America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Oh Jesus

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2018/10/29/craziness-bomb-suspect-cesar-sayoc-and-stormy-daniels-worked-at-the-same-strip-c-n2533093

Using that logic, then virtually every act of terror can be blamed on every sitting President.


Of course, it MIGHT have been the lyrics from one of the heavy metal songs Ceasar stripped to.

We'll start calling you Tipper809

Let it be known that Speyside stated that if Trump were not President of the United States, then Ceasar the stripping terrorist might not have sent pipe bombs in the mail to anyone.


In an equally plausible reality, had I not named my dog Sadie, then Ceasar the stripping terrorist might not have made the pipe bombs to begin with.


It's a shame we'll never know.

Meanwhile I have to buy a book on dog names.

how can you ever lose when you get to misrepresent the opposing view first?

Arguments are down the hall...I thought this was the Office of Silly Banter???

While the two thoughts are pretty much equivalent, your having so carelessly named your dog doesn't suit the convenience of the leftists who are determined to use any and all means, illogical or not, to "resist" the Trump administration ...

The dog-naming is too obviously silly and ridiculous while the idea that some bomb making loon had a Trump bumper sticker on his van can (and has) been successfully used to make the weak-minded and non-critical thinkers believe that it's Trump's fault ...

He said exactly what I said. Or vice-versa.

I simply used it to preface the rest of my post.

I even used the term "might". Even though his earlier protestations implied a more vigorous influence.

LMMFPWAO

I would advise tg to sell his acreage...too close to tornadoes.

Inaccurate analogy?
Dude. They are YOUR words.
Own them.

Do me a favor.
Read post 164 and tell me how that's "rib eye versus avocado".

Own the words.
Or don't say them to begin with.

164 is pretty much tail gibberish. You are wrong in so many ways I don't know where to start.

I voted for neither as well...

but I think I met Sadie, and I believe she had her tongue and paws all over me without my consent.
Do I have the right "animal" Joe?

HA!

Honest question:
Are you f*cked in the head?

I quoted you.
I quoted me.

Don't be a d*ck head.

Own your words.

A man would.

sooo wicked!
you're like uh idiot, and I can't stop laughing.

I dunno tail... It's been years since I killed someone for "acting stupidly"...

However, the "enemy of the state" could justifiably be killed. They are the enemy. You kill the enemy.

I understand you kill people who act stupidly, and touch the enemy in what may be considered a loving manner.... But that's probably just a po-tay-toe po-that-is-the-stupidest-false-equivalence-ever sort of thing...

Now get out there and start killing anyone you think is acting stupidly....

As soon as you kill the enemy of the state.

Wait.

Oh yeah.

Sane people don't extrapolate rhetoric to that degree.

But that doesn't fit your narrative, so you lie and try to twist things to make your point.


It bothers you that we agree Trump should tone things down.
But you want to use his verbiage as a reason an insane person committed a crime.

You are the new Tipper Gore.

Congratulations.

You can assail the music industry next.

Actually Tail in 155 you were mocking me. In 164 you took part of 155. Then you complain about people. I'm not sure what you want me to own, you left out Sadie the dog.

Tail....some days I wish you had taken a logic class or two. Even a class on mathematical sets would help.

I think we can agree that all people who go on bombing sprees are insane.

However, not all insane people go on bombing sprees.

You conflated the two concepts.

If you say a bunch of inflammatory rhetoric, identifying groups as "enemies of the people" and subsequently, a previously insane person who hadn't gone on a bombing spree chooses to do so, is it your fault? Maybe, maybe not. However, if you keep the rhetoric up, the chances increase that one of them will be your fault.

There have already been multiple actions in the US which could have been instigated by words or tweets our @sshole in Chief has said or tweeted, and he has not slowed down or stopped at all.

What does that say about him?
If he hasn't been the direct cause of any of the violence yet, by the end of 6 years odds are he'll be the direct cause of a couple. And he doesn't care. None of what has happened has caused any changes in his completely voluntary behavior. No one has asked him to be nice to his political opposition or the media. All he has to do is stop using the type of rhetoric that would identify them as necessary targets of violence for his loyalists.

If you want a real world example, look at what I say on here. No one accuses me of being nice to people here. I call people stupid, I make fun of the dumb things they say, their sad lives and the fact they use a username like tailgater.... But I never imply the need for violence. No one would take my words as an indication that some dude named tail should be blown up, no matter how insane they are. And point of fact, if I did say something which implied the need for violence, and some dude named tail was blown up, I'd be totes broken up about it for a couple minutes, and would likely change the tone of my posts, because I wouldn't want it to happen too many more times after that....

(Humor in the last paragraph for any idiots who can't read into the words)

(PM me if you're serious and I'll get with Frank)

Some day you'll learn that when I am humorous, it is for my benefit. I don't necessarily expect others to find it as funny as I do.

maybe they're the sane ones and we're all crazy for not doing whatever we want whenever we want...

Life isn't in a vacuum, although you like to piecemeal your retorts as if it were.
The comparison was made (Obama to Trump) because it's real when you escape your vacuum.

You see the simple. the obvious. trump used words that you understand. Words like "enemy" (wipe drool from you face. blink. Continue)

Obama said the po po acted stupidly.
Innocent enough.
Unless you know that he was talking about white cops acting against a black man.

You are afraid to embrace the reality. That was a trigger for MANY. Hell, it helped create the BLM. And Obama continued similar rhetoric much to the chagrin of people trying to come together rather than be decisive.

You are literally assigning blame to Trump for an insane person sending pipe bombs in the mail. At least that's what you said and what you're trying to "prove" with your drivel-in-a-vacuum.
I'm saying that neither President is to blame for the actions of the insane.

I find it odd that you find my opinion so offensive.

But we all know WHY you feel that way.
But never fear. You're not alone.

I'm only worth a one point bump?