America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by delta1. 96 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Senate Impeachment Trial thoughts...
rfenst Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
... I am looking forward to watching the Trial just because it is history in the making.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Over it.

It's a sham perpetuated by a single party (and not the entire party either!) in the House. first it was the "Russia, Russia, Russia" narrative to push us to this point and that imploded. Then it was "Stormy, Stormy. Stormy" pushed by a fraudulent human with a law degree and it imploded then it became "Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine". The constant movement of the goal line tell me that they have nothing. If only the Democrats in the Senate could maintain some sort of regularity and stick to what they bemoaned during the Clinton impeachment where real statues were broken that were listed and not generalities that separate the branches of government. Ill let their own words out of their mouths do the talking though...

https://youtu.be/yjC7RvZ9vjk

https://youtu.be/lWxBOfmba94

At first, I wanted witnesses. I wanted a laundry list and check em off and expose them for what they all are...LIARS. Obama, Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Schiff, the "whistleblower", Hunter and Creepy Quid Pro Joe to march up there and get exposed. Now, I want a lid on it. Store it next to the Ark of the Covenant in the "warehouse". It's not the job of the Senate to make the case for impeachment, that's the House's job. They did such a poor job of it they want "Big Brother" to step in and it doesn't work that way! This entire debacle will only cost the Dems in the upcoming election. In the House, the Senate and the White House.

On the flip side...The NY Times has made up their minds to support a race pandering liar and grumpy what's her face for their endorsement. Whatever that gets anyone...meh. They couldn't even back a single one of the DNC's candidates.
teedubbya Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'll watch parts and certainly follow it. I have no intention on putting my head in the sand and pretending it's not there because it doesn't fit my chosen universe of "facts".

And while I think the current billionaire politician in the white house that was born with a golden spoon in his mouth and is fooling the common folk who he would never actually deal with in real life is laughing all the way to the bank and is the most corrupt person we have had in the office in my lifetime...... I really wish the dems would just concentrate on finding better people and winning the election.

The dude was clearly corrupt before he ever won. If you can't beat that hot mess you deserve him..... then again neither could the record number of R's running against him once again demonstrating there is more similarity between the parties than differences.

It is sort of bad to (illegally) withhold funds until another country announces an investigation in to your political rival however. To let that go would be to make us 3rd world countryish. And if you believe there was really just a heart felt concern to fight corruption (retroactively) in foreign lands you really have drank the orange kool aid and need to reread the previous paragraph. You want to believe that out of convenience but in no way would accept that premise if you removed or switched the R and D.

That said this process is already over and it is a farce by both sides. This admin is straight out of Orwell but it seems as if the other side is too. They are both playing and those lathered up on either side are the puppets.

I really do not understand the cult like devotion some have to either party, to the point they willingly ignore fact and logic (And in the current case the party's core values over the last 50 plus years). And it's definitely not just one team. It's not mutually exclusive at all. The screaming chimps on one side actually believe they look different than the screaming chimps on the other. And to not worship at the cult of their choice completely puts you in the other cult.

Sad. (mirroring a carrots line)
Tittums Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
I'll be watching all of it and laughing my butt off when he is acquitted because people like TW can't get over Trump winning. Then I will vote for Trump again, just to piss off everyone who hates Trump. I get accused of party over country yet all these Trump haters seem to ignore how well the country is doing or they would rather the country fail if it means someone other than Trump.
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Tittums wrote:
I'll be watching all of it and laughing my butt off when he is acquitted because people like TW can't get over Trump winning. Then I will vote for Trump again, just to piss off everyone who hates Trump. I get accused of party over country yet all these Trump haters seem to ignore how well the country is doing or they would rather the country fail if it means someone other than Trump.



I'm over trump winning. I think we deserve him and if he wins again we deserve him even more. I am saddened he is the leader of my party at the moment but so be it. There will be pieces left to put back together in his wake, and folks in the party that traded away promising futures on him will be ejected. I believe the republican core issues will return at some point if the damage isn't too deep. It could have a long term cleansing effect.

I always want the country to do well and never want it to fail. We are doing well in some areas and we are failing miserably in others. I was no obama fan and didn't vote for him, but I rooted for him to pull us out of the financial crisis. I have no idea what McCain or Romney would or wouldn't have accomplished. That would be pretending fantasy land is fact.

I want the country to exell under trump. To pretend it would have been the opposite under hill dog is pretending fantasy land is fact. You may believe it.... but it's not fact. And had she won (I did not vote for her) I would root for her and call her on the BS.

