America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 16 months ago by HockeyDad. 20 replies replies.
Buh-Bye Alcohol Fetal Asperger's Syndrome Green Puppet!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Dems kick frumpy climate activist Greta to the curb, replace her with a soft-spoken, hot blonde…



The left may have finally figured out that frumpy and obnoxious teenagers are not the best way to promote their precious “climate change.”

Greta Thunberg, the homely-looking Swedish climate activist with an angsty personality, splashed on the scene back in 2018, when she was only 15-years old.

But where’s Greta now? It seems as if she’s fallen off the weather map.

First Post: 

Greta Thunberg, who inspired a global movement, has been out of the limelight in recent times. Her silence on burning issues has led some to believe that her days of activism are behind her.

Well, they may be right. Because it looks like the left has upgraded their climate activist. Greta 2.0 is a 20-year-old blonde Iranian-American named Sophia Kianni.

She’s beautiful, and she doesn’t scream and yell (yet).

Free Beacon:

Greta’s absence at the UN climate summit created an opportunity for other (hotter and less obnoxious) climate activists to steal her spotlight. Meet Sophia Kianni:

The 20-year-old UN climate adviser stole the show at COP27, cementing herself as the new and vastly improved Greta Thunberg.

She also goes to Stanford.

Free Beacon:

Kianni’s undeniable hotness might actually persuade some normal Americans to start caring about climate change.

In light of these developments, the Washington Free Beacon will conduct a formal reassessment of our militant anti-climate editorial stance.

I don’t know of she’ll convince conservatives to eat bugs, but this New Greta is a vast improvement over Old Greta.

https://www.revolver.news/2022/12/dems-kick-frumpy-climate-activist-greta-to-the-curb-replace-her-with-a-soft-spoken-hot-blonde/


So just like that Lil "How Dare You" gets pushed out the door.

It's only a matter of time before some non-binary kook gives this one the boot so eat all the frankenfood and charge up those EV's for her while you can!
HockeyDad Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
This Sophia Kianni lady makes a pretty good argument on the need to address climate change.
DrafterX Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
I'd leave her dripping from every orifice in her body... Mellow
RayR Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
You've seen her boobs DrafterX? Eh?

I've heard that sex sells climate change.

https://media.thereformation.com/image/upload/q_auto:eco/c_scale,w_auto:breakpoints_100_2160_9_20/v1/prod/media/W1siZiIsIjIwMjAvMTEvMDEvMjMvNTQvMDcvMGE5MTRkYzMtY2ZjOC00NTZlLWFmZTAtNjE0ZWE2Mjc2NjBiL1NvcGhpYS1LaWFubmkgMi5qcGciXV0/Sophia-Kianni%25202.jpg

Definitely not frumpy like that Greta.
Mr. Jones Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
This "may"? Win C-BID's "BALLSIEST THREAD TITLE OF THE YEAR"

Has a very good chance...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Mr. Jones wrote:
This "may"? Win C-BID's "BALLSIEST THREAD TITLE OF THE YEAR"

Has a very good chance...



Gotta be honest...I've been rewatching Mad Men again.

Went to a circle for titles. Then I remembered the ol tried and true approach. Truth in advertising.

VIOLA!

I mean if Icarus can fly to the sun with Kent Lapper...the moon is reachable!
Sunoverbeach Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,649
Long ago everyone owned horses and you were rich if you owned a car. Now, everyone owns cars and you're rich if you own a horse
DrMaddVibe Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
SHADDAP GRETA!!!!


Ozone layer may be restored in decades, UN report says



The ozone layer - which is on track for recovery - protects against harmful ultraviolet rays from the sun

Human action to save the ozone layer has worked as hoped, and it may recover in just decades, the UN says.

An international agreement in 1987 to stop using the harmful chemicals that were damaging the layer has been successful, the major assessment says.

The ozone layer is a thin part of the Earth's atmosphere that absorbs most of the ultraviolet radiation from the Sun.

When it is depleted, this radiation can reach the surface - causing potential harm to humans and other living things.

Ultraviolet rays can damage DNA and cause sunburn, increasing the long-term risk of problems such as skin cancer.

The ozone layer began depleting in the 1970s.

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which were commonly found in spray cans, fridges, foam insulation and air conditioners, were blamed for eating away at the ozone layer.

