America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 years ago by opelmanta1900. 295 replies replies.
6 Pages<123456>
COVID19 is winning.
teedubbya Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The brassard bush is burning now. I sprayed it with the clap which is my god given right. Merica.
DrafterX Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
That was God's bush... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
God deserves the spray as much as anyone else. That’s my right. I can spray or grab any bush I wanna.

Screw the bush.
DrafterX Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I bet you like the big bushy ones... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
As long as they are covered with my spray, I like to spray and it’s my right
teedubbya Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
When you are a star you can spray anywhere you want. I just spray.
DrafterX Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I need to go spray in my back yard... it's good to spray outside... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It’s good to spray everywhere. If it gets on someone it’s their fault. They shouldn’t be there. Some of the sheeple don’t get it.
DrafterX Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
I feel better.. altho there was no body to spray on.. Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Your mil will be closer soon.
DrafterX Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
LOL
frankj1 Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
I used to spray and run away.
But since I joined this group, I am no longer ashamed.
DrafterX Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
TW might have an issue in da face but that's just speculation... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
No way spray away. It’s your right.
DrafterX Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
As long as you don't expect him to turn the favor.. Frank don't play that.. Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
If you spray Frank you contemplate this on da tree of woe... just sayin... Mellow
Speyside Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
It's an honor to be sprayed by Trump. Kind of like kissing the papal ring.
frankj1 Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
DrafterX wrote:
If you spray Frank you contemplate this on da tree of woe... just sayin... Mellow

you have been there for me from day one!
Mcdanielsamuel Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 04-28-2020
Posts: 611
I got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell.
Speyside Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
More cowbell is always good.
tailgater Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
I once saw a very large tiger spray an inattentive photographer.
Top 10 funniest things ever.
gummy jones Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
tailgater wrote:
I once saw a very large tiger spray an inattentive photographer.
Top 10 funniest things ever.


link or it didnt happen
frankj1 Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
gummy jones wrote:
link or it didnt happen

you worried you got caught in the act?





Hi Tiger.
victor809 Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
So.... Back to COVID....

Let's look at some fun numbers. CDC published some interesting numbers on pneumonia deaths over the time of the COVID pandemic.
So, in the US as a whole, over the period of time from Feb 01 to May 23, there were 83k COVID tagged deaths
Over that same time, there were 96k Pneumonia deaths (not tagged as COVID).

Now, if you look at 2017 data, total yearly mortality is about 50k a year..... We're already at 96k over a 4mo period of time. One would assume there's probably another 15-20k worth of actual pneumonia deaths remaining to occur in this year (assuming death by pneumonia is consistent year round). So for pneumonia, we could estimate we are probably 60-65k OVER our expected deaths in 2020. This is likely unattributed COVID.

With that in mind, let's start looking at some particularly "odd" states.
Like Florida....where over that period of time they experienced 5.5k deaths from pneumonia (unattributed to COVID). Over all of last year, Florida experienced 3k deaths from pneumonia. In 1/3 of the year (when they would expect 1k deaths from pneumonia) they got 5.5k.
Georgia.... Should have about 600 deaths from Pneumonia, they have 2k
Texas... Should have about 1k deaths, has 5k
California should be about 2k, instead it's 8k


It keeps going. Our actual deaths from COVID are already likely much closer to 200k than to the 100k we are counting at this point.

Anyway, thought it would be interesting to some people.
Here's where you can get the data to play with yourself:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09_tables-508.pdf
tailgater Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
gummy jones wrote:
link or it didnt happen


I was maybe a freshman in high school.
Back in the day, no cell phones to capture it.

Circus was in town and the Tiger arched his back and sprayed about 15 feet or so.
Caught the photographer on her front, from head to toe.
I'm talking dripping wet.

I'm laughing just typing this.
teedubbya Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
At the zoo I once saw a hippo spray **** everywhere and use it’s tail to bat it even further. People were pissed lol.
frankj1 Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
victor809 wrote:
So.... Back to COVID....

Let's look at some fun numbers. CDC published some interesting numbers on pneumonia deaths over the time of the COVID pandemic.
So, in the US as a whole, over the period of time from Feb 01 to May 23, there were 83k COVID tagged deaths
Over that same time, there were 96k Pneumonia deaths (not tagged as COVID).

