America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 2 years ago by bgz. 130 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
The Marxists got their own holiday display at a state Capitol
Dg west deptford Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 05-25-2019
Posts: 2,836
Richard Dawkins will tell you he could be wrong about everything he knows.

Then he'll tell you he knows there's no God.

Someone who says they can't know anything can't then say he knows something.

Words matter.

Without God you can't know anything.
Thus there's no such thing as atheists because the word is a knowledge claim of "No God"

I have a question too Spey, why would brew hope everyone wouldn't be a Christian?
RayR Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,884
Speyside2 wrote:
Please tell, what God has Brewha chosen?


The State is as God walking on Earth
Speyside2 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
I have no answer for you my friend. A wise man recently told me either the Jews or the Christians are correct. If it's the Christians then all Jews need to convert after their body is dead and gone. If it's the Jews then all Christians need to convert after their body is dead and gone. I found that to be an interesting perspective.
bgz Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
You're talking to someone here who has spent far more time than he would like to admit pondering the concept of an eternal soul.

Daunting experience... exhausting really. I doubt most of those pandering for an immortal soul have actually wrapped their head around the implications...

First off, it blatantly violates the second law of thermodynamics. Second... forever? Like forever ever?

Heaven, hell, they both sound awful... I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone would want that. I get tired just thinking about it.

After the last stars die... and there's nothing left... all that remains, is the energy from all the past dead souls.

Ya, ok... then what?
Brewha Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Speyside2 wrote:
Please tell, what God has Brewha chosen?

I sir, am agnostic.

I believe that some things are by their nature unknowable.

My comments are from a sociological standpoint. Not that many here would believe in science…
frankj1 Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Speyside2 wrote:
I have no answer for you my friend. A wise man recently told me either the Jews or the Christians are correct. If it's the Christians then all Jews need to convert after their body is dead and gone. If it's the Jews then all Christians need to convert after their body is dead and gone. I found that to be an interesting perspective.

if they're each wrong then followers of Loo Rockwell win.
Both of them.


Brewha Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Dg west deptford wrote:
Richard Dawkins will tell you he could be wrong about everything he knows.

Then he'll tell you he knows there's no God.

Someone who says they can't know anything can't then say he knows something.

Words matter.

Without God you can't know anything.
Thus there's no such thing as atheists because the word is a knowledge claim of "No God"

I have a question too Spey, why would brew hope everyone wouldn't be a Christian?

I understand that what Dawkins has to say is both offense and seems contradictory to some. I really do.

but in fairness, your comment that “without God you can’t know anything” is at least as offensive. And more invasive. So Pot, meet Kettle.

I have no hope that people are Christian or not. I respect their choice.

You may disagree, but I would tell you that each person comes to know God in their own way. Christ need not apply for the job.

A lot of problems start in this world when people start believing what others tell them of God rather than finding it for themselves. Then someone floats the idea that one cannot know god without the teachings and writing of others. And that is where the fight begins.

But at the end, no one knows beyond their chosen beliefs - which is only a mild kind of knowing, you know?
Brewha Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
frankj1 wrote:
if they're each wrong then followers of Loo Rockwell win.
Both of them.



Well……you can’t win if you don’t play!
Brewha Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
bgz wrote:
You're talking to someone here who has spent far more time than he would like to admit pondering the concept of an eternal soul.

Daunting experience... exhausting really. I doubt most of those pandering for an immortal soul have actually wrapped their head around the implications...

First off, it blatantly violates the second law of thermodynamics. Second... forever? Like forever ever?

Heaven, hell, they both sound awful... I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone would want that. I get tired just thinking about it.

After the last stars die... and there's nothing left... all that remains, is the energy from all the past dead souls.

Ya, ok... then what?


Here is your red pill:

Ernest Becker.

Good luck.
Speyside2 Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
Let's play two, Ernie Banks.
frankj1 Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
it's a great day for baseball...
Brewha Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Speyside2 wrote:
Let's play two, Ernie Banks.

