America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by Speyside. 204 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345>
This is unacceptable!
JadeRose Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
HuckFinn wrote:
Vic, she's just a regurgitater with a big mortgage.
She's "just following orders"

Personally, I feel bad for her. What a horrible gig.






Pretty sure Nuremberg took care of THAT defense.
victor809 Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Jade... Just trying to make sure you keep meeting the higher expectations I have for you than for others... :)
DrMaddVibe Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
victor809 wrote:
Jade... Just trying to make sure you keep meeting the higher expectations I have for you than for others... :)



Why???

You Brown Shirts have been issued your walking orders by Maxine Waters!!!
JadeRose Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
DrafterX wrote:
that's how TW described you... Mellow




He was looking at my balls.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
It's being reported that Huckabee left the horrible restaurant peacefully after finishing appetizers...went to another restaurant down the street where they were followed and further harrassed.

The Left wants to behave the same way America was before the Civil Righs Act was passed. Only now it's not color that has them agitated its who you work for!

They have the balls to call Trump a Nazi? The Nazis acted the same way they are now.
victor809 Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Why???

You Brown Shirts have been issued your walking orders by Maxine Waters!!!

Be quiet you fat trailer trash slob.

How many times do I have to state that I want nothing to do with a fat, idiotic, child abuser such as yourself. I ignore you, and you piss off and do whatever uneducated, irresponsible, idiots do. You have no value to any discussion, and no real value to the world at large.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
victor809 wrote:
Be quiet you fat trailer trash slob.

How many times do I have to state that I want nothing to do with a fat, idiotic, child abuser such as yourself. I ignore you, and you piss off and do whatever uneducated, irresponsible, idiots do. You have no value to any discussion, and no real value to the world at large.



Yes... show the world how wrong you are and how hateful you can be.


HuckFinn Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
victor809 wrote:
Just following orders... Nothing good ever was explained with "just following orders"...

I don't feel bad for her. She can leave the job at any time.

Wasn't defending her body of work.
I'm satisfied seeing that she looks miserable doing her job.

'Just following orders' was meant to be satirical. Thought that was clear.
Wasn't defending the woman. Give her a break. She's caught between a rockheaded boss and a Mexican wall.
victor809 Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
HuckFinn wrote:
Wasn't defending her body of work.
I'm satisfied seeing that she looks miserable doing her job.

'Just following orders' was meant to be satirical. Thought that was clear.
Wasn't defending the woman. Give her a break. She's caught between a rockheaded boss and a Mexican wall.


Oh... Didn't think you were defending her... And caught your satirical reference. Was trying to reinforce the statement. Must not have come through on tone....
victor809 Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Yes... show the world how wrong you are and how hateful you can be.



What part of "silence you child abusing, fat, trailer trash idiot" is so difficult for you to understand.

If I ever want to know what your opinion of something I said is, I'll promptly give myself a frontal lobotomy. You add nothing to any discussion.
bgz Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Damn, victor rampaging today, battling all comers (except for Ewok, nobody wants to battle Ewok, he 9 fingers that sh1t better than anyone) ...

This message has been brought to you by Abilify.
JadeRose Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
victor809 wrote:
Jade... Just trying to make sure you keep meeting the higher expectations I have for you than for others... :)



You give me a diamond cutter too, Vic!
ZRX1200 Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
Victor, Jesus still loves you b u t I don't. I'm praying for you though.
JadeRose Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
Ewok126 wrote:
Sarah Sanders Huckabee?

I think shes hawt! That double chin, man I bet she could chug a c0ck like nobody's business. It gives me a chubby just thinking about it.

Give that poor woman another triple burger with extra cheese and stop the hate!

The more chins shes got the less space I got to fill when the time comes. As they say, the grand canyon is tight if you pack enough meat into it! Herfing jester





Wait a minute.....Hey VIC.....you give ME $hit for mentioning her go-funny eye when THIS softball is out there?


Ok....just checkin...this IS Cbid after all.

(I bet she can "chug a c0ck" like a champ, though)
JadeRose Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
ZRX1200 wrote:
Victor, Jesus still loves you b u t I don't. I'm praying for you though.



Naw...he called. Vic is gonna have "problems" later today. Something about crotch boils.
ZRX1200 Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
He does know urine isn't really showering right?
JadeRose Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
ZRX1200 wrote:
He does know urine isn't really showering right?




Who...Trump? Apparently not
victor809 Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Expectations Jade.... Expectations.
Anything you post is taken as a "liberal" view... So you need to be better than the others.

Ewok is .... Ewok. Later when I criticize tail for calling Nancy pelosi ugly and un-fkable he isn't going to point to ewoks post and say liberals say the same thing.... He doesn't consider ewok to be representing the liberal view point.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
victor809 wrote:
What part of "silence you child abusing, fat, trailer trash idiot" is so difficult for you to understand.

