America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by frankj1. 151 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
The liberal media take on calling POTUS an MF'er
victor809 Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I like the disclaimer. Can I hire your lawyers?
Ewok126 Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
dstieger wrote:
never mind the disclaimers...I couldn't get through the first sentence fragment/question....mind restating the point...if any?



Oh you didn't have your disclaimer notice up. I misunderstood what your question was referring to. Anxious

Just have your attorney contact mine. Blink Blink Blink I think I said that right.

As to your question, and that is if I understand it correctly now, I had a stroke and I cant remember what I was trying to say but I am sure there was a point. Sorry brother.Beer
Ewok126 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
victor809 wrote:
I like the disclaimer. Can I hire your lawyers?


Sure, they work for free and they are pretty good. fog


UPDATE: I contacted them and they said the Disclaimer is transferable via copy and can be used by anyone Left or Right, in or out of court. They also said, feel free to change it accordingly to your needs. If you should have any issues give them a call at 1-800-YubNub and they will assign you an attorney, free of charge of course, that will help you through your legal needs. Herfing
tailgater Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Ewok126 wrote:
but what if "today's world" view's of the defined line is blurred?

I mean we do now live in a place where people are fighting to be not only accepted as a female even though they have a dong but, they are also insistent that every single individual now not only refer to them as such but must also now forget every bit of the simplest biological education that they have ever had and every bit of education that has also been in existence since man has been able to say the words penis and vagina. Or, to where so many insist that if I do not boycott Target for selling a stalk of cotton for home decoration that I am a racist. I mean how much more blurred can the "Defined Line" be?

So nah, I can say that blaming "today's world" is not cop out, It is a fact.

Also just to play devils advocate here, you must remember that EVERYONE, including you and I. Our perception is indeed our reality. The thing is, every one dose not perceive things the same way thus leading to the difference in OP's

The only difference is mine is right! LMAOOOOOOO......... Of course this last line is a joke. I guess the proper way I should say such so the blurred line ignorant ones can understand would be, my perception of this mater and my reality is right for ME!

Oh, I almost forgot my Disclaimer Notice!

Disclaimer Notice
Any of the terms used above is not meant to offed or to be insulting, rude, derogatory, disrespectful, hurtful, wounding, abusive, objectionable, displeasing, annoying, exasperating, irritating, vexing, galling, provocative, provoking, humiliating, impertinent, impudent, insolent, personal, discourteous, uncivil, impolite, unmannerly, unacceptable, shocking, scandalous, outrageous in any way.

Each and every term is meant by its true and factual definition.

If you should try and read between the lines and come to a different conclusion, offended or distorted meaning other than what is factually stated then that resides with you and your dim-witted, dull, dumb, half-witted, mentally slow, retarded, simple, simple-minded, slow, slow-witted, unintelligent, assessed, charged, delayed, funded, held up, in waiting, indebted, negotiated, on hold, on the shelf, pigeonholed, postponed, prolonged, protracted, remanded, renegotiated, scrubbed, stalled, staved off, or temporized way of thinking and I shall not be held liable.

This disclaimer notice was written up by

Ewok, Ewok and Ewok Attorney at Law and Magistrate
126 Endorian Drive,
Endor, Moon, Section Delta E

PH# 1-800-YUBNUB

We work for you in "Today's World!"


Robin Thicke didn't write that!


Speyside Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
"Pray to let his days be few and let another have his office." You are right Tail, I shouldn't, call you an idiot, that would be insulting to idiots. Even an idiot would be able to easily infer that they were being asked to pray for Obamas death. You do the Republican talking heads proud. Please try to obfuscate better.
DrafterX Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I say that about my boss occasionally.. doesn't mean I want him dead.. just gone.. Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
DrafterX wrote:
I say that about my boss occasionally.. doesn't mean I want him dead.. just gone.. Mellow

you want I should have a chat with your boss?
DrafterX Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Thanks Frank... But I took care of it... ThumpUp
frankj1 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
you didn't use the 1099 guys?
Interesting.
Speyside Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Drafter, your logic is flawed. Your boss could be promoted, be fired, be demoted, go to work for another company, retire, or die. Many different options, I'm sure I missed some. A sitting president has never been convicted by legislative vote. One president, Nixon resigned from office. Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, and Kennedy were assasinated. Harrison, Taylor, Harding, and Roosevelt died of natural causes while in office.

As Obama had made no statement to resign from the presidency, and never did, the logical assumption is that Purdue asked people to pray for Obamas death, which would have been the only way he would have left office before the end of his term.
victor809 Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
The verse immediately following 109:8 is "may his children be fatherless and his wife a widow"

There isn't much ambiguity there.

