America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by DrafterX. 155 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
And they said it wouldn't work...
teedubbya Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And drafter still sucks balz
frankj1 Online
#52 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
tailgater wrote:
You can twist it anyway you want.

Pattern?
How about the "pattern" of using tariffs to make a point.
Trump didn't just dangle the carrot in front of China. The tariffs are implemented. For good or for bad.
Now he used the same tool to get Mexico to wake up.

And it may not work.
But to say that it won't and using fabricated scenarios to support the claim is pessimism. At best.





it wasn't the tariffs threat. and they have not worked with China.

I think the missed point here (tw first brought it up) is that the tariff threat is not what got us to where Mexico is doing whatever they may be going to do. That deal was in place. But it was slow going to implement, and our negotiator Kirsten Neilsen has left due to Trump's impatience. The tariff threat is Trump falsely marketing his muscle as a weapon.

some of the stuff has been in place a long time, some since December (MPP/-allow asylum seekers to stay in Mexico/Kirsten Neilsen), and some (National Guard deployment/Kirsten Neilsen) since March.

But in the past week negotiations failed to get Mexico to agree to allow the US to reject asylum seekers that had not sought refuge in Mexico first...so no changes in a coupe of months...nothing new happened this week.

but Trump did what he does and found a way to back off of his risky. irrational tariff threats at one of our closest friends and one of our largest trade partners.

The only new news here is that Trump made a fanfare of in-place agreements (by the long gone Neilsen) as a way to back off his bully threats that his party and his advisers feared he really meant.

He bluffed, got no support from supporters, and then did his mass media releases that was believed by uninformed blind supporters and repeated here.

So, it's nice that our friends in Mexico are going to help, they promised to see what they could do months ago, and Trump sold this as though he brought them to their knees last week.

And now we have to see if it will even help at all. I read we may not know until July at the earliest.
DrafterX Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
So last week's visit to Washington by the Mexican delegates was just to visit the Lincoln Memorial I guess... They prolly took in a show too.. Mellow
frankj1 Online
#54 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
DrafterX wrote:
So last week's visit to Washington by the Mexican delegates was just to visit the Lincoln Memorial I guess... They prolly took in a show too.. Mellow

evidently it was to get them to agree to allow the US to reject asylum seekers that had not sought refuge in Mexico first...as I said before.

It did not or at least has not happened yet.

That's why this is not new news.
DrafterX Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Guess not... I wonder what Trump won't get done this week... Think
victor809 Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
so.... are we back on idiots claiming we need a wall? Or is immigration fixed?
DrafterX Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Hey, not only the idiots want a wall.. Not talking
DrafterX Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
The wall was cool when Obama requested it.. what happened..?? Huh
frankj1 Online
#59 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
what has happened happened under Neilson, one of a few people Trump urged out of office because things weren't working fast enough.
It's just been repackaged as though his new tariff threats made Mexico crumble...think old product packaged in a nice container with "New and Improved" commercials.

The bigger deal is that Congress would never attempt to stabilize the issue.
frankj1 Online
#60 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
DrafterX wrote:
The wall was cool when Obama requested it.. what happened..?? Huh

he was kidding
DrafterX Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Laugh
DrafterX Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) now says that “a wall is an immorality,” back in 2013, she supported a bill that required the construction of 700 miles of border fencing. (Trump has called for a wall of “anywhere from 700 to 900 miles” long.) The bill negotiated by the Gang of Eight, which included current Democratic leaders Sens. Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.) and Richard J. Durbin (Ill.), declared that “not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary [of Homeland Security] shall establish . . . the ‘Southern Border Fencing Strategy,’ to identify where 700 miles of fencing (including double-layer fencing) . . . should be deployed along the Southern border.”

That’s not all. The bill further said that “the Secretary may not adjust the status of aliens who have been granted registered provisional immigrant status . . . until 6 months after . . . [the Secretary submits] a written certification that . . . there is in place along the Southern Border no fewer than 700 miles of pedestrian fencing.” In other words, Democrats agreed that no illegal immigrants could get a path to citizenship until all 700 miles of border fencing had been fully completed.

Every Senate Democrat voted for the Gang of Eight bill — including 36 Democratic senators still serving today. President Barack Obama agreed to sign it. Indeed, he praised the bill for including what he called “the most aggressive border security plan in our history” and said that “the Senate bill is consistent with the key principles for commonsense reform that I — and many others — have repeatedly laid out” (emphasis added). That bears repeating: Obama said building a 700-mile fence on the southern border was consistent with the principles of the Democratic Party.

Pelosi supported the Gang of Eight bill, saying at the time that “every piece of this legislation has had bipartisan support” (emphasis added).

Film at 11.... Mellow



But this is old news... Ignored History.. it'll be scrubbed from the internets soon I'm sure... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Had this happened we wouldn't have 2,000 illegals crossing at the same time everyday... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
it wasn't the tariffs threat. and they have not worked with China.