If I ever want to know what your opinion of something I said is, I'll promptly give myself a frontal lobotomy. You add nothing to any discussion.


No need to reinforce the notion that you look like the banjo playing kid in Deliverence.

You have the rat teeth, the receding baldness and the sneer you have posted in every pic here on Cbid. For a guy that wants to claim everyone is fat...you're no picture of health with that pot belly of yours.
victor809 Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Z...I think you know how much I care about an imaginary sky fairy's love and prayers.....

Same goes for jesus's...
bgz Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
So you're not allowed to talk sh1t here about peoples' looks if they are on the same side as you?!?!?!

WTF, I thought this is cbid, guess I need to find a new forum.
victor809 Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrMaddVibe wrote:
No need to reinforce the notion that you look like the banjo playing kid in Deliverence.

You have the rat teeth, the receding baldness and the sneer you have posted in every pic here on Cbid. For a guy that wants to claim everyone is fat...you're no picture of health with that pot belly of yours.


The instant that you stop directing any communication towards me is the point in time that I stop pointing out that you are a 5'10, 280lb (gonna crap out from a coronary soon carrying that wide load around) piece of trailer trash with an arrest record for child abuse.

You have shown yourself to be a disgusting human being over the years of your presence here, and I want absolutely nothing to do with you. But you want to keep directing posts my way, I'm going to keep pointing out that you are human refuse.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
Be careful Vikki...the ban hammer is over your head.

Use the ignore function Mr. Get Along.
victor809 Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Be careful Vikki...the ban hammer is over your head.

Use the ignore function Mr. Get Along.


Again... Because you're too damn stupid to understand words the first time you see them....

The instant that you stop directing any communication towards me is the point in time that I stop pointing out that you are a 5'10, 280lb (gonna crap out from a coronary soon carrying that wide load around) piece of trailer trash with an arrest record for child abuse.

Simply stop trying to engage me in a conversation. Just stop. Go bother someone else.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
SO MUCH HATE from such a small little man.

Keep on believing the lies you tell rat face.
JadeRose Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
Victor810...come on down!
JadeRose Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
victor809 wrote:
Expectations Jade.... Expectations.
Anything you post is taken as a "liberal" view... So you need to be better than the others.

Ewok is .... Ewok. Later when I criticize tail for calling Nancy pelosi ugly and un-fkable he isn't going to point to ewoks post and say liberals say the same thing.... He doesn't consider ewok to be representing the liberal view point.




meh......I'm mostly here for the lol's and to continue my seduction of teedubbya.
victor809 Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrMaddVibe wrote:
SO MUCH HATE from such a small little man.

Keep on believing the lies you tell rat face.


Just too damn stupid aren't you.
Point out anywhere I've lied.
You are in fact a 5'10, 280lb (gonna crap out from a coronary soon carrying that wide load around) piece of trailer trash with an arrest record for child abuse.

Any it's funny that a 5'10 guy would be calling me little.

All you have to do is go bother someone else with your nonsense.
HuckFinn Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Back at the ranch...

So the baker (who, to protect the innocent I'll in the future refer to as Sara Lee) who has no problem baking detailed custom-made opposite sex couple wedding cakes refuses to bake one for a gay couple. 
And the Supreme Court agrees with Sara, 7-2. 
Ok. Then the court makes a post-decision fancy statement about the importance of equal rights for gays and lesbians and blah blah blah, and rejects the claim that store owners have broad religious liberty and rights to turn away customers because of their sexual orientation.


Leave it to the S.C. to make things crystal  clear.


Clearly if they were a black opposite sex couple they'd be guaranteed their fancy cake. Now. But it sure took some doing to get there. 

 How about a mixed race opposite sex couple? Is there wiggle room for Sara there? Pastor?

 Or a Muslim couple wanting the figure of the bride on the cake to be wearing a hijab and the groom a white throbe? We good Sara?


Gets tricky. Too many very disturbing variations. What about opposite sex couples, man and beast?

http://www.mindblowing-facts.org/2013/11/10-unbelievable-people-who-married-animals/

I'd want to see THAT cake!


I think the one thing everyone can agree on is we can't agree on everything.
And if we as a collective can't come to an agreement, who better than the individual behind the counter to make the call. 


It's inevitable. SOMEONE'S gonna have their rights protected and someone's gonna be pissed.

Turning Huckabee away is pretty harmless and just purely symbolic compared to the treatment Waters feels the immigrants are receiving.

Even if you disagree with her, it's undeniable, missing dinner and missing mommy are well, pretty different.
victor809 Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
JadeRose wrote:
meh......I'm mostly here for the lol's and to continue my seduction of teedubbya.


... mostly....

