America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by frankj1. 202 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345>
American Family Values
frankj1 Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
RMAN4443 wrote:
How much will that cost me?

meh. 2000 kids with a parent or two? you wouldn't notice at all...Plus, that department is likely already funded so no additional surcharges will be placed on you.

now the wall on the other hand!
delta1 Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
DrMaddVibe wrote:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/photos-obama-immigration-detention-facilities

“Obama administration prosecuted nearly 500,000 illegal immigrants between FY 2010-FY2016. They referred 1/5 of illegals for prosecution, which often resulted in family separations.”


Why all the crying now? Oh yeah...the economy is still going strong...we can't talk about that.

Next designed feigned outrage in 3...2...



http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2018/jun/19/matt-schlapp/no-donald-trumps-separation-immigrant-families-was/


The truth is that although the Obama administration prosecuted many illegal border crossers, his administration refused to intentionally separate families. It happened infrequently, not intentionally....

It was something they considered, but rejected very quickly...
DrafterX Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I'm sure records were destroyed.. Mellow
bgz Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
frankj1 wrote:
I don't watch CNN, Fox, or any of the opinion news, to be perfectly honest...though tail says it's why people who think like me have been told what to think.

I read two newspapers, and watch a local news broadcast in the evening. Even get some info here from the rare links I open.

Yet somehow sound bites and stuff intended to create/shape opinion finds me no matter how careful I am to not step in it.

Yesterday I saw a 10 second thing from Fox with some blond woman (who is probably well known here) who said with a straight face while posing in front of a pic of kids laying on silver thermos blankets on the floor of a warehouse..."some liken it to summer camp, or private school".

My first thought was she had been told to do what was needed to soften the visual atrocity clearly presented. With no sound, your last thoughts would have been summer camp etc.

Any chance many cons are not coming to their own conclusions through enlightened independent brilliance? and aren't some of them not also elected officials?


The cons don't want to do anything about it either... Cheap labor.

As far as putting thoughts in my head... no, I've always wished they would do more to curb illegal immigration but thought it was a pipe dream because neither side wanted to change anything.
cacman Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
Get busted on a drug offense or other crime that requires serving time in prison, and Social Services will come and take your kids They will want to make sure your relatives are suitable to raise children before passing them off. And trust me, becoming a ward of the State and being dumped into a foster home or institution is no picnic for a kid. It's not he kids fault his parents are azzholes or criminals. But that is the system.

With crime comes consequences and punishment.

My daughter tried to apply for assistance (MediCaid). She is a preschool teacher with 2 Assoc degrees. She barely makes more than what many want to raise the minimum wage to. She makes too much to qualify. However, if she was an immigrant, or pregnant, or a single mother she would have qualified.

Don't want to get separated from your kids? Then don't commit a crime and put them in a position where you may. That pretty applies if you are a citizen too.
delta1 Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
that is more humane than just pulling them apart and keeping them in separate detention facilities, sometimes in different cities/states...without either 's knowledge of where the other is...
tailgater Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Perhaps someone has stated this in one way, shape or form in this thread.
I haven't read the whole thing.

But this attack by the LEFT is a clear case of TDR.

Trump did not make a new policy designed to tear children from parents.
He
simply
did
not.

Sure, a "zero tolerance" stance resulted in higher numbers.

But children are ROUTINELY taken from criminal parents.
Every
Freaking
Day.

The hysteria against YOUNG kids being taken away is real. And it's important. And the laws need to be changed. 98.2% of Americans agree. And this time they're all correct.

But the hysteria against TRUMP is a fuqing joke.
A President makes zero law changes, but firmly calls for strict enforcement of existing laws.
And then he's blamed for the results??

Petition to change the laws.
Protest for family rights.
But don't be so fuquing stupid that you blame the sitting POTUS.
Because..
Trump.

This is a public service announcement.



DrafterX Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
But they gots nothing else.... There's nothing else... Sad
delta1 Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
Here are the facts, tail...

https://www.npr.org/2018/06/19/621065383/what-we-know-family-separation-and-zero-tolerance-at-the-border
HuckFinn Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
tailgater wrote:
Perhaps someone has stated this in one way, shape or form in this thread.
I haven't read the whole thing.

But this attack by the LEFT is a clear case of TDR.