I think the missed point here (tw first brought it up) is that the tariff threat is not what got us to where Mexico is doing whatever they may be going to do. That deal was in place. But it was slow going to implement, and our negotiator Kirsten Neilsen has left due to Trump's impatience. The tariff threat is Trump falsely marketing his muscle as a weapon.

some of the stuff has been in place a long time, some since December (MPP/-allow asylum seekers to stay in Mexico/Kirsten Neilsen), and some (National Guard deployment/Kirsten Neilsen) since March.

But in the past week negotiations failed to get Mexico to agree to allow the US to reject asylum seekers that had not sought refuge in Mexico first...so no changes in a coupe of months...nothing new happened this week.

but Trump did what he does and found a way to back off of his risky. irrational tariff threats at one of our closest friends and one of our largest trade partners.

The only new news here is that Trump made a fanfare of in-place agreements (by the long gone Neilsen) as a way to back off his bully threats that his party and his advisers feared he really meant.

He bluffed, got no support from supporters, and then did his mass media releases that was believed by uninformed blind supporters and repeated here.

So, it's nice that our friends in Mexico are going to help, they promised to see what they could do months ago, and Trump sold this as though he brought them to their knees last week.

And now we have to see if it will even help at all. I read we may not know until July at the earliest.



So I guess you didn't write post #8.

Because that would be moving your proverbial goal posts.

frankj1 Online
#65 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
tailgater wrote:
So I guess you didn't write post #8.

Because that would be moving your proverbial goal posts.


don't see the inconsistency...you may be correct, but I'm missing it.
as a preventive move though, news about old news came out after #8.

are you not seeing or denying that he made all this sound like he just accomplished this last week through economic bully threats?
DrafterX Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
We shoulda prolly just given Mexico a few billion dollars and made them promise to help... Mellow
frankj1 Online
#67 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
not gonna bite, X.
teedubbya Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It was totally different back then and stuff. Making a fake ‘mergancy and fake cure is the only thing that will work now days.

Trumphausen by proxy is the only fix.

Merica
DrafterX Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Back then we didn't have two thousand people a day crossing illegally... Mellow
frankj1 Online
#70 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
was that when you wore an onion on your belt?
ZRX1200 Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
We need to tax dollars sent to Mexico at 75% and punish employers who hire illegals.
teedubbya Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
Back then we didn't have two thousand people a day crossing illegally... Mellow



So it’s actually trumps fault.
frankj1 Online
#73 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
if only he and his friends would stop placing help wanted ads in Honduran newspapers
DrafterX Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Lots of iguanas there... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Iguana be a lifeguard
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
frankj1 wrote:
was that when you wore an onion on your belt?


...which was the style at the time. They didn't have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get where those big yellow ones.

David
tailgater Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
don't see the inconsistency...you may be correct, but I'm missing it.
as a preventive move though, news about old news came out after #8.

are you not seeing or denying that he made all this sound like he just accomplished this last week through economic bully threats?


I'm not saying either way.
Just that you lambasted the "news" of the tariff, only to learn later that it was old news.
And even if it the news is old, the papers were just recently signed, so the timing isn't at all disingenuous, as it seems you're implying.
I know you don't like Trump, and I share some of the same disgust towards his tactics and antics. I just don't dismiss things based solely on the origin. And truth be told it was time for the US to put a little pressure on our friends to the south. Their inaction is borderline criminal and we're paying the price.

frankj1 Online
#78 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
tailgater wrote:
I'm not saying either way.
Just that you lambasted the "news" of the tariff, only to learn later that it was old news.
And even if it the news is old, the papers were just recently signed, so the timing isn't at all disingenuous, as it seems you're implying.
I know you don't like Trump, and I share some of the same disgust towards his tactics and antics. I just don't dismiss things based solely on the origin. And truth be told it was time for the US to put a little pressure on our friends to the south. Their inaction is borderline criminal and we're paying the price.


totally incorrect. the tariff was new news. fake news as it turns out.
he threatened the tariff to make it look like he bullied Mexico into a brand new agreement.

the tariff threat was new, and there was no need except to pull a con job, but the stuff they agreed to was done before, some months ago...see, not new news at all.

the con that he got you to buy was to repackage and announce agreements already in place from Neilsen's tenure (and maybe well before) while threatening stuff that he wouldn't have to do, that not even his party supported...'cept a few here.

