America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by Speyside. 83 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Those treasonous Democrats
frankj1 Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,219
Speyside wrote:
Thank you for the correction, I'm not like a genius with words.

so it was an occident, eh?
Speyside Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Well, it certainly was occidental.
delta1 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
no apologies needed...I'm an original occidental oriental...
frankj1 Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,219
delta1 wrote:
no apologies needed...I'm an original occidental oriental...

I thought you'd never get here!
delta1 Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
ahhh so...
frankj1 Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,219
oy vey
delta1 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
ror
banderl Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., called Trump “Cadet Bone Spurs” on Monday, pushing back on his remarks that those who did not applaud during his State of the Union address last week were “un-American” or “treasonous.”

“We don't live in a dictatorship or a monarchy. I swore an oath—in the military and in the Senate—to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not to mindlessly cater to the whims of Cadet Bone Spurs and clap when he demands I clap,” Duckworth tweeted Monday evening.
frankj1 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,219
delta1 wrote:
ror

excellent
victor809 Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Not to nitpick Duckworth... but he does rank higher than cadet...

Shouldn't he be CIC Bonespurs?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,398
banderl wrote:
Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., called Trump “Cadet Bone Spurs” on Monday, pushing back on his remarks that those who did not applaud during his State of the Union address last week were “un-American” or “treasonous.”

“We don't live in a dictatorship or a monarchy. I swore an oath—in the military and in the Senate—to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not to mindlessly cater to the whims of Cadet Bone Spurs and clap when he demands I clap,” Duckworth tweeted Monday evening.



All in the link i posted. The senator has lost her mind and her voice by attaching herself to Clinton's bandwagon of pu$$yhats.

Way to catch up. The rest of the TDS'ers here needed their 3rd wheel.

The rest of us love the laughs.
Speyside Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
She just sees Trump for what he is.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,398
The butthurt continues.


TDS...it real.
Speyside Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
The idiocy continues.

Truth, it's real.

BTW, it real, is very poor grammar.
banderl Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
DrMaddVibe wrote:
All in the link i posted. The senator has lost her mind and her voice by attaching herself to Clinton's bandwagon of pu$$yhats.

Way to catch up. The rest of the TDS'ers here needed their 3rd wheel.

The rest of us love the laughs.



Can't be repeated enough.

Lost her voice?
I would say that she has done more than any keyboard commando here in service to her country.
She deserves to say whatever crosses her mind, as opposed to your orange messiah.


I'm going to love the laughs when they drag the orange a-hole and Mike "I know nothing" Pence away in cuffs.
Kawak Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 11-26-2007
Posts: 4,025
Speaking of dragged away in cuffs...this can't end well for the latte complexion ex Prez. But no biggie, if you like your dr. you can keep yo dr.


Flashback: President Obama Promised ‘No Political Influence’ in FBI Investigations ‘Period. Full Stop.’


On April 10, 2016, former President Barack Obama vowed that there was no political influence on any investigations in the FBI.
“I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case,” Obama said. “Full stop. Period.”


Obama made his comment in an interview with Fox News reporter Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday.

Obama was referring to the FBI investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her private email server, but he went a step further.

Obama’s promise has been revisited, now that evidence exists that the FBI investigation of President Donald Trump and his campaign may have been politically influenced.

“POTUS wants to know everything we’re doing” a text between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page read in September 2016 as former FBI Director James Comey prepared a briefing on the email investigation case. The new texts raise questions about Obama’s involvement, despite his claim in April that there was no political influence.
victor809 Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
If your threshold for being "dragged away in cuffs" is "there are questions about whether he may or may not have lied on fox news"... then I expect you want the current moron arrested?
fiddler898 Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
victor809 wrote:
If your threshold for being "dragged away in cuffs" is "there are questions about whether he may or may not have lied on fox news"... then I expect you want the current moron arrested?


Um, FOX News lies on FOX News. Isn’t that their whole point?
victor809 Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
fiddler898 wrote:
Um, FOX News lies on FOX News. Isn’t that their whole point?


