America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by fishinguitarman. 138 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
I stand for the Flag and kneel for the Cross-seriously-megan
izonfire Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
Is that all you guys got???

OK - I agree I need some schooling on the subject.
Evidently, the sports arena has been hijacked and used for political purposes numerous times.

I believe in the ideology of my argument.
Should exceptions be made to that? Certainly.
In the case of serious human rights abuses.
And what is the threshold to meet that classification?

Should it be based on a handful of questionable, highly publicized cases?
The media only presents only a tiny fraction of the injustices that occur every day.
Which ones are highlighted and why? Is there an agenda?
It’s obvious every time I look at multiple news sources.
Selective outrage at selective stories.
Suppression of stories that contradict the agenda.

No doubt why their is so much distrust today.
Are we ever shown the “truth”?

Just because an athlete possesses tremendous physical abilities,
Does that make them any more righteous than you or me?
Their position gives them a platform. Are they supported by truth?
Or perceived truth based on what has been widely presented?

Does someone want to become the next multi-million dollar SJW???
frankj1 Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
izonfire wrote:
Is that all you guys got???

OK - I agree I need some schooling on the subject.
Evidently, the sports arena has been hijacked and used for political purposes numerous times.

I believe in the ideology of my argument.
Should exceptions be made to that? Certainly.
In the case of serious human rights abuses.
And what is the threshold to meet that classification?

Should it be based on a handful of questionable, highly publicized cases?
The media only presents only a tiny fraction of the injustices that occur every day.
Which ones are highlighted and why? Is there an agenda?
It’s obvious every time I look at multiple news sources.
Selective outrage at selective stories.
Suppression of stories that contradict the agenda.

No doubt why their is so much distrust today.
Are we ever shown the “truth”?

Just because an athlete possesses tremendous physical abilities,
Does that make them any more righteous than you or me?
Their position gives them a platform. Are they supported by truth?
Or perceived truth based on what has been widely presented?

Does someone want to become the next multi-million dollar SJW???

good post.

let me also say that I don't find it odd or disconcerting that so many people get indignant at what they perceive as acts that disrespect the flag/anthem.
I don't do things that would be perceived that way, but my show of respect is not to be confused with flag worshiping stuff.
It's just respect for what we are and how we got here. I'd be happy to rise, remove my hat, place my hand over my heart, and have a moment of silence without any flag in center field, without the organ playing the anthem...
And if some around me sat, or knelt, I'd feel like they are legitimizing the pride I have in the freedom we share in deciding and expressing our differences about the USA.


DrafterX Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
I'd pour my beer on them... well, think about it anyways... stadium beers are expensive.. Mellow
Speyside Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
IZON, I would never do what certain athletes have done. I have way to much respect for those who have bled and died to keep our freedoms and ideals protected. BUT, part of that freedom is the right to protest non violently. My feelings are much like Frank's here. You, I, and anyone else has the right to disagree with their form of protest. But the constitution guarantees them the right to protest. In truth I find those who need to tell them how to act are the ones acting unAmerican. We have went to war multiple times to protect freedom, our own and the world's. Just because someone espouses closed minded views doesn't make them wrong, but at the same time it doesn't make them right.
frankj1 Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
DrafterX wrote:
I'd pour my beer on them... well, think about it anyways... stadium beers are expensive.. Mellow

gotta sneak in your own...it's the American Way!
fishinguitarman Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,148
9/11 ceremony at the fire station down the road for those that bled and died for this country and our Stars and Stripes!
CelticBomber Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
izonfire wrote:
Is that all you guys got???

OK - I agree I need some schooling on the subject.
Evidently, the sports arena has been hijacked and used for political purposes numerous times.

I believe in the ideology of my argument.
Should exceptions be made to that? Certainly.
In the case of serious human rights abuses.
And what is the threshold to meet that classification?

Should it be based on a handful of questionable, highly publicized cases?
The media only presents only a tiny fraction of the injustices that occur every day.
Which ones are highlighted and why? Is there an agenda?
It’s obvious every time I look at multiple news sources.
Selective outrage at selective stories.
Suppression of stories that contradict the agenda.

No doubt why their is so much distrust today.
Are we ever shown the “truth”?

Just because an athlete possesses tremendous physical abilities,
Does that make them any more righteous than you or me?
Their position gives them a platform. Are they supported by truth?
Or perceived truth based on what has been widely presented?

