RMAN4443 wrote:Didn't sound ironic?....sounded like you were responding in anger with words you use often.....you actually used "cuck" in 4 or 5 posts in that thread....I just reread the exchange again, and you were definitely responding in anger. you most definitely were not "mocking the group that uses that term"....you most definitely were "using" that term, which makes you a member of the "group that uses" that term, which you say you "mock"...
So,I'm gonna go with the fact that you're a member of that "group", and not to bright yourself.....as well as a liar and a hypocrite...
Once again you've done it. While calling me "not to[sic] bright" you've used the incorrect form of the word "too". You do this almost every time you try this. It's almost like you've got some sort of mental block.
Anyway... what it sounded like is irrelevant. The term "cuck" got brought into this board a long while ago.... probably by jimmyct or someone similar. It's since been used in a similar manner as "snowflake"... it's a term which came from far-right boards which was used to insult people on the left as being not masculine. As with snowflake, I use it here to ironically mock the far right members of this board who are hilariously acting exactly like their compatriots would complain about lefty's acting.
I don't give a wet fart if you thought I sounded angry. It's a dumb word to ever use unironically, since I don't give a flying f-ck what someone's sexual proclivities are, nor do I think it means anything about the rest of their personality.
If I'm calling you a cuck, it's because I think you're a right wing nutjob who probably has used that term unioronically, and I'm mocking you for exhibiting the same traits you think you're above.