Corporations are supposed to be amoral. Not moral, not immoral, amoral. The fact that they have developed a conscience and have begged the current administration to not lower pollution standards, not lower CAFE standards, etc., represents a seismic shift in how corporations are governed. They exist to enrich their shareholders. That is their job. The fact that we now have so many corporations speaking out to beg a president to stop rolling back things that cost these corporations money is (1) an encouraging sign that they are, as entities, evolving to grow a conscience, (2) likely as a result of pressure from their shareholders, (3) a bit scary in that it goes against everything a form of business model has stood for in this country for a really long time, and (4) a sign that they see that the government has abdicated its moral and legal responsibilities. I just wonder what will happen if we cannot return to a normal administration and the corporations can or feel forced to take a larger role. They are not elected by the citizens, but at least someone is trying to keep the Exxon Valdez from fouling Prince Rupert Sound all over again.
BTW, "presidential harassment" is not a thing, it is part of the job description. From the second you are declared the winner come election night, you could be the greatest president this country has ever seen, and there will always be a line of people waiting to threaten, kill, harass, etc. you. For the rest of your life. He may as well be screaming "salad abuse" or :"raccoon disrespect". Utter nonsense. The job comes with a level of harassment; you can debate whether that is a sign our democracy is working, or that it is just unfair, but it is a fact of the job. If you're too thin-skinned to suffer a scuffed knee, stay off the damned playground. Also, it helps to not be as corrupt as humanly possible.