America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 years ago by frankj1. 76 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Random impeachment trial thought.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Trump Acquitted (Again), But Trump Hatred Continues


Written by Ron Paul


Last week’s second impeachment trial of former President Trump should serve as a warning that something is very wrong in US politics. Far from a measured, well-investigated, rock-solid case against the former president, America was again abused with day after day of character assassination, innuendo, false claims, and even falsified “evidence.”

The trial wasn’t intended to win a conviction of Trump for “incitement” because the Democrats already knew that the votes were not there. So, just as with the last impeachment trial, the goal was to fling as much dirt at Donald Trump as they could while the cameras were rolling. Their hatred of Donald Trump is so deep and visceral that probably a psychologist would have been more beneficial to them than yet another impeachment trial.

It would be incorrect to say that the House managers’ case fell apart, because they had no case to begin with. They never had a case because they made no effort to develop a case. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court saw from the beginning that this was no legitimate impeachment trial and informed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer that he would not preside. Without the Chief Justice, there was no Constitutional impeachment trial. So they put on a show trial instead.

As Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley kept asking, why didn’t the House schedule a single hearing to investigate what really happened up to and on the day of the Capitol melee on January 6th? They had weeks to do so. Professor Turley believes they might even have been able to make a decent case if they had tried.

Why did they not call witnesses? Were there no rioters who could be called to explain under oath how Trump’s speech had inspired them to enter the Capitol building to overturn the election?

Were they afraid that under cross-examination we might have found out more about Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows’ claim that Trump offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops in Washington before January 6th but that his offer was rebuked? What about reports that Capitol Hill Police were left without back-up and unprepared for what happened? House and Senate leadership is responsible for security at the Capitol and they obviously failed. Why?

The House and Senate Democrats (and a few Republicans) did not succeed in their ultimate goal: preventing Trump from ever running again for political office. But that doesn’t mean they are giving up. They are not about to give citizen Trump a moment of peace. They are intent on continuing their witch hunt but it looks less and less like any desire for justice. It looks like fear. They are afraid if he is allowed to run again he may be elected. So they cannot allow that vote to happen.

And they accuse Trump of undermining democracy.

There were a number of reasons to impeach and convict President Trump while he was in office. Bombing Syria on bogus grounds without authorization was one of them. But Democrats love war as much as Republicans so they weren’t about to uphold their Constitutional obligations.

Impeachment 2.0 may be over, but those blinded by hatred for Trump are not about to give up. They are irrational and obsessed. They are also dangerous.

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/february/15/trump-acquitted-again-but-trump-hatred-continues/
Brewha Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,161
LOL - As though Trump has a character to assassinate.....

LOL
DrMaddVibe Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Brewha wrote:
LOL - As though Trump has a character to assassinate.....

LOL



Impeachment 2.0 may be over, but those blinded by hatred for Trump are not about to give up. They are irrational and obsessed. They are also dangerous.



Applause Applause Applause
Brewha Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,161
DrMaddVibe wrote:

Impeachment 2.0 may be over, but those blinded by hatred for Trump are not about to give up. They are irrational and obsessed. They are also dangerous.



=d> =d> =d>

That’s it Doc - stay proud of your fascist ideals!

Protect us against democracy!
tonygraz Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,230
Ron Paul is an idiot - it's inherited.
frankj1 Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
he precedes Rand.
rfenst Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
frankj1 wrote:
he precedes Rand.

OK. I agree.
But, Rand is an @sshole.
delta1 Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
his other hole is much more obnoxious
RayR Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
See the rabid parrots circling irrational and obsessed🦜🦜🦜🦜
Dr. Paul is correct as always which drives the parrots even more mad!
Smooth light Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-26-2020
Posts: 3,598
Hey Yogi Bear got any more picnic baskets? NINE
delta1 Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
good thing about Rand Paul is that nobody (or not many) listens to him...so he has little influence...last time I heard his name, Senate colleagues were mad at him for not wearing a mask in Senate Chambers


can anybody point to any accomplishments?
RobertHively Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,817
delta1 wrote:
good thing about Rand Paul is that nobody (or not many) listens to him...so he has little influence...last time I heard his name, Senate colleagues were mad at him for not wearing a mask in Senate Chambers


can anybody point to any accomplishments?


He didn't wear a mask in the Senate chambers, so there's one accomplishment right off the bat.
HockeyDad Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
RobertHively wrote:
He didn't wear a mask in the Senate chambers, so there's one accomplishment right off the bat.


He should have been charged with 99 counts of attempted murder.
frankj1 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
RayR wrote:
See the rabid parrots circling irrational and obsessed🦜🦜🦜🦜
Dr. Paul is correct as always which drives the parrots even more mad!

don't stop short or you'll get a smooth light up your ass.
#60 is that parrot you keep seeing...
as DMV says, the jokes just write themselves.
You two have claimed the parroting crown, we surrender!
sqwak!
frankj1 Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
RobertHively wrote:
He didn't wear a mask in the Senate chambers, so there's one accomplishment right off the bat.

I think you proved Al's point
teedubbya Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Masks are bad m’kay
ZRX1200 Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
Yeah Rand is OBVIOUSLY the biggest problem in government.

I smell 🐂💩
DrMaddVibe Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Naw...that's their oozing fear. It just smells like that because they're filled with it!
RayR Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
Yep, it's that oozing fear that the most daring liars they hold up high as exemplar Americans might be knocked down to the ground by the likes of the Paul's or anybody for that matter calls out their 🐂💩
Abrignac Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
There were no winners. Only losers: the entire citizenry. More time wasted on theatrics at the cost of the people’s business.
frankj1 Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
I heard Rand Paul's older neighbor knocked him down to the ground
delta1 Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Abrignac wrote:
There were no winners. Only losers: the entire citizenry. More time wasted on theatrics at the cost of the people’s business.



McConnell tried to position himself as a "winner" with his Trump smackdown speech immediately after the acquittal...

not sure if the new AG will take his advice, tho...


theatrics...
frankj1 Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
delta1 wrote:
McConnell tried to position himself as a "winner" with his Trump smackdown speech immediately after the acquittal...


not sure if the new AG will take his advice, tho


theatrics

and Trump trashed him!
delta1 Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
and...if Biden does not get any bipartisan help from the GOP on his agenda, the gloves could come off...
RayR Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
frankj1 wrote:
I heard Rand Paul's older neighbor knocked him down to the ground


Ya, he blindsided Rand when he was getting off his riding mower wearing noise reduction ear muffs. The guy is a weirdo who apparently didn't like the way Rand was doing his yard work and the fact that Rand was calling for repealing federal marijuana prohibition. He's a busybody yankee originally from New England, surely you know the type Frank.
frankj1 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
RayR wrote:
Ya, he blindsided Rand when he was getting off his riding mower wearing noise reduction ear muffs. The guy is a weirdo who apparently didn't like the way Rand was doing his yard work and the fact that Rand was calling for repealing federal marijuana prohibition. He's a busybody yankee originally from New England, surely you know the type Frank.

I may have voted for Dr. Ron once, maybe back in the Gene Burns era on Boston talk radio
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12