Does someone want to become the next multi-million dollar SJW???


So you should be the arbiter of acceptable and unacceptable protest? Every US Olympic athlete pays their own way from start to finish. Just because they wear the uniform of the US doesn't mean they give up any rights. The National Anthem played at the beginning of all sporting events in the US is because the US Military was looking for ways to get young people to enlist. So they offered money to each league to play the Anthem and stir up patriotism, Especially at college games. All this info is public. The Military has admitted to it. The documents are public. Maybe YOU SHOULD do some homework before criticizing these men and women who spent the majority of their lives working towards something where they could make a statement and start a conversation. They earned their right to make a public statement. You don't have to agree with it but you should respect it.
tailgater Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
the kneelers are more like the original Americans and the ones who demand that the kneelers stand are like their English rulers...


LOL!

So kicking a ball is akin to laying your life on the line for freedom.

That's precious.


CelticBomber Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
tailgater wrote:
LOL!

So kicking a ball is akin to laying your life on the line for freedom.

That's precious.





The thought process is the same. If you honestly thought he was comparing the possible violence for disobedience you are purposefully being dishonest. You might be taken more serious if you weren't always so dishonest in your arguments. You and Victor are two sides of the same coin. Penny for your thoughts? Brick wall
tailgater Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
CelticBomber wrote:
So you should be the arbiter of acceptable and unacceptable protest? Every US Olympic athlete pays their own way from start to finish. Just because they wear the uniform of the US doesn't mean they give up any rights. The National Anthem played at the beginning of all sporting events in the US is because the US Military was looking for ways to get young people to enlist. So they offered money to each league to play the Anthem and stir up patriotism, Especially at college games. All this info is public. The Military has admitted to it. The documents are public. Maybe YOU SHOULD do some homework before criticizing these men and women who spent the majority of their lives working towards something where they could make a statement and start a conversation. They earned their right to make a public statement. You don't have to agree with it but you should respect it.


Comedy gold!

We should "respect" an athlete. LOL!
Their profession is adult recess. Sure, they're good at it. But most people who do what they do do it for free.
They do it on weekends for fun. They pay for field time and for refs.
But according to you they "earned" a right to make a public statement?
Newsflash: I don't watch those sports to hear from the players.
They earned a spot on a highly competitive team. Good for them.
They didn't earn the right to a national soapbox. They simply took that. The two things are unrelated.
It's shameful that they do it. And it's shameful to consider it something earned and something that demands respect.

Unless I was right to begin with, and you did mean this as a comedy sketch.
In which case KUDOS!


tailgater Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
CelticBomber wrote:
The thought process is the same. If you honestly thought he was comparing the possible violence for disobedience you are purposefully being dishonest. You might be taken more serious if you weren't always so dishonest in your arguments. You and Victor are two sides of the same coin. Penny for your thoughts? Brick wall


You gotta admit that would be a cool coin.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
I can't tell if cb is calling stupid people gay or gay people stupid... Either way, he's bound to piss someone off...
izonfire Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
CelticBomber wrote:
Every US Olympic athlete pays their own way from start to finish. Just because they wear the uniform of the US doesn't mean they give up any rights. The National Anthem played at the beginning of all sporting events in the US is because the US Military was looking for ways to get young people to enlist. So they offered money to each league to play the Anthem and stir up patriotism, Especially at college games. All this info is public. The Military has admitted to it. The documents are public. Maybe YOU SHOULD do some homework before criticizing these men and women who spent the majority of their lives working towards something where they could make a statement and start a conversation. They earned their right to make a public statement. You don't have to agree with it but you should respect it.


I don't believe that any citizen should give up any rights. I believe we all have a right to peaceful protest.
I do not believe any player has a right to hijack opening ceremonies for their own righteous cause.
That is the team's time, the event's time, to be enjoyed by the fans who paid to see that event.
It is not a public moment to do with whatever you feel like doing.
They can form protests, proclaim their cause, make public appearances, form organizations, spread propaganda on their own time.

BTW - These athletes have worked a majority of their lives to achieve athletic excellence, nothing necessarily more.

OK - by your reasoning, she should be allowed to kneel in protest. Therefore, every other single player should be allowed to protest for their own personal pet cause. We all have causes that our dear to our hearts. Her cause can not supersede any others. That would only be fair and righteous, correct???