Always the intellectual……Herfing
tonygraz Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,243
Is Deptford planning a new crusade ?
Speyside2 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
Nah, if I wanted to go that route I would tell you that since the laws of physics are immutable then I think the energy that created the universe must be concious. If that energy was random they the universe would not be sustainable. I would also tell you that before the persecution of the Catholic church men of science were men of God. Also, to be an intelectual I have to be an Agnostic or Atheist yes?
HockeyDad Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
Brewha wrote:
Not that many here would believe in science…


Fauci?
Brewha Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Speyside2 wrote:
Nah, if I wanted to go that route I would tell you that since the laws of physics are immutable then I think the energy that created the universe must be concious. If that energy was random they the universe would not be sustainable. I would also tell you that before the persecution of the Catholic church men of science were men of God. Also, to be an intelectual I have to be an Agnostic or Atheist yes?


I thought the Catholic Church exiled Galileo because he was a man of science……
Speyside2 Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
Did you even read what I said? You are being redundant. Galileo was persecuted because he was a man of science, he was also a man of God. Most of the Illuminati were. Also, was Galileo exiled? I thought he was arrested and imprisoned. To this day there are rumored to me many manuscripts in the archives that have never seen the light of day from the Catholic Churches evil break with science. Catholics are very nice people overall. The Catholic church to this day is evil. Apologies to anyone Catholic. Fundamentalists of any religion are evil in my opinion. Also let's differentiate between God and religion, there is an absolute difference. For purposes of our discussion I will define God ass the massive conscious energy that created the universe. Finally you be you, I'll be me. BTW, if energy can neither be created or destroyed where did the energy that created the universe come from, since there is nothing outside the known universe. So I guess nothing really in this case implies unknown. And there is every individuals leap of faith, how they rationalize the something that is nothing. Mind you in this missive I only speak for myself.
bgz Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Brewha wrote:
I thought the Catholic Church exiled Galileo because he was a man of science……


He was exiled to home arrest because he claimed the Earth orbited the sun... the church didn'tike that, because it made a better story if the church was at the center of the uni-verse (one verse or single word).
RayR Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,884
This is interesting...

The Ultimate New Age Religion

By Bionic Mosquito
December 30, 2021

Quote:
We are Satan’s people
Knights in Satan’s service
– Thanatorture

…the Revolution…has a theological and spiritual foundation, even if its “theology” is an inverted one and its “spirituality Satanic.”

Nihilism: The Root of the Revolution of the Modern Age, by Eugene (Fr. Seraphim) Rose

What is at the root of the nihilistic doctrine? What are its theological sources? What is its ultimate program? These are the questions that Fr. Rose intends now to explore. And for this, he turns to two people: Nietzsche, who he describes as a “systematic Nihilist,” and Dostoyevsky, “whose insights strike to the very heart of Nihilism and strip aside its masks.”

Regarding Nietzsche, well-known phrases are offered: there is no truth, God is dead. Nietzsche describes well the state of modern man. “God is dead” means that we have lost our faith in God; “there is no truth” means that we have lost the divine and absolute. But Fr. Rose offers that Nietzsche does more than merely observe the reality of the situation:

Zarathustra is a “prophet”; his words are clearly intended as a counter-revolution directed against the Christian Revelation.

It isn’t just that God no longer exists; men wish Him to no longer exist. Men are not merely agnostic; the death of God is not merely some kind of “cosmic catastrophe.” Men are also not merely atheist. No one is atheist, as no one denies God except to accept and serve another false god in His place.

More...

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/12/bionic-mosquito/the-ultimate-new-age-religion/

bgz Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
RayR wrote:
This is interesting...


Read the article... same tired trend...

1. Look, there's the evil enemy.

2. Here's why they're evil.

3. Here's how they want to get you (or turn you evil).

4. Here's the solution... pray and go to church and don't learn anything worldly because it's evil.

Same tired game plan, same tired playbook.

Christianity somehow became the top alpha entity, not just any God mind you, specifically the Abrahamic god. Somehow 2000 years ago, they figured it all out despite believing the world was flat, basic elements were earth, wind, fire and water...
Yeah, they had it all figured out.

What did they figure out?

