America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 months ago by Mr. Jones. 55 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
George SanTos accussed of Sexual harassment in the capital building ..already ?
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Mr. Jones Offline
#1 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 10:20 AM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
He illegally "hired" a worker? Apprentice? With no pay but a promise to hire later...Not talking

Which is against house rules...Gonz

He allEgEDleY got this new hire 30 yr old man ( who looks gay as the day is long) to work for him...he asked him to sit on a small couch with him to go over paperwork...
He touched his knee at first...then slid his MIT down the dudes inner thigh...then grabbed his groin....
He / santos told the dude his husband was out of town and asked him to come home with him and asked me if he was a member of the Grinder moho website..allEdgEdLey...

The dude just filed a complaint with the capital police....

SANTOS IS A LYING LOSER AND A MENTAL CASE
allEdgEdlEy...
Abrignac Offline
#2 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 11:00 AM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
After he posted his complaint on Twitter:

Myers added: “These matters will not be litigated on social media or through news media. They are serious offenses and the evidence and facts will speak for themselves if the committee takes up the matter. This tweet is being made public in light of transparency.”

Dude wants his 15 minutes of fame and apparently he doesn’t want Santos’ deek. As far as the allegations themselves, Santos should have never been sworn in.
ZRX1200 Offline
#3 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 12:18 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
He was elected.
JGKAMIN Offline
#4 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 12:36 PM EST
Joined: 05-08-2011
Posts: 1,400
Once this buffoon got in I figured they’d continue coming at him with whatever scandal they can until he finally taps out. It’s not a matter of if, just what it will finally be and when he’s gone.
frankj1 Offline
#5 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 1:40 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
ZRX1200 wrote:
He was elected.

truthfully, he wasn't elected. In no way does whatever-his-real-name-is resemble the candidate he advertised.

A pretty impressive young conservative was elected and that's the person those voters deserved.
ZRX1200 Offline
#6 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 4:40 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
A lying politician?

I don’t believe you Frank.

In fact I’m now OUTRAGED!!!
ZRX1200 Offline
#7 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 4:41 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
I think he was teaching the intern that erections have consequences.
frankj1 Offline
#8 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 4:58 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
ZRX1200 wrote:
A lying politician?

I don’t believe you Frank.

In fact I’m now OUTRAGED!!!

lying politicians are quite common.
This guy isn't that.
Abrignac Offline
#9 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 5:15 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,263
ZRX1200 wrote:
He was elected.


I realize that. But, the Speaker is responsible for swearing in the members. I’m sure there is a Congressional rule that specifies how the Speaker swear in the members. Is/was it within McCarthy’s power to tell him to pound sand?
HockeyDad Offline
#10 Posted: Sun, Feb 5 2023, 5:25 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
Abrignac wrote:
I realize that. But, the Speaker is responsible for swearing in the members. I’m sure there is a Congressional rule that specifies how the Speaker swear in the members. Is/was it within McCarthy’s power to tell him to pound sand?


If the speaker has the power to chose who is sworn in, there is no more need for elections.
burning_sticks Offline
#11 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 11:12 AM EST
Joined: 08-17-2020
Posts: 152
If this happened in my home state, I'm pretty sure the Governor gets to appoint a replacement to fill the term, if a congressman needs replace for illness death etc. Who do you think Hockel would appoint.
Mr. Jones Offline
#12 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 12:10 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
Not a republican
HockeyDad Offline
#13 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 12:44 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
frankj1 wrote:
truthfully, he wasn't elected. In no way does whatever-his-real-name-is resemble the candidate he advertised.

A pretty impressive young conservative was elected and that's the person those voters deserved.



That is all pretty stuff but truthfully, he was elected. Turns out the unicorn farts didn’t smell so good.

Option 1: File for a recall election.

Option 2: The House could vote to expel him. That’s happened only twice since the Civil War and was after someone was convicted of crimes.

If being a POS liar was grounds for expulsion nobody would be able to finish out their term!
ZRX1200 Offline
#14 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 12:48 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
A fellow house/senate member from another state telling that states voters to pound sand?

Congress critters are not considered civil officers.