Trump did not make a new policy designed to tear children from parents.
He
simply
did
not.

Sure, a "zero tolerance" stance resulted in higher numbers.

But children are ROUTINELY taken from criminal parents.
Every
Freaking
Day.

The hysteria against YOUNG kids being taken away is real. And it's important. And the laws need to be changed. 98.2% of Americans agree. And this time they're all correct.

But the hysteria against TRUMP is a fuqing joke.
A President makes zero law changes, but firmly calls for strict enforcement of existing laws.
And then he's blamed for the results??

Petition to change the laws.
Protest for family rights.
But don't be so fuquing stupid that you blame the sitting POTUS.
Because..
Trump.
This is a public service announcement
.




Don't drink and post.
teedubbya Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Yea that was an epic fail
delta1 Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
tail insists that libs have Trump Derangement Syndrome...meaning that libs mindlessly get outraged at anything Trump does, regardless of whether there is a positive outcome from Trump's actions or words.

The reverse of that TDS coin is the con side: Trump Delusion Syndrome...meaning Trumpian cons mindlessly believe anything Trump or Trump Media says, that Trump's alternative facts are reality, despite being shown that Trump has lied repeatedly.


Given Trump's relatively small track record with positive achievements and repeated utterances of demonstrably false statements...which side seems mentally healthier...

Cons were going 90 mph, staunchly supporting Trump's family separation policy, repeating his administration's lies about it being a Dem contrivance ... Trump and his supporters injected hate and de-humanized the issue by calling the illegal border crossers an "infestation," "vermin"...a supporter openly mocking the playing of a purported audio tape of a child in a detention center crying by saying "wah wah" while rubbing his eyes...

And then Trump changes course, basically going back to how Obama did things.........................................wai....what??? Nevermind...
DrafterX Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Who did that..?? If he backs of zero tolerance I'll be disappointed.. the kids were pawns because Pelosi said they were... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I guess now the question is do the kids get treated worse or do the illegal criminals get treated better.. Think
teedubbya Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Drafter sure loves trump
DrafterX Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
So, apparently Dems won't be happy until we start the catch & release into our country again... Which isn't surprising at all... Mellow
Speyside Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
I like it Al, Trump Delusion Syndrome. That does describe many Cons.
teedubbya Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
In this case drafter and several others have Trump Munchausen by proxy.
DrafterX Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Cause I want our immigration laws enforced..?? Huh
teedubbya Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
no because you are obstinate and purposefully ignore information that is not convenient to your trump love


but you are dreamy and I love you
DrafterX Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Love you too man... Laugh
Speyside Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
At least Tail is consistent. Wrong, but consistent.
bgz Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
When talking politics, wrong is subjective...

When you're talking left and right, both extremes are bat sh1t.
delta1 Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
DrafterX wrote:
Who did that..?? If he backs of zero tolerance I'll be disappointed.. the kids were pawns because Pelosi said they were... Mellow


Trump and Lewandowski ramped up the dehumanization of immigrants...


https://www.ktvb.com/video/syndication/veuer/trump-democrats-want-illegal-immigrants-to-infest-the-country/602-8164360

https://www.timesofisrael.com/critics-say-trumps-description-of-immigrants-recalls-nazi-propaganda/


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/corey-lewandowski-fox-news-trump-down-syndrome-border-family-separation-a8407371.html


Pelosi is so bad, she wants everyone to eat broccoli...but she actually said the kids were prawns, and that they would go well with broccoli and some sort of alfredo sauce...
DrafterX Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Laugh
Abrignac Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,273
fiddler898 wrote:
And the crime committed by these kids who are doing the time is...

Go ahead, we'll wait.


Nice of you to blur the line.
bgz Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
CNN feed is still bombarded with this crap...

I now know why they don't have comments enabled on their articles... cause they know people would call them out on their horsesh1t and they wouldn't be able to afford mods to delete it all in a timely fashion.

The only thing that will make the left happy is putting things back to the way they were.

I'm pretty sure they have an underground force dedicated to providing illegals with their "Voting Manual for Undocumented Migrants".
Abrignac Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,273
Let's not tiptoe around the issue in an attempt to muddy the water.