1. It's easier to rule by fear than reason.

2. It's easier to group people together and get them all on the "same page" if they could point at a common enemy.

3. It's way easier to keep them inline if they can never actually see their leader (God) nor the leader of their enemy (Satan)

4. Then they use the long lasting assumption that they are "correct" as an axiomatic base for their "logic".

Meh... tired.

The more I read about it, the more I like to think of it as the grand gaslighting...

Every preacher I ever heard...

We are all sinners, I'm a sinner (obviously... not me, the preacher dumb azz), you're a sinner...

Then go through a bunch of wild azz reasons for your sin trying to hit pretty much everything to ensure that everyone is in fact a sinner (and if not, they should be thinking they are after getting beat down for 15 minutes).

Then provide the cure (Tithing makes everything better and will help wash away your sins).

Meh

Ok, for the article!!!

Who thinks there's nothing? There's obviously something. We live in a place which we call a universe, a think that's a good start to an axiomatic base.

The Universe Exists (pretty sure we can all agree on that one).

So I'm not sure who's saying there's "nothing", but clearly that's not the case.

So I guess the idea is "meaning" or lack there of.

I disagree that if you are not Christian or otherwise do not believe in any other deities, it does not imply that you have no "meaning" in your life.

I believe meaning is relative to the observer... aka, life is what you make of it.

If you want to sit around b*tching about liberals and heathens all day? Then I guess that's the meaning of your life.

Listen, this thing we live in, call it what you want. We have no idea the shape of this thing, whether this thing is sentient, if it is sentient, we can't see the bounds of it, have no idea what sentience would look like at that scale... yet these people 2000 years ago some how figure out what "it" wants.

Right....

It sounds to me like atheists like myself (specifically atheists with my hobbies), want what you want... To know more about this beautiful, wonderful structure we live in... call it what you will, God, the Universe, Nature, what ever... we all strive to understand it better, but we choose to go about it in different ways.

The fact that I choose to study math, physics and computation as opposed to burying my head in a Bible does not make me evil.

Throughout history, the church has shown time and time again that it would prefer to lock heretics like Galileo away then let them speak... their livelihood literally depends on people NOT UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD AROUND THEM.
Dg west deptford Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 05-25-2019
Posts: 2,836
Thank you Ray!
Very encouraging word

Benny, your close keep searching
Brewha Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Speyside2 wrote:
Did you even read what I said? You are being redundant. Galileo was persecuted because he was a man of science, he was also a man of God. Most of the Illuminati were. Also, was Galileo exiled? I thought he was arrested and imprisoned. To this day there are rumored to me many manuscripts in the archives that have never seen the light of day from the Catholic Churches evil break with science. Catholics are very nice people overall. The Catholic church to this day is evil. Apologies to anyone Catholic. Fundamentalists of any religion are evil in my opinion. Also let's differentiate between God and religion, there is an absolute difference. For purposes of our discussion I will define God ass the massive conscious energy that created the universe. Finally you be you, I'll be me.

BTW, if energy can neither be created or destroyed where did the energy that created the universe come from, since there is nothing outside the known universe.


So I guess nothing really in this case implies unknown. And there is every individuals leap of faith, how they rationalize the something that is nothing. Mind you in this missive I only speak for myself.

Actually, I mis read what you wrote.


About the energy though: The thought is that cosmic inflation occurred from a temperature well below the Plank constant which caused the Hot Big Bang and subsequent baryogenesis. This suggests that the energy that “appeared” was only a change of state from the quantum foam that is the fabric of timespace. As well as causing timespace as we know it.
Of course it is a lot more expedient to just say God created it. Then we can ask where God came from….



Oh, In my experience ones religious convictions don’t have that much of a bearing on one being an intellectual. Though there may be a statistical bias.
bgz Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Dg west deptford wrote:
Thank you Ray!
Very encouraging word

Benny, your close keep searching


You know you're hooked in a hobby when you knowingly go into it knowing you're likely never going to figure it out.

It's the journey that matters.
Brewha Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
bgz wrote:
You know you're hooked in a hobby when you knowingly go into it knowing you're likely never going to figure it out.

