America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 22 months ago by Brewha. 88 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
350+ Shooting this Weekend
8trackdisco Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,075
According to NewsNation this morning.

We really need to speed up the defunding of the police to quell the violence.
MACS Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
8trackdisco wrote:
According to NewsNation this morning.

We really need to speed up the defunding of the police to quell the violence.


And half of those were in Chicago... am I right?
Brewha Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Just to get out in front of the Right here, let me be the first to say:

"Guns are NEVER the problem"
Sunoverbeach Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
Sure thing, Brew. Because gunless people are peaceful and docile 98.2% of the time
Brewha Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Sunoverbeach wrote:
Sure thing, Brew. Because gunless people are peaceful and docile 98.2% of the time

And they shoot people somewhat less.....
HockeyDad Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
Only the government should have guns. Problem solved.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
Brewha wrote:
And they shoot people somewhat less.....

Yup, and I'm sure they won't resort to stabbing, bludgeoning, and general beating and kicking
ZRX1200 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,599
I’m holding out to have a law against breaking the law, and a law against murder.

Mellow
MACS Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
Can we agree that Thomas Jefferson was a brilliant man? Can we also agree that Cesare Beccaria was also brilliant when it came to crimes and punishment?

Well... here's what ol' Tommy had to say when speaking of Beccaria's treatise on crimes and punishment...

"A principal source of errors and injustice are false ideas of utility. For example: that legislator has false ideas of utility who considers particular more than general conveniencies, who had rather command the sentiments of mankind than excite them, who dares say to reason, "Be thou a slave;" who would sacrifice a thousand real advantages to the fear of an imaginary or trifling inconvenience; who would deprive men of the use of fire for fear of their being burnt, and of water for fear of their being drowned; and who knows of no means of preventing evil but by destroying it.

The laws of this nature are those which forbid to bear arms, disarming those only who are not disposed to commit the crime which the laws mean to prevent. Can it be supposed, that those who have the courage to violate the most sacred laws of humanity, and the most important of the code, will respect the less considerable and arbitrary injunctions, the violation of which is so easy, and of so little comparative importance? Does not the execution of this law deprive the subject of that personal liberty, so dear to mankind and to the wise legislator? and does it not subject the innocent to all the disagreeable circumstances that should only fall on the guilty? It certainly makes the situation of the assaulted worse, and of the assailants better, and rather encourages than prevents murder, as it requires less courage to attack unarmed than armed persons."

But some folks believe they're smarter than the smartest men. Fools, I tell ya... fools.
Speyside2 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,384
"No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms."

^TJ.

Guns are a symptom, not the problem. Figure out the problem first, then fix it.
MACS Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
Greenwood Park Mall...

Armed 22 year old stops a mass shooting in its friggin' tracks. Hit the bad guy 8/10 times from what was reportedly 40 yards. With a handgun. Carried legally. Didn't hit anyone else. Many lives were very likely saved as the dbag had 100 rounds.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
And responded to the threat in about 15secs after the psychopath started shooting
Brewha Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
And there we have it. Guns are not the problem.

It takes people to use a gun so people must be the problem.

Or maybe bullets are the problem, I mean guns themselves don't actually kill people - it's the bullets, and the people who fire them.

No, that's too grainy. let's stick with people are the problem. Bad people.

And laws don't work on bad people, so no need to have laws about people being bad.

So in the end, 450+ shootings is all because of bad people. And there is really nothing you can do about that.

And you really can't tell if someone is bad - till they shoot someone - so no way to stop bad people from - uh, being bad. With a gun.

No, not a thing you could do....

Sunoverbeach Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
OK, brew. Take the guns. Then what's the answer when bad people still inflict violence and death? How about we restrict arms for real? I guarantee nationwide amputation of every man woman and child will reduce homicide rates. Granted, the majority of people use their limbs responsibly, but f$%k those guys
Brewha Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Sunoverbeach wrote:
OK, brew. Take the guns. Then what's the answer when bad people still inflict violence and death? How about we restrict arms for real? I guarantee nationwide amputation of every man woman and child will reduce homicide rates. Granted, the majority of people use their limbs responsibly, but f$%k those guys

What? I thought I capture the "common wisdom" fairly well....