Sure it's NOT a good thing to separate children from their parents. But, it's also not the responsibility of US taxpayers to subsidize housing for people who want a better life. Every year hundres of thousands of people use subterfuge to enter the US. They are encouraged by activists posing as immigration proponents to come and apply for asylum. These so-called activists realize that there is insufficient infrastructure to handle these asylum cases. This results in "indefinite" waits for a court case. They are then used as pawns to show the inhumanity of keeping them detained so "churches" step in as sjw's who resettle these illegals, This allows them to be assimilated into society where they then give birth to anchor babies. It then becomes inhumane to send these newly minted citizens with there families to there home origin of their parents.

Shame on those who try to paint this any other way.

DrafterX Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Ya... Mad
Speyside Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
There is a straight forward answer to this, though I doubt our government would do it or our courts would uphold it. Immediate deportation of anyone who enters our country illegally. There really is no need that I can see for court verdicts for deportation in this circumstance.

Secondly we should eliminate all foreign aid to countries that have significant numbers of their citizens illegally crossing our border. Use this money to cover our costs.

Thirdly eliminate all foreign aid to Mexico. They are culpable in allowing their citizens and others cross their borders and ours. Use this money to cover our costs.

Fourthly eliminate the concept of anchor babies. There should be no citizenship just because they were born here.

Fifthly seize all assets of those who hire illegal aliens. Use the money to cover costs.
bgz Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
All that sounds good on paper... but the amnesty loophole is what's clogging up the system.
DrafterX Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Pull the finger out of the ****... Mellow
bgz Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Loophole X, not ...

Oh nevermind.

I mean, Ya Mad
HuckFinn Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Lot of misinformation, fear, hate...and sweeping erroneous nonsense in this conversation...
And I get it...kind of..but if it's your wallets your protecting, well..research around..

From:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_the_United_States



Research shows that illegal immigrants increase the size of the U.S. economy, contribute to economic growth, enhance the welfare of natives, contribute more in tax revenue than they collect, reduce American firms' incentives to offshore jobs and import foreign-produced goods, and benefit consumers by reducing the prices of goods and services.[8][14][15][16][17] However, there are a number of illegal immigrants that take part in unreported employment. Working tax free, these individuals at able to accept lower wages ultimately driving down the price of unskilled labor. Economists estimate that legalization to illegal immigrant population would increase the immigrants' earnings and consumption considerably, and increase U.S. gross domestic product.[8][18][19][20][21][22]

If it's crime you're sure they bring to the states...


There is no evidence that illegal immigration increases the rate of crime in the United States.[23] There is scholarly consensus that illegal immigrants commit less crime than natives.[24][25] Sanctuary cities – which adopt policies designed to not prosecute people solely for being in the country illegally – have no statistically meaningful impact on crime.[26] Research suggests that immigration enforcement has no impact on crime rates.[27][28][26]

Since the Great Recession (December 2007 to June 2009) more undocumented immigrants have left the United States than have entered it, and illegal border crossings are at the lowest levels they have been in decades.

Historically, up till 1924 anyway, we had open borders. Only 1% of immigrants were rejected.
Would you be here if these conditions hadn't existed?
Probably not.

People are fleeing intolerable conditions. Like my grandparents did.
bgz Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
You must not live in a border state.

Actually, there hasn't been much in the news about crimes by illegals lately here, but that could just be because it doesn't fit the mainstream media narrative so they quit reporting on them.
HuckFinn Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Pretty sure Fox would tell us if there was, no?

New York, where I am, ranks 3rd after California and Florida as having the most illegals.
bgz Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. Are you saying your solution would be just to open the flood gates and let everyone in?
HuckFinn Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
No. But those seeking asylum? Process them.
Fearing immigration is erroneous. And unrealistic.
Punishing kids, unconscionable.
fiddler898 Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
Abrignac wrote:
Nice of you to blur the line.

‘Twasn’t I who blurred the line, but at least we can agree that we’re still awaiting an answer!
bgz Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
HuckFinn wrote:
No. But those seeking asylum? Process them.
Fearing immigration is erroneous. And unrealistic.
Punishing kids, unconscionable.


So just take every asylum seeker at their word then?

hint: They all claim asylum.
Abrignac Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,273
HuckFinn wrote:
No. But those seeking asylum? Process them.