It's the journey that matters.

Their new singer is pretty good.
bgz Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Brewha wrote:
Their new singer is pretty good.


If the Christians are right, hopefully I can opt out... Don't stop believing now on my account... I would rather end it Sopranos style.
Speyside2 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
While baryogenisis is possible, I simply find it to be a working hypothesis. Plus at least for myself the whole concept of energy neutral is just to incomplete. Not so much in a matter, anti matter concept, but in tangential ways. Though it is fascinating to consider. Finally time simply looses meaning for me at energy neutral. Is there positive and negative time? If there is are we time neutral and what the heck would that mean?
Brewha Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Speyside2 wrote:
While baryogenisis is possible, I simply find it to be a working hypothesis. Plus at least for myself the whole concept of energy neutral is just to incomplete. Not so much in a matter, anti matter concept, but in tangential ways. Though it is fascinating to consider. Finally time simply looses meaning for me at energy neutral. Is there positive and negative time? If there is are we time neutral and what the heck would that mean?

Interesting. Are you speaking of energy neutral in the frame work of the weak force (talking bosons here)?
bgz Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
I think he's asking why we are even able to have this conversation if there was equal matter and anti-matter... he's thinking there should be nothing.

I think he finds the lack of nothingness disturbing.

But I'm historically bad at translating speyside.
Speyside2 Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
Yes, and yes.

I find baryogenisis and lyptogenisis compelling yet incongruous. As there are now more bayrons than anti bayrons, and more lyptons than anti lyptons how can there presently be energy neutral. If in the beginning the universe was energy neutral it should still be energy neutral?

What I find disturbing is my complete lack of understanding of nothingness. So I conclude there is no nothingness at any given moment in time. Then time takes on dimension for me. At that point my questions lose meaning for me.
frankj1 Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
so, I can breathe now?
rfenst Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,289
I just finished praying and God told me you all have it wrong. I am dead as$ serious.
Don't believe he spoke to me? Prove me wrong!
Hell, you can even go ahead and prove me right!
LOL.
RayR Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,884
Dg west deptford wrote:
Thank you Ray!
Very encouraging word

Benny, your close keep searching


Benny is searching for God's knowledge while believing there is no higher intelligence.
What fools these mortals be.
bgz Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
RayR wrote:
Benny is searching for God's knowledge while believing there is no higher intelligence.
What fools these mortals be.


Um... you're trying to claim you know my beliefs now?

I've stated my beliefs, none of which had anything to do with any proclamation of whether or not the universe is sentient or whether or not we live in a universe that can be described by panpsychism.

Where you however are claiming you know... I will make the claim however that you don't know for certain, because nobody knows for certain.

I will however have to side with Sean Carroll in saying that "God is a Bad Theory".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew_cNONhhKI

I'm sure you'll be about as interested in that as I am in most the LewRock stuff you post.

In my opinion the probability is low that the universe is "conscious" and resembles anything we would be able to perceive as such... from what I can tell the only way to communicate with it is through mathematics.

I've seen more failed prayers than not attributed to "God's will", whereas the random low probability events that do line up with a prayer end up in "See, I told you".

You and DG are the ones making the proclamations here (That your Abrahamic, Christian god is real one true God and anyone who doesn't believe is a fool).

I'm just saying I don't gaf what you think, but I'm more than open to argue with you about it (I get bored).
bgz Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Then there's this...

https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/.premium.MAGAZINE-jewish-god-yahweh-originated-in-canaanite-vulcan-says-new-theory-1.5992072

I'm not saying the above is true, it just highlights how limited the scope of size people had back then... they weren't thinking on the scale of the universe (they had no idea how to even be able to describe the universe other than through arbitrary pictures they saw in the sky)

I know the modern claim is God's domain is the entirety of all that there is where I'm guessing that includes a higher cosmological multiverse.

I don't think people back then had a concept of how big the universe really is... I don't think most people now have a concept of how big the universe really is... I mean it's really really big.

I guess what I'm ultimately trying to say is...

In my brain, the idea of a personal god just doesn't compute... it never will.
rfenst Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,289
bgz wrote:
In my brain, the idea of a personal god just doesn't compute... it never will.