- The hippy should be allowed to strike a yoga pose to represent peace and world unity
- The vegan should be allowed to wear a suit of meat
- The tree-hugger should be allowed to wear shrubbery on her head
- The environmentalist should be allowed to wear solar panels
- The pet adoption supporter should be allowed to stand in a kennel of pups
- The LGBTQ member should be allowed to wear a rainbow banner
- The outdoors woman should be allowed to don her coonskin cap and rifle
- The auto accident awareness chick should be allowed to wear a busted up car door
- The wiccan should be able to wear her witches hat
- The anti-Masshole player should have her mini-Masshole wearing a gag and straight jacket in tow
- etc, ...

You do agree, right?
Each one has a right to their personal protest, yes?
You can't righteously deny any of them their right to protest.
That wouldn't be righteous.

So now you have an event that has been completely hijacked and turned into a chaotic carnival!
Yippee sportsmanship!!!

By allowing one, you must allow others, which then becomes a very slippery slope indeed...
(and no, I'm not referring to the Chinese national you have tied and lubed up in the basement)
(again, no offense to my Asian brothers and sisters, except for my Asian wannabe Latino friend)


CelticBomber wrote:
So you should be the arbiter of acceptable and unacceptable protest


I agree with you completely!!!

IZON - 2020
Clear Vision for America!
frankj1 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
going to the absurd is a waste of time.
delta1 Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Americans loved it when Jesse Owens showed up Hitler at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin...I guess protests at sporting events on the world's stage are OK, but only in some cases...

Owens was still was just a black man, a second class citizen, when he came home...
izonfire Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
frankj1 wrote:
going to the absurd is a waste of time.


Uh-Uh Frank!!! You’re not kicking that one past me!
We are interrupting play because I protest!!!!!!!

(BTW - wondering when and where you will be attending your next large event.)
(UUUUhhhhh, why??? Just curious...)

Anxious
izonfire Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
Actually, I was using hyperbole to illustrate my point.
It’s all absurd. It’s a team sport. She is taking the spotlight from everyone else.
Drawing all attention to her cause.
If she has it, everyone else should have it as well.
That would only be fair...

tailgater Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
going to the absurd is a waste of time.


Is that your password?

teedubbya Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I thought his password is smellmyfinger all caps.
frankj1 Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
tailgater wrote:
Is that your password?


changed it to coolcoin tonight!
teedubbya Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Noted. Coloncoin.
frankj1 Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
yeah, give that a try.
izonfire Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
He in deep schitt
tailgater Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
changed it to coolcoin tonight!


That's absurd.
frankj1 Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
nice!
Speyside Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Jesse Owens when making a point about protests? Get real. He disproved the concept of Arian supremacy in sports. No more, no less. Don't start with revisionist history BS. Even your point about solidarity and not black power is incorrect. Look up Harry Edwards and the roll he played. In fact, look up Harry Edwards comments on the 68 Olympics and his ongoing roll in the black community.
teedubbya Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The story of Peter Norman’ is fascinating.


teedubbya Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Saw a documentary on this awhile back. I never knew. Worth a read.

http://griotmag.com/en/white-man-in-that-photo/

Don’t know or care what groit magazine is or isn’t. The story is a good one.
teedubbya Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
“I couldn’t see why a black man couldn’t drink the same water from a water fountain, take the same bus or go to the same school as a white man.

There was a social injustice that I couldn’t do anything about from where I was, but I certainly hated it.

It has been said that sharing my silver medal with that incident on the victory dais detracted from my performance.

On the contrary.

I have to confess, I was rather proud to be part of it”.
CelticBomber Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
tailgater wrote:
Comedy gold!

We should "respect" an athlete. LOL!
Their profession is adult recess. Sure, they're good at it. But most people who do what they do do it for free.
They do it on weekends for fun. They pay for field time and for refs.
But according to you they "earned" a right to make a public statement?
Newsflash: I don't watch those sports to hear from the players.
They earned a spot on a highly competitive team. Good for them.
They didn't earn the right to a national soapbox. They simply took that. The two things are unrelated.
It's shameful that they do it. And it's shameful to consider it something earned and something that demands respect.

Unless I was right to begin with, and you did mean this as a comedy sketch.
In which case KUDOS!




