America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 2 years ago by Speyside. 125 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
VERDICT!!!
frankj1 Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
teedubbya wrote:
That is what is telling. Folks are justifying this kill WITH the video. What happens when there isn’t video?

the Civil Rights Act?
Mr. Jones Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,359
Now the OtHER 3?4? DUDeS GET tHEIR ASSES
PUt ON A SPIT ROTESSEIRE AND GET THEIR ASSES FRIED FOR THIRD DEGREE MANSLAUGHTER AT LEAST?
Or ACCOMPLICES TO SECOND OR THIRD DEGREE MURDER...THOSE 3-4 DUDES ARE T.O.A.S.T....

TOast I sAy...
HockeyDad Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,069
George Floyd should still be alive today. And while nothing will bring him back or heal the unthinkable pain his killing caused his family and Black Americans everywhere, today’s verdict offers a retribution on toxic masculinity and a ray of light in the fight for racial justice.
Speyside Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
^ +1.
RayR Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,802
This case could never be called justice being served because it was so politicized from the very beginning until the end.
After the conviction, the evil ghoul Pelosi couldn't help but liken George Floyd's death as a human sacrifice to the sick leftist idea of justice, which is really just anything that can be used to continually ignite the emotions of the violent leftist zombie mob and aggrandize the power of the left progressive pols.

I can concur with this rant by Candace Owens on Tucker, she says it all.

https://youtu.be/3k-bxl2DtW0
opelmanta1900 Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
HockeyDad wrote:
George Floyd should still be alive today. And while nothing will bring him back or heal the unthinkable pain his killing caused his family and Black Americans everywhere, today’s verdict offers a retribution on toxic masculinity and a ray of light in the fight for racial justice.

I actually agree with this, but you forgot your sarcasm emoji...
teedubbya Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Was thinking same thing. Thought is was a trap LOL
fiddler898 Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
izonfire wrote:
That video should not have been allowed in court, as it is very prejudicial...


The technical name for this is "evidence."
izonfire Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,642
fiddler898 wrote:
The technical name for this is "evidence."

Yes, “prejudicial evidence” specifically.

As in,
clearly showing manslaughter at the very least...
teedubbya Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Lol
teedubbya Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
But but he was on the shoulders not the neck and flying cows farting caused him to get too much co2. You couldn’t see that in the video let alone the three tons of fentanyl they found in the cop car three days later. People need to quit believing in heir lyin eyes. Maybe the cop should have done more but he certainly didn’t kill him. *rolling eyes*

This is a travesty!

People actually believe this crap. Even his coworkers don’t believe it.
HockeyDad Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,069
opelmanta1900 wrote:
I actually agree with this, but you forgot your sarcasm emoji...


That’s your toxic masculinity talking.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
No, me calling that new guy "sweetheart" in that other thread was my toxic masculinity talking...
HockeyDad Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,069
opelmanta1900 wrote:
No, me calling that new guy "sweetheart" in that other thread was my toxic masculinity talking...


Did he take the bait?
HockeyDad Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,069
Thank you George Floyd for sacrificing your life for justice.
MACS Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,599
HockeyDad wrote:
Thank you George Floyd for sacrificing your life for justice.


Not sure he ingested 3 times the lethal dose of fentanyl on purpose... but maybe he did because he did not want to get caught with it.
teedubbya Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
As we found during the trial that dialog don't hunt
izonfire Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,642
HockeyDad wrote:
Thank you George Floyd for sacrificing your life for justice.

He's a martyr now.
In a hundred years, they're gonna obsess about all the bad schitt he did...
8trackdisco Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,000
teedubbya wrote:
Pretty hard to convict a cop. Must have been pretty obvious.


Being in prison, it is going to be real hard for him to find the real killers.

-Orenthal.
MACS Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,599
teedubbya wrote:
As we found during the trial that dialog don't hunt


That perfectly fair trial that wasn't politicized at all? Okie doke.
frankj1 Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
maybe in the forums.
But the facts repeated here would have been introduced by his attorney if they had any merit.
Though they did find some uningested pills in the patrol car 3 days later...
MACS Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,599
In the forums? Nahhhh... in the media? F--- yes.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,309
HockeyDad wrote:
Thank you George Floyd for sacrificing your life for justice.


Nancy?

Is that you?
Speyside Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Many people also thought the Scopes trial reached the wrong verdict. Many people thought the Emmitt Till trial reached the correct verdict. Sometimes you get justice, sometimes you do not. This time justice was served. May George Floyd rest in peace. He was a man.
teedubbya Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
MACS wrote:
That perfectly fair trial that wasn't politicized at all? Okie doke.



The jury had to go on facts as presented to them. You don't. You can go on what your news sources tell you are the facts. It was a fair trial as presumably his chances for appeal are.

It is incredibly difficult to convict a cop. If it is unfair in either direction it would be in the benefit of the police. We've seen that time and time again. And I am ok with that. I believe it is better to have 10 guilty folks walk then to have one innocent go to jail. And I would amplify that for the popo. It's a hard job and they need to make split decisions. They should get the benefit of the doubt but not the benefit of omerta and carte blanche to go rogue. They have more of a responsibility to act appropriately because of their authority. I know you don't believe that based on previous conversations.

