America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by delta1. 79 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Flynn Court Docs Point to Collusion with Russia
delta1 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
The Special Prosecutor's plea recommendation for Michael Flynn describes his cooperation as timely and substantial and urged no prison time because of his value as a witness. It also seems to identify top members of Trump's campaign who coordinated with Russians during the campaign, continued to do so after the election during the transition, and after Trump took office. The document was heavily redacted before it was released to the public, so the names were obscured. Ominously, the reason for the redaction was due to on-going investigations.

This looks like a ton of bricks that will ultimately squash Trump's family and friends who were instrumental in his campaign.

Trump may have seen this coming early in his Presidency when he famously asked, "Can I pardon myself?"
ZRX1200 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,577
LMAO
frankj1 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
it's reasonably possible that Trump did or did not get directly involved in any of the Russian actions to mess with our opinions and ultimately our voting, which definitely happened...but I was posting long ago about the danger of his mortgages/loans owed to Russia and attempts to get a Trump Tower Moscow built (or some such name) that started before he ran and may have never stopped. Flynn, Manafort,and Cohen, with their vast political and business connections in Russia, Ukraine et al, had great value in these efforts. Let's not pretend.

If true, this left him compromiseable (new word) to Putin and his banks, the only banks (maybe China too) in the world that would loan him a nickle. Consider that his positive marketing on behalf of Putin and Russia started early on in the primary process. And the drum banging only slowed when virtually all of his appointed people and Congress expressed disgust.

With all that said, and more not said yet, I wouldn't bet the house that Flynn is being "rewarded" for info that leads to impeachable offenses. But I could see enough crap that a resignation or decision to not seek reelection is the result...and if the news is really bad for Trump, I'd much prefer those options than impeachment for the good of the country.
teedubbya Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Several things are clear to anyone with a sound mind.

There was no collusion.
There were tons of WMDs in Iraq.
Obama wasn’t born here.
Hillary clearly broke the law but the republicans controlling all branches of the government at the moment will not do their duty.

Duh.
Abrignac Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,259
delta1 wrote:
The Special Prosecutor's plea recommendation for Michael Flynn describes his cooperation as timely and substantial and urged no prison time because of his value as a witness. It also seems to identify top members of Trump's campaign who coordinated with Russians during the campaign, continued to do so after the election during the transition, and after Trump took office. The document was heavily redacted before it was released to the public, so the names were obscured. Ominously, the reason for the redaction was due to on-going investigations.

This looks like a ton of bricks that will ultimately squash Trump's family and friends who were instrumental in his campaign.

Trump may have seen this coming early in his Presidency when he famously asked, "Can I pardon myself?"


Doesn't make good sense to speculate on politics, Wind has a way of changing direction.
delta1 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
have you read the addendum? Despite all the redaction...the road map is pretty clear...

https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-special-counsel-files-flynn-sentencing-memo
frankj1 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
I did not read it.
bgz Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
I'll wait for the History Channel documentary.
delta1 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
c'mon guys, the addendum is only 6 pages, of which half the content is redacted...only 5 or 6 key sentences tells you what Mueller has regarding Trump campaign members and Russian coordination ...

Flynn was with Trump from the beginning of his campaign, and became a mentor of sorts to Kushner...if anyone knows what really happened and who did what, Flynn does...
DrafterX Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Hillary woulda had him whacked by now if he was working for her... Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
DrafterX wrote:
Hillary woulda had him whacked by now if he was working for her... Mellow

um. I mighta forgot to mention that call we got late one night...?
teedubbya Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Ram whacks off
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
frankj1 wrote:
um. I mighta forgot to mention that call we got late one night...?



About the pizza dude..?? Huh
DrafterX Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
teedubbya wrote:
Ram whacks off



TW..!! Laugh
frankj1 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
DrafterX wrote:
About the pizza dude..?? Huh

yeah, yeah. that one.
Jeebus, I was afraid I used my private server.
ZRX1200 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,577
I’ve seen that movie......
bs_kwaj Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 02-13-2006
Posts: 5,214

Define 'collusion' for this case.