Article 2 section 5 of the constitution both the house and senate may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.

I love it when emotions run things, best way to choke power away…..
drglnc Offline
#15 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 1:01 PM EST
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 706
ZRX1200 wrote:
A fellow house/senate member from another state telling that states voters to pound sand?

Congress critters are not considered civil officers.

Article 2 section 5 of the constitution both the house and senate may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.

I love it when emotions run things, best way to choke power away…..



Since 1789 the Senate has expelled only 15 members. None Since the Civil War... 14 were expelled during the Civil War for supporting the Confederacy. 1 was expelled in 1797 for treason. In every other case in which the Senate considered expulsion it was either dropped or they failed to act before the member left office by resigning or term ending.

realistically this will be left to the voters to decide unless he resigns...
ZRX1200 Offline
#16 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 3:36 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
As it should be.

Don’t look now……we’re agreeing.
drglnc Offline
#17 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 3:50 PM EST
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 706
ZRX1200 wrote:
As it should be.

Don’t look now……we’re agreeing.


I have no issue agreeing with someone on either side of the political spectrum when the facts align.

things we may, or may not disagree on...

I believe that states (with a vote by the population, not unilaterally by some state official) should have the ability to recall a member of congress however, that is not a power they currently poses.

i also feel that the members of The House GOP Steering Committee that put him on 2 committees should feel the wrath of voters as being implicit in his defrauding of the voters. Putting him on committees with the knowledge of his actions they made it clear that they did not care he was a fraud...


HockeyDad Offline
#18 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 4:04 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
HockeyDad wrote:
That is all pretty stuff but truthfully, he was elected. Turns out the unicorn farts didn’t smell so good.

Option 1: File for a recall election.

Option 2: The House could vote to expel him. That’s happened only twice since the Civil War and was after someone was convicted of crimes.

If being a POS liar was grounds for expulsion nobody would be able to finish out their term!





So I just realized that New York has no legal provision for recall elections.

Ain’t it funny when you give up a right or the government takes it from you and then you decide you actually want it!

I amend Option 1 to: go pound sand. That’s pretty much the only option.
ZRX1200 Offline
#19 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 4:27 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
He is gay so I think all criticism is because of hateful bigoted homophobia.
HockeyDad Offline
#20 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 4:43 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
ZRX1200 wrote:
He is gay so I think all criticism is because of hateful bigoted homophobia.


That prolly caused a lot of trouble with the voters. He’s gay so you have to vote for him. He’s republican so you can’t vote for him.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#21 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 4:49 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Ihold on here...I think I see the problem all those repressed gays won't like the pounding of the sand.

They're gonna want hemp lube.
ZRX1200 Offline
#22 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 5:02 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
It’s the premier food source.
Stogie1020 Offline
#23 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 5:33 PM EST
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,308
HockeyDad wrote:
That prolly caused a lot of trouble with the voters. He’s gay so you have to vote for him. He’s republican so you can’t vote for him.

It's like frosted mini wheats...
JGKAMIN Offline
#24 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 5:37 PM EST
Joined: 05-08-2011
Posts: 1,400
Those who don’t want him in will continue finding one thing after the next until he decides to tap out.
MACS Offline
#25 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 6:40 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
Stogie1020 wrote:
It's like frosted mini wheats...


Whooooaaaaa... the sugar is offset by the fiber, bruh. They're a diuretic. Much like democrats.

BAHAHAHAHA!
ZRX1200 Offline
#26 Posted: Mon, Feb 6 2023, 10:05 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
Wilford Brimley did like to be regular.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#27 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 7:03 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
Well, now he's regular dead.
ZRX1200 Offline
#28 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 10:12 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
He’s only mostly dead.
HockeyDad Offline
#29 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 10:23 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
Prolly Covid
Stogie1020 Offline
#30 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 11:29 AM EST
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,308
HockeyDad wrote:
Prolly Covid

Frosted mini wheats cause Covid. Dang.
Mr. Jones Offline
#31 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 7:58 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
I'm still wondering??

If his mom didn't die in the twin towers on 9/11... 2000?...