All this innocent little "they just want him out of office" BS is just that.
DrafterX Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
So, I really want my boss dead..?? Think
tailgater Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Speyside wrote:
"Pray to let his days be few and let another have his office." You are right Tail, I shouldn't, call you an idiot, that would be insulting to idiots. Even an idiot would be able to easily infer that they were being asked to pray for Obamas death. You do the Republican talking heads proud. Please try to obfuscate better.


Republican talking heads?

You might get your words from the media, but I already admitted that I hadn't seen nor heard that quote before. So I clearly haven't checked in with my trump.com talking points.

You're like a cheating husband/wife who assumes that your spouse is also cheating.

You get your thoughts from the media, so you assume others do.

It's painfully obvious when you prop up a generic quote and tell us what it has to mean.
You feel that way because you were told that's what it has mean.

Get out more.
Expand your horizons.

tailgater Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
The verse immediately following 109:8 is "may his children be fatherless and his wife a widow"

There isn't much ambiguity there.

All this innocent little "they just want him out of office" BS is just that.


IF that were included in speysides media redux I would have to admit it means death.

I simply offered a reasonable interpretation based on what was provided.


Ewok126 Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
tailgater wrote:
Robin Thicke didn't write that!



Nope he did not write write that, but he did Testify Anxious
Speyside Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
The world according to Tail. Take off those orange colored glasses and get in touch with reality. I guess the obvious, that you sound just like the talking heads from FOX is beyond your comprehension also. Your assumptions are moronic. Why would you think I get my thoughts from the media? Just because they don't dovetail with yours? Get a brain sparky, they don't dovetail with yours because I do not agree with you. I guess you are dense enough that you couldn't reach the simple conclusion of what Perdue was talking about. Why don't you go to a revival meeting? Perhaps they can heat your delusions of Trump being anything other than anathema for us.
Speyside Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Interesting on your unwillingness to comment on Trumps sh** ho** comments. I seem to recall some if not all cons saying but it's the truth. The truth is Trump is a MF. Care to explain the difference? Of course not, it does not fit your agenda, as simple minded as that may be.
Speyside Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Now read closely, so as your attack can have at least a minimal amount of accuracy. This has not been a good week for Trump. Rumor has it that the Mueller report will say that Trump helped Putin destabilize the United States. Put on your thinking cap. I am not cheering this leak. I am simply stating what was leaked. Nor am I saying this is true. Most of all I am not saying Trump did this. What I am saying is this leak is particularly bad for Trump. Now go to your safe place snowflake. As far as proper use of the slang term, here it is because you are so clearly ignorant of it.

"Snowflake is a 2010s derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are over-emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions."
ZRX1200 Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,599
Ummmm, hey buddy.......

Your self righteous indignation is showing.

Yeah, right there.
tailgater Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Speyside wrote:
The world according to Tail. Take off those orange colored glasses and get in touch with reality. I guess the obvious, that you sound just like the talking heads from FOX is beyond your comprehension also. Your assumptions are moronic. Why would you think I get my thoughts from the media? Just because they don't dovetail with yours? Get a brain sparky, they don't dovetail with yours because I do not agree with you. I guess you are dense enough that you couldn't reach the simple conclusion of what Perdue was talking about. Why don't you go to a revival meeting? Perhaps they can heat your delusions of Trump being anything other than anathema for us.


This.
This is what we get when you have nothing to offer to the discussion. Liberal "debate" tactics 101: Attack trump and his skin color. (check).
Call the opposing view moronic (check)
Use their own counterpoint against them (check)
LOL!

Your TDS is duly noted.
I haven't defended anyone, yet you're livid about it.

You're a hoot.

WTF is a revival meeting?
If you didn't get that from your media-master then that means you must look up that obscure sh*t for jollies.
Hey, to each their own.
Like I said.
A hoot!



tailgater Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Speyside wrote:
Interesting on your unwillingness to comment on Trumps sh** ho** comments. I seem to recall some if not all cons saying but it's the truth. The truth is Trump is a MF. Care to explain the difference? Of course not, it does not fit your agenda, as simple minded as that may be.


Couple things.
1. I did comment on his comments back when they were relevant (to a degree).
2. They are true. Like it or not, places like Haiti aren't just poor, they are controlled by evil dictators and militia.

As for trump being an MF'er?
How is that true?
Did he f*ck his mother?
Or maybe just the mother of someone very close to you?