Sorry, you're using the wrong bait for this fishy. If you believed any of what you just wrote I'd feel sad not get angry, But, it is good to know you, out of all the people in the country, know where and when our rights start and stop. I'm sure you've devoted years to studying constitutional law.RollEyes
CelticBomber Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
opelmanta1900 wrote:
I can't tell if cb is calling stupid people gay or gay people stupid... Either way, he's bound to piss someone off...



Where is Freud when you need him?
tailgater Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
CelticBomber wrote:
Sorry, you're using the wrong bait for this fishy. If you believed any of what you just wrote I'd feel sad not get angry, But, it is good to know you, out of all the people in the country, know where and when our rights start and stop. I'm sure you've devoted years to studying constitutional law.RollEyes


Miss the point much?

My rant was about being told I had to "respect" the political soapbox of a professional athlete.

I was told that a soccer player (for instance) has somehow "earned" the right to use a national platform to spew their own personal beliefs.

I'll say it again: I don't. And they didn't.

You can call it "bait", but that's just a cop out.


CelticBomber Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
tailgater wrote:
Miss the point much?

My rant was about being told I had to "respect" the political soapbox of a professional athlete.

I was told that a soccer player (for instance) has somehow "earned" the right to use a national platform to spew their own personal beliefs.

I'll say it again: I don't. And they didn't.

You can call it "bait", but that's just a cop out.





All I said was you had to respect a person's right to say what they wanted, not what they said.
delta1 Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Speyside wrote:
Jesse Owens when making a point about protests? Get real. He disproved the concept of Arian supremacy in sports. No more, no less. Don't start with revisionist history BS. Even your point about solidarity and not black power is incorrect. Look up Harry Edwards and the roll he played. In fact, look up Harry Edwards comments on the 68 Olympics and his ongoing roll in the black community.


using a sporting stage to make a political statement - this is what all these actions have in common...

but you insist they not speak out, to "just dribble and shut up" because they do nothing more important than play games...how quaint....

who should be allowed to speak up about perceived injustices?

how do you like them Patriots?
Speyside Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
No, I don't, but you are making up something that wasn't there at that time. Owens did protest at the 68 Olympics. Follow the Harry Edwards comment. Edwards did and does some interesting things. If you think Owens made a political statement, please enlighten me. I see an athlete who was great, won gold medals, and made Hitler look foolish. But I see no protest or political statement.
tailgater Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
CelticBomber wrote:
All I said was you had to respect a person's right to say what they wanted, not what they said.


OK.
You say they "earned their right to make a public statement".

On their own time, they are entitled to that right but your statement is misleading.
Others "earned" that right for them.

The ONLY thing they "earned" was a position on a sports team.
No more, and no less.

Using their earned fame to capture an audience on their own time is their right. On their own time.

Using the spotlight of the sporting event is not theirs to pollute. Because then we would have to decide what is OK and what is not. Would it be OK for someone to protest gun control during the national anthem? How about abortion? Pro or con. It simply doesn't belong at a sporting event during the anthem.





Speyside Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Tail, wouldn't there be no we in the equation? Their employers set the rules, same as any other employer. Or are you stating that you as a taxpayer have a right to have input on team USA women's soccer? I would see that as a slippery slope. The we that I do see is that we can choose to watch or not watch. Also we have the right to express our opinions.
CelticBomber Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
tailgater wrote:
OK.
You say they "earned their right to make a public statement".

On their own time, they are entitled to that right but your statement is misleading.
Others "earned" that right for them.

The ONLY thing they "earned" was a position on a sports team.
No more, and no less.

Using their earned fame to capture an audience on their own time is their right. On their own time.

Using the spotlight of the sporting event is not theirs to pollute. Because then we would have to decide what is OK and what is not. Would it be OK for someone to protest gun control during the national anthem? How about abortion? Pro or con. It simply doesn't belong at a sporting event during the anthem.








Again you're not reading it. They "earned" the right to be where they were when they made their statement. Whether at the Olympics or on a football field they dedicated their lives to becoming the best they could be. So, yes they earn the right to make whatever statement they did in those public forms. Through their own hard work and their rights as American's. It's not that hard. I'm not trying to be tricky here.
tailgater Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
CelticBomber wrote:
Again you're not reading it. They "earned" the right to be where they were when they made their statement. Whether at the Olympics or on a football field they dedicated their lives to becoming the best they could be. So, yes they earn the right to make whatever statement they did in those public forms. Through their own hard work and their rights as American's. It's not that hard. I'm not trying to be tricky here.