Now, if you look at 2017 data, total yearly mortality is about 50k a year..... We're already at 96k over a 4mo period of time. One would assume there's probably another 15-20k worth of actual pneumonia deaths remaining to occur in this year (assuming death by pneumonia is consistent year round). So for pneumonia, we could estimate we are probably 60-65k OVER our expected deaths in 2020. This is likely unattributed COVID.

With that in mind, let's start looking at some particularly "odd" states.
Like Florida....where over that period of time they experienced 5.5k deaths from pneumonia (unattributed to COVID). Over all of last year, Florida experienced 3k deaths from pneumonia. In 1/3 of the year (when they would expect 1k deaths from pneumonia) they got 5.5k.
Georgia.... Should have about 600 deaths from Pneumonia, they have 2k
Texas... Should have about 1k deaths, has 5k
California should be about 2k, instead it's 8k


It keeps going. Our actual deaths from COVID are already likely much closer to 200k than to the 100k we are counting at this point.

Anyway, thought it would be interesting to some people.
Here's where you can get the data to play with yourself:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09_tables-508.pdf

I've been wondering if many deaths have simply been attributed to pneumonia that might be covid.
This is not only no surprise, it may be just the first unusually fast rising cause of death to be overlooked.
Speyside Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Interesting extrapolation Victor. I think your premise is correct. Frank I suspect you could see the same trend with many compromised people. Heart, diabetes, obesity, lowered immune system, and on and on. Victor, there also are going to be deaths years from now that were accelerated by COVID 19. Autoimmune disease comes to mind as a primary example.
BuckyB93 Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,188
Posted Tues, May 26, 2020

BuckyB93 wrote:
When you say winning, what do you mean by that?

And when people talk about this curve thing... is there some natural phenomena, some law of nature or physics defines how the curve is supposed to look? Is it supposed to be linear, logarithmic, exponential, quadratic...

When you say that we must accept a second wave... where is this law of nature written that makes you so sure that one is coming?

Looking at this data, things are on a general decline with saw tooth peaks and valleys with a period of about one week. Is this a natural cycle of some sort or a function of the data reporting cycle.

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/new-cases

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

Based on these graphs, I expect a local mini peak in cases sometime around this coming weekend.


Yep, looking like another localized mini peak is hitting now.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

If the cycle continues, we'll be looking for another local minimum around Tues June 2nd. It's really weird that the virus appears to have a built in calendar.
BuckyB93 Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,188
In case you forgot, there's a virus going around. The late week peak is upon us.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

Lock up the women and children, baste your threshold with the blood of virgins because it's going to come back again next week after a fall off over the weekend. See... even the virus takes the weekends off.
delta1 Online
#131 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
hmmmm...silly Bucky....


many COVID19 deaths occur at home...still a lot of people in America who do not have health insurance...county records the death but do not conduct tests...

another factor that indicates the mortality rate of the virus is higher than reported...
BuckyB93 Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,188
So we are not to trust the reported numbers? I thought the smart people believed the reported numbers. Now your telling me that the numbers are not trustworthy?

Back to the graphs. I thought these were the graphs and data that we are using to determine policy and how we should react/respond. What happened to the "sky is falling" calls when the instantaneous daily reported numbers showed a rise in infection and death rates, the scrolls along the bottom of all the newscasts like it was the Final Four tournament updates? This graph shows a decay in infection rates with a short term cyclic period of about a week.

Is there a built in clock in the Rona because it looks like we have predictable peaks at the end of each week? Is that the cycle of testing and data reporting or should we lock down every weekend to avoid these swings? It's never too late to make knee jerk reactions based small snapshots in time.

Where is the spike we were promised when things began opening up? Remember the post Memorial Day spike that everyone was worried about? Memorial day was almost 2 weeks ago. Isn't 14 days the mandatory quarantine period to ensure that the Rona hasn't taken hold of it's victim?

Where did this stuff go?
teedubbya Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The numbers absolutely are not precise. If that translates to trustworthy for anyone so be it.

The numbers are artificially low. They just are, almost by definition.

The virus is also pretty predictable in terms of spread. In terms of health damage that’s a different thing. But in terms of spread it’s acting as expected. With precision or certainty? Nope. If that’s the standard then not so much. But that’s never the standard and not really reasonable.

The numbers are starting to rise again for the most part. In some areas that’s more true than others. That is also expected. I suspect they will continue to but will be tempered some by outdoor conditions.