Is she still alive...

Or is she D.E.A.D.?

IF THE FORMER?

IM PURTY SURE SHE WISHES SHE WAS DECEASED...
allEdGeDlY

She spawned this A-HOLE AND HAS TO ADMIT HE'S HER SON...

WHAT A BUMMER...
Mr. Jones Offline
#32 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 8:02 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
Just Google it...

She was in BRAZIL ON 9/11 , 2000...

SHE DIED IN 2016...UNRELATED TO ANY SICKNESS CAUSED BY 9/11 ....
JGKAMIN Offline
#33 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 8:07 PM EST
Joined: 05-08-2011
Posts: 1,400
Mr. Jones wrote:
Just Google it...

She was in BRAZIL ON 9/11 , 2000...

SHE DIED IN 2016...UNRELATED TO ANY SICKNESS CAUSED BY 9/11 ....

But was she in Brazil on 9/11, 2001…?
frankj1 Offline
#34 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 10:58 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
of course not. She was at her Synagogue saying Kaddish for her parents who perished at the hands of the Nazis in the Holocaust.

Can't anyone other than MrJones distinguish between typical resume tweaking and a flat out imposter?
frankj1 Offline
#35 Posted: Tue, Feb 7 2023, 11:04 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
just heard Santos, if that's his real name, got Mitt Slapped!
ZRX1200 Offline
#36 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2023, 12:41 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
Mitt locked him into the dog crate on top of his Mormon mobile?
Mr. Jones Offline
#37 Posted: Wed, Feb 15 2023, 8:20 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
What's he doing lately?
Except dodging the press Corp...
Inquiring minds want to know...

Next thing to come out will be that he is on the "DOLE" AND COLLECTING S.N.A.P. FOOD STAMPS AND LIVING IN A
"SECTION 8 H.U.T." IN ARLINGTON ,VA...
AllEdgEdLey...
ZRX1200 Offline
#38 Posted: Thu, Feb 16 2023, 1:38 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
I heard he was pulling an Ilhan Omar and was marrying his brother.
JGKAMIN Offline
#39 Posted: Thu, May 11 2023, 6:18 AM EST
Joined: 05-08-2011
Posts: 1,400
JGKAMIN wrote:
Once this buffoon got in I figured they’d continue coming at him with whatever scandal they can until he finally taps out. It’s not a matter of if, just what it will finally be and when he’s gone.

And now you have it, a 13-count federal indictment. Guess that explains why they haven’t gotten around to the Hunter Biden thing yet, all resources were on board getting to the bottom of this one.Angel
rfenst Offline
#40 Posted: Thu, May 11 2023, 2:03 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
JGKAMIN wrote:
And now you have it, a 13-count federal indictment. Guess that explains why they haven’t gotten around to the Hunter Biden thing yet, all resources were on board getting to the bottom of this one.Angel

Santos is a clear and present danger presently. Charges are necessary right away b/c his R colleagues don't have the balls to oust him immediately.

Hunte is irrelevant: nevertheless he's probably going to jail, absent a pardon.
Stogie1020 Offline
#41 Posted: Thu, May 11 2023, 2:19 PM EST
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,308
rfenst wrote:
Santos is a clear and present danger presently. Charges are necessary right away b/c his R colleagues don't have the balls to oust him immediately.

Hunte is irrelevant: nevertheless he's probably going to jail, absent a pardon.

Wow... Please tell me you forgot the "sarcasm" smiley.
HockeyDad Offline
#42 Posted: Thu, May 11 2023, 2:25 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
There should be a recall election filed for Santos immediately.

Hunter is irrelevant. All he did is be the conduit in an international money for influence scheme with the Vice President. This is perfectly fair foreign bribery.
ZRX1200 Offline
#43 Posted: Thu, May 11 2023, 3:00 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
I think we all know POC jomo RepubliCANTS in office are an absolute clear and present danger. Liars or not!

