CelticBomber wrote:Every US Olympic athlete pays their own way from start to finish. Just because they wear the uniform of the US doesn't mean they give up any rights. The National Anthem played at the beginning of all sporting events in the US is because the US Military was looking for ways to get young people to enlist. So they offered money to each league to play the Anthem and stir up patriotism, Especially at college games. All this info is public. The Military has admitted to it. The documents are public. Maybe YOU SHOULD do some homework before criticizing these men and women who spent the majority of their lives working towards something where they could make a statement and start a conversation. They earned their right to make a public statement. You don't have to agree with it but you should respect it.
I don't believe that any citizen should give up any rights. I believe we all have a right to peaceful protest.
I do not believe any player has a right to hijack opening ceremonies for their own righteous cause.
That is the team's time, the event's time, to be enjoyed by the fans who paid to see that event.
It is not a public moment to do with whatever you feel like doing.
They can form protests, proclaim their cause, make public appearances, form organizations, spread propaganda on their own time.
BTW - These athletes have worked a majority of their lives to achieve athletic excellence, nothing necessarily more.
OK - by your reasoning, she should be allowed to kneel in protest. Therefore, every other single player should be allowed to protest for their own personal pet cause. We all have causes that our dear to our hearts. Her cause can not supersede any others. That would only be fair and righteous, correct???
- The hippy should be allowed to strike a yoga pose to represent peace and world unity
- The vegan should be allowed to wear a suit of meat
- The tree-hugger should be allowed to wear shrubbery on her head
- The environmentalist should be allowed to wear solar panels
- The pet adoption supporter should be allowed to stand in a kennel of pups
- The LGBTQ member should be allowed to wear a rainbow banner
- The outdoors woman should be allowed to don her coonskin cap and rifle
- The auto accident awareness chick should be allowed to wear a busted up car door
- The wiccan should be able to wear her witches hat
- The anti-Masshole player should have her mini-Masshole wearing a gag and straight jacket in tow
- etc, ...
You do agree, right?
Each one has a right to their personal protest, yes?
You can't righteously deny any of them their right to protest.
That wouldn't be righteous.
So now you have an event that has been completely hijacked and turned into a chaotic carnival!
Yippee sportsmanship!!!
By allowing one, you must allow others, which then becomes a very slippery slope indeed...
(and no, I'm not referring to the Chinese national you have tied and lubed up in the basement)
(again, no offense to my Asian brothers and sisters, except for my Asian wannabe Latino friend)
CelticBomber wrote:So you should be the arbiter of acceptable and unacceptable protest
I agree with you completely!!!
IZON - 2020
Clear Vision for America!