Beer
rfenst Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,251
bs_kwaj wrote:
Define 'collusion' for this case.

Beer


to conspire
dstieger Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
rfenst wrote:
to conspire

bs_kwaj wrote:
Define 'collusion' for this case.

Beer

Conspire to do what?

And probably need to define conspire, too...does conspire only apply to illegal activity?
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Kinda like taking control of the DNC and running Bernie out... Mellow
rfenst Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,251
dstieger wrote:
Conspire to do what?

And probably need to define conspire, too...does conspire only apply to illegal activity?


No, but it is the "lingo" of law for two or more people who plan/endeavor to commit an illegal act.
DrafterX Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Like TW and Jade did about that goat..?? Huh
dstieger Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Thanks, Robert. I was asking about 'law definition'.
Mr. Jones Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,409
You can turn this "up ..down..and all around"

B
U
T

HERE'S THE SKINNY :

FLYNN IS A > R.A.T.
MANAFORT IS A > R.A.T.
+ Cohen and about 5 other lowball minions are all > RATS

AND MUELLER.. " the investigator" ... IS A PREMEDITATED FIRST DEGREE MURDERER who was in charge(11-13 YRS?) of the
FBI-SSG DIVISION at its inception AND turned them into a organized gangstalking & lawless murder squad "as per his direct instructions" after
"911 and the world trade center disaster"...

MUELLER was CLOSE buddies with Whitey Bolger the R.A.T
AND MUELLER has spent his entire life making RATS TURN ON OTHER CRIMINALS to get convictions...

Make no mistake about it...

Trump is shaking in his boots...
Pence is cringing too...

Mr. Jones's congressional hearing testimony is the only
"ace in the hole" either of the above two have left.
Gene363 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,796

Meanwhile, Hillary laughs and laughs as she reviews her foundation bank account and recalls the Russia Uranium deal.
dstieger Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I think 10 above counted as a "But Hillary "
dstieger Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I've said since Day1 that I don't believe that Trump actively engaged Putin or Russian government to help win the election....that's what I always thought was the central allegation. I still believe that, however, that isn't to say that Trump isn't going to be justifiably tarnished with some pretty bad actions; convictions, even.
Money laundering; stupid, if not illegal business dealings; involvement, or even awareness of the DNC email thing and Facebook 'news'.....even if Trump is somehow ignorant of all of it...he's still surrounded himself with enough dirt that he will be hurt; though likely not impeached
DrafterX Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Guilty till proven innocent seems to be the style of da times.. Mellow
delta1 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
It does seem that all of Trump's denials about him and his campaign being involved with the Russians from the beginning have been proven to be lies. The biggest lie exposed thus far, by Cohen, was that the Trump organization WAS involved in negotiations with Russia and Russian govt. banks (including one on the US sanctions list) regarding the Trump Tower Moscow deal. Cohen said Trump and he were working on that deal until about June, 2016, a year after his announcement that he was running for President. From June 2015, at the beginning of his candidacy and throughout the campaign and after his election, Trump has insisted he had no business dealings with Russia.

But we have become so accustomed to Trump and his people lying to us, that this big lie doesn't seem to matter that much to those who continue to support him.

The question becomes: was Trump running for President on behalf of the American people, or to promote his own self-interests? It appears that many people in the Trump campaign were in it for the money: Manafort, Cohen, Stone, Kushner....

They were hoping to enrich themselves leveraging the candidacy, prolly not expecting to win, but taking advantage of the opportunities and contacts afforded by a run for the most powerful office in the world. The Trump Tower Moscow deal with Russia has been in Trump's mind for decades. Putin and Russia was being stifled by US and world sanctions for its annexations of Ukraine and Crimea and so was eager to do business and willing to pull illegal strings to help the Trump campaign. The Russians offered to help Trump win the election and likely to help him build the Trump Tower Moscow resort in exchange for a promise to pull back on US imposed sanctions on Russia if they got the office.

Then the "O Crap" moment...surprise surprise...they actually won and had to serve the American people. How much were they doing for us...how much were they doing for themselves...