You're not being tricky. Or accurate.
They've earned an audience to watch them perform. Not pontificate or otherwise make a statement that is personal.

Perhaps the guy who sings the national anthem should then have the "right" to play on the team? I mean, he earned his right to be on the field through hard work and dedication.
Or let's be more realistic. He's given a microphone. Should he be allowed to break mid song and preach about his vegan lifestyle?


delta1 Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
none of the players stopped mid-event to make a statement...the nature of their events (popularity) invite the media, who elicit their thoughts on the sport and myriad other things...because some segment of their audience are interested in what the athlete is like as a human being...that is part of the equation of sport as a national obsession...

athletes are invited to appear on other broadcast events...they don't just show up and speak...you seem to approve when they express opinions that align with yours...
frankj1 Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
wait...some highly trained athletes who have become better at what they do than virtually all the rest of us, put in more hours getting there than virtually all the rest of us, and have risen to the level of a top three in the entire world (Olympics) or top few dozen (Pro Sports) find themselves in a position to be seen/heard by a yuuuuge audience and express the same rights we have but we don't get on that platform of opportunity...?


waaaaaaahhhhhhhh! American Way, whiners. Life's not fair, our system of competition creates the best, the best get opportunities the rest of us don't...what have I left out about our way of life?

Bunch of babies.

OK, more seriously, I wouldn't do it on the platform, but if I had that kind of fame and felt that strongly and was interviewed and it came up, I just might express my views if I felt injustice was happening. I'm an American, damn it, and shutting up to please those opposed to my views is cowardly.

Has anyone thought how they'd feel if an athlete grabbed the mic and said MAGA? Would you still complain? It's the message, not the medium (did I just channel Warhol?
Admit it to yourselves. But remember, the stuff we consider ugly is the definition of our freedom to express without fear.
teedubbya Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
How about all the praise god talk that’s common... as if god gaf that you scored and your team won.

frankj1 Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
teedubbya wrote:
How about all the praise god talk that’s common... as if god gaf that you scored and your team won.


if I was a bookie, I wouldn't take God's action.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:
How about all the praise god talk that’s common... as if god gaf that you scored and your team won.


seriously... God's a steelers fan and could care less about any other teams or sports... Not talking
teedubbya Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I would. I’ll take god plus 7
frankj1 Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
you're taking God and you want points?
the fix is in.
teedubbya Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Well he’s not very athletic
izonfire Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
The achievements of an athlete, however physically gifted, says absolutely nothing about their intellect. They could have a brain the size of a pea. But some see no problem with them hijacking an event for their own political protest.

God gave up on this thread 20 posts ago...
tailgater Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
none of the players stopped mid-event to make a statement...the nature of their events (popularity) invite the media, who elicit their thoughts on the sport and myriad other things...because some segment of their audience are interested in what the athlete is like as a human being...that is part of the equation of sport as a national obsession...

athletes are invited to appear on other broadcast events...they don't just show up and speak...you seem to approve when they express opinions that align with yours...


Where did you get that?

Oh yeah. You made it up.

If you have a valid point, you don't have to lie.

Your lie is duly noted.



In case you still don't comprehend (understand), I don't want anyone displaying a personal protest during the national anthem.

Didn't mean to confuse you.


tailgater Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:


OK, more seriously, I wouldn't do it on the platform, but if I had that kind of fame and felt that strongly and was interviewed and it came up, I just might express my views if I felt injustice was happening. I'm an American, damn it, and shutting up to please those opposed to my views is cowardly.

Has anyone thought how they'd feel if an athlete grabbed the mic and said MAGA? Would you still complain? It's the message, not the medium (did I just channel Warhol?
Admit it to yourselves. But remember, the stuff we consider ugly is the definition of our freedom to express without fear.


For me, it's about the disrespect during the anthem.
If you're being interviewed after the event and you tell the world what you think, that's fine. But during the anthem, or on the field while playing for the USA we don't need personal politics played out.

And I'll type this slowly for the liberals here: it doesn't matter the message. If they worshiped a MAGA hat I'd take the same position. Keep it on your own time.


Remember Brady and the hat? He didn't wear it onto the field during the anthem. It was in his locker and the liberals cried out loud.
I'm not displaying that hypocrisy. But the liberals feel the need to project it. Because that's from the liberal playbook, but it ain't from mine.




Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
3 Pages<123>