someone (and point out the judgement) for a believe, or idea they came up with due to an unwillingness to look at information, than it is to judge someone based solely on the color of their skin.

One judgement is based on choices a person has made, ideas they have in their head. The other is based solely on their birth and is something they never had control over.

You appear to find the two things equivalent, and the judgement of each party the same, thus the logical conclusion that you would find bieng mean to nazis as unacceptable too. I don't find it to be equivalent. In fact, I might even judge the decision-making process of people who find them equivalent....
victor809 Offline
#223 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:


Drafter on the other hand sold his soul to trump. He even got an orange o-ring.


FIFY
DrafterX Offline
#224 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Mad
frankj1 Offline
#225 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
DrafterX wrote:
Mad

you want I should make this go away?
victor809 Offline
#226 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
What? You offering to bleach drafter's bunghole?
frankj1 Offline
#227 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
don't make me go to Rhode Island...
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#228 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
For those of you who think that as a white man, I have no clue about racism, you couldn't be further from the truth. We lived our entire life in a solid blue county, one that voted over 80% for Obama and 77% for Clinton. My daughters where raised Christian, and where instructed that all people where children of God, and to never judge any one on the color of their skin.

My oldest daughter married an Asian man, and my youngest a Black man, with Donna and my blessing. Our dearly loved grandchildren are bi-racial. My youngest daughter's Father In Law was a pastor of a large black church in Camden, NJ, and a civil rights activist. He had been invited several times to meet with President Obama at the White House. Even though we had polar opposite political views, we got along just fine.

Our youngest daughter was treated with disdain by many of her husband's extended family and friends. The black women especially where angry with her for marrying "one of their" black men. She was treated nasty at family gatherings and when they got together with her husband's friends. Even though her children are very dark, and have strong African American features, they where always considered "the white" grandchildren and shunned by many.

Our in-laws invited us a couple times to special events at their church. Many in the congregation treated us with vile hatred. If looks and actions could kill, we would have been dead. It was as if they where saying "what are these white people doing at OUR church?"

Our oldest daughter also experienced extreme racism from her husband's extended Asian family. Both marriages eventually failed.

In solid blue NJ, our bi-racial grandchildren where treated as outcasts. Blacks wouldn't except them because they where white, and the whites wouldn't accept them because they where black.

Both daughters eventually moved to solid red counties in the "deep racist" south. Counties that voted over 80% for Trump. Surprisingly, in the "racist" south, they where accepted and loved. Most of them have become very popular with their classmates and teachers, and have many friends. Some white, some black, some Hispanic and some bi-racial. The "racist" white southern neighborhoods they live in have also accepted these bi-racial children with open arms.

Strange that my family's personal experience with racism, is the exact opposite of the narrative we are fed every day.

David
tailgater Offline
#229 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Are you saying she was just telling a harmless racial joke rather than specifically hating on someone while supporting her hate with racism.

Your trumplust has you supporting Rosanne bar. You realize that right?


Discussion: Roseanne and racism.
TW response: Trump.

Pure awesome.


tailgater Offline
#230 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
HuckFinn wrote:
Disclamer: I don't offer the following as an excuse for Bee, just as the reason why she said what she said about Ivanka. To be honest, I just found this out. Maybe you all already knew this (?)

She was criticizing the Trump administration over the separation of undocumented families apprehended at the border. There were photos of illegal immigrant moms being separated from their kids, lots a tears, kids sleeping in cages. Predictably she got worked up. Then she showed this newly released photo of Ivanka with her baby. Perfect photo.

And obvious dichotomy.

Then the rant : "Ivanka Trump, who works at the White House, chose to post the second most oblivious tweet we've seen this week," Bee said. "You know, Ivanka, that's a beautiful photo of you and your child, but let me just say, one mother to another, do something about your dad's immigration practices, you feckless c***!"
"He listens to you," she added. "Put on something tight and low-cut and tell your father to f***ing stop it. Tell him it was an Obama thing and see how it goes, OK?"

Bee apologized for the comment on Twitter Thursday afternoon.
"I would like to sincerely apologize to Ivanka Trump and to my viewers for using an expletive on my show to describe her last night. It was inappropriate and inexcusable. I crossed a line, and I deeply regret it," she said.

... not an excuse for the dumb outburst.
Just the context.





This board doesn't allow context.
You must love Samantha Bee.

tailgater Offline
#231 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
It’s amazing to me anyone can support trump and pretend to be upset about anything vile or hateful.

.


You sure are easy to amaze.

I bet you still wonder how your uncle kept finding quarters behind your ear.


tailgater Offline
#232 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Still a buncha whiny babies.

Two people say stupid things.
One is held responsible.

And the one held responsible said the stupid thing outside her workplace, while the one NOT held responsible said the stupid things while at work.

It is fruitless to have further discussion with those who can't see the double standard.


teedubbya Offline
#233 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Then don’t. If you only want to see it your way there is no reason to discuss with anyone else.

If you can’t or won’t see the distinction it’s ok. Some can! Who’s right? It’s opinion. Just because yours differs doesn’t make it right (or wrong) with no reason to discus. I differ with your opinion but it’s still worthy of discussion. I recognize I’ll not change yours. That’s cool.

Trump himself made this about him as well. I tend to not discuss things in a vacuum.
DrafterX Offline
#234 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
That's prolly best... Playing with your vacuum should definitely be alone time... Mellow
HuckFinn Offline
#235 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
Well Huck, we will just have to agree to disagree. You wish to catagorize some forms of hatred as worse then others, while I feel all hatred is vile and wicked. I'm not going to change your mind, and you're not going to change mine. Peace out, brother.