:)
Speyside Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
I am very disappointed in the Supreme Court. I never knew Leonardo DaVinci baked cakes. To consider decorating a cake to be artistic freedom is patently absurd. At the same time refusing to serve someone at a restaurant is equally absurd. Is this artistic freedom also? Common sense dictates that if a business serves all customers.

I do not care what the law says. At one time the law said it was legal to own African Americans and they were chattel. It was the law, but it sure as hell wasn't right. Nor does the protected group concept fly with me. The constitution states all men are created equal. That pretty much says it all.
HuckFinn Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Speyside wrote:
I am very disappointed in the Supreme Court. I never knew Leonardo DaVinci baked cakes. To consider decorating a cake to be artistic freedom is patently absurd. At the same time refusing to serve someone at a restaurant is equally absurd. Is this artistic freedom also? Common sense dictates that if a business serves all customers.

I do not care what the law says. At one time the law said it was legal to own African Americans and they were chattel. It was the law, but it sure as hell wasn't right. Nor does the protected group concept fly with me. The constitution states all men are created equal. That pretty much says it all.

Have you seen some of these elaborate cakes? They really are works of art.
Refusing to serve someone at a restaurant is harsh. But given the political climate?
Not absurd. What's absurd in the Age of Trump?

Turning Huckabee away was a harmless, symbolic act (eat elsewhere!)
But a big statement (you're defending indefensible policies!)

We may all be created equal but we sure aren't treated equally. That's the reality.
And reality is always a work in progress.
Ewok126 Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
bgz wrote:
Damn, victor rampaging today, battling all comers (except for Ewok, nobody wants to battle Ewok, he 9 fingers that sh1t better than anyone) ...

This message has been brought to you by Abilify.




Anxious ThumpUp
delta1 Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,776
I guess it's OK to discriminate against Muslims...at least according to SCOTUS...so it's the law of the land...will have to read the opinion to see how narrowly constructed is that permissible discrimination...


I do see some irony in this thread...guys who've never been the victim of discrimination...debating about what's acceptable or not when acting on one's prejudices...
RMAN4443 Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
HuckFinn wrote:
Back at the ranch...

So the baker (who, to protect the innocent I'll in the future refer to as Sara Lee) who has no problem baking detailed custom-made opposite sex couple wedding cakes refuses to bake one for a gay couple. 
And the Supreme Court agrees with Sara, 7-2. 
Ok. Then the court makes a post-decision fancy statement about the importance of equal rights for gays and lesbians and blah blah blah, and rejects the claim that store owners have broad religious liberty and rights to turn away customers because of their sexual orientation.


Leave it to the S.C. to make things crystal  clear.


Clearly if they were a black opposite sex couple they'd be guaranteed their fancy cake. Now. But it sure took some doing to get there. 

 How about a mixed race opposite sex couple? Is there wiggle room for Sara there? Pastor?

 Or a Muslim couple wanting the figure of the bride on the cake to be wearing a hijab and the groom a white throbe? We good Sara?


Gets tricky. Too many very disturbing variations. What about opposite sex couples, man and beast?

http://www.mindblowing-facts.org/2013/11/10-unbelievable-people-who-married-animals/

I'd want to see THAT cake!


I think the one thing everyone can agree on is we can't agree on everything.
And if we as a collective can't come to an agreement, who better than the individual behind the counter to make the call. 


It's inevitable. SOMEONE'S gonna have their rights protected and someone's gonna be pissed.

Turning Huckabee away is pretty harmless and just purely symbolic compared to the treatment Waters feels the immigrants are receiving.

Even if you disagree with her, it's undeniable, missing dinner and missing mommy are well, pretty different.

Sara doesn't make wedding cakes anymore. ..for ANYONE. ..horse
tailgater Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
I call him the orange moron.
I've probably made fun of his hair.
I believe I also pointed out he was probably a lot fatter than his Dr claimed.

I admit I occasionally make fun of a politicians looks... I laughed when people pointed out mcconnel looks like a turtle.

But I specifically don't do it to female politicians because we have too many years of history of valuing women solely by their looks. Falling back on appearance when criticizing female politicians is a cheap and easy attack and shows a lack of creativity.

We don't care if a male politician is attractive (even if we mock his orangeness or vanity weave of hair)... But people like to post about how attractive their sides female talking heads are compared to the other side... Or how attractive their sides female congresspeople are compared to the other side. Which means they are still valuing female appearance for a job which does not require men to be attractive.

Society has a double standard in place. That will lead to inconsistencies. When people stop pretending a female politician's appearance is somehow relevant then I'll probably stop criticizing people for being lazy and falling back on that attack.


So you can't make fun of a woman's looks. But you can a mans.

You do realize that you're being sexist. Don't you?

