America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by tailgater. 200 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
The type of viewpoint that makes me want a better president.
teedubbya Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I was being sarcastic. What’s happening to the kids at this point is wrong even if you beleive in the initial separation because they are criminals.

They lost track of who the kids are and who they belong too.
frankj1 Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
MACS wrote:
My father in law entered the country because I am married to his daughter. So. What's your point? What was her contribution, aside from marrying a sailor?

He was here for about 6 years. He came here legally. He worked and sent money home to the Philippines. After 6 years he missed home so much he returned. I don't blame him.

my point was a response to your post in that thread...

You wrote:

"Do you not believe we should only accept those immigrants who will contribute TO society rather than draw from it? Especially if they draw from taxpayer funded sources without ever having contributed a dime to those sources?"

and I used Trump's wife dragging her family in as Exhibit A..her contribution was that she is photogenic.

still has nothing to do with how to track kids separated from misdemeanor convicts.
MACS Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
Yeah... and the complete and total blame for all of this is on the gov't that's attempting to protect its sovereignty, and not on the people who are attempting to circumvent it.

Won't somebody please think of the children!!!???!!!
DrafterX Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
It's old news being dragged out to influence the midterm elections... The problem has been fixed... Where was the outrage when Obama did the exact same thing..?? Huh
frankj1 Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
you guys should go to bed...knowing that I love you.
DrafterX Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Love you too Frank... ThumpUp
teedubbya Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Obama did not do the exact thing and it’s not fixed.

MACS the thing about life is not much is mutually exclusive. You can blame the parents for their part and the government for theirs. It’s not all or nothing. Prior to arrest all actions are on the parent. Once in custody that changes quite a bit. It’s easy.

And again, no one is absolving the parents in here to my knowledge. But yes the government did screw up in their haste to change things quickly. They simply not prepared to do what they needed to do. You’ve seen it before as have I. It’s clear as day.

Thinking most/many/all of the parents aren’t looking for their kids so it’s their fault the government lost track of who is who is alien to me.
MACS Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
frankj1 wrote:
you guys should go to bed...knowing that I love you.


You do NOT f***in tell me what to do!!

Signed---

Senior Chief!
frankj1 Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
I'm sorry

TW
MACS Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
frankj1 wrote:
I'm sorry

TW


Apology accepted

jpotts
DrafterX Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
freaks.. Mellow
tailgater Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Um .... it’s not 38 kids so yea we must be talking about something different.


I'm sure the numbers will change with the wind, but here's what we see in the news cycle:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/trump-admin-asks-more-time-reunite-kids-parents-separated-border-n889301

That's an older one from early July, but the numbers change daily. This one just stuck in my memory.


Either way, it's the PARENTS that can't be found in the vast majority of situations.

That's a LOT different from kids lost in the system with parents searching for them.

tailgater Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
I know where the parents are...in jail.
Cuz if they were roaming free in our country, then they would not have been separated for being illegal aliens.

I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but it's getting tougher to follow.


If the parents are in jail, then how could we possibly reunite them?

You're trying too hard to make a point that doesn't exist.



Let me say this clearly:
It's a travesty that our system failed. We should know where every matching family member is.






tailgater Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
let's simplify this part...parents searching for their kids, or not.

if the parents tail is citing are in jail, then they can not be roaming freely in search of their children...yes or no?

and he is complaining that they are not searching for their children.

I admit I am confused...just looking for a few simple sentences explaining how the jailed parents could be free to do the searching.



Frank,
The claim by the ACLU, the media, and the Trump Haters is that there are families trying to reunite that are unable to do so because our government screwed the pooch with their paperwork.

I've seen news reports from the main stream media that talk about kids with no one looking for them. I have not seen the reports of parents looking for their kids.

If you are correct, and the parents are in jail, then the ACLU, the media, and the Trump Haters are being disingenuous. Because those families are NOT trying to reunite. The headlines about separated families are not talking about jailbird parents crying for their kids. The implication by the media is that freedom loving mom and dad are searching in vain for junior who was viciously ripped from their loving arms by Trump himself.