To suspend fact and reality for either party is something I simply don't understand.


Edit - Its a forgone conclusion he will get acquitted. I don't see me getting too worked up over that. It's a given. If you are happy with the whole process by both parties that's on you.
Tittums Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
teedubbya wrote:
I'm over trump winning. I think we deserve him and if he wins again we deserve him even more. I am saddened he is the leader of my party at the moment but so be it. There will be pieces left to put back together in his wake.


I am hoping we do not go back to a party full of cowards. I think you and Dershowitz should attempt a third party if you feel this way. He is without a party as well. I imagine there are quite a lot of people out there from both parties that feel their respective party left them. I think they are all insane if they think things have not changed forever.


teedubbya wrote:
I want the country to exell under trump. To pretend it would have been the opposite under hill dog is pretending fantasy land is fact. You may believe it.... but it's not fact. And had she won (I did not vote for her) I would root for her and call her on the BS.


The country would have a continued a slow crawl to prosperity assuming "hilldog" didn't create more an more regulations to strangle that growth to death. Then we would all be dead because we would be at war with Russia.
teedubbya Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I am nothing like dershowitz who is a dem. Weird.

Instead of forming a third party I'd just like the rinos like T to do so. The very fact someone calls the party before trump (lifelong democrat) a party full of cowards shows they were never really a Republican but something different. Yet they want to assume the party name and have the true republicans form another party. All while calling long time republicans rinos and non republicans republicans. It's pure orwell and I actually find it tactically beautiful but intellectually dishonest.

but I'd have no problem with that. I'm attached to the values and ideas rather than the name and parties have flipped and changed name before. We will evolve thats for sure. Tomorrow will never be like today.

I do not know what would have happened under hill dog economically. If I had to guess I'd say similar to what is happening now but it is a guess on both of our parts. The only difference is I recognize that.
dstieger Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I just want Graham (or Jordan or Gaetz or some other Trump suckophant) to acknowledge that Trump's actions and intent were FD up. Not impeachable....not that dems aren't in a political game...just that Trump fd up...just once....publicly
Tittums Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
teedubbya wrote:
I am nothing like dershowitz who is a dem. Weird.


I never claimed you were a perfect match. You, like Dershowitz, are a man who feels like they no longer have a party because their respective party has gone insane.

teedubbya wrote:
Instead of forming a third party I'd just like the rinos like T to do so. The very fact someone calls the party before trump (lifelong democrat) a party full of cowards shows they were never really a Republican but something different. Yet they want to assume the party name and have the true republicans form another party. All while calling long time republicans rinos and non republicans republicans. It's pure orwell and I actually find it tactically beautiful but intellectually dishonest.


Republicans weren't cowards before Trump? OK. I am fully aware Trump was a lifelong Democrat. He is also what made current Republican politicians no longer terrified of being called racist sexist homophobes. He rolls into the Republican party like a rock star with all the same brash and attitude of one and both sides sling **** at him that just never stick.

If you want people like Murkowski, Susan Collins, or (the now thankfully dead) John McCain to be the majority of Republicans then I beg you once again to go start a party with Dershowitz and take the surviving of the two with you. They might has well be Democrats anyways.
teedubbya Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'm nothing like dershowitz so don't really get why I would start a party with him unless it's not about values beliefs and goals but about team colors. It seems devoid of any thought and more about something else. That and being thankful for someones death says a lot.
Tittums Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
teedubbya wrote:
I'm nothing like dershowitz so don't really get why I would start a party with him unless it's not about values beliefs and goals but about team colors. It seems devoid of any thought and more about something else. That an being thankful for someones death says a lot.


You're right, I am sorry. You are welcome to pretend to feel welcome in the new Republican party all you want. I am sorry I ever said you are a person without a party like Dershowitz. It ain't your daddy's Grand Old Party anymore.

teedubbya wrote:
That an being thankful for someones death says a lot.


I celebrate the death of all of Trump's enemies.
teedubbya Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Meh. We will see. In the end short term thinking usually loses to long term. Not always though.
Tittums Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
teedubbya wrote:
Meh. We will see. In the end short term thinking usually loses to long term. Not always though.


