MACS wrote:CA already has that law. Can't own mags with more than 10 capacity.
Z is saying it means something different. Not a matter of mags with over 10 capacity, but a gun that can accept a mag over 10 capacity.
In other words guns legal in Cali running mags meant to be legal in cali because they are limited to 10 would not be legal in Oregon because they could accept a larger mag capacity (not that you necessary have said magazine). You can't just ditch the magazine (expensive enough)
It looks to me like conjunction junction is in play though just from what Z posted.
"semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine, any feature like a folding or telescoping stock
and that can accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition."
Based on this and this alone....
Specific to rifles apparently
detachable magazine AND Folding(or telescoping) Stock AND can (read as ability to) accept more than 10 rounds of ammo
this would exclude marlin 60s etc. The folding or telescoping stock eliminates most.
still a crappy law.