America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 months ago by RayR. 223 replies replies.
5 Pages<12345>
Electric Cars in California
Brewha Offline
#151 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
I see London, I see France…..


Or to quote a noted intellectual:
“I yam want I yam”

He as French too.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#152 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,412
Think


A Fool and His Money are Soon Parted – Meaning, Origin and Usage


Are you trying to impress upon someone the importance of financial education? The proverb “a fool and his money are soon parted” can teach your son or daughter the importance of learning how to manage money.

This post unpacks everything you need to know about the origin and meaning of this proverb.

Idiom Meaning

The meaning of the phrase “a fool and his money are soon parted” means that people with no financial literacy will generally unintentionally throw away any fortune that comes their way. Typically, the phrase does refer to money and the person’s economic sense.
Brewha Offline
#153 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Popeye was no fool.
And for investments, he was into olive oil….
Sunoverbeach Offline
#154 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
Brewha wrote:
No, they are not too successful - they do have a long way to go.

All I’m saying is they are trying.

OK, so given this, and the number of people who've stated they believe this will eventually be the future, it seems to me the lack of demonstrable success is leading to opposition to mandates as opposed to it being generated by a fixation on fossil fuels.

Maybe they sort it out in 8yrs. Maybe they need more time than that. But if they don't figure it out and the switch is flipped nationwide, I'd guess we're in for a significant amount of chaos
Brewha Offline
#155 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Sunoverbeach wrote:
OK, so given this, and the number of people who've stated they believe this will eventually be the future, it seems to me the lack of demonstrable success is leading to opposition to mandates as opposed to it being generated by a fixation on fossil fuels.

Maybe they sort it out in 8yrs. Maybe they need more time than that. But if they don't figure it out and the switch is flipped nationwide, I'd guess we're in for a significant amount of chaos

That would be true if it were being done.

But right now CA is saying no new ICE 13 years from now. Existing ICE are fine. A transition, not a switch flip.

And just like they have been building and expanding the grid for the last 100 years, lots should happen in the next decade. And the decades after that.



But back to mandates - Some feel the govmut should never mandate anything. Some feel that mandating the death of ICE won’t work. Some feel that without mandates we will never keep pollution in check.

I’m in the last camp - we have to have mandates or people/businesses will never change. And I assure you the technology is there to make it happen in the coming decades - which is the time frame we are talking.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#156 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
I don't disagree that business will take the most cost effective route without being forced to do otherwise. Hell, I have a job because of environmental regulations. However, I remain unassured the technology is there if it's only in theory at the moment. Show me the power and I'm in. Though I'll still be buying a flat plane crank V8 in the financially stable future
Brewha Offline
#157 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Sunoverbeach wrote:
I don't disagree that business will take the most cost effective route without being forced to do otherwise. Hell, I have a job because of environmental regulations. However, I remain unassured the technology is there if it's only in theory at the moment. Show me the power and I'm in. Though I'll still be buying a flat plane crank V8 in the financially stable future

I encourage you to look into the demonstrated technology. Even the lowly Model 3 will beat a good V8 (3.2 sec 0-60).

And I have had a long love affair with V8s. But wait until you feel maximum torque instantly at all speeds.
Game changer.
ZRX1200 Offline
#158 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,589
Right now how does this work with apartments?

Not to throw another reality wrench in your one lane where this works butt…..you know your fellow travelers don’t believe in property rights so it seems like a reasonable question.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#159 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
We've gone over this before brew. Mustang/Shelby ownership is a lifelong dream of mine. If the Mach E weren't a chitty crossover SUV I might be tempted
Brewha Offline
#160 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
ZRX1200 wrote:
Right now how does this work with apartments?

Not to throw another reality wrench in your one lane where this works butt…..you know your fellow travelers don’t believe in property rights so it seems like a reasonable question.

2022:
Right now - most people can't get and EV. The big three have just begun tooling up.
Right now home charging is hit and miss based on where you live. To upgrade your home might cost a lot, or nothing.
Right now EV's are not a practical choice for many apartment dwellers.