If Mueller can answer those questions, the answers will determine if Trump will be impeached...
DrafterX Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Clinton Foundation.. Mellow
dstieger Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
DrafterX wrote:
Guilty till proven innocent seems to be the style of da times.. Mellow


Why not? Do you doubt Hillary's guilt?


As to Mueller targets, I thought there were already a half-dozen or so that have pleaded guilty
DrafterX Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Hillary's crimes are well documented but ruled to be 'careless' to keep her out of jail by her sheeples... Mellow
Speyside Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
You all forgot to mention Benghazi in your list of Hillary transgressions. That would make you 3 for 3 in idiotic comments. Innocent untill proven guilty? Is that for Republicans only? Hillary has never been arrested, let alone convicted of anything. Quite a double standard you have. Then again, Drafters gut reaction could be right, after all he has quite a gut.

If you want something comparable to the present investigation look up Warren Harding Teapot Dome scandal. There are some striking similarities.
dstieger Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Warren Harding used a foreign government to help get him elected? I'm not looking it up at the moment. Can you summarize the similarities, please?
frankj1 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
dstieger wrote:
I've said since Day1 that I don't believe that Trump actively engaged Putin or Russian government to help win the election....that's what I always thought was the central allegation. I still believe that, however, that isn't to say that Trump isn't going to be justifiably tarnished with some pretty bad actions; convictions, even.
Money laundering; stupid, if not illegal business dealings; involvement, or even awareness of the DNC email thing and Facebook 'news'.....even if Trump is somehow ignorant of all of it...he's still surrounded himself with enough dirt that he will be hurt; though likely not impeached

pretty good chance this is correct.
I really have no idea if Trump led an active attempt to sway the election, pretty big undertaking...and Russia may have had enough incentive to do so without an actual "deal" in place.

To me, from the beginning, the problem for the USA is the influence Russia has purchased in the White House...much like the Saudi's have recently.

Abrignac Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,259
delta1 wrote:
It does seem that all of Trump's denials about him and his campaign being involved with the Russians from the beginning have been proven to be lies. The biggest lie exposed thus far, by Cohen, was that the Trump organization WAS involved in negotiations with Russia and Russian govt. banks (including one on the US sanctions list) regarding the Trump Tower Moscow deal. Cohen said Trump and he were working on that deal until about June, 2016, a year after his announcement that he was running for President. From June 2015, at the beginning of his candidacy and throughout the campaign and after his election, Trump has insisted he had no business dealings with Russia.

But we have become so accustomed to Trump and his people lying to us, that this big lie doesn't seem to matter that much to those who continue to support him.

The question becomes: was Trump running for President on behalf of the American people, or to promote his own self-interests? It appears that many people in the Trump campaign were in it for the money: Manafort, Cohen, Stone, Kushner....

They were hoping to enrich themselves leveraging the candidacy, prolly not expecting to win, but taking advantage of the opportunities and contacts afforded by a run for the most powerful office in the world. The Trump Tower Moscow deal with Russia has been in Trump's mind for decades. Putin and Russia was being stifled by US and world sanctions for its annexations of Ukraine and Crimea and so was eager to do business and willing to pull illegal strings to help the Trump campaign. The Russians offered to help Trump win the election and likely to help him build the Trump Tower Moscow resort in exchange for a promise to pull back on US imposed sanctions on Russia if they got the office.

Then the "O Crap" moment...surprise surprise...they actually won and had to serve the American people. How much were they doing for us...how much were they doing for themselves...

If Mueller can answer those questions, the answers will determine if Trump will be impeached...


Al your feelings about President Trump are well known. But, as of this moment there is zero evidence publicly available that shows Trump himself having colluded with the Russians. While on the subject, I’m not sure anyone has pled or been found guilty of the nonexistent crime of colluding with the Russians. Most of the guilty pleas have been due to individuals lying to the FBI regarding being in legal contact with Russian individuals before and after the election.
DrafterX Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Why is it so hard to believe people just didn't like Hillary..?? Think
frankj1 Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
Gene363 wrote:
Meanwhile, Hillary laughs and laughs as she reviews her foundation bank account and recalls the Russia Uranium deal.