Seriously SOB, "The Problem" is not recognizing the danger of freely distributing guns to anyone who wants one.

Add to the fear that any regulation will end in no citizen being able to own a gun or a ginsu.

Hell people here actually question the value of, and need for, laws.




We live in the wild west and it will get a lot worse from here.
Squat and watch now as our friends tell us that more guns is the only answer...
MACS Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
Brew wants to outlaw fire so he don't get burned.
Brewha Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
MACS wrote:
Brew wants to outlaw fire so he don't get burned.

Was I using too many big words again macs?
HockeyDad Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
Brewha wrote:
What? I thought I capture the "common wisdom" fairly well....




Seriously SOB, "The Problem" is not recognizing the danger of freely distributing guns to anyone who wants one.

Add to the fear that any regulation will end in no citizen being able to own a gun or a ginsu.

Hell people here actually question the value of, and need for, laws.




We live in the wild west and it will get a lot worse from here.
Squat and watch now as our friends tell us that more guns is the only answer...


Sounds like we need more government to solve this.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
Let's forego the "guns are freely distributed to anyone" portion of your statement, because it's been covered repeatedly in recent threads and it's still bullchit.

Your view amounts to all the guns should be taken away. I know, I know, AR15s and high capacity mags. But AR15s are a tiny sliver of the deaths you're concerned about. So once they're banned, and the rate of firearm deaths remains largely unchanged, will people decide they need a different strategy, or double down and hit up handguns next?

It's not fear. It's recognition of logical progression in those who have misplaced their fear
Brewha Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
HockeyDad wrote:
Sounds like we need more government to solve this.

Maybe they should just issue guns - you know, like Obama phones?
Brewha Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Sunoverbeach wrote:
Let's forego the "guns are freely distributed to anyone" portion of your statement, because it's been covered repeatedly in recent threads and it's still bullchit.

Your view amounts to all the guns should be taken away. I know, I know, AR15s and high capacity mags. But AR15s are a tiny sliver of the deaths you're concerned about. So once they're banned, and the rate of firearm deaths remains largely unchanged, will people decide they need a different strategy, or double down and hit up handguns next?

It's not fear. It's recognition of logical progression in those who have misplaced their fear

No, that is not my view.

I would settle for a "well regulated militia".

But regulation of fire arms is both bad and useless - right?






But, let me ask you; what is the problem? Is there even a problem?
You know, 450 shootings is kinda small potatoes if you look at it the right way. And it didn't happen in my back yard.

Can we trust that anyone even got shot at all?
Sunoverbeach Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
What exactly is your picture of a well regulated militia? My understanding of how that worked at the time was a weekend of training once or twice a year. Do the members have to turn in their weapons so they aren't tempted to do bad things the other 362 days?

While you're going for a point by way of exaggeration, I would be interested in a breakdown of the 450+. How many were justified. How many were in defense of their lives or their families? How many of them do you feel deserve to die because they aren't a regulated militia, so shouldn't have a gun?
Brewha Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Sunoverbeach wrote:
What exactly is your picture of a well regulated militia? My understanding of how that worked at the time was a weekend of training once or twice a year. Do the members have to turn in their weapons so they aren't tempted to do bad things the other 362 days?

While you're going for a point by way of exaggeration, I would be interested in a breakdown of the 450+. How many were justified. How many were in defense of their lives or their families? How many of them do you feel deserve to die because they aren't a regulated militia, so shouldn't have a gun?

My option on what our gun regulations should be has been well stated. But I'm interested in if you think there even is a problem. Is there?


To keep in the spirt, many of those 450 were prolly asking for it, of just some boys horsing around. And I'm sure the rest - if it even happened - were pure self defense.


8track could be pushing fake news, ya know....
HockeyDad Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
Brewha wrote:
Maybe they should just issue guns - you know, like Obama phones?


That would also require more government.
HockeyDad Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
Brewha wrote:
My option on what our gun regulations should be has been well stated. But I'm interested in if you think there even is a problem. Is there?


To keep in the spirt, many of those 450 were prolly asking for it, of just some boys horsing around. And I'm sure the rest - if it even happened - were pure self defense.


8track could be pushing fake news, ya know....