2035 - 13 years hence:
Auto manufactures have had EV modules for sale for more than 10 years.
Home and apartments have long had 240 volt wall plugs (exactly like for a cloth dryer) designed in or retrofitted because of the cost and convenience factor.
People who don't want and EV either buy a new PHEV or keep their ICE car.

Now - Then - and Beyond:
People living in a van down by the river still get screwed.
Brewha Offline
#161 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Sunoverbeach wrote:
We've gone over this before brew. Mustang/Shelby ownership is a lifelong dream of mine. If the Mach E weren't a chitty crossover SUV I might be tempted

I hope you like the car when you get it.
I liked mine.
MACS Offline
#162 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,770
Sunoverbeach wrote:
We've gone over this before brew. Mustang/Shelby ownership is a lifelong dream of mine. If the Mach E weren't a chitty crossover SUV I might be tempted


My neighbor has a Shelby GT500. Pretty sure it's a 2014. White with blue stripes. LOUD.

Took me for a ride... FAST, too.
Abrignac Offline
#163 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,270
Brewha wrote:
50% increase? 100% increase?

Someone did not do their math home work……

But go ahead and just make sh1t up. Cause your FREEDOM in in the line!


No you didn’t do your homework which is why you keep making sh1t up. I suggest you reread my post and apply your mathematical skills.
Brewha Offline
#164 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Abrignac wrote:
That is correct. Most homes have 200 amp service panels. Costs a couple thousand to upgrade. But, I don’t know of any power grid in the US that could accommodate a 50% increase in demand which is what it would take to power a household charging just one EV. If we mandate out all fossil fuel vehicles then we’re talking a demand increase of at least 100% or more considering most households regularly operate AT LEAST two vehicles.

Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.



Ok AB, what a, I missing here?

How does household demand increase by 50% for one EV?

When you say "demand" is that in kWh per month? Full load amps?

Homes with 200 amps service do not use 200 amps continuously - especially at night - if ever.
In fact if you add up all the circuit breakers in your panel they commonly exceed 200 amps. The engineer that originally designed the building and electrical system understood that the loads were intermittent, and very unlikely to be maxed out at the same time.

I have been exclusively charging my EV at home - off of 150 amp service - with no upgrade to the house and no problems. In fact, my electric bill only barely went up. I have an existing clothes dryer wall plug. NEMA 14-30, 30 amps @ 240v. Charges my car at 22 miles per hour. So like 260 miles of range overnight (6pm-6am).

Adding 30 or 50 amp served to you home "might" mean upgrading the base service - but it is not likely.
I did not need to.
Brewha Offline
#165 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Anthony,

In fairness I should be more polite about this.

30+ years I have been an engineer, and even I had to check a reference and do some math before I knew an EV would be no problem.
It sounds like power a home does not have - but it doesn't work like that.

As I said, I do it on 150 amp service. In a 3 bedroom, 2-1/2 bath home with a pool and 2 HVAC units. A bit over 2,500 sq/ft in the Texas heat.

Even with 2 EV's, you don't charge during the day when your using lots of power. And you don't often need to change from empty. Charging an EV at home is about like using an electric clothes dryer or your oven. Your home as that power - especially overnight.

And if you need fast charging, you spend 15-20 minutes at a 3 phase, 480 volt charger. Sorry - homes just don't get 3 phase power.

When I did the math on my home, it was apparent that the changes I had been doing made it a no brainer. Loosing incandescent and florescent lighting, having HVAC with a much higher SEER rating, and so on - I really don't need 200 amps of service. 200 amps is based on 20th century calculations - and we are not there anymore.




I guess it pizzes me off to hear so many people say the technology is not ready, or that it won't work. But then again, we are talking about where we will be in 10-20 years. But it works great for me - today.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#166 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
MACS wrote:
My neighbor has a Shelby GT500. Pretty sure it's a 2014. White with blue stripes. LOUD.

Took me for a ride... FAST, too.

