tailgater wrote:Huh.
I missed the post where someone claimed religion held a monopoly on morality.
No you didn't miss anything. I never claimed you said that. I made a statement. It's a common argument in the God vs Atheist debates.
tailgater wrote:
And your cynicism is where you claim that people of faith shirk personal responsibility. If that's your understanding of religion then you either fail to grasp the entirety of the message, or you twist a single aspect to make your point while ignoring the charitable bounty so often associated with local churches.
Pretty sure that's the pure definition of being a cynic.
Again I didn't say people of faith "shirk" responsibility. I said they have to accept responsibility for their actions as the definition of God and Religion change to fit the times. I thought I was commenting on religion, not pointing the finger at individual people as you seem to feel. Again I NEVER made any comment about any charitable things religion has done. I was referring to all the things done in the name of religion throughout history that now would be anathema to people of most faiths. As society has advanced and our understanding of the world has advanced religions have had to "edit" the supposed word of God to fit in with the times. That's not cynicism. It's a simple truth.
tailgater wrote:
As for the name? Why do you care what others call him? Even in regards to a forged tomb. Fake name on it? OK. But if the name was historically correct would it change your view? Rhetorical, of course. Which is why I call you out as disingenuous.
Strike that. Your post was disingenuous. I have faith that you are not.
As for the name, I don't really care. I just think it's funny every time someone finds a tomb that read's "Here lies Jesus" and they get all excited. It wasn't a condemnation of everyone who believes. It's just something I find amusing. Half the people I've ever asked think Christ is his last name. Saying if the name was historically correct would my opinion be different? No. The first historical reference to Jesus as the Messiah was written over 100 years after he supposedly lived. In one short sentence. What is disingenuous about that?
dis·in·gen·u·ous
/ˌdisənˈjenyo͞oəs/
adjective
not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.
Where did I do that? I made a few random comments on the topic. You've accused me of being disingenuous, ignoring the charitable work of religions, ( I noticed you failed to address that accusation on a comment I never made), a Cynic, and bitter. You got all that from a few general statements I made. You're projecting issue's you seem to have onto me.
Do I believe in God? Nope. Is the bible the literal word of God? I don't think so, the literal word of God seems to have changed quite a bit through the years. Do I have a problem with people who believe? Depends on what they believe (Just look at those wacky Mormons and Scientologists for example).
Do I have a problem with faith? It depends on the faith and what people use their faith to justify. (Suicide bombers, female circumcision, child brides as examples). I raised two kids in the Jewish faith. I'm a member of a Synagogue because they get something out of their beliefs and faith. I'm happy for them. But, if you ask me, no I don't believe in God and I don't think Jesus existed. I believe religion and all it's holy books and traditions are man made. You've accused me of making claims about religion and it's charitable works and I'm the one who's disingenuous?
In nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti
StePHen