America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Did the Trump campaign supporter get whacked..??

BlamenTed Turner for producing the first 24 hour news channel (CNN). There just isn't that much news to justify its existence. They're more a content provider and less a news organization. Where is Walter Cronkite when you need him?

In the recent video footage obtained by Project Veritas, John Bonifield a Sr. Producer at CNN, admits to several beliefs that are in direct conflict with the official CNN narrative that Trump has colluded with Russia, and that Russia has interfered with the 2016 election. Bonifield expresses clear doubts that there is a fire behind the Russia smoke, stating, “I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the President committed a crime.” He also confirms suspicions that CNN staff is ideologically biased against Trump, stating, “I know a lot of people don’t like him and they’d like to see him get kicked out of office…”

Bonifield even further confirms CNN’s bias against the President, stating, “I think the President is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me…you have no real proof.”

Bonifield exposes that Russia has been great for CNN’s ratings, and that orders from CEO Jeff Zucker himself have directed CNN to pursue Russia leads at the expense of other stories. Bonifield states “And the CEO of CNN said in our internal meeting, he said ‘good job everybody covering the Climate Accords, but we’re done with it let’s get back to Russia.’”

He further comments on Russia, “it’s mostly bull**** right now. Like, we don’t have any giant proof…if it was something really good, it’d leak.”

Because they aren't a news organization. They're a Democratic propaganda orgsnization.

LMAO!

And John Kerry's boat is named Scaramouche.
It means "a cowardly braggot" often depicted by a Clown character.

I hear Theresa named it.

Galileo Figaro Magnifico.

then there's the fact that colluding isn't even illegal... but they sure went after Trumps like he ate a puppy-dog or somethin...

I think obama was public in his support ... i didn't realize he used the cia and our intel agencies to break the laws of those countries/alliances to direct a covert operation possibly aided by the other parties.... now that I know that it is a direct correlation and I am outraged.

I'm talking about both/all. it is amazing to me how many justify what they do by something they hate someone else doing.

he was public and funds were used for the opposition at least against netanyahu

once again, whatever

from what i gather thats about the same degree the russians were involved and many times more than trump is guilty of

if the russians simply publicly supported trump and gave money no issue (possibly on the money piece). But it looks like some laws may have been broken (by the ruskies...not necessary trump) Some may be ok with russian hacking and espionage because it benefited them. I'm not no matter who it benefited.

So you didn't vote for Hillary because of the Russians?

Or are you just looking out for the dumb people who were easily swayed?

LOL!

just confused what any of this has to do with trump - because lets be honest, we only care (at least mostly) when it seemed damning to trump. i know everyone (maybe not you, i havent paid attention) has now conveniently changed their outrage to russia but it was all directed towards the potus and his staff up until very recently. i will be waiting for the hour long apology segment on cnn and the front page retraction and public apology to trump in the nyt, etc but wont hold my breath.

i cant imagine anyone supporting another country hacking us but my original comment was just that, from the evidence we have and have had historically, obama has done far more to meddle in the affairs of other nations then trump has yet a couple weeks ago the "only thing that could help our embarrassed nation save face was to impeach him [paraphrase]."

seems people would rather just keep kicking the offended/outraged can down the road rather then getting some work done.

I don't like trump... as a person and a business man... the fact that he is a democrat doesn't enter in to it for me.... but I never accused him of collusion or anything else. He may have, but I don't know. The jury is out.

But Obama did not do more of this type of thing than Putin. Thats just simply not true given the facts we have thus far.


As for the highlighted part Trump supported and encouraged it... now he says he was just joking and stuff

#33...didn't know tail was a cattle rancher...






not true...for most of us (except those who are fed only by FOX), it was always about Russia's secret interference in our election...we need to get to the bottom of what they did, make them pay (more than just Obama's sanctions, which Trump seems to want to reverse) and then fix the barn door. Obama didn't do anything like what the US intel people have said, so far, that the Russians have done to influence free elections, and are continuing to do, all around the world. Not sure if Trump did anything personally to help the Russkies, but it sure looks like at least three of his campaign people, Flynn, Manafort and Paige have suspicious ties to Russian intelligence...Trump was really vocal during the campaign about getting help from wiki-leaks, who got their info from the Russians, and that's a concern...

Do not interpret this to mean that Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton and his Presidency is illegitimate. He won...he's our President...we can't change that...but if there is proof that key people in his campaign helped a foreign enemy tamper with our electoral process, they must be held accountable. It should be that way, even if Hillary had won and some of her people conspired with a foreign govt. to try to tilt the result.

That explains why the GOP controlled Congress...GOP controlled...initiated investigations about Russian meddling in our elections through their Intelligence Committees. They did that very near the beginning of Trumps's presidency, when the US intelligence agencies presented their findings. There are still some clear thinkers on both sides of the spectrum

1. trump needs to stop saying so much (stupid) stuff...i agree. when you have diarrhea of the mouth you are bound to say stupid stuff. arguing with pop stars is not the place of a president or anyone with a brain for that matter.

2. i agree putin is worse than obama as far as meddling (by far) but obama has done more of it (to date at least) than trump has - that was my only point on that topic.

3. trump was a democrat and now i have no idea what he is - but i knew that going in. he remains a wild card who i happen to agree with on more than a couple issues. if he is representative of the new democrats (if that exists) as an option against the liberals then i can predict we will see a huge resurgence and likely takeover of "new democrats."

Damn auto correct butchered that. Oh well.

He is

he was just doing what Hillary told him to... he sure flip-flopped on her tho... prolly got to know her and stuff...

gummy so you are on record as having no issue with russian intel hacking or attempting to hack our election because everyone does it? At least you are honest.

I for one recognize espionage happens from all sides but will not tolerate it against my country when identified and will not accept the leader of our country's actions if he was an active participant (big if...not saying true).

well, Trump asking the Russians to hack Hillary on camera didn't really help things much... just sayin...

True... true...

No one is accusing him of doing so in another country's election. They are accusing putin of that. They are accusing Trump (with no proof yet) of colluding or coordinating with Putin in our election.

Obama does not stand accused of anything of the sort and it really doesn't belong in the conversaitonas anything other than a hollow diversion.