David (dpnewell)

Of course some forms of hatred are worse than others!
I can hate my local restaurant because the food sucks. But isn't it a whole other brand of hate to hate it because all the waiters are black? I hate green candy. And Sunday morning lawn mowers. Isn't Islamic hate for infidels more intense and much more vile?

Cmon.

Kids fight. They hate each other for an afternoon. Can you compare their hatred, 'vile' as it is, with the lynchings of black people, or Buchenwald.

We'll never eradicate hate from the world. And who'd want to? It's a good thing to hate certain things: terrorism, dictators... cancer..etc, etc.

But I see a line regarding racism. Hating whole groups.
What Bee said was not an insult that extended to Ivanka's ancestry and family. Was personal.

HuckFinn Offline
#236 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
tailgater wrote:
This board doesn't allow context.
You must love Samantha Bee.


I do. I love everyone.

From the general tone of your posts it almost seems (to me) that you're skipping around as you type.


You skipping TG?
Gene363 Offline
#237 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,814
Five pages of, "I know you are, but what about me?"

For F**k sakes it's like two old klansmen arguing about whose ass is the whitest.


Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan
RMAN4443 Offline
#238 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
HuckFinn wrote:
Of course some forms of hatred are worse than others!
I can hate my local restaurant because the food sucks. But isn't it a whole other brand of hate to hate it because all the waiters are black? I hate green candy. And Sunday morning lawn mowers. Isn't Islamic hate for infidels more intense and much more vile?

Cmon.

Kids fight. They hate each other for an afternoon. Can you compare their hatred, 'vile' as it is, with the lynchings of black people, or Buchenwald.

We'll never eradicate hate from the world. And who'd want to? It's a good thing to hate certain things: terrorism, dictators... cancer..etc, etc.

But I see a line regarding racism. Hating whole groups.
What Bee said was not an insult that extended to Ivanka's ancestry and family
. Was personal.


Seems like her insult did extend to Ivanka's family , when she added that little incestuous jab....or at least that's how I'd take it if someone told me to approach my daughter dressed in a sexually provocative manner to try to manipulate her to do what I wanted.....
and when criminals break laws(illegal aliens are criminals), doesn't the law put their children with other family members while they are incarcerated? And if no family members are available the children go to DCYF facilities?


and weren't you the guy that wanted LIME M&M's? d'oh!
teedubbya Offline
#239 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Well my ass is pretty white.
Gene363 Offline
#240 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,814
teedubbya wrote:
Well my ass is pretty white.



I'll take your word on that because I'm not looking. 😳
RMAN4443 Offline
#241 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
teedubbya wrote:
Well my ass is pretty white.

Did you get yourself one of those Paris Hilton Bung-hole bleachings? Did it burn?Anxious
HuckFinn Offline
#242 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
RMAN4443 wrote:


and weren't you the guy that wanted LIME M&M's? d'oh!


You're right. I "kind of" did.

But green candy? I have zero respect for green candy lovers.

Freaking thread-crosser.
DrafterX Offline
#243 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Nothing wrong with green jolly Rogers.. Mellow
RMAN4443 Offline
#244 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
HuckFinn wrote:
You're right. I "kind of" did.

But green candy? I have zero respect for green candy lovers.

Freaking thread-crosser.

Guilty as charged, but NO sword crossingShame on you ....I'm not built for thatAnxious
tailgater Offline
#245 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
HuckFinn wrote:
Of course some forms of hatred are worse than others!
I can hate my local restaurant because the food sucks. But isn't it a whole other brand of hate to hate it because all the waiters are black? I hate green candy. And Sunday morning lawn mowers. Isn't Islamic hate for infidels more intense and much more vile?

Cmon.

Kids fight. They hate each other for an afternoon. Can you compare their hatred, 'vile' as it is, with the lynchings of black people, or Buchenwald.

We'll never eradicate hate from the world. And who'd want to? It's a good thing to hate certain things: terrorism, dictators... cancer..etc, etc.

But I see a line regarding racism. Hating whole groups.
What Bee said was not an insult that extended to Ivanka's ancestry and family. Was personal.



So a bad joke about a person's looks is racism?
If that's true, then in Bee's opinion all women must be the C word.
Bee's choice of insults was only effective because her target was a woman.

This isn't about which insult was worse. It's about politics and the double standard in main stream media.
tailgater Offline
#246 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
HuckFinn wrote:
I do. I love everyone.

From the general tone of your posts it almost seems (to me) that you're skipping around as you type.


You skipping TG?


Note to self: close the blinds.

victor809 Offline
#247 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
A double standard only exists in a situation where two things are equal.

Your inability to understand how those two things are different does not make it a double standard. It just means you don't understand something.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#248 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,423
victor809 wrote:
A double standard only exists in a situation where two things are equal.

Your inability to understand how those two things are different does not make it a double standard. It just means you don't understand something.




Definition of double standard

1 : bimetallism

2 : a set of principles that applies differently and usually more rigorously to one group of people or circumstances than to another; especially : a code of morals that applies more severe standards of sexual behavior to women than to men



And there's no metal in the thread.
victor809 Offline
#249 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Silence you dispicable fat moron.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#250 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,423
victor809 wrote:
Silence you dispicable fat moron.



Wow.

You never learn.

Ever.

I'm not going to lower myself to your slithering.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages<123456>