I thought so... but quack seems to believe it frequently
DrafterX Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,538
Well, we all know it wouldn't be Obama's only lie... Not sure why it's so hard to believe.. it's been pretty damn obvious for quite sometime now.. Mellow
victor809 Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Kawak wrote:
Speaking of dragged away in cuffs...this can't end well for the latte complexion ex Prez. But no biggie, if you like your dr. you can keep yo dr.


Flashback: President Obama Promised ‘No Political Influence’ in FBI Investigations ‘Period. Full Stop.’


On April 10, 2016, former President Barack Obama vowed that there was no political influence on any investigations in the FBI.
“I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case,” Obama said. “Full stop. Period.”


Obama made his comment in an interview with Fox News reporter Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday.

Obama was referring to the FBI investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her private email server, but he went a step further.

Obama’s promise has been revisited, now that evidence exists that the FBI investigation of President Donald Trump and his campaign may have been politically influenced.

“POTUS wants to know everything we’re doing” a text between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page read in September 2016 as former FBI Director James Comey prepared a briefing on the email investigation case. The new texts raise questions about Obama’s involvement, despite his claim in April that there was no political influence.


Hahahahahahaha.... Losing....

http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/07/media/right-wing-media-fbi-text-message-clinton-investigation/index.html

Seems unlikely that message had anything to do with clinton.

How does it feel to constantly be pushing fake news?
Speyside Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Wahhhhh, look what Obama did...... Seems to be a standard defense for Trumps BS. News flash, what Obama did or didn't do is no justification for the orange moron. Neither is what Hillary did or didn't do.

Quacker, Obama did something. So what. You all have TDSS. Which makes TDS seem like nothing at all. But hey, lets talk about slick Willie. At least we can agree that his choice in women was not so great. I mean, JFK did MM, now that's presidential.
delta1 Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Look at the date that the text message occurred: September 2016. That was around the time the US intel agencies became convinced of Russian meddling, intended to hurt Clinton and help Trump. Any President would want to know what the investigators were doing. But Trump doesn't seem interested...

A few weeks later, the Obama WH informed the public of Russian meddling, but this story was buried by Trump's "Puzzie grabbing" boast. Days later in October, just weeks before the election, Comey released his memo about the FBI's investigation into Hillary's emails, and then a week before the election, he released a second memo regarding the investigation into Clinton's emails, effectively sinking her campaign...

Publishing out of context statements is a cynical way to make anything look suspicious or incriminating...to the un-informed consumer of "news".
jw517 Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2018
Posts: 4
I don't see anybody coming to the presidents rescue here. Isn't there one Shawn Hanity here? It's beyond politics it's right vs wrong,good vs evil,coffee or tea,stew or borsch,bourbon or vodka.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,398
jw517 wrote:
I don't see anybody coming to the presidents rescue here. Isn't there one Shawn Hanity here? It's beyond politics it's right vs wrong,good vs evil,coffee or tea,stew or borsch,bourbon or vodka.



Shhh

It's more fun watching this collection of TDS'ers lose their minds stepping all over each other with their grief, woe and projected speculation.


That and the grammar police...when they make an appearance...to deflect any post or message is internet gold. Please don't ruin the moments.

I'm pretty sure the President can handle his own business.
Speyside Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Word.
DrafterX Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,538
Grease..?? Huh
TMCTLT Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Shhh

It's more fun watching this collection of TDS'ers lose their minds stepping all over each other with their grief, woe and projected speculation.


That and the grammar police...when they make an appearance...to deflect any post or message is internet gold. Please don't ruin the moments.

I'm pretty sure the President can handle his own business.




THIS Beer

Kawak Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 11-26-2007
Posts: 4,025
jw517 wrote:
I don't see anybody coming to the presidents rescue here. Isn't there one Shawn Hanity here? It's beyond politics it's right vs wrong,good vs evil,coffee or tea,stew or borsch,bourbon or vodka.


Not Shawn but just as good!