Sure, there's a double standard. We all know it.
Unlike the left, I won't deny it (Samantha Bee anyone?).
But to come out and say it's OK to make fun of someone's looks as long as they have a Y chromosome?

Gotta admit.
I can live with that.



JadeRose Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
tailgater wrote:
So you can't make fun of a woman's looks. But you can a mans.

You do realize that you're being sexist. Don't you?

Sure, there's a double standard. We all know it.
Unlike the left, I won't deny it (Samantha Bee anyone?).
But to come out and say it's OK to make fun of someone's looks as long as they have a Y chromosome?

Gotta admit.
I can live with that.







Hey Tail...Vic says you quote me as a "liberal viewpoint"!! Thanks, Buddy. I like you too.
JadeRose Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
delta1 wrote:
I guess it's OK to discriminate against Muslims...at least according to SCOTUS...so it's the law of the land...will have to read the opinion to see how narrowly constructed is that permissible discrimination...


I do see some irony in this thread...guys who've never been the victim of discrimination...debating about what's acceptable or not when acting on one's prejudices...





ROR
victor809 Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Same way you can tell a white person they look like a monkey, but can't say that to a black person.

Nothing exists in a vacuum. As long as there are people specifically using certain insults against specific races or genders or sexualities as a way to "put them in their place" then when you fall back on those same insults you show that you're making the lazy argument.

I expect better from Jade, because he doesn't usually go for the lazy insult.

I'm not saying you can't insult women for their looks. If a woman asks you to sleep with her (hahahhaha I crack myself up) then her looks are very pertinent to the discussion. If Huckabee Sanders offered you a bj, feel free to point out that her appearance makes your d1(k wilt. But for the most part these are successful, professional people and the chance of any of us (even my sexy self) nailing them is 0%... So their appearance is irrelevant.
victor809 Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Delta.... Our law says it's ok to discriminate against countries... Now many of these are Muslim countries... But the list is:
Iran
North Korea (Trump's BFF!)
Syria
Libya
Yemen
Somalia
Venezuela

There are non Muslim countries on the list... And there are Muslim countries not on the list. The problem is of course, Trump's words. He wanted to ban Muslims, because he's a piece of sh$t who thinks all Muslims are evil. The law as written doesn't do that, so the question becomes whether the intent behind the law makes the law unconstitutional... The court ruled it didn't...

If there was some sort of religion test to enter the country, that would be a Muslim ban... And it would be the dumbest thing ever, since religion is fungible.... "You Muslim?" ... "Nope!"
DrMaddVibe Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,389
delta1 wrote:
I guess it's OK to discriminate against Muslims...at least according to SCOTUS...so it's the law of the land...will have to read the opinion to see how narrowly constructed is that permissible discrimination...


I do see some irony in this thread...guys who've never been the victim of discrimination...debating about what's acceptable or not when acting on one's prejudices...



It wasn't about Muslims. It was about verifying the background checks to whom can enter and adding more time to get it done, but just like the baker that wouldn't decorate a cake it confounds the Left here on this site.

Doesn't anyone ever read anymore? Some sure want to act like the know a lot, when they can't even take the time to actually understand what it is they're mad at.
HuckFinn Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
So no more your mom is so ugly jokes?
Eg...that her birth certificate reads like a letter of apology?


Suks.
DrafterX Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Yo momma's so old, when she lifted her boob to wash under it, a pilgrim fell out.... Mellow
bgz Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Yo momma so fat you can f*** her ankle rolls.
DrafterX Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
OhMyGod
frankj1 Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
JadeRose wrote:
ROR

Judges ruled this is permissible...as long as you actually raffed

Now the Supreme Court on the other hand...
tailgater Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
JadeRose wrote:
Hey Tail...Vic says you quote me as a "liberal viewpoint"!! Thanks, Buddy. I like you too.


Just liberal when compared to mine.
It's all relative.
Like incest.


tailgater Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Same way you can tell a white person they look like a monkey, but can't say that to a black person.

Nothing exists in a vacuum. As long as there are people specifically using certain insults against specific races or genders or sexualities as a way to "put them in their place" then when you fall back on those same insults you show that you're making the lazy argument.

I expect better from Jade, because he doesn't usually go for the lazy insult.

I'm not saying you can't insult women for their looks. If a woman asks you to sleep with her (hahahhaha I crack myself up) then her looks are very pertinent to the discussion. If Huckabee Sanders offered you a bj, feel free to point out that her appearance makes your d1(k wilt. But for the most part these are successful, professional people and the chance of any of us (even my sexy self) nailing them is 0%... So their appearance is irrelevant.


You're trying too hard.


ZRX1200 Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
Where's your Obama outrage Al?
tailgater Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
You momma so ugly and black that she's immune from ridicule.




Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>