BuckyB93 wrote:So we are not to trust the reported numbers? I thought the smart people believed the reported numbers. Now your telling me that the numbers are not trustworthy?
Back to the graphs. I thought these were the graphs and data that we are using to determine policy and how we should react/respond. What happened to the "sky is falling" calls when the instantaneous daily reported numbers showed a rise in infection and death rates, the scrolls along the bottom of all the newscasts like it was the Final Four tournament updates? This graph shows a decay in infection rates with a short term cyclic period of about a week.
Is there a built in clock in the Rona because it looks like we have predictable peaks at the end of each week? Is that the cycle of testing and data reporting or should we lock down every weekend to avoid these swings? It's never too late to make knee jerk reactions based small snapshots in time.
Where is the spike we were promised when things began opening up? Remember the post Memorial Day spike that everyone was worried about? Memorial day was almost 2 weeks ago. Isn't 14 days the mandatory quarantine period to ensure that the Rona hasn't taken hold of it's victim?
Where did this stuff go?
sorry, Bucky... I thought you were being facetious...
I read somewhere that the reason the virus "takes the week-end off" is because many of the folks recording the data are off on week-ends, so some week-end data gets reported on Mondays...at least that rationale was used to explain that phenomena locally...
but because of the "haphazard" appearance and the real world difficulty in tracking actual cases of a brand new infectious disease, it lends itself to an argument that the date can't be trusted...
NY, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Mexico, Brazil, United Kingdom and other nations have proven the deadly nature of the disease and should not be overlooked...heck, we in America have the highest counts of infections and deaths, and there are many among us who think the numbers are trivial, not real...