I have to say I am surprised to see the Russian Uranium deal mentioned by you, Gene.

any specifics that would show a direct deal from her to them of a Canadian company that required the sign off of several department heads? Where is that uranium now?
DrafterX Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
At Da Paladium... Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
Abrignac wrote:
Al your feelings about President Trump are well known. But, as of this moment there is zero evidence publicly available that shows Trump himself having colluded with the Russians. While on the subject, I’m not sure anyone has pled or been found guilty of the nonexistent crime of colluding with the Russians. Most of the guilty pleas have been due to individuals lying to the FBI regarding being in legal contact with Russian individuals before and after the election.

there is definitely no direct evidence publicly available that shows Trump colluded with the Russians to "fix" the election, true, and that is part of the core of the investigation. I really don't understand th ecertainty on either th eguilty or innocent teams at this point, I'm waiting it out.

But as investigations of things this yuuuge go, there are so many intermingled occurrences that lead to related issues. I'm thinking, as I have from day one, it won't end up about any finite number of votes, but rather inroads influencing our top policies and favors...we have seen the affects of this early on in this term. That would be a worthwhile goal for Russia in itself.

Bear in mind I do not expect nor even want a successful impeachment. The country does not win if that happens.
frankj1 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
DrafterX wrote:
At Da Paladium... Mellow

good point!
frankj1 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
DrafterX wrote:
Why is it so hard to believe people just didn't like Hillary..?? Think

I don't like her.
DrafterX Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Well, if Trump get impeached and Pence has an accident on the way to da pizza place Pelosi gets to be President... Many would call that a win... Mellow
Abrignac Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,259
frankj1 wrote:
there is definitely no direct evidence publicly available that shows Trump colluded with the Russians to "fix" the election, true, and that is part of the core of the investigation. I really don't understand th ecertainty on either th eguilty or innocent teams at this point, I'm waiting it out.

But as investigations of things this yuuuge go, there are so many intermingled occurrences that lead to related issues. I'm thinking, as I have from day one, it won't end up about any finite number of votes, but rather inroads influencing our top policies and favors...we have seen the affects of this early on in this term. That would be a worthwhile goal for Russia in itself.

Bear in mind I do not expect nor even want a successful impeachment. The country does not win if that happens.



It really sucks that so much effort is expended for us as a nation to bicker as we do.

Losers need to accept and move on. Winners need to be gracious.
Burner02 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,876
Speyside wrote:
You all forgot to mention Benghazi in your list of Hillary transgressions. That would make you 3 for 3 in idiotic comments. Innocent untill proven guilty? Is that for Republicans only? Hillary has never been arrested, let alone convicted of anything. Quite a double standard you have. Then again, Drafters gut reaction could be right, after all he has quite a gut.

If you want something comparable to the present investigation look up Warren Harding Teapot Dome scandal. There are some striking similarities.


Have never heard anyone mention that Hillary did anything illegal in regards to Benghazi.

Simply put, I do think she is a monumental POS for not doing a damn thing to help those four Americans and for sitting back and letting the video lie take flight.

Guess that would be a double standard as you call it.
Speyside Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
A high ranking cabinet member illegally profited from his position. Manafort, Flynn, and Kushner failed to register as foreign agents. Trump Corp is in court in New York state over potential illegal gains from foreigners. Those are known. The similarity is potentially illegally profiting due to a high ranking government position.
Burner02 Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,876
Guess that would be a deflection from the Benghazi double standard thingie.
DrafterX Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Clinton Foundation... Mellow
ZRX1200 Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,577
Thank God Hilldog didn’t profit from being a high ranking cabinet member........

Jesus you just can’t make this stuff up, I’m making popcorn LMAO
delta1 Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
Abrignac wrote:
It really sucks that so much effort is expended for us as a nation to bicker as we do.

Losers need to accept and move on. Winners need to be gracious.



and we all have to accept that ours is a civil society with established rules...and we all have to follow the rules...no one is above the law...


Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>