America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Monarchical executive?!!!

You did see how the house behaved right?

LMAO .....co equal branches bro.

We're always on for coffee in the morning. You know this.

Drafter... Perhaps fewer Republican presidents would have impeachment attempts if fewer Republican presidents did impeachable things...

Seriously... What's that quote? " The reason that bad things happen to you... is because you're a dumbass. "

Go ahead and take it, if I wasn't home I'd say take my keys too. I'm drunk.

that's it...you're grounded!

Communism is a stretch. I will give you that. But are you going to deny the socialist tendencies of the majority of the Democrat's Presidential offerings? Nevermind AOC ready to take up the torch the second Bernie has the heart-attack that finally does him in.

Not funny.

North and south are not regional ideologies either. They represent alignment with either Authoritarianism or Libertarianism

I guess you don't spend a whole lot of time on other media platforms. Last night after Trump's acquittal, I was told by one person that I needed to be sent to a reeducation camp. Another one called me a Putin lover and that I should be deported to Russia. A third stated that the people need to rise up and execute Trump and all his supporters. Yet folks wonder why I'm so adamant about keeping my guns. These are just three of the dozens and dozens of threats I have received over the past few years from loving, tolerant leftists. Oh, and believe me, the call for a 2nd Civil War is coming from both sides, which concerns me deeply. Though I won't condone anyone from the right calling for one, I can recall at least 6 leftist posts this week alone screaming for a Civil War.

David

Maybe I read it here, not sure. You can vote yourself into communism but you have to shoot your way out.

I would have to ask what forums you're on that allow that sort of behavior. I have personally never seen this

So it's his own friends who are sending him death threats?

That seems...

.... logical I suppose.

I’m gonna take a hot bath. Brewha care to join me?💅

All we need is 51% not the whole pie.

It's adorable how optimistic you are...

More likely, twitler will get re-elected. He doesn't need a majority, just a strong 40-something percent in the right states. Those people already exist and showed up for him 4 years ago. They have not changed their minds (Really, when you choose to vote for him to be president, you prove that logic is not going to sway you from any of your decisions).

This pattern will continue with the Senate.

The house will continue to go Dem. But that will be irrelevant as everything will get stuck in the Senate.

it was the Federalist Paper 65... here's a paragraph which argues for the need on the impeachement power to restrain the executive and an argument to use the example of impeachment that exists in Great Britain...highlighted sentence says that impeachment is a means check the executive...

"What, it may be asked, is the true spirit of the institution itself? Is it not designed as a method of NATIONAL INQUEST into the conduct of public men? If this be the design of it, who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves? It is not disputed that the power of originating the inquiry, or, in other words, of preferring the impeachment, ought to be lodged in the hands of one branch of the legislative body. Will not the reasons which indicate the propriety of this arrangement strongly plead for an admission of the other branch of that body to a share of the inquiry? The model from which the idea of this institution has been borrowed, pointed out that course to the convention. In Great Britain it is the province of the House of Commons to prefer the impeachment, and of the House of Lords to decide upon it. Several of the State constitutions have followed the example. As well the latter, as the former, seem to have regarded the practice of impeachments as a bridle in the hands of the legislative body upon the executive servants of the government. Is not this the true light in which it ought to be regarded?"

his statements in that essay are about how impeachments would work is a prediction, moreso than an argument against impeachment...

65 details the body that will hear the case in an impartial manner. It wasn't entered for the need of impeachment. They feared our government would be out of control and that is why it's typed the way it is with the government actually being a negative on almost everything except for Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. He used the House of Commons as an example. It was and still is a corrupt "House of Cards". 66 goes a little bit deeper. You can't just type in a google search and cram what you want into the Federalist Papers. These were the documents that the Founders used to illustrate what the Constitution would behave like so the citizens could petition for any necessary changes.