The environmental disasters we've almost fixed

A gaping hole in the layer was discovered by scientists in 1985. Just two years later, the Montreal Protocol was signed - with 46 countries promising to phase out the harmful chemicals.

The deal later became the first UN treaty to achieve universal ratification, and almost 99% of banned ozone-depleting substances have now been phased out.

The Antarctic ozone hole continued expanding until 2000, after which its area and depth began improving slowly.

Now, a report co-produced by UN, US and EU agencies says the Montreal Protocol is working as hoped.

It says that, if current policies are maintained, the ozone layer will be restored to 1980 values - before the ozone hole appeared - at different points in different places:

2066 over the Antarctic, where ozone depletion was the worst
2045 over the Arctic
in about two decades' time everywhere else

While the depletion of ozone is harmful due to solar radiation, it is not a major cause of climate change.

But saving the ozone layer has had a positive knock-on effect on global warming, the report suggests, because some of the harmful chemicals that were phased out are powerful greenhouse gases.

That phase-out will have prevented up to 1C of warming by the middle of the century - if compared to increasing their use by 3% per year, the scientists found.

While the report has been hailed as good news - and evidence that rapid, international action to avert environmental crises can work - it warns that continued progress on the ozone layer is not guaranteed.

For example, proposals to limit global warming by sending millions of tonnes of sulphur dioxide into the upper atmosphere - known as stratospheric aerosol injection - could drastically reverse the ozone layer's recovery.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-64215660
RayR Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
"For example, proposals to limit global warming by sending millions of tonnes of sulphur dioxide into the upper atmosphere - known as stratospheric aerosol injection - could drastically reverse the ozone layer's recovery."

Sulphur Dioxide? A major pollutant of heavy industry? A major component of acid rain that kills trees and stuff that could also drastically reverse the ozone layer's recovery?
There's a proposal to pump millions of tonnes of stuff into the stratosphere to limit global warming?

I've been a skeptic for years of these political scientists portraying themselves as climate change experts with their many schemes to plunder the economy to enrich themselves, but this is nuts.
Mr. Jones Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
I still think this thread W.I.N.S.

"THE BALLSIEST O.P. THREAD TITLE OF THE YEAR,"

SIGNED
THE KENT LAPPER
MACS Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
This guy sums up climate change pretty damn succinctly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKIOSnKX96E
RayR Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
MACS wrote:
This guy sums up climate change pretty damn succinctly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKIOSnKX96E


I saw the LEFTIES in that audience sink into their chairs. They didn't applaud even once at the jokes.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
That little muppet with bad manners can GTFO here...

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/comparison-of-antarctic-iceberg-observations-by-cook-in-177275-halley-in-1700-bouvet-in-1739-and-riou-in-1789-with-modern-data/A918D63BD86273038498E5BAE541BE3D

More than 300 years of iceberg and guess what? They were about the same size and place back then as they are now. The Kenyan King's digs on Martha's Vineyards is safe.

Greta should've stayed in school.
Mr. Jones Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
She was homely looking as a kid....

Now... she's skanky , gangally and no make up nasty..... alleDgeDleY

Bwuhahahaha 😂😂😂😂😂
PapaWhiskey Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 01-01-2023
Posts: 755
MACS wrote:
This guy sums up climate change pretty damn succinctly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKIOSnKX96E


This guy is on point. Thank you for posting MACS!
delta1 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Exxon Mobil scientists privately knew as much about climate change as the scientific community at large, as their internal records show, and yet they continued to lie to the public about their role.


https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063

"For decades, some members of the fossil fuel industry tried to convince the public that a causative link between fossil fuel use and climate warming could not be made because the models used to project warming were too uncertain. Supran et al. show that one of those fossil fuel companies, ExxonMobil, had their own internal models that projected warming trajectories consistent with those forecast by the independent academic and government models. What they understood about climate models thus contradicted what they led the public to believe. —HJS"


HockeyDad Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
It is Exxon’s fault. I will only buy Chevron gasoline now. I’ve done my part.
Mr. Jones Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
Me Too !!!

Signed,

cHaRLie rOsE
Sunoverbeach Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,649
Is BP climate safe? Speedway? I'm not looking to pedal to work
HockeyDad Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
As long as it’s not ExxonMobil, you’re doing your part for climate change. No need to get rid of that car or go 100% solar.
Users browsing this topic
Guest