I read #40 as pretending to be George Washington, but instead of the cherry tree he chopped down the Log Cabin R’s.
rfenst Offline
#44 Posted: Thu, May 11 2023, 7:38 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Irrelevant means Hunter is not connnected to George Santos.
Irrelevant also means that Hunter seem to longer be benefitting from whatever he did wrong.
Irelevent does not mean that I do not want to see Hunter and others go to jail if found guilty too.
rfenst Offline
#45 Posted: Thu, May 11 2023, 7:40 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
HockeyDad wrote:
There should be a recall election filed for Santos immediately.

Yup.
And, a quick replacement per that state's laws.
RayR Offline
#46 Posted: Fri, May 12 2023, 8:17 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
rfenst wrote:
Yup.
And, a quick replacement per that state's laws.


Recall of elected officials is not permitted in New York.

"While recall elections do not occur, the New York Constitution states, "Any town, village, improvement district or fire district officer, except a justice of the peace, may be removed from office by the supreme court for any misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in office." Any citizen within the officeholder's district may submit an application for removal to the local branch of the appellate division of the supreme court."

https://ballotpedia.org/Laws_governing_recall_in_New_York
DrMaddVibe Offline
#47 Posted: Fri, May 12 2023, 10:09 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,394
HockeyDad wrote:
There should be a recall election filed for Santos immediately.

Hunter is irrelevant. All he did is be the conduit in an international money for influence scheme with the Vice President. This is perfectly fair foreign bribery.



You forgot he fingerpainted masterpieces of art with paint that have been referred to Picasso. Those sold for a lot of money, and when you look at them you wonder if he rode a short bus and a helmet when he was a kid. John Wayne Gacy and Charlie Manson were better artists than Hunter "Crackhead" Biden!
rfenst Offline
#48 Posted: Fri, May 12 2023, 11:55 AM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Quote:
RayR]Recall of elected officials is not permitted in New York.

"While recall elections do not occur, the New York Constitution states, "Any town, village, improvement district or fire district officer, except a justice of the peace, may be removed from office by the supreme court for any misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in office." Any citizen within the officeholder's district may submit an application for removal to the local branch of the appellate division of the supreme court."

https://ballotpedia.org/Laws_governing_recall_in_New_York

Has it ever been interpretted to apply to a Representative of a Congresional District? I don't feel like doing the research...
RayR Offline
#49 Posted: Fri, May 12 2023, 12:32 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
rfenst wrote:
Has it ever been interpreted to apply to a Representative of a Congressional District?


I fixed your spellin'
Anyway, the answer is no since it would require an amendment to the state constitution to recall a federal official like a congressman, for which there has never been enough support to do so.
rfenst Offline
#50 Posted: Fri, May 12 2023, 1:01 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Can the House of Representatives remove officials from office?

If a federal official commits a crime or otherwise acts improperly, the House of Representatives may impeach—formally charge—that official. If the official subsequently is convicted in a Senate impeachment trial, he is removed from office. Senate.gov

4. a. A special election shall not be held to fill a vacancy in the
office of a representative in congress unless such vacancy occurs on or
before the first day of July of the last year of the term of office, or
unless it occurs thereafter and a special session of congress is called
to meet before the next general election, or be called after three
months before the general election in such year. NewYork.gov.

Recall of Members of Congress. You want to know whether voters in a state can recall a member of the United States Congress. No, they cannot. Any attempt by a state to recall a member of Congress is prohibited by the Federal Constitution.

Can Congress be voted out of office?
Voting to expel requires the concurrence of two-thirds of the members. This is set out in Article 1, Section 5, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.

Voting to expel requires the concurrence of two-thirds of the members. This is set out in Article 1, Section 5, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.https://www.google.com/search?q=new+york+state+constitution+2023+removal+from+office+federal+congres+representative&sxsrf=APwXEdcKMm02_soyyxCJ_XgIWXrmj72edQ%3A1683913844467&ei=dHxeZJWMHJSUwbkPquaBqAo&ved=0ahUKEwiVlqD0q_D-AhUUSjABHSpzAKUQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=new+york+state+constitution+2023+removal+from+office+federal+congres+representative&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQA0oECEEYAFAAWABgAGgAcAB4AIABAIgBAJIBAJgBAKABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

That should be a start...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Back to Top