According to the well-regarded Rasmussen poll (by way of Jim Hoft, who first connected these dots), President Trump’s job approval rating sits at a healthy 48 percent. At this exact time in his own presidency (February 7, 2010), Barack Obama’s job approval rating was just 44 percent. That puts Trump at +4 over Obama.
On that same date, a full 56 percent disapproved of the job Obama was doing. On the other hand, only 51 percent say the same about Trump — a +5 point advantage for our current president, and an overall advantage of +9.



This is nothing less than a massive failure for the American media — proof that this disgraced institution is now so discredited they can no longer move the needle.

In February of 2010, the media were into year two of licking Obama’s boots, which is why he defied gravity throughout eight terrible years of economic stagnation, unceasing scandals (fast and furious, Benghazi, the IRS, “you can keep your insurance”) and countless foreign policy bungles.

Fast forward to today and you have the entire institution of the media beating Trump bloody with more than 90 percent negative news, most of it manufactured lies about Russia and obstruction of justice.

The full brunt and force of the media is focused against Trump… In fact, the intensity of the media attacks have only increased since Trump’s approval ratings started to improve two weeks ago.



And still he sits at 48 percent approval, or +4 points ahead of the media’s Precious Barry.

In all my years of watching the media, I have never seen anything like this — a media utterly incapable of moving the needle of public opinion. During the 2016 presidential election, the media were at least able to affect the polls. Those polls turned out wrong, but the media at least moved that needle. There has never been a time when a media freak out did not in some way result in some movement in public opinion. But that is exactly what we are seeing today.

Today, the media are so lacking in moral authority, so ineffective, so incapable of shaping public opinion, their unceasing screeching is backfiring. Trump is becoming more popular, as are his policies, even on the issue of immigration, which is supposed to a third rail for “racist” Republicans.

Another reason the media are so freaked out right now is the implosion of the Mueller investigation. Despite the media making a public spectacle of themselves in their fight against transparency (the release of the Nunes memo); despite the media’s efforts to then downplay the bombshells within that memo after it was released, none of this worked.

Thanks to alternative media, the people are learning the truth, which is why the MSM’s increasingly desperate 24/7 screeching of Russia! Russia! Russia! (that laughably includes reheating fake news from last year) is being ignored, is now a white noise no one hears anymore.



Basically, these four things are happening….

1) After unceasing amounts of fake news, the media have lost all credibility with a public that only sees them as hysterical and partisan antagonists towards the president.

2) The public is beginning to realize that there is not a single shred of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians, or that he in any way obstructed justice. Despite two years of media assurances, millions in corporate media dollars spent to uncover wrongdoing, countless leaks, and a full-scale investigation run by Trump antagonists in the Deep State — they have found exactly bupkis.

3) The only real and verifiable evidence of 2016 election meddling has exposed Democrats, Hillary Clinton, and the FBI, as the bad actors.

4) As the public tunes out the media’s histrionics and conspiracy theories, they instead focus on the actual job Trump is doing, and have come to the conclusion that he is doing a damn fine job in every respect. ISIS is on the run, the economy is humming, jobs are being created…



After two years of The Media Who Cried Watergate! at every twist and turn in all things Trump, the people are now ignoring these neurotic fools and liars to think about things that matter. And as of right now, when it comes to what matters, the public is happier with Trump than they were with Barry


John Nolte
victor809 Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Another opinion piece copy/pasted by quack
Speyside Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Craptastic. Opinions are like Aholes, everyone has one. A Breitbart contributor writing a pro Trump, anti Obama piece, imagine that. Bet I could copy and paste something from CNN that claims the exact opposite.

Good job Quacker. I like reading fiction. I wish yours was more riveting.
victor809 Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
What's funniest to me is the idea that "popularity" is a satisfactory rebuttal to anything....

"The president is doing a very unamerican thing and trying to squash dissent!"
"That's fine! He's POPULAR!!!!"

sigh.... we deserve the resulting country we will get.
Speyside Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
He had a fine teacher in Putin.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12