Last model year Carroll had a direct hand in before his death. That's my second choice. Still aiming for the GT350 which runs about the same cost as the '14 500. New 500s are awesome, but like 50-60% more and not a manual amongst them
Brewha Offline
#167 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Would it offend you if I said “donut machine”?
Sunoverbeach Offline
#168 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
Nah, that's crazy talk. I'm sure with 660hp ('14) and 760hp ('20), everyone treats them with nothing but the utmost care and respect.
Brewha Offline
#169 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Sorry to say that have a presents on YouTube.
Lots of people that don’t know how to control that kind of power.
And throttle off snap oversteer is a bitch - voice of experience here….
Sunoverbeach Offline
#170 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
Yeah, I've seen 'em. Some equate that to Mustang owners can't drive. Truth is stupidity exists through all models. And slamming the throttle on cold tires after a show is stupid
Abrignac Offline
#171 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,270
Brewha wrote:
Anthony,

In fairness I should be more polite about this.

30+ years I have been an engineer, and even I had to check a reference and do some math before I knew an EV would be no problem.
It sounds like power a home does not have - but it doesn't work like that.

As I said, I do it on 150 amp service. In a 3 bedroom, 2-1/2 bath home with a pool and 2 HVAC units. A bit over 2,500 sq/ft in the Texas heat.

Even with 2 EV's, you don't charge during the day when your using lots of power. And you don't often need to change from empty. Charging an EV at home is about like using an electric clothes dryer or your oven. Your home as that power - especially overnight.

And if you need fast charging, you spend 15-20 minutes at a 3 phase, 480 volt charger. Sorry - homes just don't get 3 phase power.

When I did the math on my home, it was apparent that the changes I had been doing made it a no brainer. Loosing incandescent and florescent lighting, having HVAC with a much higher SEER rating, and so on - I really don't need 200 amps of service. 200 amps is based on 20th century calculations - and we are not there anymore.




I guess it pizzes me off to hear so many people say the technology is not ready, or that it won't work. But then again, we are talking about where we will be in 10-20 years. But it works great for me - today.


You’re good Scott. I know you’re passionate about your beliefs. What I was alluding to was the reality of what would be required to support a world without petroleum powered automobiles.

Here is my logic. Most homes have at least 2 vehicles. In today’s world most households have at least two wage earners.

During the pandemic many office jobs transitioned to remote. However, many of those workers have returned to brick and mortar locations. Remote work increases costs mostly due to the need for VPN’s not needed in hardwired locations. Especially when a company has a pre-existing fixed real estate cost.

That means that during a 2 to 3 hour period every evening millions of vehicles will be plugging in to recharge for the next day. As a result, there will be a huge increased demand for power during this period. Perhaps a 50-100% increase at this time. After which demand will subside.

To handle such an increase a tremendous upgrade in infrastructure will be required. However, this will be a short window. I wonder if such an upgrade for such a short period be economically feasible.
tailgater Offline
#172 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
HockeyDad wrote:
There once was a time when they were considered heroes.


That's so early pandemic.
tailgater Offline
#173 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Brewha wrote:
Are you sure you went to an engineering school? Because your above problem is not, well…engineered.

Most people charge at home and don’t need to get “gas” on the road. Now in the future a Bucky’s or a Love’s truck stop is going to look a bit different. In year to come.

I have 150 amp service at home. I use a 30 amp/240 volt plug in the garage to get a full tank every night.
If I need more/faster I would go to a 480 volt super charge and get a cup of coffee. Doesn’t happen often. In fact it’s never happened.

It's never happened. Probably because they practically don't exist.
Or is it they don't exist, practially?

And forget engineering. You would flunk common sense. Or maybe just plain comprehension.
My scenario was very clearly aimed at long distance driving.
I'll provide pictures next time. You can review them while waiting for your hypothetical super charging station.
(I think Elon Musk has taken more people into space then have used those things. But hey. we've got 13 years...)



tailgater Offline
#174 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Brewha wrote:
2022:
Right now - most people can't get and EV. The big three have just begun tooling up.
Right now home charging is hit and miss based on where you live. To upgrade your home might cost a lot, or nothing.
Right now EV's are not a practical choice for many apartment dwellers.