It saddens me to know kids don't or won't have a family.
I think we all wish the record keeping was better.
But that was a result, not the goal.
frankj1 Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
so. we are closer now.

I'd even add that the almost 2% of kids (38 or so?) affected by missing parents may have been taken by us from adults who were not really their parents...I'm sure some of the cases fall under this tragic setting.

so that may explain why no parents are claiming them...but I now think you and I would agree that simple record keeping could have placed the kids and the adults who brought them in the same room at the end of each case.

At that point, our gov personnel could have decided to just send them back or attempt to involve other governments to find the real parents...a choice of worse and worser.

I am pretty sure I haven't mentioned Trump yet.
teedubbya Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Tail the report from July with the “38” out of 3000 (also on the first paragraph) which is what I pasted from does not say or imply the parents are not looking for them. Your continuation to insist that is either just stubborn or I thought you were smarter than that.

The kids in question are not lost. The government has them in hand. They didn’t wander off, they are in custody. They’ve just been shipped around the country and we lost track of who they are or who they belong to. In the process we didn’t let the parents know remotely where we sent them. I fear some of these situations might be permanent despite the parents desperate attempts to find their kids. There is no link. It’s been broken and the deck has been shuffled several times. If you are in New Mexico, have no idea the government sent your kid to the east coast, and the government has no record of where they sent your kid you are effed. And the government has a kid in custody for which they can not locate their parents. The damn parents.

They are under 5 years old and can’t help the delema. We can’t find their parents largely because we don’t know who their parents are, or where they are at. We played three card monte with them and lost track. It has zero to do with parents not looking.

That story in no way shape or form is how you describe. At that time there were 3000 kids involved. Of those 3000 still being detained and separated at that moment 38 are ones where there is not enough information to locate the parents. Often the only link to the parents was a phone number in the kids hand. If lost no link. Oopsie daisy can’t find the parents. The government didn’t document properly in their haste. This is well known and well reported/documented even by fox.

Go back and read your statements. To say the parents are not looking is absurd, isn’t based on anything, is a total misreading of your own article, and doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t pass any logic test even without looking further.

I hope this isn’t how you read and interpret things on a daily basis or I’ve been giving you too much credit for years.
teedubbya Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I’ve been saying all along, concede the arrest and separation. I may not agree but that o e is debatable. What is not debatable is once in custody the government has a responsibility. They failed. In their haste to implement this they neglected basic things like documentation and tracking. That’s not a controversial statement. It’s pretty well accepted by the government and the courts to be true. The government was overwhelmed and inept as a result. This was done in haste.

While I suppose it’s possible to find a parent or two who ditched their kids for whatever reason it is not the norm, in no way large scale, is at best on the fringes of the issue and is bizarre to try to frame the issue this way. The insistence on trying to frame it that way is in no way coherent and makes all of us dumber by the moment and may god have mercy on your soul (billy Madison humor).


Just so odd to see anti government types defend a complete failure of the government machine when it suits them.
cacman Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
For the sake of the childrens, document the undocumented immigrant who broke the law.

teedubbya Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Yes. Then send them home together. I’m not for the government shelving their responsibility simply because I don’t like this particular boogie man. Do it right.
Speyside Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
TW, there is something else going on here and was the reason I started the thread. The ACLU took the government to court for the following. The government said they had no responsibility to reunite children with parents that had been deported during the time of separation. The courts agreed with the ACLU in that the government does have a responsibility to reunite these families.
teedubbya Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Understood. I was including those kids in my comments when I said in custody, in the us, or out of country.

The government has certain responsibilities once taking someone in to custody. They have failed those responsibilities and in some cases are trying to rationalize or justify it.

They split a family, don’t keep very good track of where they ship a toddler while at the same time sending a parent voluntarily or involuntarily out of country. Now they don’t have enough info to match kid with parent. And if they figure that out then they need to figure out parent movements in another country.

Not a very well thought out fiasco.

And yes... asylum seekers bad, government good, they deserve everything they get the law breaking scum. Signed a Cuban cigar smoker.
bgz Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Why are we still talking about this?