The Democrats have been running their long term plan for ages. That's why I am glad things like the Virginia rallies and progressive's gun-grabbing rhetoric remind us to be prepared for their long term plan coming to conclusion.
teedubbya Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Tittums wrote:
The Democrats have been running their long term plan for ages. That's why I am glad things like the Virginia rallies and progressive's gun-grabbing rhetoric remind us to be prepared for their long term plan coming to conclusion.



lol as usual I don't think you are grasping what I am saying. what you are saying is random, or just what you want to say and is in no way tied to what I was saying. maybe that was intentional but it's probably my fault for not articulating it well enough.
teedubbya Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
dstieger wrote:
I just want Graham (or Jordan or Gaetz or some other Trump suckophant) to acknowledge that Trump's actions and intent were FD up. Not impeachable....not that dems aren't in a political game...just that Trump fd up...just once....publicly




Sorry for the threadjack rfenst. dst is pretty on point for me.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
At this point i find politics, politicians, and those who intently follow either to be consistently the most obnoxious and unlovable people in the room...

On one side you have morons saying trump is the best President ever and on the other you've got tardos claiming trump is the most corrupt President ever...

It's a bunch of idiots who have no idea what they're talking about trying desperately to get others to agree with them... **** both teams... **** em right in the ear....
victor809 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I'm still pretty convinced tits is just brew or fuzz playing a "trump supporter" role. That's just too perfect.
ZRX1200 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
Trump is about to make the senate great again.
teedubbya Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
sounds like zrx is predicting one or both parties will have folks crossing party lines.
frankj1 Online
#20 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
opelmanta1900 wrote:
**** both teams... **** em right in the ear....


and we're back to aural sex...
Krazeehorse Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 04-09-2010
Posts: 1,958
I just got done emailing my senator requesting he get the dog and pony show over as quickly as possible. We know why it's happening and how it's going to end. Back to work boys.
Buckwheat Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
teedubbya wrote:
I'll watch parts and certainly follow it. I have no intention on putting my head in the sand and pretending it's not there because it doesn't fit my chosen universe of "facts".

And while I think the current billionaire politician in the white house that was born with a golden spoon in his mouth and is fooling the common folk who he would never actually deal with in real life is laughing all the way to the bank and is the most corrupt person we have had in the office in my lifetime...... I really wish the dems would just concentrate on finding better people and winning the election.

The dude was clearly corrupt before he ever won. If you can't beat that hot mess you deserve him..... then again neither could the record number of R's running against him once again demonstrating there is more similarity between the parties than differences.

It is sort of bad to (illegally) withhold funds until another country announces an investigation in to your political rival however. To let that go would be to make us 3rd world countryish. And if you believe there was really just a heart felt concern to fight corruption (retroactively) in foreign lands you really have drank the orange kool aid and need to reread the previous paragraph. You want to believe that out of convenience but in no way would accept that premise if you removed or switched the R and D.

That said this process is already over and it is a farce by both sides. This admin is straight out of Orwell but it seems as if the other side is too. They are both playing and those lathered up on either side are the puppets.

I really do not understand the cult like devotion some have to either party, to the point they willingly ignore fact and logic (And in the current case the party's core values over the last 50 plus years). And it's definitely not just one team. It's not mutually exclusive at all. The screaming chimps on one side actually believe they look different than the screaming chimps on the other. And to not worship at the cult of their choice completely puts you in the other cult.

Sad. (mirroring a carrots line)



Well said. fog
Speyside Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Isn't this a conviction trial? I thought he was already impeached.
Buckwheat Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Speyside wrote:
Isn't this a conviction trial? I thought he was already impeached.



Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner! Applause Beer

No impeached US president has ever been removed from office. fog
Gene363 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
Dismissed for lack of evidence.
rfenst Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Schiff sure gives an excellent opening statement. Very skilled.
dstieger Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
rfenst wrote:
Schiff sure gives an excellent opening statement. Very skilled.


I didn't see it....but, I'm laughing out loud here...are you being serious Robert, or just trying to get Tittums to blow chunks?


Schiff delivers a set of lines pretty well -- but, on any further examination, he's generally full of partisan crap -- he sounds impassioned at times, but he rarely says much that isn't meant to create left talking points or rile up righties -- I don't think even he believes much of what he actually says most of the time
rfenst Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
No. No. No. I am not commenting on anything beyond his legal skill to give an Opening Statement.
dstieger Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
How'd we end up with so many courtroom lawyers in the Capitol? And is that a good thing?
rfenst Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
No way, man.
rfenst Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Sekulow didn't do nearly as well, but still did decently.
rfenst Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Anyone else been watching this all day?
Tittums Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
Sorry I haven't been ranty and angry as you all have come to expect. I am just too damned happy and amused with this.