2035 - 13 years hence:
Auto manufactures have had EV modules for sale for more than 10 years.
Home and apartments have long had 240 volt wall plugs (exactly like for a cloth dryer) designed in or retrofitted because of the cost and convenience factor.
People who don't want and EV either buy a new PHEV or keep their ICE car.

Now - Then - and Beyond:
People living in a van down by the river still get screwed.


13 years.
Apartments will have 240V wall plugs. (although I've always thought of them as 220/221, whatever it takes).

OK Mr. "infrastructure appears in an instant". In 13 years, you think that every apartment will have at least one 240V plug for every unit.
Even if that proves to be true, what about families with more than one vehicle?
My son lives in Boston. His apartment doesn't have a lot. He gets a permit and parks on the street.
Will all the legal parking spots have these magic outlets? At 240V each?
But forget about the volts. It's the amps that matter when designing the infrastructure. How many amps will we be feeding? At night (when folks are home). With their AC on. Or their soon-to-be-mandated ELECTRIC heat in the winter.

This 13 year vision looks eerily similar to Disney's Tron.
Maybe if dear old Nicoli Tesla had won the war, we'd be able to embrace his wireless concept. But our ac/dc method can't possibly be upgraded to that degree in 13 years.
Hell, maybe never.

But you do love your mandates.


Brewha Offline
#175 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Abrignac wrote:
You’re good Scott. I know you’re passionate about your beliefs. What I was alluding to was the reality of what would be required to support a world without petroleum powered automobiles.

Here is my logic. Most homes have at least 2 vehicles. In today’s world most households have at least two wage earners.

During the pandemic many office jobs transitioned to remote. However, many of those workers have returned to brick and mortar locations. Remote work increases costs mostly due to the need for VPN’s not needed in hardwired locations. Especially when a company has a pre-existing fixed real estate cost.

That means that during a 2 to 3 hour period every evening millions of vehicles will be plugging in to recharge for the next day. As a result, there will be a huge increased demand for power during this period. Perhaps a 50-100% increase at this time. After which demand will subside.

To handle such an increase a tremendous upgrade in infrastructure will be required. However, this will be a short window. I wonder if such an upgrade for such a short period be economically feasible.

Keeping in mind that we are looking at a decades long transition, the number are more favorable that they might seem.

The concern with the power grid is peak load. It can run at full gain 24-7, but when everybody needs to much at once, say 4 to 6 pm, well that’s the problem we have today. If everyone ran their clothes dryer from 10pm to 6am, it’s really not an issue - today.

It is far cleaner and more efficient to charge cars from a power plant that have them burn gas. Thus the mandates in CA.

The power grid has been expanding constantly over the last hundreds years - based on projected need. And yes - EV’s or no, we will need a hell of a lot more going forward. This is why we push for multiple sources of power and dynamic storage.
I think we are up to it.
tailgater Offline
#176 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Brewha wrote:
Anthony,

In fairness I should be more polite about this.

30+ years I have been an engineer, and even I had to check a reference and do some math before I knew an EV would be no problem.
It sounds like power a home does not have - but it doesn't work like that.

As I said, I do it on 150 amp service. In a 3 bedroom, 2-1/2 bath home with a pool and 2 HVAC units. A bit over 2,500 sq/ft in the Texas heat.

Even with 2 EV's, you don't charge during the day when your using lots of power. And you don't often need to change from empty. Charging an EV at home is about like using an electric clothes dryer or your oven. Your home as that power - especially overnight.

And if you need fast charging, you spend 15-20 minutes at a 3 phase, 480 volt charger. Sorry - homes just don't get 3 phase power.

When I did the math on my home, it was apparent that the changes I had been doing made it a no brainer. Loosing incandescent and florescent lighting, having HVAC with a much higher SEER rating, and so on - I really don't need 200 amps of service. 200 amps is based on 20th century calculations - and we are not there anymore.




I guess it pizzes me off to hear so many people say the technology is not ready, or that it won't work. But then again, we are talking about where we will be in 10-20 years. But it works great for me - today.



I'm sold.
Let's mandate.