Whatever gun regulations you want, we already have it in California. It is an easy case study.
Brewha Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
HockeyDad wrote:
That would also require more government.

Guess you didn't get no Obama phone either....
HockeyDad Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
Brewha wrote:
Guess you didn't get no Obama phone either....


I didn’t get no Trump/Biden Covid checks either.
Brewha Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
HockeyDad wrote:
Whatever gun regulations you want, we already have it in California. It is an easy case study.

That's what they said about Climate Change.
HockeyDad Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,130
Brewha wrote:
That's what they said about Climate Change.


Yes, we already have that too. We even have carbon credits. (And .30 a KWH)
Brewha Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
HockeyDad wrote:
I didn’t get no Trump/Biden Covid checks either.

At least you are helping to keep the government small.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
I do believe there's a problem. I also believe it's largely a mental health problem. And I believe the violence will continue with or without guns unless it is addressed.

Sarcasm noted, but statistics would indicate that a decent % of those shootings are likely in self defense. Am I blanketing all 450+ as justifiable in direct opposition to how that fear mongering figure is portrayed? Hell no. I'm not blind, just disagree with your position
MACS Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
Brewha wrote:
Was I using too many big words again macs?


My left testicle is smarter than you. In fact... both of my dog's testicles are smarter than you and they died a couple years ago when he was neutered.
RayR Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
All the GUBMENT has to do is write a law outlawing crazy people. Then nobody will be crazy. 🤪
Brewha Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Sunoverbeach wrote:
I do believe there's a problem. I also believe it's largely a mental health problem. And I believe the violence will continue with or without guns unless it is addressed.

Sarcasm noted, but statistics would indicate that a decent % of those shootings are likely in self defense. Am I blanketing all 450+ as justifiable in direct opposition to how that fear mongering figure is portrayed? Hell no. I'm not blind, just disagree with your position


SOB, I thank you for your honest opinion.

While I choose to make my point with sarcasm, I mean no offense to you. I’m just trying to illustrate my point.
That’s why I like the forum. We get to see each other views, and maybe hash things out.

I believe that the proliferation of gun in the hands of common people, out and about, escalates the violence needlessly. fist fights turn into gun fights. Stay bullets cause collateral damage. By standers shoot back.

So yes, I think we have a problem.
Brewha Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
MACS wrote:
My left testicle is smarter than you. In fact... both of my dog's testicles are smarter than you and they died a couple years ago when he was neutered.

You are as constant as the Northern Star.
Rather than debate the issue, just start calling people stooopid.

Do you think that makes you look smart?
MACS Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
Brewha wrote:
You are as constant as the Northern Star.
Rather than debate the issue, just start calling people stooopid.

Do you think that makes you look smart?


Also Brewha...

Brewha wrote:
Was I using too many big words again macs?


Typical democratic tactic... do it and then accuse the opposition of it. LOL

Brewha Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
Oh, you get confused between sarcasm and personal insults.

Ok,
Sarcasm: “what, are you stupid?”
Insult: “Damn, you’re stupid”

I fine point I will grant you.
8trackdisco Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,075
MACS wrote:
And half of those were in Chicago... am I right?


Only 60? 0ver the weekend. NYC and Atlanta round out the top three.

Now some of the more affluent neighborhoods are crowd funding for additional patrols from off duty police officers.

Most of those screaming Defund the Police and aggressively shopping at Target during what became a 100% off door busters are going to have the chickens come home to roost.

Watch for the Underserved Apologist to call on rich people to keep their neighborhoods safe.

Redlining 202.
8trackdisco Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,075
Brewha wrote:
And they shoot people somewhat less.....


Correct. Here are the numbers shared on NewsNation this morning.

In NYC, shootings and homicides are down. Robberies, burglaries and assaults are higher than usual. Up 30%.

Minneapolis, burglaries are up 6%, thefts 31% and carjackings up 14%.

Brewha is right. It isn’t about guns.

Brewha Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
8trackdisco wrote:
Correct. Here are the numbers shared on NewsNation this morning.

In NYC, shootings and homicides are down. Robberies, burglaries and assaults are higher than usual. Up 30%.

Minneapolis, burglaries are up 6%, thefts 31% and carjackings up 14%.