The new CNN talking point is Lebron... separated children are so last month.
tailgater Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Tail the report from July with the “38” out of 3000 (also on the first paragraph) which is what I pasted from does not say or imply the parents are not looking for them. Your continuation to insist that is either just stubborn or I thought you were smarter than that.

The kids in question are not lost. The government has them in hand. They didn’t wander off, they are in custody. They’ve just been shipped around the country and we lost track of who they are or who they belong to. In the process we didn’t let the parents know remotely where we sent them. I fear some of these situations might be permanent despite the parents desperate attempts to find their kids. There is no link. It’s been broken and the deck has been shuffled several times. If you are in New Mexico, have no idea the government sent your kid to the east coast, and the government has no record of where they sent your kid you are effed. And the government has a kid in custody for which they can not locate their parents. The damn parents.

They are under 5 years old and can’t help the delema. We can’t find their parents largely because we don’t know who their parents are, or where they are at. We played three card monte with them and lost track. It has zero to do with parents not looking.

That story in no way shape or form is how you describe. At that time there were 3000 kids involved. Of those 3000 still being detained and separated at that moment 38 are ones where there is not enough information to locate the parents. Often the only link to the parents was a phone number in the kids hand. If lost no link. Oopsie daisy can’t find the parents. The government didn’t document properly in their haste. This is well known and well reported/documented even by fox.

Go back and read your statements. To say the parents are not looking is absurd, isn’t based on anything, is a total misreading of your own article, and doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t pass any logic test even without looking further.

I hope this isn’t how you read and interpret things on a daily basis or I’ve been giving you too much credit for years.


I pulled one headline from thousands.
I read and watched news reports. You might have too.
If you listened closely, you heard about kids in the system. Lost. No documentation to connect them to their folks.
And...
No adults claiming them.

If we have 2,000 kids (as some reports indicate) then we should have 2,000 parents looking for them. This is not insurmountable.
But you know what is?
2,000 kids with zero parents looking for them.

Kinda tough to link them back up, don't ya think?






dstieger Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
When my kids were young, we'd threaten military school...or we'd leave them at the zoo....now parents have another threat option: "We're all going to visit Mexico and then try to sneak back into US. You don't like the way you're being treated? Just wait 'til you spend a couple weeks with ICE!"
victor809 Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
U think it's funny that for the last few days tail has reiterated the same argument over and over without bothering to actually understand the questions Frank was posing ....

Based on just reading the posts in this thread one could come to the conclusion that tail doesn't actually read people's responses to his posts.
teedubbya Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Tail no documentation thus unable to locate parents does not equal parents not looking.

Good god I’ve given you too much credit.
teedubbya Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I’m convinced tail gets it and is just trolling now. No one is that dense.
DrafterX Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Mellow
victor809 Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Maybe tail isn't actually tail but has been replaced with a sophisticated Russian bot????.....









...... Ok... An unsophisticated Russian bot....
tailgater Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Tail no documentation thus unable to locate parents does not equal parents not looking.

Good god I’ve given you too much credit.


Locate parents?

Holy crap you're dense.

If your kid was separated from you would you be difficult to locate? Documentation be damned, I'd be the one yelling to everyone in earshot.



It's funny how you Trump Haters call him racist or anti immigrant.
But then you make arguments that assume the immigrants are stupid as sh*t and can't get out of their own way.


And if the parent is in jail, then there is no one to join the kid with anyhow.


Too much credit?
LOL.
Like always you aren't even saying anything, other than being a contrarian.



Let me speak slowly:
1. No documentation on the separation. BAD on us. I agree. I've said this. Yet read your post. You moron.
2. No documentation wouldn't stop you or I if the circumstance were reversed. I know you well enough to commit to this.
3. Parents in jail or scared or in your opinion too dumb is NOT an excuse to let you kid be missing without making a stink.
4. "Unable to locate parents"?? You really do think very little of the immigrant intelligence. They are people like you and I and as such they shouldn't be "unlocatable" if that were a word.

Schmucks.

tailgater Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Maybe tail isn't actually tail but has been replaced with a sophisticated Russian bot????.....