The technology is there: for many. Yet you refuse to accept that many others actually drive long distances.
It works for you. Excellent. I already told you I'm jealous. But it doesn't work for me. It doesn't work for most.
And a decade+ of poorly thought-out infrastructure won't change that.

Look at how fast this technology is growing. Should we have built infrastructure around the technology of 13 years ago?
Because that's what we'll be looking back upon.




Brewha Offline
#177 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
tailgater wrote:
It's never happened. Probably because they practically don't exist.
Or is it they don't exist, practially?

And forget engineering. You would flunk common sense. Or maybe just plain comprehension.
My scenario was very clearly aimed at long distance driving.
I'll provide pictures next time. You can review them while waiting for your hypothetical super charging station.
(I think Elon Musk has taken more people into space then have used those things. But hey. we've got 13 years...)


Tail!
Glad to see you again showing yours.

Looking at my phone now…the nearest Supercharger station is 10.2 miles away with 2 of 12 station available (there is a great BBQ place next to the station in Grapevine)
At 11.4 miles is 5 of 10 available - slow night in Southlake.
Denton, 12 miles, dead’s as always has 3 of 6 available.
Plano is 13 miles
Dallas 21
Well you get the idea.

But long rang driving - looks like station every 50 miles or so in any direction. Prolly not so good if you live in BF.

Now in fairness, when I go long rang I usually hop a plane.
Brewha Offline
#178 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
tailgater wrote:
13 years.
Apartments will have 240V wall plugs. (although I've always thought of them as 220/221, whatever it takes).

OK Mr. "infrastructure appears in an instant". In 13 years, you think that every apartment will have at least one 240V plug for every unit.
Even if that proves to be true, what about families with more than one vehicle?
My son lives in Boston. His apartment doesn't have a lot. He gets a permit and parks on the street.
Will all the legal parking spots have these magic outlets? At 240V each?
But forget about the volts. It's the amps that matter when designing the infrastructure. How many amps will we be feeding? At night (when folks are home). With their AC on. Or their soon-to-be-mandated ELECTRIC heat in the winter.

This 13 year vision looks eerily similar to Disney's Tron.
Maybe if dear old Nicoli Tesla had won the war, we'd be able to embrace his wireless concept. But our ac/dc method can't possibly be upgraded to that degree in 13 years.
Hell, maybe never.

But you do love your mandates.



13 years is when they stop selling ICE in California.

Whaddaya think the year you can’t can buy a band new ICE car all other ICE cars vanish?
I got a buddy with a ‘70 Chevelle - how old is that?
Ok, maybe for you a car only last 12 months - bummer.

Riddle me this; does a 120 volt circuit and a 240 volt circuit both rated at 15 amps have the same power?
No sir, it is the watts that matter, not the amps. Come on, you know that (remember your engineering).

Picture and apartment block, each apartment with it’s own clothes dryer - and they all dry at once.
apocalypse, right?

Right so in Tron 2035, apartments have a clothes dryer plugs for their parking spots. Is that kind of futuristic technology even possible??? Guess we will find out.


Btw - loved the tesla ac/dc war comment.
tailgater Offline
#179 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Brewha wrote:


Riddle me this; does a 120 volt circuit and a 240 volt circuit both rated at 15 amps have the same power?
No sir, it is the watts that matter, not the amps. Come on, you know that (remember your engineering).
.


The house is rated at 200 amps 120V.
If every appliance in your home were 240V you'd only be rated for 100 amps with the same service.

That's why a typical panel will require two slots for the breaker on a 240 line, instead of just the one.


You don't need to be an engineer to know this.
tailgater Offline
#180 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Brewha wrote:
Tail!
Glad to see you again showing yours.

Looking at my phone now…the nearest Supercharger station is 10.2 miles away with 2 of 12 station available (there is a great BBQ place next to the station in Grapevine)
At 11.4 miles is 5 of 10 available - slow night in Southlake.
Denton, 12 miles, dead’s as always has 3 of 6 available.
Plano is 13 miles
Dallas 21
Well you get the idea.

But long rang driving - looks like station every 50 miles or so in any direction. Prolly not so good if you live in BF.