Motion to table every goddamned thing Senator Schumer wants. Motion carries. Goodnight all. Will be watching tomorrow.
frankj1 Online
#34 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
so what really scares you that would have become known?
rfenst Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Tittums wrote:
Sorry I haven't been ranty and angry as you all have come to expect. I am just too damned happy and amused with this.

Motion to table every goddamned thing Senator Schumer wants. Motion carries. Goodnight all. Will be watching tomorrow.

There is absolutely nothing happy or amusing about any of this.
Tittums Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
rfenst wrote:
There is absolutely nothing happy or amusing about any of this.


Oh go back to gargling Schiff's balls and you'll be in your happy place again.

Anti-Trumpers were OK with an unfair and partisan trial in the house I am happy with a partisan trial in the senate. This is what happens when you fack a man in the a$$.
Buckwheat Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
dstieger wrote:
How'd we end up with so many courtroom lawyers in the Capitol? And is that a good thing?


They established the place.
Of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 25 were lawyers. Of the 55 framers of the Constitution, 32 were lawyers.

fog
dstieger Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Maybe over the next 230 some years, we'll figure out how to dislodge some of them
tdawg447 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 01-18-2020
Posts: 2
I had no idea there even was a "swamp" before Trump started talking about the need to clean it up during the Republican debates prior to the 2016 election. Since then, nearly everything he said has turned out to be true and the "swamp" clearly has been exposed. It is the collection of appointed and civil service bureaucrats who run far too much of Washington. They have to go. Trump is fighting them tooth and nail. They are behind most of the resistance he has faced.
The problem for them is, his policies have been hugely successful in spite of unprecedented and illegal tactics used against him. People are realizing that the man meant exactly what he said about what he was going to do. That is an amazing thing, a president who does exactly what he says he will.
God bless him. He will start locking some of those scumbags up after he wins the 2020 election and that is where they belong.
Gene363 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
Observation:

Listening to Schumer talk about fairness is like hearing from Benedict Arnold about loyalty.
Tittums Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
Gene363 wrote:
Observation:

Listening to Schumer talk abut fairness is like hearing from Benedict Arnold about loyalty.


They all scream fairness after the bull they pulled in the house. Welcome to the Senate b!tches, you don't get to make unfair rules here. you don't get to make any rules. Motion to table whatever you want, motion carries. If Democrats act like a little b!tch, you must acquit.
Abrignac Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
Don’t remember who earlier suggested Titty was either Brew of Fuzz, but based on verbiage I’ll go with Fuzz.
rfenst Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Now I gotta watch Nadler's ugly face and listen to his spew.
teedubbya Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I used to like McConnell when he played granny on the beverly hillbillies
Tittums Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
rfenst wrote:
Now I gotta watch Nadler's ugly face and listen to his spew.


You were all dreamy like a schoolgirl over Schiff yesterday. I guess you only have a thing for bulging eyes.
teedubbya Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Tittums wrote:
You were all dreamy like a schoolgirl over Schiff yesterday. I guess you only have a thing for bulging eyes.



Back to mcconell huh?


to be fair I think rfenst was talking skill, not agreement or love. That's hard for a one dimensional non thinker to grasp


I was wrong about midnight mitch though

https://www.google.com/search?q=mcconnell+as+star+wars&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi7hoywkJjnAhXvV98KHY-SC2cQ_AUoAXoECAsQAw&biw=1920&bih=969#imgrc=4uN4ClRM-f42WM:
Tittums Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
teedubbya wrote:
to be fair I think rfenst was talking skill, not agreement or love. That's hard for a one dimensional non thinker to grasp


I am aware, he also said Sekulow didn't do nearly as well so I am not sure what to think of his judge of skill. Sekulow did great. I don't try to deny I am partisan but every single time Schiff talks he sounds like a child who didn't get two scoops of ice scream when Donald Trump did.
rfenst Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
The old lady who just finished her speech was totally unimpressive. I don't even recognize the Manager who is speaking now. OK, I see he is from Colorado
Tittums Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2019
Posts: 524
rfenst wrote:
The old lady who just finished her speech was totally unimpressive. I don't recognize the Manager who is speaking now.


I don't know who she is but they shouldn't have picked her. She lacks the acting/stage experience required to put on their show. Every "Let's look at that one" line (referring to multiple videos) was delivered flatly. I would hate to hear how she reads books to her grandchildren.
Brewha Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,161
victor809 wrote:
I'm still pretty convinced tits is just brew or fuzz playing a "trump supporter" role. That's just too perfect.


OhMyGod
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>