Meh. I’m just looking at actual data rather than the internet or my cable news channel of choice. It’s not political.

But the numbers to me have been surprisingly predictable. Almost vanilla.
tailgater Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
So how will these protests impact these predictable vanilla numbers?
teedubbya Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The answer to that should be pretty obvious
delta1 Online
#136 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
BuckyB93 wrote:
So we are not to trust the reported numbers? I thought the smart people believed the reported numbers. Now your telling me that the numbers are not trustworthy?

Back to the graphs. I thought these were the graphs and data that we are using to determine policy and how we should react/respond. What happened to the "sky is falling" calls when the instantaneous daily reported numbers showed a rise in infection and death rates, the scrolls along the bottom of all the newscasts like it was the Final Four tournament updates? This graph shows a decay in infection rates with a short term cyclic period of about a week.

Is there a built in clock in the Rona because it looks like we have predictable peaks at the end of each week? Is that the cycle of testing and data reporting or should we lock down every weekend to avoid these swings? It's never too late to make knee jerk reactions based small snapshots in time.

Where is the spike we were promised when things began opening up? Remember the post Memorial Day spike that everyone was worried about? Memorial day was almost 2 weeks ago. Isn't 14 days the mandatory quarantine period to ensure that the Rona hasn't taken hold of it's victim?

Where did this stuff go?


sorry, Bucky... I thought you were being facetious...

I read somewhere that the reason the virus "takes the week-end off" is because many of the folks recording the data are off on week-ends, so some week-end data gets reported on Mondays...at least that rationale was used to explain that phenomena locally...

but because of the "haphazard" appearance and the real world difficulty in tracking actual cases of a brand new infectious disease, it lends itself to an argument that the date can't be trusted...

NY, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Mexico, Brazil, United Kingdom and other nations have proven the deadly nature of the disease and should not be overlooked...heck, we in America have the highest counts of infections and deaths, and there are many among us who think the numbers are trivial, not real...
HockeyDad Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
tailgater wrote:
So how will these protests impact these predictable vanilla numbers?


Everybody gets Covid and is dead in three weeks. Just like when the states started opening. Just like after Memorial Day. All dead.

HockeyDad Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
As deadly as this virus is I just cannot accept that the folks that are recording the numbers are ofF on weekends.
delta1 Online
#139 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
some smaller cities and counties can't afford to have 24/7 coverage at the labs, public health centers and other places and agencies that report their data...so the weekend numbers lag...

here's a quote from an article in the local paper:

"Local governments announce new cases and deaths each day, though bottlenecks in testing and reporting lags can introduce delays. For instance, some agencies do not report new totals on weekends, leading to lower numbers on those days."


from: https://www.latimes.com/projects/california-coronavirus-cases-tracking-outbreak/
BuckyB93 Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,188
OK just so were clear. The virus is more dangerous than the published data shows - trust those who say so, they are the experts and have insight into the real data.

It's acting exactly as predicted except when it hasn't but don't trust the published data or the stuff we've been telling previously because those who really know what's going on have the real data and it fits their model exactly and don't question them because you are incapable of understanding the little details that we have established in our models and they aren't really models because the data fits exactly as we thought and will be able to predict what will happen this coming fall because our model predicted that things would fall off in the summer so you better watch out because a new title wave is coming because that's what we've been telling everyone so we need to make sure that we don't have egg on our face.... (whew...)

Hey look! Looters. Look over there!
teedubbya Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Not exactly what’s been said but sure why not.
Speyside Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Bucky, my last job was for retirement fun. I am very private and don't throw around I know more than you. That being said I have a PHD in cellular physiology and specialize in cellular membrane physiology and inner cellular physiology. I do not claim to know the epidemiology of this beast. But I do understand its interaction at a cellular level. No one is talking about the real danger of this virus. It isn't the deaths. It is the long term autoimmune damage. Also, if this thing mutates a specific wrong way, which I have every expectation it won't, we are looking at an extinction level event. The % is phenomenally minimal, yet it does exist. This does not mean I want the country to remain closed. I do want people to understand what we are facing. In truth this post was difficult for me because I am a private person. But what is going on is to important not to share.
BuckyB93 Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,188
OK I admit that I paraphrased so let work with what exactly has been said here

"But the numbers to me have been surprisingly predictable. Almost vanilla."
If they are so predictable and vanilla, what is the number going to be next Friday and what is the confidence level you are working with?