Nor should you ever have to.
Speyside2 Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
BGZ, many people will not even consider what you think.

Dunning-Kruger effect, in psychology, a cognitive bias whereby people with limited knowledge or competence in a given intellectual or social domain greatly overestimate their own knowledge or competence in that domain relative to objective criteria or to the performance of their peers or of people in general.

Keep on thinking, those people are rather insignificant all things considered.
RayR Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,884
Speyside2 wrote:
BGZ, many people will not even consider what you think.

Dunning-Kruger effect, in psychology, a cognitive bias whereby people with limited knowledge or competence in a given intellectual or social domain greatly overestimate their own knowledge or competence in that domain relative to objective criteria or to the performance of their peers or of people in general.

Keep on thinking, those people are rather insignificant all things considered.


So why do you puny humans concern yourselves with cosmology, baryogenisis and stuff if there is no greater plan, no greater intelligence at the heart of the universe? How do you create theories and hypotheses if there is no truth? I think Benny believes everything emerged randomly and accidentally out of chaos and discord, something like that.



bgz Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Watch the video I posted. Sean Carroll is far more credible than anything you've ever posted.
bgz Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
And you're still claiming to know my beliefs...

I know yours though... fascinating stories from history as well.

They just don't really make for a good model. Make a better model maybe?
Brewha Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Speyside2 wrote:
Yes, and yes.

I find baryogenisis and lyptogenisis compelling yet incongruous. As there are now more bayrons than anti bayrons, and more lyptons than anti lyptons how can there presently be energy neutral. If in the beginning the universe was energy neutral it should still be energy neutral?

What I find disturbing is my complete lack of understanding of nothingness. So I conclude there is no nothingness at any given moment in time. Then time takes on dimension for me. At that point my questions lose meaning for me.

These are things a bit too far outside of our experience for us to fully understand - at least for now.

But, I do see nature as imbalance trying to balance it self. Even a simple carrier wave oscillates. But where did the antimatter go? Was it really created? I think the millennials need to get cracking on this.

The nothingness prior to the Big Bang prolly was not really nothingness. It was something outside of our physical laws. Outside of timespace as we know it. Perhaps nothing to us, by our standard, but not nothing.
Brewha Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
frankj1 wrote:
so, I can breathe now?

Drama queen
Brewha Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
rfenst wrote:
I just finished praying and God told me you all have it wrong. I am dead as$ serious.
Don't believe he spoke to me? Prove me wrong!
Hell, you can even go ahead and prove me right!
LOL.

The question is why he told only you and not us.

Maybe you should start a church…..
Speyside2 Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
My dogs talk to me.

My feet ache too.
RayR Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,884
bgz wrote:
Watch the video I posted. Sean Carroll is far more credible than anything you've ever posted.


I hope he is more comprehensible than you.
I'll watch later, I just got back from seeing masked sheeple fearful of being punished for disobeying their overlords.
A strange sight in that store, the only miscreants without a face diaper were me and the employees of the establishment.
Anyway, had lunch, time for a cigar.


HockeyDad Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
It is like I’m reading a script from “The Big Bang Theory”.
Brewha Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
You want I should translate?
HockeyDad Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
Brewha wrote:
You want I should translate?


No way. “Big Bang Theory” was #1 for like 12 years. Everybody learned physics from it already.

Some look to the night sky and see their God riding on a chariot.

Some look to the night sky and see quantum foam.

Some look to the night sky and see planets that could be mined for natural resources.
bgz Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
HockeyDad wrote:
No way. “Big Bang Theory” was #1 for like 12 years. Everybody learned physics from it already.

Some look to the night sky and see their God riding on a chariot.

Some look to the night sky and see quantum foam.

Some look to the night sky and see planets that could be mined for natural resources.


#dontlookup
borndead1 Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,215
RayR, why do you hate freedom of religion?
Speyside2 Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,373
So I take it you do not want to discuss quantum gravity approaching sigularities? Sigh, I wanted to discuss the possibility the quantum gravity could cease to exist at a point equidistant between 2 singularities.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>