The dude is guilty. And if I was a cop I wouldn't want him in my ranks, let alone defend the indefensible. Luckily some of his peers felt the same way. His support seems to be much stronger in this forum then amongst his peers.
Speyside Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
He probably has grounds for appeal, Maxine Waters inflammatory rhetoric, and withheld exculpatory evidence. There is a blood toxicology report turned in so late the judge would not allow it as evidence. It might even be a mistrial. Robert could help out here.
teedubbya Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And if so, so be it. It will play out. At some point the handwringing and claiming all institutions are rigged has to stop. It's too easy to sit back and claim crap with no factual basis.

It will be interesting over the next period of time to find out what the jury heard and knew and what they didn't. If waters comments didn't reach the jury there is no there there. If it did then let 'er rip. But to sit back and claim the jury somehow is dumber than yourself and you know how this SHOULD have gone is just silly. Especially if from the start you had an opinion and your factual analysis always seems to go towards the original opinion/agenda.

There are folks that said from the start this guy is guilty at best of dereliction of duty by omitting action rather than actively doing anything wrong and they have continued to try to find info that supports that theory rather than looking at the whole thing. Anyone drawing a different conclusion simply doesn't know what they are talking about and a jury drawing a different conclusion cettainly must be tainted or wrong...... or the original theory is biased and wrong but that cant be.
rfenst Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,112
Speyside wrote:
He probably has grounds for appeal, Maxine Waters inflammatory rhetoric, and withheld exculpatory evidence. There is a blood toxicology report turned in so late the judge would not allow it as evidence. It might even be a mistrial. Robert could help out here.

Waters' comment will not have any bearing if the jury was sequestered at the time, but have not heard of the comment. Those who were aware of the comments only have to say they were unaffected by Waters' comments and stuck solely to the facts from the trial. Defense needs to poll the jury, for post-verdict questioning, one by one, to protect the issue for appeal.

What specific questions do you have?
DrafterX Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
teedubbya wrote:
But to sit back and claim the jury somehow is dumber than yourself and you know how this SHOULD have gone is just silly. .


poor jurists are just as smart as white jurists... Mellow
rfenst Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,112
teedubbya wrote:
... It will be interesting over the next period of time to find out what the jury heard and knew and what they didn't. If waters comments didn't reach the jury there is no there there. If it did then let 'er rip. But to sit back and claim the jury somehow is dumber than yourself and you know how this SHOULD have gone is just silly. Especially if from the start you had an opinion and your factual analysis always seems to go towards the original opinion/agenda....


My experience of juries, including the one I was foreman of, is that their collective intelligence, wisdom and desire to do the job right is easily in the genius range and beyond- in almost any situation. Good people who take on a serious duty and give all they have to give.

FYI, if this were in Florida, I think he probably could have had a six-person, not 12-person, jury since the death penalty was off the table, so to speak.
HockeyDad Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,069
I like how the jury waited a few hours before releasing the verdict.
dkeage Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 03-05-2004
Posts: 15,135
HockeyDad wrote:
I like how the jury waited a few hours before releasing the verdict.

It was Jimmy John’s day...
rfenst Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,112
HockeyDad wrote:
George Floyd should still be alive today. And while nothing will bring him back or heal the unthinkable pain his killing caused his family and Black Americans everywhere, today’s verdict offers a retribution on toxic masculinity and a ray of light in the fight for racial justice.

Where did you quote this from?
DrafterX Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,508
Axl wrote that man... Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,069
rfenst wrote:
Where did you quote this from?


Jennifer Lynn Siebel Newsom. California governor Gavin Newsom’s first partner.
izonfire Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,642
Love how she was able to make the connection to toxic masculinity.
Not everybody can see that...
teedubbya Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
how do you make a hormone?

don't pay her
delta1 Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,754
Chauvin's supporters who blame Floyd for his own death, be prepared for another train coming down the track...

video of a Chauvin incident involving excessive force used against a 14 year old boy in 2017 is being investigated by the DOJ...he beat the kid and put his knee on his neck for more than 16 minutes


https://abcnews.go.com/US/chauvins-conviction-floyd-murder-doj-weighs-charging-2017/story?id=77254006#





he had a history of complaints and a reputation as a bad cop...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/05/29/officer-charged-george-floyds-death-used-fatal-force-before-had-history-complaints/
rfenst Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,112
Waiting for the upcoming aggravation charge hearing/trial.
izonfire Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,642
98.2% of the people here could be charged with aggravation...
Smooth light Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 06-26-2020
Posts: 3,598
They would shoot the "fat lady" so you can't say it's over.
[email protected] Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 09-23-2020
Posts: 6
He was killed. Plain and simple. Plain... and... simple....
teedubbya Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I guess this thread is done.
izonfire Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,642
You should kneel on it a bit longer just to be sure...
teedubbya Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard Macs renamed his dog Neal in solidarity with Chauvin.
Speyside Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Hey now, he seems like a nice 🐕.
Speyside Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
You should invite him and MACS to the dog bar.
izonfire Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,642
^ If he had any fucquin decency.
IF’s don’t get much bigger than that one...
Brewha Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,147
I guess everyone is dancing around the elephant in the room....

Jury voter fraud has long plagued our nation. We all know the verdict was stolen. Everyone says.
We need to act now to stop the steal.








On another note. I reckon that if someone watching would have used their phone to play the national anthem, he would have have stopped kneeling.........
MACS Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,599
izonfire wrote:
^ If he had any fucquin decency.
IF’s don’t get much bigger than that one...


Well... he has INdecency...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>