...... Ok... An unsophisticated Russian bot....


Like a sex bot?

Count me in.
Comrade.

HuckFinn Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
tailgater wrote:
Locate parents?

Holy crap you're dense.

If your kid was separated from you would you be difficult to locate? Documentation be damned, I'd be the one yelling to everyone in earshot.



It's funny how you Trump Haters call him racist or anti immigrant.
But then you make arguments that assume the immigrants are stupid as sh*t and can't get out of their own way.


And if the parent is in jail, then there is no one to join the kid with anyhow.


Too much credit?
LOL.
Like always you aren't even saying anything, other than being a contrarian.



Let me speak slowly:
1. No documentation on the separation. BAD on us. I agree. I've said this. Yet read your post. You moron.
2. No documentation wouldn't stop you or I if the circumstance were reversed. I know you well enough to commit to this.
3. Parents in jail or scared or in your opinion too dumb is NOT an excuse to let you kid be missing without making a stink.
4. "Unable to locate parents"?? You really do think very little of the immigrant intelligence. They are people like you and I and as such they shouldn't be "unlocatable" if that were a word.

Schmucks.


'you and me'. Imbecile.
teedubbya Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
lol. Thanks for the laugh tail.

There is zero info saying the parents are not looking yet you make that up from a headline that in no way says that and keep arguing it.

I’m hoping you are doing it intentionally.

Classic.
gummy jones Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
I feel like I've spent my entire life thinking the thread title
Buckwheat Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Reading through these comments/viewpoints gives me a better understanding as to why our government is so FUBAR. Our government is a reflection of our society. In general we are all self centered narcissistic A-holes who have difficulty in grasping even the most basic concepts. We all, myself included, like to complain about this and that and seldom do we actually get off our fat *sses and do something about it. How many of you try to get out of jury duty when you are picked? A trial by jury is a keystone of our system. And the pathetic number of people that don't vote or even get involved in our elections is just disgusting. We deserve who we have in office. So suck it up buttercups. fog horse
tailgater Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
HuckFinn wrote:
'you and me'. Imbecile.


Guilty.

tailgater Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
lol. Thanks for the laugh tail.

There is zero info saying the parents are not looking yet you make that up from a headline that in no way says that and keep arguing it.

I’m hoping you are doing it intentionally.

Classic.


"There is zero info saying the parents are not looking."

It's like you're trying to prove a negative.

What I'm saying is there is zero info showing parents who ARE looking but can't find the kids.

A few back in early July timeframe had difficulty, but by all accounts it seems they found them. Since then it's been all about the kids with nobody claiming them.

Google "immigrant can't find kids" or anything else and read the news feed.

You're outraged at something that simply isn't true.
Well, not outraged perhaps. But you're defending the overall media impression. Again.
HuckFinn Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
Pretty silly back and forth. How would we know if parents were or weren't looking for their kids? The government agencies in charge? Course not.

The media? How do you source info like that?

The lost children mix-up was meant to send a strong warning to immigrants. Stay home.

Wasn't accidental.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
The government sent a strong message to those south of our border: come legally or not at all... Some say this was good,some say it was bad... No one is going to change their minds on that,it's just a difference of opinion... seems futile to discuss...

serious question, are there parents who were separated from their kids who haven't been reunited yet and who are they?
teedubbya Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Tail you drew a conclusion from a headline that can not be drawn from the headline or the story. It's a conclusion that also can not pass any logic test. That's all I'm pointing out. I suspect you get it but will never admit it.

Opel there are examples of them out there. You can find them with an easy search. Of the ones remaining resources available is a pretty big determinant of success. Thats why there is a call for attorneys to represent these folks.

I don't believe it was intentional. Maybe it was, and I'd not fault anyone with that belief. As I said I think it was inept government trying to implement something too quickly (which takes credit or blame away from the Prez).

I do not believe there is a substantial number of parents that were separated from their children that are not looking or trying to get them back and there is zero evidence that would point to tails initial assertion that is what is happening. He drew the conclusion from information that did not say that and now is claiming you can't prove a negative. He's always a moving target and in this case has given me a few laughs which I appreciate.