Sounds like a fun drive. Honey, you drive while I figure out where we're going based on these superchargers. Romantic.

And you still don't get it. You don't have to sell me on the technology. It's the mandate I oppose. And will do so with great fervor. Partly because the infrastructure literally doesn't exist. And it won't in 13 years.
CA has been trying to improve their electrical infrastructure for well over a decade. And what have we got? Brown outs and power cable forest fires. Even without the plug in EV's to worry about.

So what are you saying? that NOW it will be different?
LOL! Not even you can believe that.

Sunoverbeach Offline
#181 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,665
How do trees get online?
They log in
Brewha Offline
#182 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
tailgater wrote:
Sounds like a fun drive. Honey, you drive while I figure out where we're going based on these superchargers. Romantic.

And you still don't get it. You don't have to sell me on the technology. It's the mandate I oppose. And will do so with great fervor. Partly because the infrastructure literally doesn't exist. And it won't in 13 years.
CA has been trying to improve their electrical infrastructure for well over a decade. And what have we got? Brown outs and power cable forest fires. Even without the plug in EV's to worry about.

So what are you saying? that NOW it will be different?
LOL! Not even you can believe that.


What I don't get is your assertion that the infrastructure does not exist and won't in 13 years.
I use 100% existing infrastructure for my car today.
No there isn't a charger so you can live in a van down by the river - yet.

And none of the dozens of charge stations in my area were there 10 years ago. But they continue to pop us quickly. Not that most really need them day to day.



They need the mandate - hell we need the mandates. Or else people and businesses will sit around whining that it's too tough, too impractical, and it will never happen.
But where there is a will there is a way - and we're just gonna have to make people do it.

HockeyDad Offline
#183 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
Nope. No mandates.
Brewha Offline
#184 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
tailgater wrote:
The house is rated at 200 amps 120V.
If every appliance in your home were 240V you'd only be rated for 100 amps with the same service.

That's why a typical panel will require two slots for the breaker on a 240 line, instead of just the one.


You don't need to be an engineer to know this.

No - if all circuits were 240 volts - you get the same amps.

You would have to be an engineer or electrician to know that house with 200 amp service would have 48,000 watts maximum, because homes get 240 volts split in 2 legs of the same phase.
If you only use one leg to neural - you only get 24,000 watts, because its all 120 volt.
Home circuits are almost always of mix the two single phase voltages.
btw - you only get to use 160 amps continuously according to code.

The take away here is that if you were to use all 240 volt breakers you would get twice the power with the same 200 amps.

Twice the power hidden in the panel - who knew?
Brewha Offline
#185 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
HockeyDad wrote:
Nope. No mandates.

Come on HD - take one for the team.
tailgater Offline
#186 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Brewha wrote:
No - if all circuits were 240 volts - you get the same amps.

You would have to be an engineer or electrician to know that house with 200 amp service would have 48,000 watts maximum, because homes get 240 volts split in 2 legs of the same phase.
If you only use one leg to neural - you only get 24,000 watts, because its all 120 volt.
Home circuits are almost always of mix the two single phase voltages.
btw - you only get to use 160 amps continuously according to code.

The take away here is that if you were to use all 240 volt breakers you would get twice the power with the same 200 amps.

Twice the power hidden in the panel - who knew?



Phase.
Thank you. We upgraded electric at work. But it wasn't due to 240 or 480. It was 2 to 3 phase.

Funny thing: Up here in the Northeast, a lot of homes have 100 amp service. And a lot of others have 60 amps.

Yeah. We've got old homes.

But...mandate.

tailgater Offline
#187 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Timely piece on the news radio today.

The Pilgrim Nuclear Plant in Plymouth MA is not allowed to trickle out the radioactive cooling wastewater into the bay. Seems that despite "the science", the environmentalists are putting up a fight.
And there's only a million gallons of it...

Next up:
The town of Falmouth MA (here on Cape Cod) is finally tearing down two large wind turbines that have sat dormant for years due to public displeasure with them.
Loud.
Health and mental well being due to flicker effect.
Ugly.