While you try to sort that out, let's get back to the issue at hand.
Public speaking is different than private talks.
Unless you can prove to me that you understand this simple fact then there is no use for further discussion.
thus far, you've proven that you can't grasp this concept.
At all.

If this woman was talking to a colleague and called Trump the nasty then it's not news.
I am dumbfounded at how you don't understand that.


tailgater Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Speyside wrote:
Now read closely, so as your attack can have at least a minimal amount of accuracy. This has not been a good week for Trump. Rumor has it that the Mueller report will say that Trump helped Putin destabilize the United States. Put on your thinking cap. I am not cheering this leak. I am simply stating what was leaked. Nor am I saying this is true. Most of all I am not saying Trump did this. What I am saying is this leak is particularly bad for Trump. Now go to your safe place snowflake. As far as proper use of the slang term, here it is because you are so clearly ignorant of it.

"Snowflake is a 2010s derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are over-emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions."


Is that from your word-a-day calendar, or did you see your therapist's notes?


victor809 Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Decorum is gone.
Trump made sure of that with his very public rallies, the words he chose to use there. He's made that clear with his tweets and the words he's chosen to use there.

Fake crocodile tears over someone else other than trump saying something "nasty" is laughable.
frankj1 Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
meanwhile, Cruz's father killed JFK and no one is looking for him.
dstieger Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
frankj1 wrote:
meanwhile, Cruz's father killed JFK and no one is looking for him.

Pretty sure he's buried in Arlington National Cemetery - there's a flame and everything

But, if it makes anyone feel good, I can look for him next time I'm there....I'm not digging him up, though....if there's a marker, I'm going to take their word for it
frankj1 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
dstieger wrote:
Pretty sure he's buried in Arlington National Cemetery - there's a flame and everything

But, if it makes anyone feel good, I can look for him next time I'm there....I'm not digging him up, though....if there's a marker, I'm going to take their word for it

it's my own fault for being vague, and I have learned my lesson...

but while everyone is looking for CROS, no one is looking for CRUZ. He's getting away with murder.
victor809 Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I heard CROS was having bergher king with the Clemson team last night.
dstieger Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
frankj1 wrote:


but while everyone is looking for CROS, no one is looking for CRUZ. He's getting away with murder.

Maybe because it sounds like an impossible mission
Speyside Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
You have ignored the fact that Trump publicly called other nations sh** ho**. Exactly the same as publicly calling him a MF, unless you have the Tail version of TDS, and refuse to see this.

Yes, we have nothing to discuss. Please do continue your one sided biased talking points.
RMAN4443 Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Speyside wrote:
You have ignored the fact that Trump publicly called other nations sh** ho**. Exactly the same as publicly calling him a MF, unless you have the Tail version of TDS, and refuse to see this.

Yes, we have nothing to discuss. Please do continue your one sided biased talking points.

Would you like to pack up and move to one of those chit holes????Not talking
....if their immigration policy would allow itBrick wall
frankj1 Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
dstieger wrote:
Maybe because it sounds like an impossible mission

I feel like I'm tossing softballs at batting practice
tailgater Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Decorum is gone.
Trump made sure of that with his very public rallies, the words he chose to use there. He's made that clear with his tweets and the words he's chosen to use there.

Fake crocodile tears over someone else other than trump saying something "nasty" is laughable.


So you're embracing the "he did it first!" excuse.

That's fine.
Just recognize what it is.

tailgater Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Speyside wrote:
You have ignored the fact that Trump publicly called other nations sh** ho**. Exactly the same as publicly calling him a MF, unless you have the Tail version of TDS, and refuse to see this.

Yes, we have nothing to discuss. Please do continue your one sided biased talking points.


he he.


You give up too easily.


tailgater Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
RMAN4443 wrote:
Would you like to pack up and move to one of those chit holes????Not talking
....if their immigration policy would allow itBrick wall


I heard it's the same as living in a nation of motherf*ckers.

tailgater Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
I feel like I'm tossing softballs at batting practice


That would be underhanded.

victor809 Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Tail... No. I'm mocking you for suddenly being super concerned about decorum when you've shown no interest in it for the past 3 years.

Your concern is disingenuous. One doesn't even have to have a discussion about this woman and what she said, or whether "he did it first" is an adequate response. Your desire to be bothered by this, when you have shown no concern up until now... Tells us you're a partisan hack.

And for the record... "He did it first" is a perfectly adequate defense. When someone hits you... You hit them in return. What's your excuse later? "they hit me. So I had to hit them".
delta1 Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
don't waste your breath...

he thinks this is about public vs private ...public figures, especially public officials, should always expect their utterances and behavior to become public...expectations of privacy are few and far between...anyone who thinks otherwise is....