in short: he threatened a tariff knowing he would be cancelling it. knowing it had nothing to do with deals in place for months. knowing his followers aren't following closely. Showmanship to fool believers.
DrafterX Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Yes, a couple of the deals were in place but not all and not the expanded number of Guardsmens ... And Mexico was dragging their feet... But Beto and Bernie threw the Bullchit flag and people listened.. meanwhile the tariff threat is still alive.. Mexico still has act... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
My new puppy-dog was pissing in da house for awhile... I started yelling at her and threw her outside when it happened... Guess what, not an issue anymore... Just sayin... Mellow
frankj1 Online
#81 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
DrafterX wrote:
My new puppy-dog was pissing in da house for awhile... I started yelling at her and threw her outside when it happened... Guess what, not an issue anymore... Just sayin... Mellow

when is your term over?
frankj1 Online
#82 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
DrafterX wrote:
Yes, a couple of the deals were in place but not all and not the expanded number of Guardsmens ... And Mexico was dragging their feet... But Beto and Bernie threw the Bullchit flag and people listened.. meanwhile the tariff threat is still alive.. Mexico still has act... Mellow

what wasn't in place until last week?
Mexico hasn't agreed to the latest request about third country stuff.

they may be holding out for a deal sweetener rather than a threat from their bestest friend.
betcha they'd go along with it if we offered to pay for their wall...HA!
teedubbya Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Frank some folks want to believe in magic or slight of hand. Who are you to take that from them? Next you’ll be telling drafter there is no Easter bunny. Santa is the nuclear option.
victor809 Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
Frank some folks want to believe in magic or slight of hand. Who are you to take that from them? Next you’ll be telling drafter there is no Easter bunny. Santa is the nuclear option.


Drafter knows that santa exists. Who else could have stuck a thumb in his butt every christmas eve?
teedubbya Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
A chupacabra?
victor809 Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
A chupacabra?



A christmas chupacabra?

That like an elf on the shelf?.... but with anal thumbing?


..... so like an elf on a shelf.
teedubbya Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Remember when trump had definitive proof on the birther thing and was going to drop that bomb later .... the cliff hanger that never came. How about fatty fat fat doing everything trump wants after trump elevated him to US Prez level with a meeting. A love affair. Everyone in here rejoiced to something they would have crucified any other prez doing. Well..... we’re waiting. Remember trump begging the Mexican president to pretend he said they would pay for the wall? The reality didn’t matter. Just say it. That’s all his supporters need.

What are our military folks that were sent to the border doing? I’ll let y’all figure that one out. I hope the MexIcan military doesn’t do the same things though.

Just had two of my peers return from the “camps” on the border. They got called up and sent there for a couple months. They never get political but the stories they tell are horrible. Taking meds away, splitting families, delayed medical treatments.... to people who did not sneak in and are attempting to request asylum legally.

But the show must go on.
izonfire Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
teedubbya wrote:
Just had two of my peers return from the “camps” on the border.


Ya mean traffickers???
frankj1 Online
#89 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
so, I actually think that the stuff from a few months ago may help against illegal immigration, we shall see...though I think it was borndead who said it shouldn't be this difficult to get in.
unless Congress changes the laws (HA!) then what we have should be enforced.

what I'm (once again) perplexed by is the way everything is sold as "Look at me" by the marketer in chief. Not surprised, but amazed it still gets believers.

I like to chit on Trump. I disagree with him quite a bit. I dislike him a lot as POTUS...but the chronic diagnosis of TDS or STD or whatever the kneejerk defense system in place of his apologizers is is wrong. I don't hate him at all, even loved him as a celebrity We are allowed to think the Main Guy is incompetent without being accused of ulterior motives and mental illness...unless the target is Obama/Hillary/Biden/Sanders et al.

HA!
teedubbya Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It’s all part of the diversion necessary to distract from the slight of hand that makes magic real. And if you can simply rely on TDS you don’t have to look at reality. You don’t have to consider anything you don’t believe because they are just sick.

Ever notice how many people critical of trump begged him for something and he turned them down so now you can discount everything they say? Same tactic. It’s lazy and disengenuous but highly effective if you only need to win in your own mind and have willing accomplices. Stealing fake news and converting its meaning in to something else then morphing to enemy of the people is the same thing. You no longer need to believe anything you don’t want to. It was a brilliant Bannon move. One that used to be only acceptable to the extremists but has now become more acceptable to a larger audience. Folks that used to crow about what the other guy did are accepting worse.

Who ya gonna believe Trump or your lyin eyes.
teedubbya Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I wish I could spend executive time openly trying to come up with derogatory names to call people and have my minions find that acceptable. That’s my TDS. I’m jelly.
tailgater Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
totally incorrect. the tariff was new news. fake news as it turns out.
he threatened the tariff to make it look like he bullied Mexico into a brand new agreement.

the tariff threat was new, and there was no need except to pull a con job, but the stuff they agreed to was done before, some months ago...see, not new news at all.

the con that he got you to buy was to repackage and announce agreements already in place from Neilsen's tenure (and maybe well before) while threatening stuff that he wouldn't have to do, that not even his party supported...'cept a few here.

in short: he threatened a tariff knowing he would be cancelling it. knowing it had nothing to do with deals in place for months. knowing his followers aren't following closely. Showmanship to fool believers.