I'm sure both stories could be blamed on your typical NIMBY mentality.
But we're in Massachusetts.
We're bluer than LaLa Land on the opposite coast.

If a bunch of liberals can't or won't allow alternative energy sources, how on earth are we going to revamp our entire electric infrastructure to accommodate an all-EV marketplace in just 13 years?

DrMaddVibe Offline
#188 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,412
https://www.carscoops.com/2022/09/ev-charging-costs-nearing-gas-prices-for-users-of-public-chargers-in-the-uk/

Not like what happens in the EU stays there...LMAO!!!

PLUS...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/charging-your-ev-at-night-is-about-to-become-more-expensive/ar-AA127L48

Go figure.

https://youtu.be/DV7yx2y3TtY
Brewha Offline
#189 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
tailgater wrote:
Timely piece on the news radio today.

The Pilgrim Nuclear Plant in Plymouth MA is not allowed to trickle out the radioactive cooling wastewater into the bay. Seems that despite "the science", the environmentalists are putting up a fight.
And there's only a million gallons of it...

Next up:
The town of Falmouth MA (here on Cape Cod) is finally tearing down two large wind turbines that have sat dormant for years due to public displeasure with them.
Loud.
Health and mental well being due to flicker effect.
Ugly.


I'm sure both stories could be blamed on your typical NIMBY mentality.
But we're in Massachusetts.
We're bluer than LaLa Land on the opposite coast.

If a bunch of liberals can't or won't allow alternative energy sources, how on earth are we going to revamp our entire electric infrastructure to accommodate an all-EV marketplace in just 13 years?


How you ask? With the spirt and know how that defines us as Americans.
And never mind that the Chinese are kicking our Azzes - that’s only temporary (?).
Have Americans ever give up when things got tough - no.
Did we give up when hitler bombed Pearl Harbor - NO!
We are AMERICANS and will lead the world in clean energy, technology and know how - cause it’s us, god damn it.



No better lessons come than those from failures. And we a blazing new trails here. Time to button up.



Brewha Offline
#190 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
To breakdown the problem further:

There are two camps in America. Those who know we need to clean things up. Those that know we don’t.

What shows in this thread is that many honestly don’t think that EV’s are needed. And that are quick to point out the problems and sell the idea that EV’s are some evils plot to profit off of consumers.
You cannot sell these people on fixing a problem that they honestly or not believe does not exist.

The 1st camp has more parts.
People that know it is just a matter of doing it.
People that question it’s practicality.
People that know it just won’t work.

Now, the crux of the problem for the last two categories is that the technology of energy production and usage is complex. Most people do not understand it, and are unlikely to research it because - well it prolly is all just bull****, just like science.





When I was born there were 3 billion people in the world. Now there are 8 billion people in the world.
Things need to change.

DrafterX Offline
#191 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
That's why Fauci made the covid... Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#192 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
DrafterX wrote:
That's why Fauci made the covid... Mellow


Pretty much.
ZRX1200 Offline
#193 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,589
Sounds like if the we need EV crowd just holds their breath forever then the problem is solved.
DrafterX Offline
#194 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,548
True.. true. Mellow
Brewha Offline
#195 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
Looks like New York is issuing a no new gas car mandate in 2035 too.

Bravo!
RayR Offline
#196 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,884
Brewha wrote:
Looks like New York is issuing a no new gas car mandate in 2035 too.

Bravo!


Cheering on rule by evil dicktators again Brew? Eh?
Brewha Offline
#197 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,170
DrafterX wrote:
That's why Fauci made the covid... Mellow

Thank you Drafter.
I sometimes forget the audience here….. Glare
RayR Offline
#198 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,884
Brew if I understand the crux of the problem according to you is that the simpleton proles don't know what is good for them so they need technocrats and dicktators to force them to heed the demands of the smaut central planner people.
BuckyB93 Offline
#199 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,184
Yeah, what works for Brew should be mandated and imposed on everyone... for the common "good" for humanity.

One double NINE!s

HockeyDad Offline
#200 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
Good thing Florida didn’t mandate electric cars.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>