Nixon's example proved this lesson long ago...he was speaking in private...and those private words brought him down...

#MeToo keeps shining the spotlight on how public figures can be brought down by private utterances and private behavior...
victor809 Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Don't lie delta... He doesn't think.









(I don't have anything more to add)
frankj1 Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
tailgater wrote:
That would be underhanded.


I did it again


B. Spears
DrafterX Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
Seen her boobs before... Mellow
delta1 Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
seen her cooch too...
tailgater Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Tail... No. I'm mocking you for suddenly being super concerned about decorum when you've shown no interest in it for the past 3 years.

Your concern is disingenuous. One doesn't even have to have a discussion about this woman and what she said, or whether "he did it first" is an adequate response. Your desire to be bothered by this, when you have shown no concern up until now... Tells us you're a partisan hack.

And for the record... "He did it first" is a perfectly adequate defense. When someone hits you... You hit them in return. What's your excuse later? "they hit me. So I had to hit them".


I'm many things.
Good and bad.
But disingenuous isn't one of them.

You're late to the party, so I'll cut to the chase.
It's not about being concerned about what she said, so much as the lack of concern from those who cried about it for so long.
Further, this particular thread is about how the left view the outrage. They claim people are only concerned because it's a woman of color.

As for the "he did it first" defense being adequate?
If you accept that then you and your ilk need to stfu from here on in whenever trump shats out his next tweet.

So I guess I'll call that a win, assuming you have the integrity to embrace what you claim.

tailgater Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
don't waste your breath...

he thinks this is about public vs private ...public figures, especially public officials, should always expect their utterances and behavior to become public...expectations of privacy are few and far between...anyone who thinks otherwise is....

Nixon's example proved this lesson long ago...he was speaking in private...and those private words brought him down...

#MeToo keeps shining the spotlight on how public figures can be brought down by private utterances and private behavior...


So you still don't comprehend it?

Can't say I'm shocked.

victor809 Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I'll bite. Why?
delta1 Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
tailgater wrote:
So you still don't comprehend it?

Can't say I'm shocked.




OK, please explain the difference...
tailgater Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
OK, please explain the difference...


Comparing the "private" indiscretions of Nixon to simple vulgar words said behind closed doors should need no explanation.

Sure, both were behind closed doors.
But one was a conspiracy and one is name calling.

And when an elected official chooses an acceptance speech to spew the same filth that she feeds her doomed son, it's quite different from those same words being said in privately.

And each morning the sun appears to rise in the east due to the rotation of the earth, and one plus one is two.

Blink.
Breathe.
Blink again.


You're comparing VERY different things in an attempt to make a point. That should clue you in on the validity of your point.
delta1 Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
tailgater wrote:
Comparing the "private" indiscretions of Nixon to simple vulgar words said behind closed doors should need no explanation.

Sure, both were behind closed doors.
But one was a conspiracy and one is name calling.

And when an elected official chooses an acceptance speech to spew the same filth that she feeds her doomed son, it's quite different from those same words being said in privately.

And each morning the sun appears to rise in the east due to the rotation of the earth, and one plus one is two.

Blink.
Breathe.
Blink again.


You're comparing VERY different things in an attempt to make a point. That should clue you in on the validity of your point.


saying it's different, and explaining why/how, are two different things...

and your "explanation" (highlighted) includes conclusory elements that render the entire statement suspect...


ZRX1200 Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,599
I looked on Snopes.....
Speyside Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
All kidding and jousting aside, Tail is stating something that should be obvious to all. A private conversation is completely different than a public speaking engagement. It's really as simple as that. Our elected officials should not publicly call the president a MF. This could be tantamount to inciting a riot. Even if they believe our president is the devil incarnate, those are conversations to be held in private if they are unable to speak civilly. My only real point of disagreement with Tail is that Trump is perhaps the biggest provocateur of hateful public speech and I do not see conservatives denounce this like they should.
Phil222 Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
I do not understand how someone could say it’s acceptable to call someone an X in private, but not in public? I don’t differentiate between the two, and this is in regards to what we deem as appropriate vocabulary in American culture.

Of course there will be varying degrees and circumstances to each transgression, but the location of the offense should not determine its appropriateness. That should be an individual determination in regards to the term(s) being used.

Either it’s appropriate to call Obama the “N-word” or it’s not. It shouldn’t matter where you say it, or who you say it to. Just my two cents. Interesting discussion though. Maybe I just haven’t grasped this concept yet.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>