None of this explains your post #8.

Not sure why you're using new (to you) information to refute what you wrote.
Or more accurately WHY you wrote it.

Which is precisely the reasons for my comments.



frankj1 Online
#93 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
you're doing it again.
one more time and then on to another thread.

a short while ago, against all of his advisers and party leaders, Trump announced he was initiating 5% tariffs that would increase by 5% periodically until Mexico's knees/economy collapsed and they did certain stuff to hopefully solve Trump's signature issue. This was to commence yesterday (Monday).

suddenly, a self congratulating Trump announces the tariffs are now back burner items as Mexico has historically agreed to his demands...the indication being this happened last week and the threat of tariffs was the impetus for getting what he wanted.

I posted around this time.

Within a day or so, news leaked that there was no agreement last week, in fact the opposite occurred at the White House as Mexico would not accept demands for the third nation thingie at this time...
At the same time, we also found out new news...that Trump's announcement of historic Mexican concessions was completely unrelated to tariff threats. The POTUS's announcement was less than truthful (being nice) and the stuff Mexico will be doing had been worked out a while ago and was not something that Trump coerced last week with bullying threats.

I then posted again with actual new news that the first news wasn't news at all, it was self promoting yet incorrect misleading stuff...and old news after all.
But I could not have known it at the time of #8.

And why is this even an issue for you?
What about the actual issue?


frankj1 Online
#94 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
can't believe I reread stuff to discuss my previous posts...

so when I wrote post #32, most had been made aware that stuff was probably in place before the tariff threat. Very soon thereafter we would know it to be fact.

but in your post #45, it sounds like that info had eluded you as you still referenced the tariff threat as having worked against Mexico...
DrafterX Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
The acting Homeland Security secretary gave lawmakers a glimpse Tuesday into just how many asylum seekers skip their hearings after being released into the United States -- telling a Senate panel that a recent program found 90 percent miss their court dates.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., asked Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan how many asylum seekers coming across the southern border show up for their hearings.


“It depends on demographic, the court, but we see too many cases where people are not showing up,” he said, telling Graham that DHS recently conducted a pilot program with family units.

“Out of those 7,000 cases, 90 received final orders of removal in absentia, 90 percent,” he said.

“90 percent did not show up?” Graham asked.

“Correct, that is a recent sample from families crossing the border,” McAleenan clarified.

McAleenan’s testimony also painted a grim portrait of a border crisis that shows no signs of easing, with Border Patrol overwhelmed and underfunded. The secretary described authorities as hamstrung by laws that limit how long they can keep migrants in custody.

“Currently due to a single district court order, we cannot obtain effective immigration enforcement results for the families arriving at our border -- they cannot be held for longer than 21 days and do not receive rulings from immigration courts for years,” he said.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported that it encountered 144,000 migrants at the border in May, a level not seen in decades, describing the situation as a “full-blown emergency.” McAleenan said that 60,000 children have entered into DHS custody in just the last 40 days

Film at 11... Mellow


but let's just worry about Trump... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Everyone wants to believe in magic. But that doesn’t make it anymore real. But let’s just watch trumps magic and smile.
delta1 Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
this latest is a distraction from Trump's policies toward immigration that have fueled the "crisis" in the first place. The numbers of people swarming to our borders have increased dramatically since we've announced restrictions on asylum and cut aid to the three countries from where the migrants are coming: El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras. We've contributed to the worsening conditions in those countries, motivating people to leave...

and Trump's "solution" was to show some muscle...resulting in..............................a deal that has been in place, for the most part, for months...but his peeps adore him, so it is what he says it is...
teedubbya Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
He got a nice love letter from fatty fat fat we can’t see. He keeps it next to his jammies, the deal with Mexico no one can see and he may never need to bring out if they do fake good, and they the birthed proof.

The beautiful thing is he is setting it up for if he ever does tell the truth and people question him that will prove he always tells the truth.

He is good.
dstieger Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
DrafterX wrote:


Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., asked Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan how many asylum seekers coming across the southern border show up for their hearings.


“It depends on demographic, the court, but we see too many cases where people are not showing up,” he said, telling Graham that DHS recently conducted a pilot program with family units.

“Out of those 7,000 cases, 90 received final orders of removal in absentia, 90 percent,” he said.

“90 percent did not show up?” Graham asked.


Lindsey Graham is a lawyer and was paying attention in class when he was taught 'never ask a question if you don't know the answer'

He's been building his case for a change to asylum request law for months. 'Make 'em request asylum from their home country'

He seems convinced that would solve nearly all of our illegal crossings problems.

DrafterX Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,536
Trump's fault.. ok..
It can't be California offering free health care to illegals... Surely that's not gonna attract more illegals... Mellow
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>