I still think he's trolling because if he is sincere then I have given him too much credit and need to remember that in future discussions LOL.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Useful numbers:

493 kids
Among children who have not been reunited, the largest group consists of those who crossed the border with adults whom the government has not contacted since releasing them from custody. This includes parents who have been deported to their home country, have left the country voluntarily, have been released into the United States or whose locations are otherwise unknown.

34 kids
Another group is children whose parents waived their right to reunification, according to the government.

57 kids
“Red flags” from background checks on parents could include things such as criminal histories, abuse allegations.


97 kids
In some cases, attorneys have barred the government from releasing a child until certain conditions are resolved, such as documenting when and where a child was taken into custody.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/local/tracking-migrant-family-separation/?utm_term=.38a37bf6e15c

teedubbya Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Useful numbers:

493 kids
Among children who have not been reunited, the largest group consists of those who crossed the border with adults whom the government has not contacted since releasing them from custody. This includes parents who have been deported to their home country, have left the country voluntarily, have been released into the United States or whose locations are otherwise unknown.

34 kids
Another group is children whose parents waived their right to reunification, according to the government.

57 kids
“Red flags” from background checks on parents could include things such as criminal histories, abuse allegations.


97 kids
In some cases, attorneys have barred the government from releasing a child until certain conditions are resolved, such as documenting when and where a child was taken into custody.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/local/tracking-migrant-family-separation/?utm_term=.38a37bf6e15c




Now that is some info you can draw conclusions from. Interesting.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Disclaimer: each of the bullet points in the original article contained some amount of commentary that i edited out... tried to just get the facts in there... visit the site if you want the whole thing...
tailgater Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Tail you drew a conclusion from a headline that can not be drawn from the headline or the story. It's a conclusion that also can not pass any logic test. That's all I'm pointing out. I suspect you get it but will never admit it.

Opel there are examples of them out there. You can find them with an easy search. Of the ones remaining resources available is a pretty big determinant of success. Thats why there is a call for attorneys to represent these folks.

I don't believe it was intentional. Maybe it was, and I'd not fault anyone with that belief. As I said I think it was inept government trying to implement something too quickly (which takes credit or blame away from the Prez).

I do not believe there is a substantial number of parents that were separated from their children that are not looking or trying to get them back and there is zero evidence that would point to tails initial assertion that is what is happening. He drew the conclusion from information that did not say that and now is claiming you can't prove a negative. He's always a moving target and in this case has given me a few laughs which I appreciate.

I still think he's trolling because if he is sincere then I have given him too much credit and need to remember that in future discussions LOL.


With extreme sincerity it is quite obvious that you truly are a moron.

You are trying so hard to counter a point I initially made based on casual observations.
You don't want to believe it so you are desperate to disprove it.
But you can't. And therefore you haven't.
And somehow I'm to blame for your inadequacies.








tailgater Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Useful numbers:

493 kids
Among children who have not been reunited, the largest group consists of those who crossed the border with adults whom the government has not contacted since releasing them from custody. This includes parents who have been deported to their home country, have left the country voluntarily, have been released into the United States or whose locations are otherwise unknown.






Thank you.



ZRX1200 Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
https://ijr.com/2018/08/1114726-man-claimed-cross-border-daughter-turns-raping/
Speyside Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
News source PROPUBLICA

Worker Charged With Sexually Molesting Eight Children at Immigrant Shelter
The allegations against the Southwest Key youth care worker are the latest in a series of serious accusations of sexual abuse inside the government’s immigrant youth shelters.
Speyside Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
News source NY Times.

More Than 450 Migrant Parents May Have Been Deported Without Their Children.
teedubbya Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Tail I am absolutely amazed you don’t get it. You are making a fool out of yourself. Anyone reading this can decide for themselves.

That said I’m good. I don’t care if you get it and it’s not worth my time anymore.
teedubbya Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The thirty four in opels numbers did what amounts to putting their kids up for adoption. That part doesn’t surprise me.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>