Thanks, Jamie. I didn't know the story behind the Liberty, only that McCain's father was an Admiral. A quick bit of research shows he was not responsible for the attack, but he knew the truth about the Israelis and used his position to cover it up...the attack happened in '67 and Israel was our biggest ally in the Middle East...I don't remember that there was much controversy in the papers then...the big news was about race riots and the civil rights movement...I've got some reading to do...
My question (s) is: do we judge a son by the faults of his father, and conversely, do we elevate a son because his father is highly regarded?
If the story about the Liberty being attacked by Israel to blame Egypt in order to drive the US efforts in the ME more towards Israel, then shouldn't the bulk of the outrage be directed at Israel, and not at the son of the father who played no part, except to cover it up?