Opel,
There's a lot of people who have a problem with the big bang theory (myself included). Unfortunately, it's the best model we currently have that fits observational data. I think I would be more comfortable with it if we were actually able to find the theoretical dark matter, or find an alternative to dark matter and dark energy that would adequately fit observation. I have high hopes for Modified Newtonian dynamics, but it too currently has issues where critics say it doesn't completely eliminate the need for dark matter. Going into this in further detail would be beyond the scope of this thread;)
I could see why you would have a problem with the big bang and accelerating inflation... but you made a claim earlier in the thread that actually supports the prevailing model (not sure if you knew it or not).
Quote:
Randomness never results in order... Even infinite randomness... It results in infinite chaos
What you are describing there is entropy, and that same concept in our current model leads to the ultimate death of the universe (heat death). That is when the expansion of the universe reaches a point to where no further entropy is possible.
Anyway, I don't see how it's beneficial to our understanding of the universe to scrap the best model we have and say f*ck it, this is too silly, let's just assume a creator who exists outside of what we can see created everything and go from there.
That's not logical.
The big bang theory is actually a product of mathematics and logic, not the lack thereof.
There's a lot of subjects that have been scientifically proven that defy logic from what we see on a daily basis... #1 on that list... quantum mechanics. If you're beating your head on the wall over the big bang theory... don't even bother looking up wave particle duality... and don't bother looking up quantum entanglement. That sh*t will blow your lid.