It's been well reported that anyone showing up at the boarder is now seeking asylum. Activists know it will overwhelm the immigration courts. In fact, the number of cases has grown exponentially in a few years time. This leads to them being resettled in the US while they await their fate. After they have been here awhile they are hailed as contributors and any attempt to then deport them is labeled inhumane. Likewise holding them in detention is also labeled unconscionable. The only considerable remedy then is to welcome with open arms anyone who makes it into the US.

HuckFinn wrote:
Fearing immigration is erroneous. And unrealistic.

I don't think anyone fears legal immigration.

HuckFinn wrote:
Punishing kids, unconscionable.

You know it's not that uncomplicated.
ZRX1200 Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,599
I wouldn't try reason.

Not there.
DrafterX Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
A wall would solve this problem.. and stopping trucks at the border marked bananas... . Mellow
HuckFinn Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Abrignac wrote:
It's been well reported that anyone showing up at the boarder is now seeking asylum. Activists know it will overwhelm the immigration courts. In fact, the number of cases has grown exponentially in a few years time. This leads to them being resettled in the US while they await their fate. After they have been here awhile they are hailed as contributors and any attempt to then deport them is labeled inhumane. Likewise holding them in detention is also labeled unconscionable. The only considerable remedy then is to welcome with open arms anyone who makes it into the US.


I don't think anyone fears legal immigration.


You know it's not that uncomplicated.

Sessions so-called New Rules:It’s labeled “Interim Guidance” for asylum officers — the people in charge of conducting interviews for asylum and “credible fear” screening interviews for migrants at the border that determine whether they’ll be allowed to stay in the US and pursue an asylum claim. Most are simply turned away at the border.

And these are people trying to enter legally.
Many that are turned away then try to sneak in.

Guess you have little sympathy for refugees claiming they're afraid to go home...
And I do.

DrafterX Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
No means NO..!! Mad
HuckFinn Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
DrafterX wrote:
No means NO..!! Mad

Like just say no to drugs?

That worked.

Abrignac Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,273
HuckFinn wrote:
Sessions so-called New Rules:It’s labeled “Interim Guidance” for asylum officers — the people in charge of conducting interviews for asylum and “credible fear” screening interviews for migrants at the border that determine whether they’ll be allowed to stay in the US and pursue an asylum claim. Most are simply turned away at the border.

As they should be absent a lack of credible threat to their safety. Do you have evidence to the contrary?

HuckFinn wrote:
And these are people trying to enter legally.
Many that are turned away then try to sneak in.

So if they can't enter legally, they sneak in? Should we treat them different than any other criminal? Last I checked entering the US illegally was a criminal act.

HuckFinn wrote:
Guess you have little sympathy for refugees claiming they're afraid to go home...
And I do.


How does being in favor of legal immigration make someone unsympathetic?


bgz Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Huck, I don't think any of us are unsympathetic to their situations.

We have borders, and we have to protect the borders... we can't just let everyone walk in without question.

Just like I'm sure most of the random solicitors that knock on your door mean well, but you don't just let them walk in. It's a door, it's there for a reason, and you don't want people walking through it without your permission. I guess I could be wrong about that, you might just let any old hooker or crackhead claiming to be a person in need walk through your door at any time they want... but I'm guessing you don't.

So consider the border a giant f***ing door.
DrafterX Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Ya.. Mad
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
HuckFinn wrote:
No. But those seeking asylum? Process them.
Fearing immigration is erroneous. And unrealistic.
Punishing kids, unconscionable.


Huck, I read an article a few days back that stated that according to immigration officials, over 80% of asylum seekers where lying. No one in fearing immigration. We just want it done according to our laws. When my ancestors came here in the 1880s and 1910s, they did it the legal way. They learned the language and assimilated into the American culture. They did not receive government hand outs, and worked hard to make it in this country. They where proud to be Americans. A far cry from what is happening today.

Sure, many immigrants are hard working, learn the language and assimilate into our culture. To these I welcome with open arms. The ones that refuse to learn the language, refuse to assimilate, game the system for handouts and then demand that we make accommodations for their language and culture, are the ones I have problems with. When some schools can't even fly the American flag because it offends certain immigrants, you know we are doomed as a nation.

David (dpnewell)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>