Brewha is right. It isn’t about guns.


It’s so true.
Even without the guns peeps would be gettin shot….



Really though, Biden Guns to fix all this???
8trackdisco Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,075
MACS wrote:
Can we agree that Thomas Jefferson was a brilliant man? Can we also agree that Cesare Beccaria was also brilliant when it came to crimes and punishment?

Well... here's what ol' Tommy had to say when speaking of Beccaria's treatise on crimes and punishment...

"A principal source of errors and injustice are false ideas of utility. For example: that legislator has false ideas of utility who considers particular more than general conveniencies, who had rather command the sentiments of mankind than excite them, who dares say to reason, "Be thou a slave;" who would sacrifice a thousand real advantages to the fear of an imaginary or trifling inconvenience; who would deprive men of the use of fire for fear of their being burnt, and of water for fear of their being drowned; and who knows of no means of preventing evil but by destroying it.

The laws of this nature are those which forbid to bear arms, disarming those only who are not disposed to commit the crime which the laws mean to prevent. Can it be supposed, that those who have the courage to violate the most sacred laws of humanity, and the most important of the code, will respect the less considerable and arbitrary injunctions, the violation of which is so easy, and of so little comparative importance? Does not the execution of this law deprive the subject of that personal liberty, so dear to mankind and to the wise legislator? and does it not subject the innocent to all the disagreeable circumstances that should only fall on the guilty? It certainly makes the situation of the assaulted worse, and of the assailants better, and rather encourages than prevents murder, as it requires less courage to attack unarmed than armed persons."

But some folks believe they're smarter than the smartest men. Fools, I tell ya... fools.


A conflicted man and the standard bearer and father of the Democratic Party. He’s happy he is dead. He wouldn’t have a chance speak on college campus and would be banned from Twitter.

Certainly he believed in accountability.

He also believed in um…… diversity in the sheets.
8trackdisco Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,075
Brewha wrote:
And there we have it. Guns are not the problem.

It takes people to use a gun so people must be the problem.

Or maybe bullets are the problem, I mean guns themselves don't actually kill people - it's the bullets, and the people who fire them.

No, that's too grainy. let's stick with people are the problem. Bad people.

And laws don't work on bad people, so no need to have laws about people being bad.

So in the end, 450+ shootings is all because of bad people. And there is really nothing you can do about that.

And you really can't tell if someone is bad - till they shoot someone - so no way to stop bad people from - uh, being bad. With a gun.

No, not a thing you could do....



Yes, bad people stole guns from good people and used them for violent, illegal purposes.

Example: Wisconsin. Eight people were either fined, lost their guns or were convicted of shooting people unlawfully. 338,000 Wisconsinites have a conceal and carry permit.

Wonder how many c&c shooters were part of the 50+ shot in Chicago.
8trackdisco Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,075
Brewha wrote:

8track could be pushing fake news, ya know....


News Nation. Morning in America. You can find the stories on cable and likely through app and the interweb.
8trackdisco Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,075
Brewha wrote:
At least you are helping to keep the government small.


It should get smaller, as more people leave the representative democracy of Cali, there will be fewer electors/delegates in congress.
8trackdisco Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,075
Brewha wrote:

I believe that the proliferation of gun in the hands of common people, out and about, escalates the violence needlessly.


What do “common people” look like?
ZRX1200 Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,599
Flyover people….
Brewha Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
8trackdisco wrote:
What do “common people” look like?

Peeps like you and me 8.

Not so sure about Ray….
Brewha Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,173
8trackdisco wrote:
News Nation. Morning in America. You can find the stories on cable and likely through app and the interweb.

Yes, no contest.

But I think we all have the privilege of calling anything fake news.
Member when NASA and NOAA said climate change was a problem? Got the fake news stamp right he in river city. Still does by some.
MACS Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,774
Remember when the UN said, in 1989, that because of global warming sea rise would bury some countries by the year 2000?

Yeeeeaahhhh... over 2 decades ago. No countries sank or were covered by water. Clearly that was some fake news. Lie and lie and lie trying to scare people and they will think your full of chit.
RayR Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Brewha wrote:
Peeps like you and me 8.

Not so sure about Ray….


I don't look like "common people" like you.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>