victor809 wrote:I agree with dstieg... Having average internet people/bots vote on bias of a news site is a terrible idea.
it is not actual voting, but blind testing of sample stories, which is only part of their ratings formula...here's their methodology:
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-rating-methods
it gives you a starting point/quick reference check to evaluate a source, and when you look at their "judgments" of many of the ones on the "in" list, seems fairly accurate...
not advocating...just pointing to an option to quickly see if the source of a story has a history...