dstieger wrote:I'm pretty fed up with all of the media parading individuals to support their position on this. The fact that any news organization has a position is bad enough. But to cherry-pick individuals and say they support or tip an argument is insane. I don't care if it's citizens or mayors of town of 300, or 4 year veteran CBP agents....it isn't helping clarify anything.
is it a "position" if it is based on facts and reality? the job of reporters is to provide the public with facts and the truth...
the overwhelming truth and facts are that the POTUS has exaggerated the danger at the southern border...about crime, drugs, illnesses, invasions and terrorists...the media goes to the border, and the scene does not resemble a place under attack by a criminal invading horde: hacking and coughing, raping and murdering, or even stealing jobs from Americans...
the problem is a cumulative one, dispersed among all ports of entry, along our coasts, at our airports...but the POTUS ignores that reality and wants us to believe that our eyes, ears and minds are lying to us...because he tells the truth, and his truth is that a wall will solve this problem...
... the POTUS who is now raising the alarms of another caravan coming to invade our country, a danger that he lost interest in after the mid-term elections...the media reports that...is that insane?
or cherry-picking the deaths of citizens at the hands of illegals, as if that is a common occurrence, crimes that the same cherry-picking media reports on whenever they occur...