"Meh. I’m just looking at actual data rather than the internet or my cable news channel of choice. It’s not political." - T Dub
"but because of the "haphazard" appearance and the real world difficulty in tracking actual cases of a brand new infectious disease, it lends itself to an argument that the date [sic] can't be trusted..." Delta

So the data being published is not real and can't be trusted yet this is the data that is used to feed the fear and hysteria of the general population. Only those in the know have access to the secret vault of truth and we must accept their conclusions of this super secret real data because they are the professionals.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
BuckyB93 wrote:
OK I admit that I paraphrased so let work with what exactly has been said here

"But the numbers to me have been surprisingly predictable. Almost vanilla."
If they are so predictable and vanilla, what is the number going to be next Friday and what is the confidence level you are working with?

"Meh. I’m just looking at actual data rather than the internet or my cable news channel of choice. It’s not political." - T Dub
"but because of the "haphazard" appearance and the real world difficulty in tracking actual cases of a brand new infectious disease, it lends itself to an argument that the date [sic] can't be trusted..." Delta

So the data being published is not real and can't be trusted yet this is the data that is used to feed the fear and hysteria of the general population. Only those in the know have access to the secret vault of truth and we must accept their conclusions of this super secret real data because they are the professionals.

so 2 possibly slightly contradictory quotes written by 2 different people equals you're not a racist, how?
BuckyB93 Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,188
Speyside wrote:
Bucky, my last job was for retirement fun. I am very private and don't throw around I know more than you. That being said I have a PHD in cellular physiology and specialize in cellular membrane physiology and inner cellular physiology. I do not claim to know the epidemiology of this beast. But I do understand its interaction at a cellular level. No one is talking about the real danger of this virus. It isn't the deaths. It is the long term autoimmune damage. Also, if this thing mutates a specific wrong way, which I have every expectation it won't, we are looking at an extinction level event. The % is phenomenally minimal, yet it does exist. This does not mean I want the country to remain closed. I do want people to understand what we are facing. In truth this post was difficult for me because I am a private person. But what is going on is to important not to share.


This is kind of a pivot of what has been spouted out over the past how many (?) months. It's all been about the number of deaths, the number of infections, the virus is everywhere and will kill you and everyone near it within a matter of months.

Now we're going say that was never the case? Now we're going to say that what the experts were really talking about it's long term lingering effects all along. You know, that foggy area were we can't really trace or put a number to - plenty of wiggle room come up with a conclusion.
BuckyB93 Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,188
opelmanta1900 wrote:
so 2 possibly slightly contradictory quotes written by 2 different people equals you're not a racist, how?


Some of my really good friends are (insert appropriate ethnicity here) so I can't be a racist. Chicks, on the other hand, this country went to hell once they got the "equal pay for equal work" crap.
RobertHively Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,837

So now it's racist to not believe the "experts" who have been wrong time after time?

Getting crazy.

Apologies on the house!



delta1 Online
#148 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,784
not quite, Bucky...a few clarifications are in order...I do not want to throw the baby out because of some dirt in the bathwater, as the skeptics seem to infer...

it is not the case of garbage in garbage out...there are plenty of reliable data points: number of people who have tested positive, and numbers of people who have died after testing positive, as examples...all of which point to a serious health issue that required a serious public health response...to have done otherwise would have been negligent malpractice on those officials who we have entrusted with protecting our collective health...not to mention the millions of mourning people around the world who have buried nearly half a million loved ones who are victims of the virus...

as with many new natural catastrophes, predicting outcomes is inexact...some want certainty and criticize when it isn't delivered...well the first wave was pretty serious...

Speyside Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
No I offered you accurate information and explained why I have the chops for you to consider it. I did not say the deaths aren't worrisome. I did not say keep the country closed. I just think not enough people have been given enough information to understand the totality of the virus. Information is knowledge. Knowledge allows for informed decisions. If you dig you will find what I am talking about. Unfortunatly it is not sensational enough for the talking heads.
frankj1 Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Theodore, I seem to recall discussion here over recent months about long term care, like 30 to 40 years, of lung scarred victims who did not die, organ damage that will require amazing amounts of money to cope with for many years, blah blah blah.

The goal posts aren't moving, but a few place kickers are lining up for field goals at the same time.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages<123456>